Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

HP Pavilion 14 Laptop review: A well-thought-out device, an attractive exterior

Well controlled and silent. The Pavilion 14's IPS display, Bang & Olufsen loudspeaker system and its largely silent operation make this device a great entertainer. The notebook is equipped with an Intel i5 CPU and 16 GB of RAM, ensuring plenty of processing power.
Mario Petzold, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (translated by Katherine Bodner), 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...
Attractive even when closed: anodized aluminum with a white finish and a reflective HP logo
Attractive even when closed: anodized aluminum with a white finish and a reflective HP logo

Similar to the recently reviewed HP Pavilion x360 14 (2021), this version without a touchscreen features a large RAM module and a pleasantly bright display. As both the battery capacity and the various security functions ranging from a Kensington Lock to a webcam shutter have been deployed rather sparingly, the dv-series HP Pavilion 14 is clearly intended for private use.

Potential users should be pleased with the good speakers and the departure from a silver or black chassis as well as with the device's performance. Still, the lack of a dedicated GPU means that only simple games are displayed smoothly. Our test unit is equipped with 16 GB of RAM and a 1-TB SSD, which is very generous for this kind of device. The model is also available with components that are half the size. Buyers can choose between the i5-1135G7 used in this device and the faster i7-1165G7.  

The segment of 14-inch models offers a wide range of competitors. The Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400 and Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05, for instance, have many similarities - including a mixed verdict. Find out what we make of this device's weaknesses in this detailed review.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! English native speakers welcome!

News Writer (AUS/NZL based) - Details here

HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng (Pavilion 14-dv Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-1135G7 4 x 2.4 - 4.2 GHz, 51 W PL2 / Short Burst, 22 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake UP3
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs - 1024 MB, Core: 1300 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, DDR4, 27.20.100.8935
Memory
16149 MB 
, LPDDR4, 3200 MHz, dual-channel
Display
14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, LGD0619, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: headset, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19 x 325 x 216 ( = 0.75 x 12.8 x 8.5 in)
Battery
43 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.44 kg ( = 50.79 oz / 3.17 pounds), Power Supply: 280 g ( = 9.88 oz / 0.62 pounds)
Price
1,000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.8 %
01/2022
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1.4 kg19 mm14.00"1920x1080
79.1 %
06/2020
HP 14s-dq1431ng
i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
1.5 kg18 mm14.00"1920x1080
86.4 %
10/2021
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1.4 kg14.9 mm14.00"1920x1080
83.9 %
11/2021
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1.5 kg19.2 mm14.00"1920x1080
85.2 %
04/2021
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1 kg14.95 mm14.00"1920x1080
86.3 %
05/2021
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
R5 5500U, Vega 7
1.4 kg19.1 mm14.00"1920x1080

Case – HP manages an appealing but simple look

The chassis gives an overall stable impression. The back of the display and the frame around the keyboard are made of aluminum. The lid has a white finish, which, combined with the matte surface structure, differentiates it from other notebooks. The surfaces are anodized and hardly show any signs of aging. While the bottom cover is made from plastic, it looks very similar to the other parts of the case and will only be recognized as such at closer inspection.

The slightly roughened surfaces do not show finger prints. The HP logo, on the other hand, shows smeary marks very quickly. The workmanship is good. The individual components look neat and were put together seamlessly.   

The device is also very resistent to warping. The notebook always stays flat, and there are no noises that would indicate friction. The hinges appear to be robust. The way they are anchored in the housing allows for precise adjustments. We did not notice any teetering of the display while typing. Because the hinges are so tight, it is difficult to open the device with one hand. We were somewhat disappointed by the stability of the keyboard, which gives way slightly unter increased pressure.

The display's opening angle is 130°. The display cover lifts the back of the notebook off the table slightly, but this is hardly noticeable thanks to the chassis' sound construction. 

The weight of just below 1.5 kg is within the average range and should not be an issue on the go. The Pavilion 14 is surprisingly thick for a 14-inch device with a thickness of 17 mm. More on that in the section on maintenance. 

Size comparison

325 mm / 12.8 inch 216 mm / 8.5 inch 19 mm / 0.748 inch 1.4 kg3.17 lbs323.4 mm / 12.7 inch 215.6 mm / 8.49 inch 19.2 mm / 0.756 inch 1.5 kg3.27 lbs324 mm / 12.8 inch 225 mm / 8.86 inch 18 mm / 0.709 inch 1.5 kg3.22 lbs321.57 mm / 12.7 inch 211.59 mm / 8.33 inch 19.1 mm / 0.752 inch 1.4 kg3.04 lbs320.6 mm / 12.6 inch 208.18 mm / 8.2 inch 14.9 mm / 0.587 inch 1.4 kg3 lbs318.9 mm / 12.6 inch 207 mm / 8.15 inch 14.95 mm / 0.589 inch 1 kg2.22 lbs
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Connectivity - Only the minimum for the HP Pavilion

At least there is a USB A port both on the left and right side of the device. This is complemented by an HDMI 2.0 port that supports 4K resolution at 30 fps, a microSD card reader that is slightly faster than average, a combined audio port and one USB-C port.

