Notebookcheck

Intel HD Graphics 4600

Intel HD Graphics 4600

The Intel HD Graphics 4600 (GT2) is a processor graphics card included in some of the Haswell processors of 2013. The base clock can be automatically overclocked using Turbo Boost technology.
Depending on the processor model, the base and turbo clock rates may differ greatly resulting in varying graphics performance between CPU models.

In comparison to the HD 4000, the graphics core has been modified extensively. The GPU supports DirectX 11.1, OpenCL 1.2 and OpenGL 4.0. It also features an improved decoder for 4K videos and the fast Quick Sync encoder.

According to Intel benchmarks in 3DMark 11, the HD Graphics 4600 will be up to 60 percent faster than the previous HD 4000. In our gaming benchmarks, however, the improvement was only about 30 percent. This performance boost is achieved by architectural improvements and an increased number of execution units: The GT2 version integrates 20 EUs, compared to 16 EUs for the old HD 4000. Thus, the HD 4600 not only matches some dedicated GPUs such as the GeForce GT 620M/630M, but also competes with the fastest integrated AMD GPUs like the Radeon HD 8650G.

Due to the 22nm 3D Tri-Gate production process, power consumption should be relatively low. The HD Graphics 4600 can be found on dual- and quad-core Haswell models in the 37 - 57 Watt TDP range.

ManufacturerIntel
HD Graphics Series
HD Graphics P530 (compare) 24 @ 350 - 1050 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5600 (compare) 24 @ 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 6000 (compare) 48 @ 300 - 1000 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4600 20 @ 200 - 1350 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5500 (compare) 24 @ 300 - 950 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5000 (compare) 40 @ 200 - 1100 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4400 (compare) 20 @ 200 - 1100 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5300 (compare) 24 @ 100 - 900 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4000 (compare) 16 @ 350 - 1350 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Broadwell) (compare) 12 @ 100 - 850 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4200 (compare) 20 @ 200 - 850 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Skylake) (compare) 12 @ 300 - 800 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) (compare) 16 @ 320 - 700 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Braswell) (compare) 16 @ 320 - 700 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) (compare) 12 @ 320 - 640 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Haswell) (compare) 10 @ 200 - 1000 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (compare) 16 @ 200 - 600 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 3000 (compare) 12 @ 350 - 1350 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2500 (compare) 6 @ 650 - 1150 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (compare) 6 @ 350 - 1100 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2000 (compare) 6 @ 850/1100 - 1350 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (compare) 6 @ 350 - 1100 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (compare) 4 @ 311 - 896 (Boost) MHz32/64/128 Bit
CodenameHaswell GT2
ArchitectureHaswell
Pipelines20 - unified
Core Speed200 - 1350 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
DirectXDirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0
technology22 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement01.06.2013
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-4790K4 x 4000 MHz, 88 W350 MHz1250 MHz
Intel Core i7-47904 x 3600 MHz, 84 W350 MHz1200 MHz
Intel Core i7-4770K4 x 3500 MHz, 84 W400 MHz1200 MHz
» show 39 more
min. - max.200 - 400 MHz900 - 1350 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 42224     avg: 42242.5     median: 42242.5 (9%)     max: 42261 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 20937     avg: 25955.7     median: 22583 (3%)     max: 34347 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 3322     avg: 5276.2     median: 5040.5 (10%)     max: 7233 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 3892     avg: 5864.8     median: 5613 (3%)     max: 7536 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 432     avg: 650.3     median: 592.5 (3%)     max: 904 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 499     avg: 702.9     median: 635.5 (2%)     max: 978 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 31725     avg: 47455.3     median: 48631 (6%)     max: 64426 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 655     avg: 1059.9     median: 1041 (4%)     max: 1464 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 572     avg: 925.9     median: 910.5 (2%)     max: 1258 points
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
min: 18916     avg: 21325.7     median: 22200 (12%)     max: 22861 Points
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 13616     avg: 15057.7     median: 15760 (34%)     max: 15797 Points
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - DX 11, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
min: 13.5     avg: 14.4     median: 14.4 (5%)     max: 15.2 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - OpenGL, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
min: 15.2     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (9%)     max: 15.8 fps
SPECviewperf 11
Siemens NX 1920x1080 +
Tcvis 1920x1080 +
SolidWorks 1920x1080 +
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 +
Maya 1920x1080 +
Lightwave 1920x1080 +
Ensight 1920x1080 +
Catia 1920x1080 +
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 +
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 +
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 +
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 +
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 +
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 +
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 +
Windows 7 Experience Index - Gaming graphics
min: 6.5     avg: 6.6     median: 6.5 (82%)     max: 6.7 points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Graphics
min: 5     avg: 5.5     median: 5.2 (66%)     max: 6.7 points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 +
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
min: 166     avg: 197     median: 185 (4%)     max: 252 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 262     avg: 305.5     median: 284.5 (3%)     max: 391 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
min: 665     avg: 740.6     median: 767 (3%)     max: 816 Points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
16.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
21.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Destiny 2

