Notebookcheck Logo

Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

The Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 (Rocket-Lake GPU with 16 EUs) is a integrated graphics card in the low end Tiger Lake-H CPUs. It is using the new Xe architecture (Gen12) and was announced in May 2021. This variant only uses 16 of the 32 EUs in the chip (=128 shaders) and therefore is significantly slower than the 32 EU version.

Compared to the previous generation of UHD Graphics ,the Xe architecture and the improved shader count lead to a big leap in graphics performance.

Gen. 12 / Xe Series

Iris Xe G7 96EUs compare 96 @ 0.4 - 1.35 GHz
Iris Xe G7 80EUs compare 80 @ 0.4 - 1.35 GHz
UHD Graphics 64EUs compare 64 @ 1.4 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compare 48 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
UHD Graphics 32EUs compare 32 @ 1.25 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compare 32 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compare 32 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) compare 24 @ 0.45 - 0.75 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 16 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
CodenameTiger Lake Xe
ArchitectureGen. 12
Pipelines16 - unified
Core Speed350 - 1450 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
technology10 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement30.03.2021
CPU in UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-13650HX14 x 1900 MHz, 55 W? MHz1550 MHz
Intel Core i5-13500HX14 x 1800 MHz, 55 W? MHz1500 MHz
Intel Core i5-14450HX10 x 1800 MHz, 55 W? MHz1500 MHz
min. - max.? - 350 MHz750 - 1550 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.5 pt (1%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 359     avg: 398.7     median: 404 (1%)     max: 433 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 313     avg: 344.7     median: 348 (1%)     max: 373 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 52786     avg: 61319     median: 64701 (7%)     max: 66471 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 19751     avg: 22257     median: 22256.5 (3%)     max: 24762 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 6660     avg: 8390     median: 8223 (8%)     max: 10288 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 7779     avg: 8628     median: 7982 (2%)     max: 10124 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1022     avg: 1157     median: 1151 (2%)     max: 1298 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1089     avg: 1220     median: 1203 (1%)     max: 1368 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 22104     avg: 37415     median: 35681 (4%)     max: 54459 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1684     avg: 1865     median: 1933 (2%)     max: 1979 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1474     avg: 1602     median: 1654 (1%)     max: 1679 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 5508     avg: 6769     median: 7190 (2%)     max: 7609 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 4561     avg: 5372     median: 5589 (3%)     max: 5966 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 15740     avg: 19694     median: 19694 (22%)     max: 23648 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 9852     avg: 11702     median: 12452 (16%)     max: 12803 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 4.4     avg: 4.8     median: 4.8 (1%)     max: 5.1 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
25.7 fps (6%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
3.6 fps (1%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
6.6 fps (1%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
2.8 fps (1%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
12.8 fps (3%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
0.2 fps (0%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
4 fps (2%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
14.6 fps (2%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
16.8 fps (3%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
34.1 fps (9%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
6.5 fps (1%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
6.6 fps (1%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
2.6 fps (0%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
18.8 fps (2%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
12.8 fps (2%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
21.5 fps (2%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
16.7 fps (3%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4461     avg: 9517     median: 12011 (9%)     max: 12078 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 23.53     avg: 36.2     median: 41.6 (14%)     max: 43.57 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 30.59     avg: 42     median: 46.3 (3%)     max: 49.1 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
11.4 fps (2%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
33.6 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
31.1 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
41.9 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
77.3 fps (3%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
123.6 fps (1%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
52.8 fps (1%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
4.1 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 3191     avg: 3474     median: 3473.5 (1%)     max: 3756 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 3619     avg: 3947     median: 3946.5 (1%)     max: 4274 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
292 Samples/s (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
601 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 634     avg: 726     median: 745 (1%)     max: 800 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 18.5     avg: 24.6     median: 23.4 (3%)     max: 31.8 Watt
0510152025303540Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
27.5 Watt (4%)
05101520253035Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 30.6     avg: 37.7     median: 37.7 (8%)     max: 44.8 Watt
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra
0.2 fps per Watt (15%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (15%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
33.2 dB(A) (53%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

med. 1920x1080
39.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
19
low 1920x1080
5 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Preset 1280x720
10 (!)
low 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset LowAA 1280x720
10.2
low 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
32.4
low 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Adaptive Quality Off) 1280x720
10
low 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
20.4
low 1920x1080
23.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
28.6
low 1920x1080
4.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
8.6
Steam Deck 1280x800
9.8
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
5.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
7.6
low 1920x1080
10.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
17.3
low 1920x1080
5.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
10.4
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
22.1
Diablo 4

Diablo 4

2023
low 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
20.7
low 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
19.5
low 1920x1080
3.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
5.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1280x720
9.5
low 1920x1080
6.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
9.8
low 1920x1080
3.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
17.5
low 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
15.5
low 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
10.8
low 1920x1080
6.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
10.3
low 1920x1080
3.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
4.9
low 1920x1080
4.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
3.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
4.8
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
23.7
low 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
32.2
low 1920x1080
5.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Settings 1280x720
10.1
low 1920x1080
7.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
14
low 1920x1080
20.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
29.3
low 1920x1080
10.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
17.5
low 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
11.1
low 1280x720
34.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
23
low 1280x720
23  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
12
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
9
low 1280x720
19  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
9.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
12.7
low 1280x720
21.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
11.7
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
34 36.6 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
48.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
28.9
Days Gone

