Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Back 4 Blood in test: Notebook and desktop benchmarks

Co-op battle against zombie hordes. Back 4 Blood is very reminiscent of the old Left 4 Dead. No wonder, since the shooter comes from the same developer studio. We checked the graphics requirements of the action title with several notebook and desktop GPUs.
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Brian Burriston (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! English native speakers welcome!

News Writer (AUS/NZL based) - Details here

Back 4 Blood
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Technology

Back 4 Blood should be a good choice for fans of continuous shooting. The zombie shooter from Turtle Rock Studios sends countless undead and special monsters after the players or in front of the virtual shotgun.

The whole thing happens with a solid technical foundation. The Unreal Engine 4 used is characterized by quite good textures and first-class effects. In addition to the lighting, the particle effects (e.g. for the weapons) and the fire display (flames, explosions, etc.) are also convincing. The package is rounded off by a homogeneous and pleasing graphic style and overall look.

Back 4 Blood
Back 4 Blood
Back 4 Blood
Back 4 Blood

In terms of gameplay, Back 4 Blood is - as mentioned at the beginning - very similar to the Left 4 Dead series, although the developers follow the current trend and focus on customizing. Among other things, we have weapon upgrades, a shopping system and special skill cards. Left 4 Dead meets Warzone, so to speak. The gunplay and movement are also up to date, in our opinion.

Back 4 Blood
Back 4 Blood
Back 4 Blood
Back 4 Blood

In short: If you are looking for a fun and - depending on the difficulty level - quite challenging bullet feast, Back 4 Blood should be a good choice, especially since you can also impersonate the special monsters in multiplayer mode instead of the human players. In single player mode, which unfortunately still requires an online connection, you have to make do with halfway intelligent bots, which is also entertaining for a while.

Back 4 Blood
Back 4 Blood
Back 4 Blood
Back 4 Blood

But back to the technology. In the graphics menu, which you can see further down in two of the screenshots, there are over 20 setting options. Starting with classics like the resolution (unfortunately, only the monitor's native resolution is available in Borderless Fullscreen; conventional Fullscreen doesn't exist), the field of view and Motion Blur, there are also some modern features like upscaling (including DLSS) and Chromatic Aberration.

As edge smoothing, Back 4 Blood supports FXAA and TAA. You can also switch between DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 if necessary. V-Sync and an FPS limit can also be enabled if desired.

Back 4 Blood
Back 4 Blood
Back 4 Blood
Back 4 Blood

Equally praiseworthy is the presence of various presets. The presets take care of the five fold-out quality sliders. Plus points are also given for the fact that setting changes (with the exception of DirectX) do not require a restart and are adopted directly. It would only be nice if the developers would add short text explanations to the individual graphics options.

The game size of around 25 GB turns out to be moderate by today's standards. The in-game loading times are decent. Only the game start takes a bit of time.

Back 4 Blood
Back 4 Blood
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Benchmark

In order to get the most consistent results possible, we do not use a mission for the benchmarks, but the lobby camp "Fort Hope", which you enter between missions. According to our experience, the frame rate of the benchmark sequence matches the real missions quite well. Although there can be significant performance fluctuations or drops in the latter depending on the number of zombies and the amount of effects, the average frame rate is similarly high (missions 1 and 2 of the first act were checked for 200 seconds each on an RTX 3070 with maximum details).

With the help of the CapFrameX tool, we recorded a 30-second sprint through the warehouse, which contains various objects, figures and fire elements. Since this is a fast first-person shooter, the system should reach an average of at least 40 FPS or - to be better prepared for particularly CPU-intensive and image-intensive situations - more than 60 FPS.

Results

For the benchmarks, we mainly use loan devices from our partners at XMG (Schenker Technologies) and MSI.

FHD (1,920 x 1,080)

In contrast to other current games, Back 4 Blood does not necessarily require a real gaming computer. Entry-level GPUs on the level of the GeForce MX450 can at least handle 1,920 x 1,080 pixels and the Low preset. The Medium preset would also be possible with some compromises. Midrange graphics cards like the GeForce GTX 1650 (Ti) can easily cope with the High and Epic presets in Full HD.