This selection allows for a monitor, a faster storage medium and smartphones or rechargers to be connected. The USB-C port does not fulfill the specifications for Thunderbolt, however, and is limited to 10 Gbit/s. The two other USB ports only support the older USB 3.0 standard.

This port selection, while small, should suffice in most situations, and the USB-C port can be used with an adapter, making it possible to connect several devices at the same time. But we would have appreciated at least one Thunderbolt port. The notebook clearly isn't strapped for space, after all. Fortunately, this also means that the ports are well spaced out.  

Headset, USB 3.2 Gen1
Headset, USB 3.2 Gen1
microSD, USB-C (Power Delivery, DP 1.4, 10 Gbit/s), USB 3.2 Gen1, HDMI 2.0, power supply
microSD, USB-C (Power Delivery, DP 1.4, 10 Gbit/s), USB 3.2 Gen1, HDMI 2.0, power supply
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
 
77.5 MB/s ∼100% +4%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
 
74.4 MB/s ∼96%
Average of class Office
  (17.7 - 194, n=85, last 2 years)
69.3 MB/s ∼89% -7%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
36.4 MB/s ∼47% -51%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
  (AV Pro V60)
25.3 MB/s ∼33% -66%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
  (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
23 MB/s ∼30% -69%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
 
85.9 MB/s ∼100% +1%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
 
85.3 MB/s ∼99%
Average of class Office
  (17.2 - 201, n=84, last 2 years)
79.5 MB/s ∼93% -7%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
38.7 MB/s ∼45% -55%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
  (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
28 MB/s ∼33% -67%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
  (AV Pro V60)
26.6 MB/s ∼31% -69%

Communication - Rather problematic

The Wi-Fi module Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC only reaches an average of 600 Mbit/s when sending and receiving data in our other tests. That is more than sufficient for any internet application. Even large blocks of data can be transferred fairly quickly at this rate.

However, our test module only reached about two thirds of the expected speed when receiving and just over 10 percent of the average value when sending. The router showed that the Wi-Fi 5 standard was hardly used at all. Instead, the Wi-Fi module was communicating using Wi-Fi 4 at a frequency of 2.4 GHz. Still, these weak results might even go unnoticed with some private users because it will still max out a 50-Mbit internet connection.

Based on these results, we can only conclude that there was some kind of issue with the Wi-Fi module in our test unit. After all, we would have expected results in the range of 600 Mbit/s, similar to those of other notebooks equipped with the same Wi-Fi module. Our HP Pavilion is clearly a case for warranty.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1333 (699min - 1465max) MBit/s ∼100% +1432%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1329 (1141min - 1418max) MBit/s ∼100% +1428%
Average of class Office
  (65.2 - 1775, n=115, last 2 years)
975 MBit/s ∼73% +1021%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
662 (635min - 674max) MBit/s ∼50% +661%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
642 MBit/s ∼48% +638%
Average Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
  (87 - 690, n=27)
617 MBit/s ∼46% +609%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
598 (526min - 661max) MBit/s ∼45% +587%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
87 (80min - 95max) MBit/s ∼7%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1480 (1227min - 1597max) MBit/s ∼100% +193%
Average of class Office
  (29.6 - 1722, n=119, last 2 years)
1022 MBit/s ∼69% +102%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
744 (578min - 950max) MBit/s ∼50% +47%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
637 (626min - 648max) MBit/s ∼43% +26%
Average Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
  (486 - 685, n=27)
622 MBit/s ∼42% +23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ALC6
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
604 (567min - 620max) MBit/s ∼41% +20%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
542 MBit/s ∼37% +7%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
505 (473min - 527max) MBit/s ∼34%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700Tooltip
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø504 (473-527)
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø655 (577-680)
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø87 (80-95)
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø646 (347-742)

Webcam

The webcam has a resolution of 720p, which is typically low. The color deviations a clearly noticeable. Unfortunately, the same can be said for many integrated laptop webcams.

Fortunately, however, the fairly good image in low lighting and the reliable dual array microphone still make for good video calls. Voices sound natural and background noises such as music are tuned down, making the caller easy to understand.

The missing mechanical webcam shutter might be an issue for some users.

ColorChecker
18 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
18 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
22 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
23 ∆E
18 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng: 15.69 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 27.73 ∆E

Maintenance – Yes to upgrades

In theory, HP has made maintaining and upgrading individual components very easy in the HP Pavilion 14. Unfortunately, the bottom cover is very difficult to remove, counteracting the device's high serviceability. Four of six screws are hidden beneath glued-on rubber strips. With time, as the glue hardens, it will probably become almost impossible to remove these without damaging or ripping them. The bottom cover made of plastic is held in place by a large number of clips that can also be damaged when trying to remove the cover. We recommend using a plastic tool to pry it open. A good place to start is between the display hinges. 

Once you have managed to remove the bottom cover, however, you have access to two RAM slots that both support up to 32 GB. The Wi-Fi module can also be replaced, as can the standard 2280 SSD. Even the battery can be exchanged easily. The fan is accessible for cleaning.

