Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q design is the power saving variant of the mobile GeForce RTX 2060. Therefore it is a high end gaming graphics card for thin laptops. It is based on the same chip as the RTX 2060 but with reduced clock speeds and a lower power consumption. It was released in 2020 with the Zephyrus G14 gaming laptop.

With the refresh, Nvidia also reworked the Max-Q technologies for more efficiency. Low Voltage GDDR6 (lower clocked but more headroom for the GPU) and improved regulator efficiency should improve the performance per Watt. Two new optional features can also be implemented by the OEM. Max-Q Dynamic Boost is able to shift power from the CPU to the GPU on a per frame basis to increase overall performance. Furthermore, the laptop manufacturer can also implement Advanced Optimus with a dynamic display switch (hardware) to enable Optimus, G-SYNC and high refresh rate displays (up to 4K 120 Hz).

The clock is not the only difference compared to the regular GTX 2060 though. The drivers for the Max-Q version were optimized for efficiency (and not performance; only for Max-Q models), there are optimized voltage converters for 1V operation, high-end cooling methods, and a 40 dB limit for the fan noise (with clock adjustments to ensure this at all times).

The performance should be only slightly below the normal RTX 2060 due to the decreased clock rates. It should be most suited for 1080p gaming at maximum detail level. Raytracing features however may reduce framerates a lot, so using raytracing will be limited to some games.

The chip is specified at a TGP of around 65 Watt and therefore clearly lower than the 80 - 90 Watt of the regular RTX 2060 Mobile.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce RTX 2000 Series
NVIDIA Titan RTX compare 4608 @ 1.35 - 1.77 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop) compare 4352 @ 1.35 - 1.55 GHz352 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop) compare 3072 @ 1.65 - 1.82 GHz256 Bit @ 15500 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop) compare 2944 @ 1.52 - 1.71 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile compare 3072 @ 1.37 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile compare 2944 @ 1.38 - 1.59 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop) compare 2560 @ 1.61 - 1.77 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop) compare 2304 @ 1.41 - 1.62 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile compare 2560 @ 1.14 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14002 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.98 - 1.23 GHz256 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q compare 2944 @ 0.74 - 1.1 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop) compare 2176 @ 1.47 - 1.65 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile compare 2304 @ 1.22 - 1.44 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop) compare 1920 @ 1.32 - 1.62 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.93 - 1.16 GHz256 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q compare 2304 @ 0.89 - 1.19 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile compare 1920 @ 0.96 - 1.2 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q 1920 @ 0.98 - 1.19 GHz192 Bit @ 11000 MHz
CodenameN18E-G1 MAX-Q TU106
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1920 - unified
Core Speed975 - 1185 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed11000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory6144 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1
technology12 nm
FeaturesDLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement06.01.2019

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
27.1 pt (29%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
257.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
120.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
18.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
176.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
108.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
95.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
93.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
194.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
96.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
75.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
78.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
68.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
85.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
92.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
103.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
88.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
82.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
157.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
109.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
103.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
123  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
82  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
75  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
117  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
89.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
183.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
67.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
196  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
137  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
116  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
101  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
201.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
103.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
81.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
154  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
92  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
74  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
276.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
125.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
105.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
60.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
105  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
75  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
129.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
72.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
143.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
142.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
126.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
116.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
97  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
118 118 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
84 90 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
75 84 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65 74 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
111
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
276 fps  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
130 fps  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
106 fps  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
93.1 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
104.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
94.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
75.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
94.9 102 103 111 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81.9 90 90.7 97.8 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69.7 75.6 77.4 79.8 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
59.3 63.7 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
126 139 141 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
74.1 79 82.7 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.7 61.3 62.4 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
43.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
124  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
110.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
107.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
155  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
123  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
76  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
246.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
249.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
219.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
249.7
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
299.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
299.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
229.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
146.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
268.7
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
125  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
125  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
118.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
111.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
119.4
low 1280x768
100.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
72.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
120.8 fps 141 fps 144 fps 152 fps ~ 139 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
115.1 fps 129 fps 130 fps 140 fps ~ 129 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
107.8 fps 119 fps 120 fps 131 fps ~ 119 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
103.8 fps 114 fps 116 fps 123 fps ~ 114 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
75.5 fps 83.2 fps ~ 79 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
232.2 235.1 284.8 310.8 ~ 266 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
139.9 168.2 182.1 209.6 ~ 175 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88.9 fps 100.6 fps 109 119 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51.2 56.1 fps 58.4 62.9 fps ~ 57 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24.9 45.5 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
173  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
164  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
119  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
68.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
157 fps
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
163 fps
low 1280x720
278.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
252.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
229.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
126.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
130.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
67.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.17
log 30. 01:33:51

