Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 660M

AMD Radeon 660M

The AMD Radeon 660M is an integrated GPU in the entry level Ryzen 6000 series for laptops (Rembrandt, e.g. Ryzen 5 6600U). The GPU is based on the RDNA2 architecture and has 6 of the 12 CUs (= 384 shaders) clocked at up to 1,900 MHz (depending on the CPU model). The 680M and 660M iGPUs are the first integrated graphics card with hardware raytracing support, although the performance is too slow to use it in current games.

Due to the halved CU count and lower core clock, the Radeon 660M is clearly slower than the Radeon 680M and most likely only on par with the old Radeon Vega 8 iGPUs

Thanks to the modern 6nm process and clever power-saving features, the power consumption is comparatively low (according to AMD), so the graphics card can also be used for slim and light notebooks (depending on the CPU model).

AMD Radeon 600M Series

Radeon 680M compare 768 @ 2.4 GHz
Radeon 660M 384 @ 1.9 GHz
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) compare 128 @ 2.2 GHz
Radeon 610M compare 128 @ 0.4 - 2.2 GHz
CodenameRDNA 2 Rembrandt
ArchitectureRDNA 2
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed1900 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1
Power Consumption45 Watt
technology6 nm
FeaturesTiled Rasterization, Shared Memory (up to Dual-Channel DDR4-3200)
Date of Announcement04.01.2022
CPU in Radeon 660MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H6 x 3300 MHz, 45 W? MHz1900 MHz
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H6 x 3300 MHz, 45 W? MHz1900 MHz
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS6 x 3300 MHz, 35 W? MHz1900 MHz
min. - max.? MHz1800 - 1900 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1.8 pt (5%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1153     avg: 1612     median: 1700 (5%)     max: 1793 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1016     avg: 1425     median: 1523 (3%)     max: 1588 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 235036     avg: 259056     median: 259056 (26%)     max: 283076 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 102211     avg: 106506     median: 106506 (12%)     max: 110800 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 18216     avg: 22032     median: 21798 (21%)     max: 24842 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 21857     avg: 30069     median: 31180 (8%)     max: 33949 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3216     avg: 4133     median: 4391.5 (7%)     max: 4664 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3447     avg: 4472     median: 4734.5 (4%)     max: 4993 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 156497     avg: 197158     median: 189307 (21%)     max: 272265 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
15034 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
17733 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 4904     avg: 6691     median: 7003.5 (8%)     max: 7680 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 4636     avg: 6315     median: 6651.5 (5%)     max: 7184 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 22066     avg: 22837     median: 22854 (7%)     max: 23590 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 19163     avg: 20101     median: 20168 (11%)     max: 20973 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
43616 Points (48%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 25404     avg: 27052     median: 27171 (36%)     max: 28581 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
10.9 fps (3%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom HIP *
min: 438     avg: 554     median: 537.5 (44%)     max: 755 Seconds
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
74.6 fps (19%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
42.4 fps (6%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
22.8 fps (4%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
25.8 fps (7%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
44.4 fps (12%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
51.1 fps (46%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
39.3 fps (16%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
45 fps (7%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
55.8 fps (8%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
66.6 fps (18%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
72.7 fps (8%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
23.9 fps (4%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
24.9 fps (4%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
62.6 fps (7%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
6.2 fps (2%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
53.8 fps (8%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
56.9 fps (6%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
51.7 fps (8%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
42.1 fps (4%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
5.2 fps (3%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
27 fps (4%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
4.7 fps (1%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
19.8 fps (9%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
14.2 fps (9%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
10.8 fps (4%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 12942     avg: 13209     median: 13142 (9%)     max: 13544 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
114.4 fps (38%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 93.3     avg: 121     median: 122.4 (7%)     max: 154.4 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.9     avg: 97.9     median: 97.9 (98%)     max: 98 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 10.6     avg: 14.7     median: 14.7 (5%)     max: 18.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 22.9     avg: 33.5     median: 33.5 (6%)     max: 44.1 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 63.9     avg: 86     median: 86 (6%)     max: 108.1 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
69.4 fps (7%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
93.3 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
104.3 fps (4%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
258.5 fps (2%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 128.2     median: 114.6 (3%)     max: 178.9 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 13189     avg: 14774     median: 14980 (4%)     max: 15678 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 14297     avg: 16556     median: 16656 (4%)     max: 18338 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 187     avg: 270     median: 270 (1%)     max: 353 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 785     avg: 822     median: 822 (1%)     max: 859 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 3416     avg: 3428     median: 3427.5 (3%)     max: 3439 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28.3     avg: 39.4     median: 40.4 (5%)     max: 54.7 Watt
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24.8     avg: 37.5     median: 38.4 (5%)     max: 47.3 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 27.6     avg: 38.3     median: 39.7 (9%)     max: 47.3 Watt
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra
min: 0.3575     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (34%)     max: 0.4565 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 0.3158     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (32%)     max: 0.508 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 28.7     avg: 35     median: 36.6 (11%)     max: 39.6 Watt
0510152025303540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 27.4     avg: 34.5     median: 35.6 (5%)     max: 40.4 Watt
0510152025303540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
0.2 fps per Watt (1%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 35     avg: 38.6     median: 38 (61%)     max: 48.5 dB(A)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
1900 MHz (75%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
31.6 31.6 42.2 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.8 26.8 35.5 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.8 25.6 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
14.9 18.1 22.9 24.3 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.5 12.8 17.4 18.1 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.9 10.9 11 11.6 13.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.8 9.2 11.2 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
27.5
34.1
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
8.1
7
9.2
low 1920x1080
16.5 19.1 22 22.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.8 13.9 14 15.1 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.2 10.3 13 13.3 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10 12 12.6 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
26.6
37.3
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
49.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
87.3
Diablo 4