All this explains why the Pavilion is slightly thicker than its competition. The maintenance possibilities are great - as long as you manage to remove the bottom cover without damaging it.

The most important components can be replaced
The most important components can be replaced
Two full-fledged slots mean RAM can easily be expanded
Two full-fledged slots mean RAM can easily be expanded

Input devices – A comfortable and precise keyboard

Keyboard

The standard-size chicklet keyboard is fast and precise. Users who type a lot should be very pleased with this keyboard. Both the counterpressure and the slightly audible click when the key is pressed leave a high-quality impression. Travel is on the short side as expected, but satisfactory nonetheless. Because the foundation is very stable even under strong pressure, the keyboard gives a good overall impression.

The contrast between the silver keys and dark gray lettering is not ideal. Fortunately, keyboard backlighting makes it easy to recognize the keys in low lighting. During the day, the white backlighting on the silver background can be hard to see, depending on the way the light falls. The backlighting can actually be counterproductive in these situations.

The typical layout without a number block and with smaller arrow keys should only be an issue for private users if they would like to use this device for gaming. Had HP decided to position the power button outside of the keyboard, they would have had space for full-size arrow keys.

The power button is integrated into the keyboard - not really ideal
The power button is integrated into the keyboard - not really ideal
The fingerprint sensor is integrated into the wrist rest
The fingerprint sensor is integrated into the wrist rest
 

Touchpad

There is hardly anything to criticize about the touchpad: It responds precisely and can be used just as accurately with one or four fingers, which is also due to the large surface. Only pressing the mouse keys feels a bit spongy. This does not apply to left-clicking via the normal touch-sensitive surface.

The solid keyboard frame creates a pleasant counterpressure while typing
The solid keyboard frame creates a pleasant counterpressure while typing

Display – The notebook panel lacks contrast

Close-up of panel
Close-up of panel
Backlight bleeding along the left side
Backlight bleeding along the left side

The 14-inch IPS panel is good. It features the stable viewing angles we have come to expect from an IPS display and is easy to read even outdoors thanks to its good brightness. Despite brightness levels being slightly limited when running on battery, the 330 nits still ensure that text can be read easily. 

The contrast ratio and black value, however, did not fulfill our high expectations. These values were twice as good on the previous HP Pavilion 14, for example. There are many panels with comparable characteristics, in the MSI Summit B15 A11M, for example. Photos lack brilliance due to the low contrast, but other than that we don't expect users to notice this flaw during everyday use. 

We were pleased to find that the screen showed hardly any screen bleeding. There was one lighter area along the left edge that might be visible in very dark scenes, but it is not that noticeable. The response time of 17/37 ms is above average. We did not encounter any PWM flickering.

385
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
334
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
353
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LGD0619
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 389 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 358.8 cd/m² Minimum: 23 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 330 cd/m²
Contrast: 704:1 (Black: 0.55 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.04 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.62
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
LGD0619, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
HP 14s-dq1431ng
AUO403D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Chi Mei CMN14D4, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
AU Optronics AUO7490, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AU Optronics B140HAN04.E, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Display
-37%
7%
-31%
8%
-39%
Display P3 Coverage
62
38.42
-38%
66.3
7%
42.8
-31%
67.01
8%
37.47
-40%
sRGB Coverage
92
57.71
-37%
97.4
6%
63.9
-31%
98.28
7%
56.04
-39%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
63
39.71
-37%
68.1
8%
44.3
-30%
68.33
8%
38.71
-39%
Response Times
-29%
-68%
-16%
19%
-38%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
37 ?(19, 18)
41 ?(20, 21)
-11%
52 ?(23, 29)
-41%
35.2 ?(18, 17.2)
5%
30 ?(2, 28)
19%
41 ?(18, 23)
-11%
Response Time Black / White *
17 ?(7, 10)
25 ?(14, 11)
-47%
33 ?(17, 13)
-94%
23.2 ?(14, 9.2)
-36%
14 ?(3, 11)
18%
28 ?(15, 13)
-65%
PWM Frequency
143 ?(10)
25000 ?(20)
29800
Screen
-36%
36%
-45%
45%
7%
Brightness middle
387
305
-21%
344
-11%
256
-34%
404
4%
357
-8%
Brightness
359
264
-26%
340
-5%
239
-33%
377
5%
315
-12%
Brightness Distribution
84
81
-4%
88
5%
83
-1%
79
-6%
82
-2%
Black Level *
0.55
0.16
71%
0.13
76%
0.23
58%
0.25
55%
0.455
17%
Contrast
704
1906
171%
2646
276%
1113
58%
1616
130%
785
12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.04
5.44
-35%
3.29
19%
6.2
-53%
1.47
64%
3.98
1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.28
20.42
-147%
7.48
10%
18.2
-120%
2.6
69%
6.92
16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1
4.72
-372%
1.79
-79%
3.8
-280%
0.84
16%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5
3.23
35%
3.25
35%
5
-0%
1.7
66%
3.33
33%
Gamma
2.62 84%
2.45 90%
2.29 96%
1.97 112%
2.35 94%
2.47 89%
CCT
7123 91%
7035 92%
6358 102%
7364 88%
6662 98%
6138 106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37
63
36
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
58
98
56
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-34% / -36%
-8% / 15%
-31% / -38%
24% / 33%
-23% / -11%

* ... smaller is better

While the display does not cover the entire sRGB color space, it still reaches an above-average coverage of 92 percent. The panel covers 63 percent of the Adobe color space, which is typical for displays that cover the entire sRGB color space. 