Destiny 2

2017
low 1280x720
13.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
10.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
9.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 18

FIFA 18

2017
low 1280x720
59.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
9.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
19  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
70  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
65.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
25.8 30.9 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1366x768
14.2
low 1280x720
43.6 70.8 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.3 24.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
36.9
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
16.7 23.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.5 9.3 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF FXAA 1366x768
17.4
low 1280x720
14.3 15.2 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / On (100 % Gameplay Resolution) MediumAA 1366x768
10.8
low 1280x720
0 (!) 11.6 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset (Resolution Scale Mode off) FXAA 1366x768
0 (!)
low 1280x720
9.4 11.3 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset FXAA 1366x768
6.8
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
11.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
29.5 32.6 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.5 14 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Off FXAA 1366x768
24.3
low 1280x720
0 (!) 9.9 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
0 (!) 8.3 ~ 4 fps    + Compare
low 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1280x720
0 (!) 16.4 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
0 (!) 13.9 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
25.9 30 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.8 18.7 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Disabled 4xAF 1920x1080
11
low 1280x720
69.3 71.1 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.9 47 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11 18.9 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8 11.1 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
25.1
low 1280x720
18 24.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.8 15 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset FXAA 1920x1080
8.9
low 1024x768
24.2 30.9 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.1 10 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Mafia 3

Mafia 3

2016
low 1280x720
5.8 7.8 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 17

FIFA 17

2016
low 1280x720
55 59.1 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42.2 43 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
9.4 11.1 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
0 (!) 12 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
3840x2160
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium 4x AF Off AA 1920x1080
0 (!)
low 1280x720
15.7 21.3 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.9 12.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
34.7 42.3 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.4 24.8 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
14.6
low 1280x720
14.3 16.5 (!) ~ 15 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8.7 9.7 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.1 10.4 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10.8 14 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
11 15 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5 7 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
8
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
11.3 16.8 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TrilinearAF 1920x1080
7.1
low 1024x768
15 15.5 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.9 9.7 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
18.9 25.7 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12 14.6 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
16.2 19.3 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.3 15.1 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
21.5 30.8 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.6 16.8 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.1 7.9 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
6.5 7.1 (!) ~ 7 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
4.6 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
low 1280x720
15.8 19.8 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.4 12.4 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.4 6.8 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
20.7 26.1 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.7 15 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
12.8 14.4 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
5.2 6.5 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
3 3.7 ~ 3 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
41.1 77.1 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
24.6 37.4 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.8 20.3 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1366x768
41.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
29.9 45.1 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.2 28.2 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.4 9.9 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
13.2 19.2 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.7 8.3 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.9 7.2 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
99.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
62.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
11 12 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9 10 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
10.7 13.1 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.6 8.4 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
3.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
77.7 125.8 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.3 25.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.5 12.7 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5 12.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
19.4 33.3 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.5 29.4 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.3 5.7 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
29.8 32.1 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.3 22.1 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.2 9.9 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
11.9 14.7 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.6 11 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Crew