Back 4 Blood
    1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12)     1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) AA:FX     1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) AA:T     1920x1080 Epic Preset (DX12) AA:T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP
378 (26.3min, 184P0.1, 235P1) fps ∼50%
281 (44.4min, 139P0.1, 180P1) fps ∼44%
235 (38.8min, 121P0.1, 148P1) fps ∼40%
220 (43.6min, 105P0.1, 141P1) fps ∼41%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP
377 (30.5min, 185P0.1, 239P1) fps ∼50%
273 (40min, 150P0.1, 194P1) fps ∼43%
227 (31.9min, 137P0.1, 162P1) fps ∼39%
209 (25.9min, 118P0.1, 146P1) fps ∼38%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X
332 (75.7min, 152P0.1, 189P1) fps ∼44%
300 (70.7min, 139P0.1, 173P1) fps ∼47%
274 (67.3min, 113P0.1, 144P1) fps ∼47%
272 (75.9min, 122P0.1, 150P1) fps ∼50%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X
321 (56min, 155P0.1, 187P1) fps ∼43%
295 (120min, 145P0.1, 176P1) fps ∼47%
260 (30.6min, 128P0.1, 155P1) fps ∼44%
248 (62.8min, 128P0.1, 155P1) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
317 (136min, 155P0.1, 190P1) fps ∼42%
290 (116min, 129P0.1, 168P1) fps ∼46%
273 (97.6min, 120P0.1, 154P1) fps ∼47%
270 (77.4min, 119P0.1, 149P1) fps ∼50%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP
288 (23.2min, 93P0.1, 176P1) fps ∼38%
212 (18.5min, 65.8P0.1, 143P1) fps ∼33%
181 (51.7min, 67.1P0.1, 124P1) fps ∼31%
163 (57.4min, 84.7P0.1, 113P1) fps ∼30%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP
205 (22.6min, 106P0.1, 134P1) fps ∼27%
152 (55.7min, 87.1P0.1, 96.8P1) fps ∼24%
123 (26.3min, 48.7P0.1, 78P1) fps ∼21%
114 (59.4min, 61.4P0.1, 70.2P1) fps ∼21%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
197 (24.8min, 96.1P0.1, 124P1) fps ∼26%
146 (57.2min, 75.2P0.1, 97.6P1) fps ∼23%
126 (57.9min, 70.9P0.1, 83.4P1) fps ∼21%
115 (63.4min, 64.9P0.1, 73.4P1) fps ∼21%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
Dell G5 15 SE
184 (44.8min, 105P0.1, 118P1) fps ∼24%
137 (32.2min, 69.2P0.1, 78.3P1) fps ∼22%
117 (6.13min, 55.3P0.1, 65.8P1) fps ∼20%
110 (52.7min, 55.6P0.1, 59.4P1) fps ∼20%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GP75
157 (26.9min, 89.7P0.1, 100P1) fps ∼21%
106 (51.3min, 57.1P0.1, 63.7P1) fps ∼17%
91.5 (47.3min, 48.1P0.1, 54.2P1) fps ∼16%
83.8 (45.5min, 45.8P0.1, 49.7P1) fps ∼15%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GL75
147 (22.1min, 84.5P0.1, 92.3P1) fps ∼19%
96 (31.8min, 51P0.1, 57.2P1) fps ∼15%
82.3 (41.8min, 44.8P0.1, 49.4P1) fps ∼14%
75 (38.7min, 40.3P0.1, 43.8P1) fps ∼14%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-11370H
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
77 (22.8min, 27.1P0.1, 41.8P1) fps ∼10%
46.3 (13.5min, 18.1P0.1, 22.7P1) fps ∼7%
35.3 (11.8min, 12.1P0.1, 14.9P1) fps ∼6%
33 (13.4min, 14.1P0.1, 15.2P1) fps ∼6%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

The latter mid-range GPUs can even theoretically handle a mix of 2,560 x 1,440 pixels and maximum details, although we would recommend a model from the upper mid-range for an all-round smooth gaming experience (e.g. the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti or the Radeon RX 5600M).

