Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Intel Iris Xe G7 80EUs

The Intel Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (Tiger-Lake U GPU with 80 EUs) is a integrated graphics card in the mid range Tiger-Lake U CPUs (15 - 28 Watt, e.g. Core i5 11th Gen CPUs). It is using the new Xe architecture (Gen12) and should be announced later in 2020.

The performance depends on the TDP settings of the laptop and the used cooling. First informations show that the chip can be configured at 15 and 28 Watt TDP default (as the Ice Lake-U chips) and the performance should be around a dedicated GeForce MX330 in 3DMark benchmarks. For gaming we are expecting a bit worse performance due to the missing dedicated graphics memory and driver support. Compared to the older Iris Plus G4 in Ice Lake chips, the Tiger Lake GPU should be nearly twice as fast. Benchmarks with various laptops show that the 80EU version lacks about 18% behind the faster 96EU version and on par with the MX330. Compared to AMD iGPUs, the G7 80EU positions itself around the Vega 7 and Vega 8 chips (see chart below for details).

Therefore, the iGPU is still only for lowest graphical settings and low resolutions in demanding games. Some modern games like Days Gone or Cyberpunk wont run over 30 fps in minimum settings (see below).

The Tiger Lake SoCs and therefore the integrated GPU are manufactured in the modern 10nm+ (10nm Superfin) process (improved 10nm process) at Intel and therefore should offer a very good efficiency.