92% sRGB
92% sRGB
63% AdobeRGB
63% AdobeRGB

Color accuracy is fine without having to calibrate the display, although the average color space deviation of 5 will be noticeable to the trained eye. The panel does not have a blue cast. Colors are displayed more or less perfectly after calibrating the display with a photospectrometer, which leads to a DeltaE value of 1, far lower than the typical limit of 3.

You can download our ICC profile above, from the box that shows our measurement results.

Calman colors
Calman colors
Calman grayscales
Calman grayscales
Calman saturation
Calman saturation
Calman colors (after calibration)
Calman colors (after calibration)
Calman grayscales (after calibration)
Calman grayscales (after calibration)
Calman saturation (after calibration)
Calman saturation (after calibration)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 20889 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The notebook can be used outdoors or on the go thanks to its brightness of 330 nits. Content remains easy to read even under direct sunlight (based on our trial during winter). Colors naturally lose some of their radiance. Nevertheless, a higher contrast would be desirable if the laptop is occasionally used outdoors.

Even from the most acute angle, the colors and contrasts of the screen content remain stable. Only the brightness is minimally reduced. This is what you would expect from an IPS panel.

Performance – A quiet fan

The combination of an Intel Core i5-1135G7 and 16 GB of RAM that can even be further expanded is more than sufficient for all multimedia applications. That said, the HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng soon reaches its limits when it comes to 3D applications, which is due to the missing dedicated GPU.  

Processor

The i5-1135G7 clearly focuses on low power consumption and heat development. Still, the performance improvement compared to the predecessor i5-1035G7 is not to be underestimated thanks to the efficiency of 10-nm architecture.  

The CPU can be used for more than simple office tasks. It is particularly well suited to multitasking such as simultaneous streaming, surfing and file management. The alternative CPU, Intel Core i7-1165G7, is a good choice for anyone who needs to perform more demanding tasks.  

The i5 has four cores that clock at a rate of 4.2 GHz. The total of eight chips are ideal for running several programs in parallel.

The graph illustrates that performance is reduced after 28 seconds irrespective of temperature developments
The graph illustrates that performance is reduced after 28 seconds irrespective of temperature developments

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

0651301952603253904555205856507157808459109751040110511701235Tooltip
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø674 (639.66-774.95)
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1: Ø373 (322.23-600.93)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø833 (818.78-920.41)
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø734 (723.71-860.22)
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø780 (716.77-891.96)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U: Ø1156 (1134.46-1251.72)

It is worth taking a closer look at how HP has designed the power limit for this device. The design requires a heat dissipation of 15 W. The processor can consume up to 51 W for a short time (2.4 ms). After that, the CPU remains at 22 W for 28 seconds and is then limited to 15 to 12 W if the heavy load continues.

Other manufacturers, such as Asus, allow the i5 at least 25 W while others again give it the usual maximum of 28 W for a certain period of time. This is why the Pavilion's Cinebench loop results are below average. Some similar laptops reach up to 20 percent more performance, which is also reflected in their power consumption. 

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
79.7 pt ∼80%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN -2!
Intel Core i5-1135G7
73.7 pt ∼74%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7
73.5 pt ∼74%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
 
70.5 pt ∼71%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7
68.2 pt ∼68%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng -6!
Intel Core i5-1135G7
65.3 pt ∼65%
Average of class Office
 