The Crew

2014
low 1280x720
16.8 29 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.8 20.1 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
22.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
17.9 19.9 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12 14.3 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.6 7 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
7 8.5 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
4.6 5.4 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
29.1 33.4 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.4 17.4 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.9 10.1 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
34.3 37 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13 13.7 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.4 8.9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
42 81 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30 54 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19 28 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12 13 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
13.2 16.9 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.9 11.8 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
12.5 13.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.2 9.2 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
29.7 42 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.5 26 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.9 13.4 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.8 8.8 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
18 26.8 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
12 17.4 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
low 1280x720
39 52.3 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.6 36 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.1 20.9 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
130.4 139.8 146.3 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.4 32.5 40.3 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.6 18.8 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.5 12.4 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
20.5 41.8 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14 23.8 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.7 8.3 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
79.7 80.9 98.4 119.5 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.6 28 36.6 45.8 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.3 17.2 19.7 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5 12.5 12.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
24.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
3.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
36.4 42.3 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
33.6 37.2 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.1 14.2 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
56.9 60.8 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.8 31.3 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.6 19.3 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Titanfall

Titanfall

2014
low 1024x768
39.6 46.4 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.8 23.3 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.3 14.4 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
13.6 13.7 14.3 14.9 16.2 16.5 19.1 21.3 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8 8 8.2 9.1 9.3 9.3 11 12.2 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
5.1 7.3 7.5 7.5 9.1 9.9 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
24.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
35.5 51.2 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21 28.8 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8.1 12.1 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
14.3 20.1 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.4 15.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8.8 12.7 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
40.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
36.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
56  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
low 1024x768
40 50 90 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26 31 52 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22 25 36 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
low 1024x768
112 226 ~ 169 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
64.5 85.8 116.4 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
41.9 49.4 86 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
32 35.4 35.9 52.1 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23 24 26.7 39 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18 18.8 27.7 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6 8.1 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
21.1 30.9 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.7 22.4 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
39.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
41.5 72.3 74.5 98.3 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.5 30.3 47 59.7 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.4 23.9 24.4 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
14.7 15 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11 11.4 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
6 6.6 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
50 54.2 56.4 63.7 84.5 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27 29.3 29.8 34.6 43.9 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.7 19.7 22.7 23 25.3 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
16 34 34 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12 23.3 23.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8 13.2 13.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4 6.5 6.6 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
23 24.1 27.2 28.2 29.3 30 34.7 35.2 40.7 43 44 46 52.4 57 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12 12.6 14.2 14.6 15 15.9 16.6 16.9 19.6 20.7 22.2 22.3 24.4 25.7 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.5 11.7 11.9 12 12.3 13.4 13.8 16.1 17.5 17.7 18.7 20.5 21.8 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.3 6.6 7 12.2 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
253  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
52  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
33  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
SimCity

SimCity

2013
low 1024x768
50.2 97.6 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.2 21.7 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
32.9 36.3 39.6 40.6 40.9 41.6 42.3 46.2 48.3 52.3 52.6 53 57.6 64.8 65.8 66.5 72.9 74.4 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.8 19.5 19.9 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.3 21.9 22.9 23.8 23.9 24.1 26.8 30.4 30.4 32.1 32.5 34.5 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8.9 10.3 10.8 11.2 11.2 11.5 12.2 12.3 12.8 13 13 13 14.6 15.2 17.2 17.6 18.2 19.7 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!) 4.3 8.5 ~ 4 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
16.8 30.4 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
101.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
31.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Far Cry 3

Far Cry 3

2012
low 1024x768
38.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
19.4 21.2 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13 14.5 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
5.4 9.2 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
34.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
24.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
25.9 57.9 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.7 43.8 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.1 38.5 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.7  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
186.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
99.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
49 55.5 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26 28.3 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
30.1 45.5 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.2 32.8 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.7 12.6 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.5  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1366x768
49.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
45.1 72 72.9 78 82.2 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.6 45.1 46 50.3 51 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23.2 38 38.8 42 42.6 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.9 24 24 26 26.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
0 (!) 29.7 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
32.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
47.6 55 59 66.1 77.1 92.3 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.6 25.5 27.4 28.3 35.1 42.1 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15.4 16.3 16.7 17.6 21.7 25.4 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
29.3 31.9 33 48 51.1 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14 15 15.5 23 24.2 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8 8.4 13 13.8 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4 7.3 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
141.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
63.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
27.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
20.4 32.4 35 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14 22.7 23.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18 18.6 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.7 7 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
66  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
47  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
84.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
36.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
med. 1024x768
61.3  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
27.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
low 1024x768
0 (!) 66.1 137.9 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
Additional Benchmarks
CPU 1280x1024
13.3
Civilization 5