Diablo 4

2023
low 1920x1080
34.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
68.5
low 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
21.9
low 1920x1080
36.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
70.4
low 1920x1080
17.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
31
low 1920x1080
20.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1280x720
29.7
low 1920x1080
23.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1280x720
54.5
low 1920x1080
24.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1280x720
40.1
low 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
47.8
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
24
low 1920x1080
23.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
39.4
low 1920x1080
31.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
58.9
low 1920x1080
37.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
71
low 1920x1080
26.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (without FSR Upscaling) 1280x720
45.6
low 1920x1080
29.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
51
low 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
41.9
low 1920x1080
25 28 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21 26 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15 19 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14 17 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Basic Quality Preset T2X SMAA 1280x720
52
low 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
7.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
24.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
42.4 44.7 48 58.3 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
37 40.2 42 52.3 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.2 27.2 28 37.2 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.1 5.9 8.4 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
72.1
87.1
107.3
low 1920x1080
0 (!) 45.7 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
0 (!) 24.6 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
0 (!) 24.4 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
16.1 25.9 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Settings 1280x720
40.5
low 1920x1080
26.9 34.2 40 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.7 27 31.3 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.6 17.6 20.5 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.6 15.6 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
56.3
80.8
low 1920x1080
20.3 27 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15 24 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.2 15 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
37.1
Elex 2

Elex 2

2022
low 1920x1080
22.5 33.5 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.3 25.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.8 22.8 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
49.6 71 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36.5 53.4 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.4 40.4 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
68.3
low 1920x1080
39.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
29.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
19.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
16 21.7 23.9 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.6 17.5 18.9 ~ 16 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10 12.6 16.1 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
26.2
low 1280x720
39.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
102  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
57.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
38.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
92  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
56  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1280x720
104.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
40.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
34.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
50 58.5 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21 25.6 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18 21.8 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
30.9
low 1280x720
53.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Deathloop

Deathloop

2021
low 1280x720
45.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
103.8 109.5 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
44.4 47.3 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.2 36 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.1 14.7 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Days Gone

Days Gone

2021
low 1280x720
50  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
70  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
38.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
75.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Outriders