62.2 pt ∼62%
HP 14s-dq1431ng -2!
Intel Core i5-1035G1
49.3 pt ∼49%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
6964 Points ∼100% +77%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7
5857 Points ∼84% +49%
Average of class Office
  (830 - 9653, n=58, last 2 years)
4673 Points ∼67% +19%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (2786 - 6136, n=42)
4667 Points ∼67% +19%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
3928 Points ∼56%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7
3619 Points ∼52% -8%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1356 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (1062 - 1373, n=41)
1318 Points ∼97% +1%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1311 Points ∼97%
Average of class Office
  (208 - 1578, n=57, last 2 years)
1204 Points ∼89% -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
1183 Points ∼87% -10%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1065 Points ∼79% -19%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
2570 Points ∼100% +61%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7
2207 Points ∼86% +38%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Intel Core i5-1135G7
2105 Points ∼82% +32%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (979 - 2382, n=48)
1816 Points ∼71% +14%
Average of class Office
  (159 - 3672, n=128, last 2 years)
1715 Points ∼67% +7%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1596 Points ∼62%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1548 Points ∼60% -3%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
1210 Points ∼47% -24%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
1210 Points ∼47% -24%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Intel Core i5-1135G7
523 Points ∼100% +39%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7
518 Points ∼99% +38%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (375 - 527, n=48)
505 Points ∼97% +35%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7
476 Points ∼91% +27%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
461 Points ∼88% +23%
Average of class Office
  (114 - 606, n=127, last 2 years)
451 Points ∼86% +20%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
428 Points ∼82% +14%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
428 Points ∼82% +14%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
375 Points ∼72%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
1252 Points ∼100% +86%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7
920 Points ∼73% +36%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Intel Core i5-1135G7
916 Points ∼73% +36%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7
860 (723.71min - 860.22max) Points ∼69% +28%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (431 - 925, n=51)
794 Points ∼63% +18%
Average of class Office
  (134 - 1614, n=126, last 2 years)
750 Points ∼60% +11%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
674 Points ∼54%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
606 Points ∼48% -10%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7
201 Points ∼100%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Intel Core i5-1135G7
198 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (159 - 205, n=47)
195 Points ∼97%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7
181 Points ∼90%
Average of class Office
  (75.8 - 230, n=121, last 2 years)
178 Points ∼89%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
172 Points ∼86%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
170 Points ∼85%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
1002 Seconds * ∼100% -28%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
1001.7 Seconds * ∼100% -28%
Average of class Office
  (302 - 3895, n=122, last 2 years)
845 Seconds * ∼84% -8%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
785.5 Seconds * ∼78%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7
699 Seconds * ∼70% +11%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (499 - 1044, n=46)
664 Seconds * ∼66% +15%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7
639 Seconds * ∼64% +19%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Intel Core i5-1135G7
598 Seconds * ∼60% +24%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
447 Seconds * ∼45% +43%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
31686 MIPS ∼100% +66%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Intel Core i5-1135G7
24386 MIPS ∼77% +28%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7
21582 MIPS ∼68% +13%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7
21559 MIPS ∼68% +13%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (14745 - 24873, n=48)
21398 MIPS ∼68% +12%
Average of class Office
  (4963 - 43914, n=123, last 2 years)
20446 MIPS ∼65% +7%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
19123 MIPS ∼60%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
13236 MIPS ∼42% -31%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
13236 MIPS ∼42% -31%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4821 MIPS ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4818 MIPS ∼100% 0%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4727 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4720 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (3924 - 4867, n=48)
4667 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Average of class Office
  (2059 - 5565, n=123, last 2 years)
4442 MIPS ∼92% -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
4341 MIPS ∼90% -10%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
4231 MIPS ∼88% -12%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
4231 MIPS ∼88% -12%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
5468 Points ∼100%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Intel Core i5-1135G7
5197 Points ∼95%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4737 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (3475 - 5472, n=44)
4678 Points ∼86%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4416 Points ∼81%
Average of class Office
  (873 - 6502, n=119, last 2 years)
3935 Points ∼72%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
3858 Points ∼71%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
3858 Points ∼71%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1384 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (1147 - 1428, n=44)
1377 Points ∼99%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1373 Points ∼99%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1345 Points ∼97%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
1219 Points ∼88%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
1219 Points ∼88%
Average of class Office
  (431 - 1648, n=119, last 2 years)
1178 Points ∼85%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
1118 Points ∼81%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
8.08 fps ∼100%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Intel Core i5-1135G7
6.39 fps ∼79%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7
6.03 fps ∼75%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (3.57 - 7.6, n=44)
5.91 fps ∼73%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7
5.52 fps ∼68%
Average of class Office
  (0.63 - 11.1, n=119, last 2 years)
5.49 fps ∼68%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
3.32 fps ∼41%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
3.32 fps ∼41%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
70.9 s * ∼100%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
70.88 s * ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (21.5 - 210, n=115, last 2 years)
62 s * ∼87%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
61.9 s * ∼87%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (44.2 - 61.8, n=46)
52.5 s * ∼74%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7
51.3 s * ∼72%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Intel Core i5-1135G7
50.5 s * ∼71%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7
44.2 s * ∼62%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
0.736 sec * ∼100%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1
0.736 sec * ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (0.542 - 2.07, n=119, last 2 years)
0.705 sec * ∼96%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7
0.647 sec * ∼88%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (0.619 - 0.727, n=45)
0.642 sec * ∼87%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Intel Core i5-1135G7
0.638 sec * ∼87%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7
0.623 sec * ∼85%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
0.614 sec * ∼83%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
674 Points
Help

System performance

The fairly realistic PCMark 10 illustrates the CPU's advantages. It provides plenty of computing power for starting programs (the 2.4 ms mentioned earlier). The notebook is not made for complex tasks with long-term loads but rather for tasks at irregular intervals that only require the processor's performance for a moment or so.

Therefore it is no surprise that the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05, which achieved a significantly better result in the CineBench, actually performs minimally worse in the PCMark 10. This indicates that the processor can keep up with its competition in the area of its intended use (at home, for private purposes) despite getting low results in terms of raw performance. Meanwhile, it requires less cooling and the fan remains silent for a lot of the time.

