Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc A370M

Intel A370M

The Intel Arc A370M is a dedicated mobile entry level graphics card for laptops based on Xe HPG microarchitecture. It uses the ACM-G11 chip and offers all 8 Xe-cores (128 ALUs), 8 ray tracing units and a 64-bit memory bus for 4 GB GDDR6 graphics memory. The chip integrates 7.2 billion transistors and the die measures 157 mm2.

The performance is in the entry level of dedicated graphics cards for laptops in 2022. AMD did publish some gaming benchmarks with medium settings in 5 games that showed that the Radeon RX 6500M is clearly faster. Intel only compared the A370M (with a faster CPU) to the slower Iris iGPU in the i7-1280P (see below). Thanks to the additional 2 cores and higher clock speeds, the entry level Arc A350M should be clearly left behind.

The chip also integrates two media engines for VP9, AVC, HEVC, and AV1 8k en- and decoding. The 4 display pipes support up to 4x 4k120 HDR via DMI 2.0B or DisplayPort 2.0 10G. 

The A370M is produced in 6nm at TSMC (N6 process) and supports dynamic power share (using Deep Link) with 12th gen Intel CPUs (Alder Lake).

Arc Series

Arc A380 compare
Arc A770 compare 4096 @ 2.1 - 2.4 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Arc A750 compare 3584 @ 2.05 - 2.4 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Arc A580 compare 3072 @ 1.7 - 2 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
A770M compare 512 @ 1.65 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
A730M compare 384 @ 1.1 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
A570M compare 16 @ 0.9 - 1.3 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
A550M compare 16 @ 0.9 - 2.01 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
A530M compare 12 @ 0.9 - 1.3 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
A370M 8 @ 1.55 GHz64 Bit @ 14000 MHz
A350M compare 6 @ 1.15 GHz64 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameAlchemist
ArchitectureXe HPG
Pipelines8 - unified
Raytracing Cores8
Core Speed1550 MHz
CacheL1: 1.5 MB, L2: 4 MB
Memory Speed14000 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth112 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption50 Watt (35 - 50 Watt TGP)
Transistor Count7.2 Billion
Die Size 157 mm²
technology6 nm
PCIe4 8x
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 2.0 10G Ready
Date of Announcement30.03.2022
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.intel.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3505     avg: 4023     median: 4255 (12%)     max: 4308 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 3167     avg: 3650     median: 3885 (10%)     max: 3899 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 27250     avg: 28035     median: 28128 (30%)     max: 28727 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 33721     avg: 36141     median: 35604 (9%)     max: 39098 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 7699     avg: 7735     median: 7717 (14%)     max: 7789 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 8015     avg: 8157     median: 8149 (9%)     max: 8307 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 12308     avg: 12563     median: 12520.5 (17%)     max: 12902 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 11748     avg: 12066     median: 12089.5 (10%)     max: 12338 Points
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 snx-03 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
20.9 fps (4%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 125.4     avg: 148.3     median: 129.1 (8%)     max: 190.4 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 57.7     avg: 68.1     median: 58.8 (8%)     max: 87.7 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 61.3     avg: 70.4     median: 65 (9%)     max: 85 Watt
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 65     avg: 73.1     median: 68.8 (15%)     max: 85.6 Watt
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3014     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (38%)     max: 0.3846 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.3035     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (34%)     max: 0.4078 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo 4

Diablo 4

2023
low 1920x1080
67.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
60.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
45.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
3.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
55.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
27.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
55.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
42.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
43.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
73.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
44.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
40.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 23