Outriders

2021
low 1280x720
35.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
27.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
low 1280x720
91.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
64.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
52  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
68.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
49  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
170.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
66.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
57.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
48.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
113  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
88.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
39.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
41.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low-End TAAAA 1920x1080
24.6
low 1280x720
58.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
102.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
44.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
132  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
86.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
36.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
34.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
70.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
49  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
32.3
low 1280x720
58  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
48  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
69.3 77 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.2 29 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.3 27 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.4 23 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
38.7
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
70.2 97.7 99.5 99.9 114.4 117.4 117.7 120.2 120.7 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.8 35.2 37.8 38.6 40 43 43.3 43.3 44.5 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.4 27.5 29.5 31.5 32.7 33.9 35 35.3 35.9 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.4 22.7 24.3 25.5 26.7 28.6 29 29.6 29.7 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
38 55 61 62 63 71 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18 26 29 30 31 33 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16 23 26 26 29 30 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16 22 25 26 27 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
37
low 1280x720
34.8 36 38.4 38.5 46.7 48.2 49.1 49.2 50.6 51.8 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.2 25 27.4 28.3 32 33.7 35.6 36.7 37.4 38.5 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.1 23 25.1 25.4 28.8 29.3 30.8 30.8 33.2 33.8 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
33.1 33.6 39.5 40.9 43.8 44.9 45.5 48.3 51.6 53.4 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16 16.2 19.8 19.8 20.7 21.9 23.7 23.8 24.3 24.7 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.1 11.4 14.5 15 15.2 16 16.3 17.2 17.4 17.9 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
93.7 101 103.6 108.6 109.3 114.5 121.1 121.1 135.9 144.9 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
72.2 74.4 78.6 83.6 91.1 94.4 98.5 99.3 107.7 107.9 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.4 47.1 49.2 50.7 59.1 61 63.1 64.9 65.8 70 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.8 41.3 42.7 43.8 48.4 52.9 53.9 55.4 55.7 60.8 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
32.2 61.7 76.8 82.2 86.7 90.5 93.2 98.2 ~ 78 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
40.2 44.7 45.9 46.8 52.5 52.6 58.5 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.5 19.7 22.6 23.7 25.7 27.1 27.6 28.6 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.3 12.6 14.4 15.3 15.3 17.8 17.9 17.9 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
28
28
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
92.6 93.8 109.7 118.8 128.8 128.9 132.5 133.9 142.9 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
80 83.6 98.7 99.7 103.2 116.1 118.5 120 124.9 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.1 23.6 31.2 32.4 33.9 36.4 40 40.5 40.7 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.7 10.3 14.1 14.2 14.5 15.3 17.2 18 18.9 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
78.8
102.2
60.2
101.6
83.9
92.3
60.8
92.8
76.7
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
86.4
105.4
61.6
105.7
87.4
91.4
59.3
93.4
77.9
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 243530235.6
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty2015119
Baldur's Gate 320141212
F1 2349.642.729.2
Diablo 434.627.62623.9
Star Wars Jedi Survivor11.510.2
Dead Island 236.830.122.314.6
The Last of Us17.713.211.1
Resident Evil 4 Remake20.114.7
Company of Heroes 323.72215.9
Sons of the Forest24.716.715.314.8
Atomic Heart2922.91310.2
Returnal161513
Hogwarts Legacy23.317.212.810.3
The Witcher 3 v4.0031.825.310.1
High On Life37.823.319.214.5
The Callisto Protocol26.718.517.910.3
Need for Speed Unbound29.324.118.617.6
Spider-Man Miles Morales27.322.620.2
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 202227241716
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection12.311.49.6
A Plague Tale Requiem9.437.836.74
The Quarry24.51814.4
F1 224843306
Vampire Bloodhunt23121222.4
Ghostwire Tokyo212423.9
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands34261713
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6242014
Elex 2282319
GRID Legends60453419.5
Elden Ring39.629.926.9
Dying Light 219.715.412.4
Rainbow Six Extraction453530
God of War21161310.8
Halo Infinite39.620.317.1
Farming Simulator 2210257.138.9
Forza Horizon 5923932
Riders Republic563023
Guardians of the Galaxy
Back 4 Blood104.340.434.3
Far Cry 654232018.3
Alan Wake Remastered53.632.726.4
Deathloop45.523.318.1
F1 2021107463614
Days Gone5025.322.2
Mass Effect Legendary Edition7038.9
Resident Evil Village75.333.429.9
Outriders35.330.427.9
Hitman 391.134.530.5
Yakuza Like a Dragon64.721.221.1
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla522619
Dirt 568.624.217.8
Watch Dogs Legion492622
Star Wars Squadrons170.466.657.4
Mafia Definitive Edition48.220.719.1
Serious Sam 411329.224.1
Crysis Remastered88.139.210.9
Flight Simulator 202041.614.210.4
Death Stranding58.130.629.1
F1 2020102.144.632.322.2
Gears Tactics13247.428.5
Doom Eternal86.936.234.2
Hunt Showdown70.824.219.2
Borderlands 34920.513.610.7
Far Cry New Dawn58322927
Metro Exodus4818.814.411.2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider73262218
Strange Brigade106393126
Far Cry 558282523
X-Plane 11.11443228
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark432115
Dota 2 Reborn115915749
The Witcher 378492415
GTA V1201053415
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
23
28
19
3
45
24
3
56
14

28
2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 04. 00:43:16

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 03 Jul 2025 17:16:38 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.035s ... 0.036s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.036s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11126 +0.036s ... 0.072s

#8 got single benchmarks 11126 +0.039s ... 0.111s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.111s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.375s ... 1.486s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.486s