This is noticeable when using the HP Pavilion 14 in everyday use. There is hardly any delay when starting programs. The device can easily support several browser tabs streaming video at the same time. The fan is silent most of the time, despite several tasks using processing power.

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
Vega 7, R5 5500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5193 Points ∼100% +9%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI
4794 Points ∼92% +1%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H)
4749 Points ∼91%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
4738 Points ∼91% 0%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
4624 Points ∼89% -3%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (4026 - 4952, n=41)
4599 Points ∼89% -3%
Average of class Office
  (1900 - 5690, n=119, last 2 years)
4383 Points ∼84% -8%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 16GB + 256GB HBRPEKNX0101AH
3676 Points ∼71% -23%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H)
9917 Points ∼100%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI
9772 Points ∼99% -1%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
9438 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
9386 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (8149 - 9917, n=41)
9334 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
Vega 7, R5 5500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
9303 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Office
  (4469 - 10608, n=119, last 2 years)
8757 Points ∼88% -12%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 16GB + 256GB HBRPEKNX0101AH
8322 Points ∼84% -16%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
Vega 7, R5 5500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
7717 Points ∼100% +17%
Average of class Office
  (2994 - 9512, n=119, last 2 years)
6687 Points ∼87% +1%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H)
6611 Points ∼86%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI
6487 Points ∼84% -2%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
6332 Points ∼82% -4%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
6269 Points ∼81% -5%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (5544 - 6611, n=41)
6243 Points ∼81% -6%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 16GB + 256GB HBRPEKNX0101AH
5483 Points ∼71% -17%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
Vega 7, R5 5500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5297 Points ∼100% +19%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
4858 Points ∼92% +10%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI
4719 Points ∼89% +6%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (3548 - 5206, n=41)
4538 Points ∼86% +2%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
4537 Points ∼86% +2%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H)
4434 Points ∼84%
Average of class Office
  (1270 - 5878, n=119, last 2 years)
3978 Points ∼75% -10%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 16GB + 256GB HBRPEKNX0101AH
2954 Points ∼56% -33%

DPC latencies

We tested system latency with LatencyMon. This resulted in comparatively high values above 2 ms. The driver overview indicates that the kernel mode driver framework Wdf01000.sys is responsible for this latency. However, this long execution time is presumably a symptom of an ACPI driver that is too slow.

Therefore, this configuration is not suited to real-time audio and video applications. We measured ten dropped frames within a minute when playing 4K video on YouTube. That is perfectly acceptable for an office segment device.

LatencyMon
LatencyMon
LatencyMon list of drivers
LatencyMon list of drivers
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ256HAJD
5567.8 μs * ∼100% -167%
HP Envy 17-cg
GeForce MX450, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
2154.6 μs * ∼39% -3%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H)
2086 μs * ∼37%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1603.2 μs * ∼29% +23%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
1089.3 μs * ∼20% +48%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
Vega 7, R5 5500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
474.4 μs * ∼9% +77%

* ... smaller is better

Storage device

The M.2 SSD from Intel in our test unit fulfilled our expectations. The deviation from the recorded average values is within a tolerable range. However, the storage device does a meager job if you compare it to other models. The SSD from SK Hynix in the Acer Swift 5 SF514, for example, has noticeably better access times.  

Overall, however, no process is expected to max out the speed of the storage device. A faster SSD would therefore not offer any advantages. It's size of 1 TB, on the other hand, is a real advantage. If you want to store a large collection of photos or video or record videos yourself and store them directly on the laptop, then this is the size to choose.

Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H)
Sequential Read: 1157MB/s
Sequential Write: 929MB/s
4K Read: 32MB/s
4K Write: 101MB/s
4K-64 Read: 507MB/s
4K-64 Write: 555MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.074ms
Access Time Write: 0.045ms
Score Read: 655Points
Score Write: 749Points
Score Total: 1735Points
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H)
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 16GB + 256GB HBRPEKNX0101AH
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
Average Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H)
 