Back 4 Blood
    2560x1440 Epic Preset (DX12) AA:T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X
241 (76.5min, 101P0.1, 139P1) fps ∼50%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
223 (67.7min, 98P0.1, 132P1) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X
179 (59.9min, 90.4P0.1, 117P1) fps ∼37%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP
146 (25.2min, 53P0.1, 101P1) fps ∼30%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP
140 (39.1min, 56.1P0.1, 89.9P1) fps ∼29%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP
111 (19.8min, 31.8P0.1, 69.4P1) fps ∼23%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP
75 (26.3min, 27.7P0.1, 42.7P1) fps ∼16%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
74.3 (25.1min, 26.4P0.1, 34.4P1) fps ∼15%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
Dell G5 15 SE
71.4 (30.5min, 31.3P0.1, 35.5P1) fps ∼15%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GP75
52.7 (22.8min, 25.9P0.1, 28.1P1) fps ∼11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GL75
49.1 (23.9min, 24.2P0.1, 26.2P1) fps ∼10%

UHD (3,840 x 2,160)

3,840 x 2,160 pixels in combination with the Epic preset, on the other hand, should only be unleashed on a high-end representative (GeForce RTX 3060 upwards). The VRAM requirements of the title generally seem to be within limits. 6 GB are sufficient for all common resolutions and quality levels.

Back 4 Blood
    3840x2160 Epic Preset (DX12) AA:T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X
151 (53.3min, 67.3P0.1, 103P1) fps ∼34%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
131 (48.9min, 55.3P0.1, 87.5P1) fps ∼30%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X
96.4 (44.5min, 50.9P0.1, 61.7P1) fps ∼22%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP
76.6 (15.4min, 21.6P0.1, 45.9P1) fps ∼17%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP
71.7 (31.9min, 34.3P0.1, 40.6P1) fps ∼16%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP
57.2 (14min, 16.4P0.1, 30.9P1) fps ∼13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
37.4 (19.3min, 19.5P0.1, 20.1P1) fps ∼8%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP
37.3 (14.4min, 18.1P0.1, 19.3P1) fps ∼8%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
Dell G5 15 SE
36.3 (14.9min, 15.2P0.1, 16.4P1) fps ∼8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GP75
26.1 (12.4min, 12.5P0.1, 13P1) fps ∼6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GL75
23.3 (11.3min, 11.5P0.1, 12.3P1) fps ∼5%

Note

Since gaming tests are very time-consuming and often hindered by installation or activation limits, we can only provide you with a part of the benchmarks for the publication of the articles. More graphics cards will be installed in the coming days and weeks.

Overview

Show Restrictions
PosModel< PrevNext >Back 4 Blood
 Back 4 Blood (2021)
low
1280x720
Low Preset (DX12)
med.
1920x1080
Medium Preset (DX12)
FXAA
high
1920x1080
High Preset (DX12)
TAA
ultra
1920x1080
Epic Preset (DX12)
TAA
QHD
2560x1440
Epic Preset (DX12)
TAA
4K
3840x2160
Epic Preset (DX12)
TAA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
302.5n2
284n2
278.5n2
236n2
141n2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
290
273
270
223
131
NVIDIA Titan RTX
294
270
255
182
101
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
262
227
207
145
72
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
295
260
248
179
96.4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
281
235
220
146
76.6
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
228
188
168
110
56.3
AMD Radeon RX 6800M
170
151
152
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
246.5n2
216n2
201n2
140
71.7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
214
191
178
115
57.4
AMD Radeon RX 6700M
195
163
149
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
219
191
177
121
64.9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)
237
213
193
129
66.3
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)
218
185
170
114
59.5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
293
201n2
170n3
153n3
107.5n2
55.25n2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)
190
173
156
103
52.9
AMD Radeon RX 6600
197
166
145
90.4
46
AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)
183
157
146
96.9
49.1
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop)
172
150
138
91.9
48
PosModel< PrevNext >Back 4 Blood
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)
154
140
126
80.3
39
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)
121
103
93.6
62.2
30.8
AMD Radeon RX 5600M
137
117
110
71.4
36.3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
146
126
115
74.3
37.4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
152
123
114
75
37.3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)
140
124
113
71.2
34.6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)
128
113
102
63.7
30
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
247
138
112
103
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
107
89.6
81.1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
106
91.5
83.8
52.7
26.1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
96
82.3
75
49.1
23.3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop)
96.5
84.9
77.8
48.4
23.2
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
46.3
35.3
33
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
43.7
40.4
32.4
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
60.2n2
36.95n2
32.55n2
33.7
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
73.4
29.9
24.6
23.1
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
43.8
27.4
25.9
20.2
AMD Radeon 540X
62.7
21.9
18.3
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
32.7
15.6
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
25.8
23.5
18.6
PosModel< PrevNext >Back 4 Blood
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
111
39.8
32.6
27.6
15.5
7.53
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
51.2
17.9
14.9
13.6
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
49.5
10.2
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
19
9.27
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
32.1
10.6
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
12.8
(-) * Smaller values are better. / n123 Number of benchmarks for this median value / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Test system