Civilization 5

2010
low 1024x768
55.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
med. 1024x768
34.5  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
27.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
142.7 198 ~ 170 fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
38.6 48 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
26  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 800x600
40.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
20.6 24.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1600x900
12.1 16.5 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
96.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
74.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
56.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
175  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
39.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
50.5  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
27.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
46.4  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
24.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
100.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
56.6 69 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
11.2 34 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2017, 2016
v1.8

Notebook reviews with Intel HD Graphics 4600 graphics card

Fujitsu LifeBook A544: Intel Core i5-4200M, 15.6", 2.2 kg
  Review » Review Fujitsu LifeBook A544 Notebook

Fujitsu Lifebook E544: Intel Core i5-4210M, 14", 2.1 kg
  Review » Fujitsu Lifebook E544 Notebook Review

Fujitsu LifeBook E554: Intel Core i5-4210M, 15.6", 2.3 kg
  Review » Fujitsu Lifebook E554 Notebook Review

Fujitsu Lifebook E734: Intel Core i5-4200M, 13.3", 1.7 kg
  Review » Fujitsu Lifebook E734 (E7340MXEA1DE) Notebook Review Update

Fujitsu LifeBook E744: Intel Core i7-4702MQ, 14", 1.7 kg
  Review » Fujitsu Lifebook E744 (E7440MXP11DE) Notebook Review Update

Fujitsu Lifebook E754: Intel Core i7-4702MQ, 15.6", 1.9 kg
  Review » Fujitsu LifeBook E754 (E7540MXP11DE) Notebook Review Update

Fujitsu LifeBook T734: Intel Core i5-4200M, 12.5", 2 kg
  Review » Fujitsu LifeBook T734 Convertible Review

HP ProBook 450 G1 E9Y58EA: Intel Core i7-4702MQ, 15.6", 2.4 kg
  Review » Review Update HP ProBook 450 G1 E9Y58EA Notebook

HP ProBook 640 G1 H5G66ET: Intel Core i5-4200M, 14", 2.1 kg
  Review » Review HP ProBook 640 G1 H5G66ET Notebook

HP ProBook 650 G1 H5G74E: Intel Core i3-4000M, 15.6", 2.3 kg
  Review » Review HP ProBook 650 G1 H5G74E Notebook

HP ProBook 650-H5G81ET: Intel Core i5-4200M, 15.6", 2.3 kg
  Review » HP ProBook 650 H5G81ET Notebook Review Update

Lenovo G510-59416358: Intel Core i5-4200M, 15.6", 2.5 kg
  Review » Lenovo G510 Notebook Review

Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E540 20C60041: Intel Core i3-4000M, 15.6", 2.5 kg
  Review » Review Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E540 20C60041 Notebook

Lenovo Thinkpad L440: Intel Core i5-4330M, 14", 2.3 kg
  Review » Review Lenovo ThinkPad L440 Notebook

Lenovo ThinkPad L440 20AT004QGE: Intel Core i5-4300M, 14", 2.1 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad L440 20AT004QGE Notebook Review Update

Lenovo ThinkPad L540 20AV002YGE: Intel Core i5-4200M, 15.6", 2.3 kg
  Review » Review Lenovo ThinkPad L540 20AV002YGE Notebook

Nexoc B509II Ultra: Intel Core i7-4702MQ, 15.6", 2.2 kg
  Review » Review Nexoc B509II Ultra (Clevo W550SU) Notebook

Schenker B713: Intel Core i5-4310M, 17.3", 3.1 kg
  Review » Review Clevo W670SZQ1 (Schenker B713) Barebones Notebook

Toshiba Portege R30-A-15C: Intel Core i7-4600M, 13.3", 1.4 kg
  Review » Toshiba Portégé R30-A-15C Notebook Review

