Notebookcheck

NVIDIA Quadro M2200

NVIDIA Quadro M2200

The Nvidia Quadro M2200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built most likely on the GM206 chip with 1024 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (second generation). The Quadro M2200M is built for the Intel Kaby Lake generation.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The maximum core clock of the Quadro M2200 is 1038 MHz. The performance is between the old Quadro M2000M and Quadro M3000M, but generally closer to the latter (sometimes even on par). It is not surprising that the gaming performance is comparable to the Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (Ti) and it is just behind the new GeForce GTX 1050 (Pascal).

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M2200 can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M2200 is rated at a TGP of 55 Watt (39.1 Watt TDP) – similar to the previous Quadro M2000M – and therefore best suited for 15-inch laptops and up.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1139 - 1140 MHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 962 - 1051 MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 975 - 1013 MHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1050 MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 694 - 1038 MHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 991 - 1150 MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1038 - 1197 MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 993 - 1072 MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1018 MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 475 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 756 - 1019 MHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 837 - 876 MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1029 - 1124 MHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 405 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 700 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameN17P-Q3
ArchitectureMaxwell
Pipelines1024 - unified
Core Speed694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed5508 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0
Transistor Count4940 Million
technology28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement13.01.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.de/object/mobile-works...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
23.4 pt (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5232     avg: 5253     median: 5252 (17%)     max: 5275 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 23.2     avg: 26.4     median: 27.9 (15%)     max: 28.1 fps
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
specvp11 sw-02 +
specvp11 proe-05 +
specvp11 maya-03 +
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
specvp11 ensight-04 +
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
specvp12 snx-02 +
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
83.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
37.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
78  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.3 54.8 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.5 51.9 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.2 37.5 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
139.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
105.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
123 128.7 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
68.5 71.6 72.8 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.4 40.7 41.6 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33 34.4 35.2 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
214.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
131.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
148.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
119  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
56.4  fps    + Compare