XMG Neo 15 (RTX 3080) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)
XMG Neo 15 (RTX 3080) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)
XMG Neo 17 (RTX 3070) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)
XMG Neo 17 (RTX 3070) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)
XMG Core 15 (RTX 3060) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)
XMG Core 15 (RTX 3060) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)
XMG Focus 17 (RTX 3050 Ti) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)
XMG Focus 17 (RTX 3050 Ti) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)

Device
Graphics card Processor Memory Operating system
XMG Neo 15 Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 @165 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-11800H 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Neo 17 Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-11800H 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Core 15 Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 @130 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-11800H 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Focus 17 Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti @75 W TGP (4 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-11800H 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GP65 Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (6 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-9750H 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GP75 Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (4 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-10750H 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GL75 Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-10750H 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Nvidia GeForce MX450 (2 GB GDDR5) Intel Core i7-11370H 1 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
Dell G5 15 SE AMD Radeon RX 5600M (6 GB GDDR6) AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI Prestige 14 Evo Intel Iris Xe (96 CUs) Intel Core i7-1185G7 1 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
Desktop PC I MSI GeForce RTX 3090 (24 GB GDDR6X)
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 (10 GB GDDR6X)
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 (8 GB GDDR6)
Intel Core i9-9900K 4 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
Desktop-PC II Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 FE (24 GB GDDR6X)
Nvidia Titan RTX (24 GB GDDR6)
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super (8
GB GDDR6)Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super (8 GB GDDR6)
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super (6 GB GDDR6)
PNY GeForce GTX 1660 (6 GB GDDR5)
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super (4 GB GDDR6)
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR5)
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (12 GB DDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (8 GB GDDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (8 GB GDDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 (8 GB GDDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (6 GB GDDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (8 GB GDDR6)
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 2 x 32 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
4K monitors Nvidia driver AMD driver
Asus PB287Q, Philips Brilliance 329P9H, Acer Predator XB321HK ForceWare 496.13 Adrenalin 21.10.2
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Florian Glaser
Editor of the original article: Florian Glaser - Managing Editor Gaming Laptops - 670 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2009
I discovered my interest in computers in my childhood, growing up with MS-DOS and Windows 3.1 in the early 1990s. I was especially fascinated with computer games, even from an early age. From Monkey Island through Lands of Lore to Doom, I tried every game I could get my hands on. I have been working for Notebookcheck since 2009 with my focus mostly being on high-performance gaming laptops.
Ninh Duy
Translator: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 215918 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
My main responsibility as an editorial assistant is maintaining the Library section, which aggregates reviews from other publications and channels. In addition, my daily breakfast is Notebookcheck's long list of new content, which I comb through to select the most interesting topics for translation from English to French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch."
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Back 4 Blood in test: Notebook and desktop benchmarks
Florian Glaser, 2021-10-22 (Update: 2021-10-22)