Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 740M

AMD Radeon 740M

The AMD Radeon 740M is an integrated GPU in the Ryzen 7040 series for laptops (Phoenix, e.g. Ryzen 5 7540U). The iGPU is based on the new RDNA3 architecture and has only 4 of the 12 CUs (= 256 shaders) clocked at up to 2.5 GHz (depending on the CPU model). The 740M supports hardware raytracing, although the performance is too slow to use it in current games.

Due to the reduced core count and clock speed, the performance is clearly below the Radeon 760M and 780M.

Thanks to the modern 4nm process and clever power-saving features, the power consumption is comparatively low (according to AMD). The whole chip of the first two models can be configured between 15 - 30 Watt TDP.

AMD Radeon 700M Series

Radeon 780M compare 768 @ 1.5 - 3 GHz
Radeon 760M compare 512 @ 1.5 - 2.8 GHz
Radeon 740M 256 @ 1.5 - 2.5 GHz
CodenamePhoenix
ArchitectureRDNA 3
Pipelines256 - unified
Raytracing Cores4
Core Speed1500 - 2500 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 2.1, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption30 Watt (30 - 15 Watt TGP)
technology4 nm
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesMiracast, FreeSync, Adaptive-Sync, UHBR10, HDR Metadata, SmartShift MAX, SmartAccess Memory, 8k60 AV1, 8k43 H.265, 4k175 H.264 De- and Encode
Date of Announcement23.05.2023
CPU in Radeon 740MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen Z16 x 3200 MHz, 30 W? MHz? MHz
AMD Ryzen 5 2206 x 3200 MHz, 28 W? MHz2800 MHz
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2206 x 3200 MHz, 28 W? MHz2800 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2500 - 2800 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1.8 pt (5%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1293     avg: 1668     median: 1802 (5%)     max: 1909 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1136     avg: 1478     median: 1600 (3%)     max: 1699 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 21552     avg: 21931     median: 21931 (21%)     max: 22310 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 30354     avg: 30557     median: 30557 (8%)     max: 30760 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3123     avg: 4110     median: 4525 (7%)     max: 4681 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3421     avg: 4466     median: 4843 (4%)     max: 5135 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 182534     avg: 208348     median: 208348 (23%)     max: 234161 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 5611     avg: 6946     median: 7334 (9%)     max: 7892 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 5457     avg: 6626     median: 6932 (5%)     max: 7490 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
24621 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
21237 Points (12%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 29777     avg: 30167     median: 30166.5 (39%)     max: 30556 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
14024 points (10%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 100.8     avg: 134.7     median: 142.2 (8%)     max: 161.2 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
16.3 fps (6%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
37.4 fps (7%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
99.4 fps (7%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
104.6 fps (3%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 10125     avg: 11813     median: 12414 (3%)     max: 12901 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 12189     avg: 14361     median: 14612 (4%)     max: 16282 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
364 Samples/s (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
739 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4080 points (3%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.8     avg: 39.3     median: 39.3 (5%)     max: 41.8 Watt
0510152025303540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 39.1     avg: 41.5     median: 42.5 (13%)     max: 43 Watt
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39     avg: 39.1     median: 39.1 (5%)     max: 39.1 Watt
0510152025303540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.2062     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (1%)     max: 0.2583 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
low 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
5.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
23.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
25.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
10.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
7.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
13.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080 cinem.
7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
6.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
4.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
3.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
24.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
30.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
33.5 41 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.3 35 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
18.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
38.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
25.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
129.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
93.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
87.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
34.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
32.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
25.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
9.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
7.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
58.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
72.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
59.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
18.2 20.5 21.5 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.8 16 16.5 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.3 13.3 13.8 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.3 10.4 10.6 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
9.5
10.1
8
low 1920x1080
16.3 20.2 21.7 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.5 16.4 16.4 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.3 12 13.5 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.1 10.8 12.8 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
33.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
17.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
37.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
22.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
109.7 126.8 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42.6 46.6 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.5 36.9 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.1 30.3 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
32.6 32.9 36.3 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.1 25.7 27.3 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.3 20.7 21.9 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
35.3 50.7 51.4 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.9 23.1 23.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.6 17.4 17.6 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
116.7 118.1 120.9 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
88.6 100.1 103.1 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.2 63 68.2 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.5 53.7 58.9 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
101.1 133.1 135.8 ~ 123 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
88.6 118 124.4 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.5 41.4 44.8 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.2 13.1 18.5 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
92.6
64
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
60.6
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle9.89
Stalker 210.28.276.675.5
Call of Duty Black Ops 627231413
Until Dawn23.915.39.826.94
EA Sports FC 254635.725.824.4
God of War Ragnarök19.914.311.910.5
Final Fantasy XVI10.19.638.897.82
Space Marine 213.710.49.718.78
Star Wars Outlaws7.046.354.863.92
Once Human24.717.913.412.4
The First Descendant30.618.413.611.5
F1 243732242
Senua's Saga Hellblade 28.067.965.77
Ghost of Tsushima18.515.712.99.53
Dragon's Dogma 212.311.5
Horizon Forbidden West18.115.41110.6
Last Epoch38.832.125.116.7
Helldivers 219.214.712.912.3
Enshrouded11.410.58.345.79
Palworld4235.217.315.4
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown129.593.187.4
Ready or Not34.327.318.211.1
The Finals32.929.625.819.5
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora9.58.57.16.9
Alan Wake 2119.318.49
Lords of the Fallen13.912.8107.65
Total War Pharaoh58.241.12216.7
Assassin's Creed Mirage28232216
Counter-Strike 272.759.930.120.9
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty20151210
Baldur's Gate 319151211
Lies of P27.323.720.119
The Crew Motorfest22201613
Armored Core 633.325.122.517.8
Atlas Fallen22.921.419.214.8
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart18.5
Resident Evil 4 Remake17.913.511.4
Company of Heroes 337.129.422.822.6
Atomic Heart3122.813.112.9
Returnal18171411
Hogwarts Legacy22.216.512.89.94
Strange Brigade118453629
X-Plane 11.11342621
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark462116
Dota 2 Reborn119976153
GTA V1231103814
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
28
13
3
1
33
7
2
1
39
3
2
36
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 20. 15:04:04

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 19 May 2025 05:31:39 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.032s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.032s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11588 +0.034s ... 0.066s

#8 got single benchmarks 11588 +0.017s ... 0.083s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.083s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.635s ... 0.718s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.718s

#12 Got 220 rows for game benchmarks. +0.023s ... 0.741s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.741s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.027s ... 0.768s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.337s ... 1.106s

#16 return log +0.005s ... 1.11s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-05-10)