Average of class Office
 
Drive Performance Rating
Percent
57.1
65.2
14%
47.3
-17%
91.4
60%
75
31%
23.3
-59%
59.6
4%
80.1
40%
AS SSD
17%
-20%
67%
39%
-99%
3%
36%
Score Total
1735
2067
19%
1305
-25%
3357
93%
2536
46%
910
-48%
1705 ?(1675 - 1735, n=2)
-2%
2909 ?(125 - 7098, n=120, last 2 years)
68%
Score Read
655
761
16%
345
-47%
1264
93%
997
52%
389
-41%
635 ?(615 - 655, n=2)
-3%
1121 ?(49 - 2864, n=120, last 2 years)
71%
Score Write
749
929
24%
782
4%
1488
99%
1034
38%
338
-55%
738 ?(726 - 749, n=2)
-1%
1240 ?(39 - 2797, n=120, last 2 years)
66%
Seq Read
1157
1337.36
16%
676.97
-41%
2010.92
74%
1405.16
21%
925
-20%
1250 ?(1157 - 1343, n=2)
8%
2009 ?(266 - 5613, n=120, last 2 years)
74%
Seq Write
929
651.9
-30%
194.68
-79%
960.99
3%
1010.67
9%
496
-47%
1075 ?(929 - 1222, n=2)
16%
1284 ?(52.2 - 4909, n=120, last 2 years)
38%
4K Read
32
61.85
93%
58.12
82%
48.77
52%
53.65
68%
19.99
-38%
47.8 ?(32 - 63.6, n=2)
49%
45.8 ?(8.89 - 80.6, n=120, last 2 years)
43%
4K Write
101
106.65
6%
124.05
23%
221.53
119%
122.68
21%
17.96
-82%
104 ?(101 - 108, n=2)
3%
129 ?(13.9 - 257, n=120, last 2 years)
28%
4K-64 Read
507
565.27
11%
219.59
-57%
1014.58
100%
802.84
58%
276.24
-46%
462 ?(418 - 507, n=2)
-9%
875 ?(13.1 - 2222, n=120, last 2 years)
73%
4K-64 Write
555
756.76
36%
638.44
15%
1170.45
111%
809.99
46%
270.23
-51%
526 ?(496 - 555, n=2)
-5%
984 ?(17.7 - 2470, n=120, last 2 years)
77%
Access Time Read *
0.074
0.079
-7%
0.109
-47%
0.062
16%
0.23
-211%
0.0885 ?(0.074 - 0.103, n=2)
-20%
0.0915 ?(0.032 - 0.417, n=114, last 2 years)
-24%
Access Time Write *
0.045
0.046
-2%
0.065
-44%
0.053
-18%
0.032
29%
0.249
-453%
0.044 ?(0.043 - 0.045, n=2)
2%
0.0997 ?(0.018 - 0.818, n=120, last 2 years)
-122%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
16% / 16%
-19% / -19%
64% / 67%
35% / 38%
-79% / -96%
4% / 4%
38% / 36%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0130260390520650780910104011701300143015601690182019502080221023402470Tooltip
: Ø1345 (223.32-2529.58)

GPU performance

The Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is responsible for getting motion onto the screen. The chip is integrated with the processor as an SoC. It supports DirectX 12 and reaches a clock rate of 1.3 GHz. However, the CPU's clock rate has to be reduced if the GPU is under heavy load, in order to limit heat development. The configuration with an Intel Coe i7 is equipped with a slightly more powerful Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Although the GPU performance has increased noticeably compared to the predecessors, it can still only support video rendering and image processing for private purposes. The device cannot handle more demanding games, but should be able to display older or simpler titles with some cutbacks.

Because of the way the processor is reigned in, the GPU's performance is actually above average. It is allowed to contribute more to heat development than in notebooks that allow the CPU more access to power.

3DMark Fire Strike (on mains)
3DMark Fire Strike (on mains)
3DMark Fire Strike (on battery)
3DMark Fire Strike (on battery)
3DMark Time Spy (on mains)
3DMark Time Spy (on mains)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
100 pt ∼100%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
 
92.3 pt ∼92%
Average of class Office
 
72.2 pt ∼72%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
5396 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (3480 - 6120, n=41)
5207 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Office
  (599 - 11538, n=125, last 2 years)
3891 Points ∼72% -28%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
3956 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (1990 - 4846, n=42)
3484 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Office
  (449 - 8114, n=119, last 2 years)
2712 Points ∼69% -31%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
1206 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (743 - 1408, n=41)
1112 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Office
  (194 - 2886, n=104, last 2 years)
917 Points ∼76% -24%
3DMark 11 Performance
5441 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3488 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1335 points
Help

Gaming Performance

Simple, non-demanding games can be played on the Pavilion. The newer and more complex a title, the less likely it is for the frame rate to suffice. Nonetheless, there is a wide range of games, from Battle Royal titles to sports simulations, that can be played smoothly at reduced image quality. 

We recommend choosing a resolution below FullHD and low details. With these settings, users should even be able to play some of the classics from 6 or 7 years ago. We also recommend always connecting the device to power when playing games, as the CPU and GPU cannot reach their full potential when running on battery.

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (33.5 - 92.2, n=37)
61.1 fps ∼100% +21%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
60.6 (14.3min, 21.4P0.1, 35.6P1) fps ∼99% +20%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
60.3 (28.2min, 28.3P0.1, 37.1P1) fps ∼99% +19%
Average of class Office
  (9.2 - 144, n=80, last 2 years)
55.1 fps ∼90% +9%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
51.49 fps ∼84% +2%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
50.6 fps ∼83%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
20.3 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (9.3 - 31.7, n=39)
19.9 fps ∼98% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
19.8 (15.4min, 15.6P0.1, 16.3P1) fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Office
  (4.78 - 47.9, n=71, last 2 years)
19.7 fps ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
19.1 (3.68min, 3.82P0.1, 6.51P1) fps ∼94% -6%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
15.89 fps ∼78% -22%
Back 4 Blood
1280x720 Low Preset (DX12)
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
43.8 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
 