Days Gone

2021
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
8.8
Outriders

Outriders

2021
low 1280x720
22  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
16
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
low 1280x720
22.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920x1080
12.1
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
14.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
44.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
33.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
6.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
27.2 27.2 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.4 11.4 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
9.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low-End TAAAA 1920x1080
6.4
low 1280x720
14  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
8.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
38.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13.4 14.4 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
3.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
9.5
8.8
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
15.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
4.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
25.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
28.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
10.6
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
31 31.5 33.9 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.7 12 12.3 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.9 11 11.9 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7 13.8 15 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
16 18 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
7 8 ~ 8 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
9
8
low 1280x720
14.7 18.4 18.8 29.1 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.1 14.8 16.8 17.2 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.9 13.7 15.4 15.8 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.1 14 14.6 14.9 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.8 6.6 6.9 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.2 4.7 4.8 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
53.2 98.7 108 114 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.6 53.7 57 58.1 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.5 22.6 23.1 23.8 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.1 20.9 21.5 22 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
24.5 27 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.3 9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
9.8
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
59.3 62.8 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
46.9 50 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.6 9.2 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.5 3.6 ~ 4 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
26.8
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
32.2
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown39.926.924.8
Ready or Not9.74
The Finals9.88
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 20235
EA Sports WRC6.6
Total War Pharaoh17.813.5
Assassin's Creed Mirage6
EA Sports FC 2410.7
Counter-Strike 223.416.79
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty4.66
Lies of P5.35
Armored Core 610.1
Atlas Fallen5.42
F1 2310.69.616.53
Diablo 411.2
Dead Island 29.62
The Last of Us3.32
Resident Evil 4 Remake5.59
Atomic Heart6.75
Dead Space Remake3.53
The Witcher 3 v4.009.76
High On Life9.8
Need for Speed Unbound6.23
Spider-Man Miles Morales6.71
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection3.4
A Plague Tale Requiem4.13
The Quarry3.52
F1 2212.110.97.736.02
Vampire Bloodhunt18.610.9
Ghostwire Tokyo5.73
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands7.5
GRID Legends20.115.5
Elden Ring10.3
God of War6.41
Farming Simulator 2234.714
Forza Horizon 5239
Riders Republic13
Back 4 Blood199.27
Alan Wake Remastered21.7
F1 20213514.711.9
Monster Hunter Stories 248.925.121
Days Gone13
Outriders2213
Hitman 322.7
Immortals Fenyx Rising13
Yakuza Like a Dragon15.6
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla12
Dirt 514.38
Watch Dogs Legion12.36.23
Star Wars Squadrons44.117.114.813.7
Serious Sam 433.76.05
Crysis Remastered2711
Flight Simulator 20209.93
Horizon Zero Dawn147
Death Stranding15.88.38
F1 20202612
Gears Tactics38.212.87.8
Doom Eternal17.18.11
Borderlands 3145.773.3
Control15.44.77
Anno 180025.57.88
Far Cry New Dawn15776
Battlefield V28.410.4
Shadow of the Tomb Raider15.86.7
Strange Brigade32121112
Far Cry 51787
X-Plane 11.11201513
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1465
Dota 2 Reborn93522220
The Witcher 3261795
GTA V614894
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
61
7
2
33
3

17


8








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 04. 00:25:12

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 03 Jul 2025 17:16:38 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.028s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.028s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10941 +0.032s ... 0.06s

#8 got single benchmarks 10941 +0.017s ... 0.077s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.077s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.096s ... 1.173s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.173s

#12 Got 179 rows for game benchmarks. +0.017s ... 1.191s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.191s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.05s ... 1.241s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.424s ... 1.664s

#16 return log +0.004s ... 1.669s

Notebook reviews with Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) graphics card

Blackview MP200 Mini PC review - Small desktop PC with Intel Core i5-11400H in an attractive case

Blackview MP200 Mini PC review - Small desktop PC with Intel Core i5-11400H in an attractive case

We already know Blackview from the smartphone and tablet segment, but at this point, the manufacturer also includes several Mini PCs in its portfolio. With the ...
Intel Core i5-11400H | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | 678 g
ACEMAGIC Ace ‎AX15 laptop review: An affordable office laptop with an Intel N95 processor

ACEMAGIC Ace ‎AX15 laptop review: An affordable office laptop with an Intel N95 processor

ACEMagician is a well-known mini-PC manufacturer and it has now added the ACEMAGIC Ace AX15 office laptop to its portfolio. The device is based on the Intel N95...
Intel Processor N95 | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | 15.60" | 1.7 kg
Dell XPS 15 9510 Core i5 laptop review: Basic model with the brakes engaged

Dell XPS 15 9510 Core i5 laptop review: Basic model with the brakes engaged

The Dell XPS 15 continues to be one of the few high-end multimedia laptops that is optionally also offered without a dedicated graphics card. So while those who...
Intel Core i5-11400H | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | 15.60" | 1.8 kg

Acemagic AX15: Intel Processor N95, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acemagic AX15

Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD: Intel Core i5-11400H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD

Blackview MP200: Intel Core i5-11400H, 0.7 kg
   » Blackview MP200 Mini PC is a visual highlight on the desk

Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD: Intel Core i5-11400H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
   » The basic model of the Dell XPS 15 with the Core i5 is simply too expensive

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2021-09- 9)