#12 Got 529 rows for game benchmarks. +0.073s ... 1.559s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.559s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.053s ... 1.612s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.683s ... 2.295s

#16 return log +0.011s ... 2.306s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 660M graphics card

Asus ExpertBook B1 review – The business laptop with Win 11 Pro and a 3-year warranty for $750

Asus ExpertBook B1 review – The business laptop with Win 11 Pro and a 3-year warranty for $750

The new Asus ExpertBook B1 is an affordable 15-inch office laptop aimed at price-conscious users. Equipped with an AMD Ryzen 7 processor, upgradeable RAM, a Win...
AMD Ryzen 5 7535U | AMD Radeon 660M | 15.60" | 1.7 kg
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 AMD laptop review: Cuts corners (mostly) in the right places

Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 AMD laptop review: Cuts corners (mostly) in the right places

The second edition of the no-frills ThinkPad E16 now offers decent graphics performance. Apart from that, everything looks like a ThinkPad from the premium and,...
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS | AMD Radeon 660M | 16.00" | 1.9 kg
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 laptop review: Affordable AMD ThinkPad now much more modern

Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 laptop review: Affordable AMD ThinkPad now much more modern

With the 2024 update, Lenovo modernizes its L series in key aspects. This is especially true for the AMD variant: Finally, Lenovo abandons the Ryzen 5000 platfo...
AMD Ryzen 5 7535U | AMD Radeon 660M | 14.00" | 1.6 kg
GMK NucBox M6 review: A balanced mini PC for under $300

GMK NucBox M6 review: A balanced mini PC for under $300

You don't need the latest and greatest for most HTPC builds. The two-year old AMD Ryzen CPU is sufficient for common tasks while costing half as much as Zen 4 o...
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H | AMD Radeon 660M | 526 g
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G3 AMD Laptop Review: Already very good ThinkPad even better with Ryzen 6000

Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G3 AMD Laptop Review: Already very good ThinkPad even better with Ryzen 6000

The ThinkPad X13 Gen 2 AMD has already delivered a convincing outing with Ryzen 5000. Since last year, the same platform is available with Ryzen 6000. The compa...
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U | AMD Radeon 660M | 13.30" | 1.3 kg

Morefine M600, 6600U: AMD Ryzen 5 6600U, 0.8 kg
  Review » Morefine M600 6600U desktop PC review: The affordable mini PC with an AMD Ryzen 5 6600U with 32 GB RAM and USB4

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 AMD laptop review: Efficient and faster than Intel

HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H9EA: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » HP EliteBook 845 G9 laptop review: Also convincing with Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7: AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 laptop review: Ryzen 5 6600HS meets good 16:10 display

Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 laptop review: AMD's premium ThinkPad with long battery life

Asus Vivobook S 16 OLED M5606NA: AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S 16 OLED M5606NA

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G7 ARP: AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G7 ARP

Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE: AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE

HP EliteBook 645 G11: AMD Ryzen 5 7535U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 645 G11

Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED M5506NA: AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, 15.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED M5506NA

HP Pavilion Aero 13-be2000: AMD Ryzen 5 7535U, 13.30", 1 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Aero 13-be2000

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ARH7, R5 6600HS: AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ARH7, R5 6600HS

Acer Swift Edge SFA16-41, Ryzen 5 6600U: AMD Ryzen 5 6600U, 16.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Edge SFA16-41, Ryzen 5 6600U

Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G4 ARB, Ryzen 5 6600U: AMD Ryzen 5 6600U, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G4 ARB, Ryzen 5 6600U

Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G4 ARB-21AS0006GE: AMD Ryzen 5 6600U, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G4 ARB-21AS0006GE

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7: AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7

Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW

Asus ZenBook S 13 UM5302TA: AMD Ryzen 5 6600U, 13.30", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook S 13 UM5302TA

Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE: AMD Ryzen 5 7535U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5: The only modern 14-inch ThinkPad with three USB-A ports

Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G3 21CM002UGE: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, 13.30", 1.3 kg
   » Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Gen 3 with AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U discounted by $323 in limited-time sale

   » Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G3 AMD: A good choice even in 2023

   » Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Gen 3 with AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U, 16GB RAM and 1TB SSD discounted by 66%

Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, 13.30", 1.2 kg
   » New Lenovo ThinkPad Z series feature haptic Sensel trackpad for the first time

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, 16.00", 1.8 kg
   » Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 AMD tested: Significantly faster and more efficient than Intel version

Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, 13.30", 1.2 kg
   » Lenovo ThinkPad Z13: The integrated TrackPoint buttons might succeed this time around

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2022-01- 4)