43.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Office
  (12.8 - 49.1, n=3, last 2 years)
35.2 fps ∼80% -20%
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) AA:FX
Average of class Office
  (27.4 - 39.1, n=2, last 2 years)
33.3 fps ∼100% +22%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
27.4 fps ∼82%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
 
27.4 fps ∼82% 0%
GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Average of class Office
  (15.2 - 167, n=38, last 2 years)
76.5 fps ∼100% +18%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
74.8 (15min, 43.5P1) fps ∼98% +16%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (36.5 - 98.4, n=22)
68.9 fps ∼90% +6%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
64.7 fps ∼85%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
57.2 (8.57min, 38.5P1) fps ∼75% -12%
1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average of class Office
  (13.3 - 157, n=36, last 2 years)
67.3 fps ∼100% +13%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
60.5 (14.1min, 34.5P1) fps ∼90% +2%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
59.5 fps ∼88%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (28.9 - 84.3, n=22)
59.2 fps ∼88% -1%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
44.9 (10.6min, 29.4P1) fps ∼67% -25%
Strange Brigade
1280x720 lowest AF:1
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
73.5 (57.9min, 63.4P1) fps ∼100% +1%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
73.1 fps ∼99%
Average of class Office
  (15.6 - 167, n=37, last 2 years)
65.5 fps ∼89% -10%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (36.7 - 87.7, n=25)
62.2 fps ∼85% -15%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
61.7 (14.4min, 21.1P1) fps ∼84% -16%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
48.8 (11.3min, 14.4P1) fps ∼66% -33%
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
28.8 (24.1min, 25.3P1) fps ∼100% +1%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
28.5 fps ∼99%
Average of class Office
  (8.2 - 68.6, n=36, last 2 years)
26.9 fps ∼93% -6%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (13.5 - 36.2, n=25)
25 fps ∼87% -12%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
23.8 (6.5min, 9.28P1) fps ∼83% -16%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
18.4 (5.9min, 7.09P1) fps ∼64% -35%
Far Cry 5
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
50 fps ∼100% +28%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
43 (38min) fps ∼86% +10%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
39 fps ∼78%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (17 - 54, n=21)
36.1 fps ∼72% -7%
Average of class Office
  (3 - 90, n=44, last 2 years)
33.8 fps ∼68% -13%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
23 fps ∼100% +21%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
21 (19min) fps ∼91% +11%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
19 fps ∼83%
Average of class Office
  (1 - 46, n=35, last 2 years)
18.1 fps ∼79% -5%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (9 - 25, n=20)
18 fps ∼78% -5%
Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
96.9 (85.7min) fps ∼100% +25%
Average of class Office
  (36.5 - 145, n=121, last 2 years)
84.5 fps ∼87% +9%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
81.9 (46.3min) fps ∼85% +6%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
81.5 (53.6min) fps ∼84% +5%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (66.2 - 123, n=43)
81 fps ∼84% +4%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
77.6 (51.3min) fps ∼80%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
75.4 (54.3min) fps ∼78% -3%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
65.6 (55.9min) fps ∼68% -15%
1366x768 med (1/3)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
77.2 (62min) fps ∼100% +55%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
72.3 (55.2min) fps ∼94% +45%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
70.1 (46.5min) fps ∼91% +40%
Average of class Office
  (14.6 - 130, n=121, last 2 years)
61.2 fps ∼79% +23%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (34 - 92, n=43)
57.8 fps ∼75% +16%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
54.1 (42.7min) fps ∼70% +8%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
49.9 (34.5min) fps ∼65%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
38.7 (29.6min) fps ∼50% -22%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
39.5 fps ∼100% +30%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
31.3 fps ∼79% +3%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
30.4 fps ∼77%
Average of class Office
  (5.32 - 72, n=60, last 2 years)
29.8 fps ∼75% -2%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (16.5 - 40, n=38)
29.4 fps ∼74% -3%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
24.3 fps ∼62% -20%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
13.2 fps ∼33% -57%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
20 fps ∼100% +14%
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
17.5 fps ∼88%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
17.1 fps ∼86% -2%
Average of class Office
  (1.94 - 38.3, n=48, last 2 years)
16.7 fps ∼84% -5%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (8.11 - 22, n=35)
15.9 fps ∼80% -9%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400CEAE, i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
12.2 fps ∼61% -30%

The Pavilion does a surprisingly good job at our Witcher 3 stress test at highest settings, although the game is far from playable at this low level of details.  

Instead, the measured rates show that the temperature of the SoC drops to far below 60°C after a short peak. GPU and CPU are then limited to a maximum of 17 W. The meagre frame rate remains at around 11 fps throughout. This performance is comparable with that of the Pavilion 14-ce3040ng, despite the latter being better equipped with a 10th generation i7 and a dedicated GPU.  

The core temperature drops, but the frame rates remain more or less the same
The core temperature drops, but the frame rates remain more or less the same

Witcher 3 FPS diagram