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:31:07 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.043s ... 0.044s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.044s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.044s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9631 +0.02s ... 0.064s

#7 got single benchmarks 9631 +0.019s ... 0.083s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.083s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.377s ... 0.461s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.461s

#11 Got 191 rows for game benchmarks. +0.024s ... 0.485s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.485s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.489s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.789s ... 1.279s

#15 return log +0.053s ... 1.331s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q graphics card

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV: AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » Asus Zephyrus G14 Ryzen 9 GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Laptop Review: Kicking Core i9 to the Curb

Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 Laptop Review: Pretty Much A MacBook Pro 17

HP Envy 15-ep0098nr: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2 kg
  Review » This is HP's Answer To The Apple MacBook Pro: 2020 Envy 15 Creator Core i7 Review

MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  Review » MSI Stealth 15M GeForce RTX Laptop Review: Faster Graphics than the Dell XPS 15, HP Spectre x360, or Asus ZenBook

Asus ProArt StudioBook 17 H700GV RTX 2060, Xeon E-2276M: Intel Xeon E-2276M, 17.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt StudioBook 17 H700GV RTX 2060, Xeon E-2276M

Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IV-HN020: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IV-HN020

Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IV-HN042: AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IV-HN042

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV: AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV-HA116T: AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV-HA116T

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV-HE003T: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV-HE003T

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV-HE022: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV-HE022

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV-HE253T: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV-HE253T

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IVC-HA275T (ACRNM RMT01): AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IVC-HA275T (ACRNM RMT01)

Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q

Dell XPS 17 9700-C9T5T: Intel Core i9-10885H, 17.30", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 17 9700-C9T5T

HP Envy 15-ep0015nl: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep0015nl

HP Envy 15-ep0016tx: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep0016tx

HP Envy 15-ep0041ur: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep0041ur

HP Envy 15-ep008n: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep008n

HP Envy 15-ep0098nr: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep0098nr

HP Envy 15-ep0175nd: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep0175nd

HP Envy 15-ep0190nd: Intel Core i9-10885H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep0190nd

HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk1003ns: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk1003ns

HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk1064tx: Intel Core i5-10300H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk1064tx

HP Pavilion Gaming 16-A0029NS: Intel Core i7-10750H, 16.10", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 16-A0029NS

HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0033ns: Intel Core i7-10750H, 16.10"
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0033ns

HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0042ns: Intel Core i5-10300H, 16.10", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0042ns

HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0043ns: Intel Core i7-10750H, 16.10", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0043ns

Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00CKSP: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00CKSP

Razer Blade 15 Base Model 2020, i7-10750H, RTX 2060 Max-Q: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 15 Base Model 2020, i7-10750H, RTX 2060 Max-Q

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV: AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS is faster than every mobile Intel Core i9 laptop in the market today according to our own benchmarks

   » Seven simple ways we would make the Asus Zephyrus G14 even better

Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.00", 2.5 kg
   » Here are 5 super simple ways we would improve the Dell XPS 17

   » Dell finally addresses XPS 17 9700 and Precision 5750 charging woes, but the solution isn't as simple as you may think

   » Dell XPS 17 battery drain issue fixed on latest production batches

HP Envy 15-ep0098nr: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2 kg
   » New HP Envy 15 makes for a better gaming laptop than the Omen 15

MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
   » The MSI Stealth 15M is proof that gaming laptops with 15 W to 25 W Tiger Lake Core U CPUs can work

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Radeon RX 6600M *

Class 2

Class 3

UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs *

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Graphics Card
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2018-12-23)