FIFA 23

2022
low 1920x1080
70 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
127.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
2.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
127  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
34  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
46.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
37.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
77.4
low 1920x1080
95.6 97.5 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
68.3 69.4 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55 57.6 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.7 41.9 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
31.3 34.4 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
35 35.2 35.8 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30 31.2 31.8 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24 25.4 25.6 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.3 18 20.4 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
12 12.4 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
23  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
15
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
86  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
54
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
192  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
89  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61 63 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1920x1080
117
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
low 1280x720
85.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920x1080
52.5
low 1280x720
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
80.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
40.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
15.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
77  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
57  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
189  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
27.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
76.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
14.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
64.6
low 1280x720
92.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
44.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
19.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
67  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39 42 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
175.8 175.9 184.8 ~ 179 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73.2 73.9 76.7 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.4 62 64.2 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.1 52.5 54.3 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
37.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
87 90 ~ 89 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
48 49 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
45 46 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
42 43 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
28 29 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
34.7 36.9 43.5 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27.4 27.8 34.2 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.9 24 29.9 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
22.2  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
66.9 70.3 70.4 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.4 37.9 38.4 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.6 26.3 26.7 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
14.4 19.3 19.8 37.9 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
82.6 99.1 104.4 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
69.2 83.5 92.2 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62.2 68.4 72.8 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57.7 66.3 68.3 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
121 166.7 168.8 ~ 152 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
87 98.9 100 ~ 95 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
45 53 55.9 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25 25.8 26.3 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
145.4 148.6 157.2 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
135.1 136.9 148.3 ~ 140 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.5 40.7 41.4 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!) 16.2 16.4 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
9.7 10.7 11 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
117.2
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
141.9
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo 467.160.939.2
Star Wars Jedi Survivor2319.719.217.7
Resident Evil 4 Remake45.726.311.63.52
Company of Heroes 355.747.837.237.1
Sons of the Forest27.617.411.511.4
Atomic Heart55.542.42420.2
Returnal27262210
Hogwarts Legacy43.230.319.612.7
Dead Space Remake22.617.812.18.86
High On Life73.444.640.832.6
A Plague Tale Requiem22.919.516.614.3
FIFA 237062404130
F1 22127.249.546.3332.85
Vampire Bloodhunt12787625534
Cyberpunk 2077 1.646.137.125.421
GRID Legends9769564233
God of War3531251912
Guardians of the Galaxy231412
Far Cry 686443624
F1 2021192896225
Hitman 385.754.95046.223.4
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla6233201813
Dirt 580.440.73223.115.2
Watch Dogs Legion7745341511
Horizon Zero Dawn5740353123
Gears Tactics18976.848.838.427.7
Borderlands 376.447.529.52214.5
Metro Exodus92.144.131.325.519.8
Shadow of the Tomb Raider6749413220
Strange Brigade17975635337.2
Far Cry 58949464329
X-Plane 11.1138302622.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark69372423
Middle-earth: Shadow of War44
Dota 2 Reborn9582686439.5
The Witcher 3152955126
GTA V150140411110
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
6
8
15
7
7
19
9
1
15
18
4
19
12
1
14
4

1
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 16. 09:55:57

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.044s ... 0.045s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.045s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.045s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11306 +0.013s ... 0.059s

#7 got single benchmarks 11306 +0.017s ... 0.076s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.076s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.457s ... 0.533s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.533s

#11 Got 232 rows for game benchmarks. +0.037s ... 0.571s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.571s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.028s ... 0.598s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.344s ... 1.942s

#15 return log +0.064s ... 2.007s

Benchmarks by AMD
Benchmarks by AMD
Benchmarks by Intel
Benchmarks by Intel

Notebook reviews with Intel Arc A370M graphics card

Acer Swift X 16 (2022) with Intel Arc A370M

Acer Swift X 16 (2022) review: 16-inch laptop with powerful updates

The Acer Swift X 16 (2022) is a light 16-inch laptop with additional graphics performance. The bright display finally comes in the 16:10 format and offers a hig...
Intel Core i7-1260P | Intel Arc A370M | 16.00" | 1.8 kg
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G in review: a laptop that balances efficiency and performance

Acer Swift X SFX16-52G in review: a laptop that balances efficiency and performance

Thanks to the additional Intel Arc A370M graphics processor, Acer's notebook promises significantly better performance in image and video editing – even for gam...
Intel Core i5-1240P | Intel Arc A370M | 16.00" | 1.8 kg
Intel Arc A370M debut: Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD 2-in-1 review

Intel Arc A370M debut: Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD 2-in-1 review

The Zenbook Flip 15 is back with 12th gen Intel Core H CPUs and the new Intel Arc A370M GPU to replace last year's Core U options and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q...
Intel Core i7-12700H | Intel Arc A370M | 15.60" | 1.8 kg

Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAH7, i5-12500H: Intel Core i5-12500H, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAH7, i5-12500H

Asus ZenBook Pro 15 Flip UP6502ZD, i7-12700H: Intel Core i7-12700H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Pro 15 Flip UP6502ZD, i7-12700H

HP Spectre x360 16-f1180ng: Intel Core i7-1260P, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 16-f1180ng

Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX: Intel Core i7-1260P, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX

   » Acer Swift X 16 (2022) tested: 16-inch laptop with many upgrades uses Intel Arc A370M

Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD: Intel Core i7-12700H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
   » Asus Zenbook Flip 15 Q539ZD OLED display is 40 percent dimmer than what the manufacturer is advertising

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > Intel Arc A370M GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2022-06-22)