Gen. 12 / Xe Series

Iris Xe G7 96EUs compare 96 @ 0.4 - 1.35 GHz
Iris Xe G7 80EUs 80 @ 0.4 - 1.35 GHz
UHD Graphics 64EUs compare 64 @ 1.4 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compare 48 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
UHD Graphics 32EUs compare 32 @ 1.25 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compare 32 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compare 32 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) compare 24 @ 0.45 - 0.75 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compare 16 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
CodenameTiger Lake Xe
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake
Pipelines80 - unified
Core Speed400 - 1350 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption28 Watt
technology10 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement15.08.2020
CPU in Iris Xe G7 80EUsGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core 5 220H12 x 2000 MHz, 45 W? MHz1500 MHz
Intel Core i5-13600H12 x 2100 MHz, 45 W? MHz1500 MHz
Intel Core i5-13505H12 x 1900 MHz, 45 W? MHz1450 MHz
min. - max.400 MHz850 - 1500 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1.5 pt (5%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 141     avg: 155     median: 155 (1%)     max: 169 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 1019     avg: 1135     median: 1184 (3%)     max: 1201 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 5244     avg: 8140     median: 8289 (4%)     max: 11404 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1257     avg: 2477     median: 2589 (3%)     max: 3830 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1177     avg: 3453     median: 3664.5 (6%)     max: 4991 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1560     avg: 3815     median: 4086 (4%)     max: 5398 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 25199     avg: 87442     median: 88206 (10%)     max: 180704 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 630     avg: 1323     median: 1334.5 (4%)     max: 1791 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 561     avg: 1177     median: 1193.5 (2%)     max: 1576 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 79355     avg: 167735     median: 166479 (17%)     max: 321464 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 27687     avg: 56325     median: 62965 (7%)     max: 96826 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 5327     avg: 16578     median: 16577 (16%)     max: 25911 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 6361     avg: 21947     median: 22007.5 (5%)     max: 30894 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 7611     avg: 13086     median: 13031 (12%)     max: 17012 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 7524     avg: 14905     median: 15717 (6%)     max: 19656 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2254     avg: 5485     median: 5607 (7%)     max: 7227 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2246     avg: 5195     median: 5343 (4%)     max: 6579 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 20679     avg: 23021     median: 21729 (6%)     max: 26656 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 18551     avg: 19797     median: 18628 (10%)     max: 22211 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 34227     avg: 39066     median: 37064 (41%)     max: 45907 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 15617     avg: 25923     median: 26011 (34%)     max: 34471 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 14.6     avg: 16     median: 16 (5%)     max: 17.4 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
43.8 fps (14%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
57.3 fps (25%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
63.2 fps (12%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
46.1 fps (11%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
3.8 fps (1%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
20.4 fps (4%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
8.4 fps (2%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
35.9 fps (10%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
0.4 fps (0%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
23.4 fps (9%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
31 fps (5%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
41.5 fps (6%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
56 fps (15%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
6.8 fps (1%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
20.4 fps (3%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
7.9 fps (1%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
46 fps (5%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
2 fps (1%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
37.1 fps (5%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
44.8 fps (5%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
41.5 fps (6%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
7.3 fps (2%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
6.7 fps (1%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
1.4 fps (1%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
23.6 fps (3%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
1.2 fps (0%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
13.6 fps (6%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
7.4 fps (5%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
10.1 fps (3%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 11807     avg: 28349     median: 13805 (10%)     max: 140763 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 44.63     avg: 70.8     median: 69.2 (23%)     max: 99.01 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 8.74     avg: 83.8     median: 86.2 (5%)     max: 104.2 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 12     avg: 26.1     median: 26.1 (10%)     max: 40.2814 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 21.7796     avg: 34.7     median: 34.8 (6%)     max: 47.5 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 58.36     avg: 88.7     median: 88.2 (7%)     max: 120.1 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 57.8     avg: 76.1     median: 79 (7%)     max: 91.4 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 69     avg: 82.5     median: 69.9 (1%)     max: 108.6 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 101.533     avg: 140     median: 148 (6%)     max: 170.4 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 219.558     avg: 243.2     median: 253 (2%)     max: 256.9 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 152.1     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 315 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 10269     avg: 12142     median: 12230 (3%)     max: 14628 points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 12605     avg: 15561     median: 15786.5 (4%)     max: 19099 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 286     avg: 642     median: 728.5 (3%)     max: 824 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 1176     avg: 1880     median: 2074 (4%)     max: 2194 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 2101     avg: 2872     median: 2903.5 (2%)     max: 3267 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 13.9     avg: 33.1     median: 32.7 (4%)     max: 54 Watt
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 13.6     avg: 32.5     median: 31.3 (4%)     max: 71.9 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 15.5     avg: 35.5     median: 34.9 (8%)     max: 53.8 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra
min: 0.1944     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (27%)     max: 0.4879 fps per Watt
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 0.2108     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (28%)     max: 0.611 fps per Watt
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 39.4     avg: 47.2     median: 49.3 (14%)     max: 51 Watt
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.2     avg: 42.8     median: 41.1 (5%)     max: 51 Watt
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
0.2 fps per Watt (1%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 0     avg: 35.9     median: 36.9 (53%)     max: 46.4 dB(A)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1250     avg: 1283     median: 1300 (51%)     max: 1300 MHz
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
min: 896     avg: 1131     median: 1165 (46%)     max: 1300 MHz
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
31.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
13.8
low 1920x1080
50.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset + FSR Quality 1920x1080
40.5
low 1920x1080
14.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset + Quality FSR 1920x1080
19.4
low 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Preset 1280x720
26
low 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
18.9
low 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
13
low 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
46
low 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
24
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
33.8
med. 1920x1080
61.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
53.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
51.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
23.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
27.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
44.8
low 1920x1080
13.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset LowAA 1280x720
30.6
low 1920x1080
29.8 59.4 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.2 41.3 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.2 28 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
16.8  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
91
low 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Adaptive Quality Off) 1280x720
24
low 1920x1080
34.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
58.3
low 1920x1080
31.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
33
low 1920x1080
11.5 13.5 14.9 15.5 15.8 17.2 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.3 11.7 12.2 12.3 13.7 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.6 9.2 10 10.4 12 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.1 6.7 8.5 9.7 10.6 ~ 8 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
6.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
26.5
20.2
25.3
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
8.6
10.3
low 1920x1080
12.3 13.1 13.4 15.9 19 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
9.4 10.8 11.3 13 14.8 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.2 9.2 10.5 13.1 ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8 8.3 10.2 12.8 ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
5.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
20.5
18.1
20.2
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
8.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
26.5
low 1920x1080
27.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
11.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
39.7
low 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
QHD 2560x1440
8.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
32.9
low 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
16.9
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
24.8 29.3 29.4 37.2 37.2 43 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.8 26.7 28.2 33.2 33.4 38.4 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.3 18.3 19.9 22.9 22.9 25.9 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
70.1
66.5
66.8
45.2
Diablo 4