Toshiba Satellite P75-A7200: Intel Core i7-4700MQ, 17.3", 2.9 kg
  Review » Review Toshiba Satellite P75-A7200 Notebook

Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B451JA-WO076G: Intel Core i5-4210M, 14", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B451JA-WO076G

Asus K750JA: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 17.3", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Asus K750JA

Fujitsu LifeBook A544: Intel Core i5-4200M, 15.6", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu LifeBook A544

Fujitsu Lifebook E544: Intel Core i5-4210M, 14", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu Lifebook E544

Fujitsu LifeBook E554: Intel Core i5-4210M, 15.6", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu LifeBook E554

Fujitsu LifeBook E744: Intel Core i5-4200M, 14", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu LifeBook E744

Fujitsu LifeBook T734: Intel Core i5-4200M, 12.5", 2 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu LifeBook T734

HP ProBook 640-F1Q08ES: Intel Core i7-4702MQ, 14", 2 kg
  External Review » HP ProBook 640-F1Q08ES

HP ProBook 450 G1: Intel Core i5-4200M, 15.6", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP ProBook 450 G1

HP Spectre 13t-3000: Intel Core i5-4200U, 13.3", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre 13t-3000

HP Split 13-m115sg x2: Intel Core i5-4200U, 13.3", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Split 13-m115sg x2

Lenovo G410-59410763: Intel Core i3-4000M, 14", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo G410-59410763

Lenovo G510-59416358: Intel Core i5-4200M, 15.6", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo G510

Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E540 20C60041: Intel Core i3-4000M, 15.6", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E540 20C60041

Lenovo ThinkPad L540-20AU002QGE: Intel Core i5-4330M, 15.6", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad L540-20AU002QGE

Medion Akoya E6241-MD98562: Intel Core i3-4100M, 15.6", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya E6241-MD98562

MSI CR61-i5U45FHDW7: Intel Core i5-4200M, 15.6", 2.5 kg
  External Review » MSI CR61-i5U45FHDW7

MSI CR70 2M: Intel Core i3-4100M, 17.3", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI CR70 2M

MSI CX61-20D-011UK: Intel Core i7-4702MQ, 15.6", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI CX61-20D-011UK

Samsung 940X5J-K01US: Intel Core i5-4200U, 15.6", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Samsung 940X5J-K01US

Toshiba Portege R30-A-13C: Intel Core i5-4200M, 13.3", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portege R30-A-13C

Toshiba Portege R30-A-14K: Intel Core i3-4000M, 13.3", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portege R30-A-14K

Toshiba Portege R30-A-15C: Intel Core i7-4600M, 13.3", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portege R30-A-15C

Toshiba Portege R30-A-17H: Intel Core i3-4100M, 13.3", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portege R30-A-17H

Toshiba Portege R30-A-17R: Intel Core i5-4210M, 13.3", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portege R30-A-17R

Toshiba Portege R30-A1302: Intel Core i7-4600M, 13.3", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portege R30-A1302

Toshiba Satellite C75-A-13P: Intel Core i5-4200M, 17.3", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite C75-A-13P

Toshiba Satellite P50-A-13C: Intel Core i7-4700MQ, 15.6", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P50-A-13C

Toshiba Satellite P75-A7200: Intel Core i7-4700MQ, 17.3", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P75-A7200

Toshiba Satellite Pro C50-A-1KV: Intel Core i5-4200M, 15.6", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite Pro C50-A-1KV

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1
Class 2
GeForce GTX 580
Radeon HD 6970
GeForce GTX 570
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Radeon HD 5850
Radeon HD 7770
Radeon HD 7770
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Radeon HD 6790
Radeon HD 5770
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Radeon HD 4850
Class 3
GeForce GTS 450
Radeon HD 5670
GeForce GT 240
GeForce GT 430
Class 4
Radeon HD 5570
GeForce GT 220
Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
Class 5
Radeon HD 4350
GeForce G 107M *
Chrome9HD *
Class 6
unknown *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > Intel HD Graphics 4600
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2016-01-26)