Diablo 4

2023
low 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
28.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
59.2
low 1920x1080
30.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
9.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
54.8
low 1920x1080
13.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1280x720
21
low 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1280x720
45.3
low 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
7.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1280x720
20
low 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
32.6
low 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
18.7
low 1920x1080
8.3 (!)  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
13.6 (!)
low 1920x1080
20.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
38.9
low 1920x1080
26.1 29.7 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.4 18.4 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.5 17 ~ 16 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.3 12.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
39.3
44.9
low 1920x1080
10.9 16.2 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.6 11.1 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5 6.8 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (without FSR Upscaling) 1280x720
27.3
low 1920x1080
8.8 17.2 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
8.3 14.1 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.4 11.4 ~ 9 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
25.6
low 1920x1080
4.9 17.4 (!) ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
4.6 16.7 (!) ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
4.4 14.8 (!) ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.7 (!)  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
26.1 (!)
low 1920x1080
0 (!) 23 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!) 20 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!) 16 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Basic Quality Preset T2X SMAA 1280x720
37
low 1920x1080
5.4 9.6 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
4.8 9 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
4.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
11.3
low 1920x1080
6 11.9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
5.3 9.6 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
4.7 8 ~ 6 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
6.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
16.9
FIFA 23

FIFA 23

2022
low 1920x1080
28.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
28.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Rendering Quality 1280x720
44.9
low 1920x1080
11.5 11.9 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.4 8.9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.4 7.1 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
0 (!) 11 21 32.4 32.8 33.8 35.3 39 40.1 40.6 41.4 41.4 46.6 58.8 60.5 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20 29.1 29.6 31.3 33.4 33.6 34.5 35 35.1 36.7 37 37.1 42.5 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17 21.3 22 22.6 24.9 25 25.6 25.8 25.9 26.2 29.8 30.9 32.1 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.4 16.5 16.8 18.8 19.4 19.4 19.7 22.8 23.4 23.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
11.3
57.6
0 (!)
71.7
68.5
63.5
71.5
72.4
81
56.6
67.7
low 1920x1080
39.4 41.7 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.4 25 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23 23.2 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
13.5 25.8 (!) ~ 20 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.3 19 (!) ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Settings 1280x720
13.9
low 1920x1080
19.8 20.3 20.6 20.7 21.2 24.7 26.2 26.2 30.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!) 15.3 16.1 16.3 16.5 18.8 19.7 20.3 23.9 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!) 10.2 10.4 10.5 10.5 12.3 12.5 12.5 14.7 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.1 9.5 9.7 9.7 9.9 11.4 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
39.3
45.3
55
38.1
39.2
low 1920x1080
9.1 13.4 14.1 14.3 14.7 15.7 17.8 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.4 12.2 12.3 12.9 14.7 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9 9.8 10.4 11.3 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.4 8 9 9.7 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
6.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
25.4
31.2
27
24
Elex 2

Elex 2

2022
low 1920x1080
14 15.7 (!) ~ 15 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13 13.6 (!) ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8 11 (!) ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
33 36.2 45 46.1 49.6 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.7 34.8 35.6 39.7 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21 25.7 28.2 35.5 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.5 20 25.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
68.3
low 1920x1080
23.4 24.7 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.7 19.5 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.8 16.9 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
35.7
low 1920x1080
11.3 11.7 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
9.5 9.7 ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.5 8.6 ~ 9 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Quality 1280x720
20.2
low 1920x1080
0 (!) 21 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!) 19 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!) 19 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality) 1280x720
44
low 1920x1080
14 15.7 17.6 21 21.1 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.5 14.3 14.6 17.9 18.9 ~ 16 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.3 15.1 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.1 12.5 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
26.1
low 1280x720
16 50 51 83.4 89 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18 28.8 32 38 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.8 23 27 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
61.2