Notebookcheck Logo

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

The Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Jasper Lake, Gen. 11) is an integrated graphics card in the Jasper Lake Pentium SoCs for laptops and small desktops. It is the fastest GPU version in the Jasper Lake series (Pentium Silver) and offers all 32 EUs (Execution Units / Shader Blocks). It offers no dedicated graphics memory and the clock rate depends on the processor model. At launch there are two Pentium Silver models (N6000 with 6W and N6005 with 10W) clocked at 350 - 900 MHz.

Thanks to the improved architecture and more EUs, the UHD Graphics is clearly faster than the old Gemini Lake SoCs (e.g. N5000). Intel states up to 78% better 3DMark Fire Strike scores and up to 22% more FPS in Rocket League. Still only very low demanding games should be playable.

A special new feature of the Gen11 graphics card is the new Variable Rate Shading (VRS) support. With it game designers can decide where to spend shading time and e.g. shade object in the background or behind fog with less resolution (up to using only one source for a 4x4 block). With this technique early results show up to 1.3x performance in Unreal Engine POC and 1.2x speedup in Civ 6. Up to now VRS is only supported by the new Nvidia Turing architecture (GTX 1650 and up).

Another improved hardware piece is the integrated video de- and encoder that was improved significantly according to Intel. They did not specify any more details, but the previous generation was able to decode VP9 and H.265/HEVC in Main10 profile with 10 bit color depth using the dedicated hardware.

The Jasper Lake SoCs and therefore the integrated GPU are manufactured in the 10nm process (like Ice Lake probably) at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process of TSMC.

Gen. 11 Series

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) compare 48 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 32 @ 0.35 - 0.9 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.4 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compare 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) compare 16 @ 0.25 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) compare 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
CodenameGen. 11
ArchitectureGen. 11
Pipelines32 - unified
Core Speed350 - 900 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption4.8 - 10 Watt
technology10 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement11.01.2021
CPU in UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Pentium Silver N60054 x 2000 MHz, 10 W450 MHz900 MHz
Intel Pentium Silver N60004 x 1100 MHz, 6 W350 MHz850 MHz
min. - max.350 - 450 MHz850 - 900 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.5 pt (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 274     avg: 371.2     median: 372 (1%)     max: 456 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 242     avg: 328.8     median: 330 (1%)     max: 402 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 62122     avg: 71176     median: 72158 (8%)     max: 78266 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 4709     avg: 5737     median: 5531.5 (6%)     max: 7589 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 5681     avg: 7297     median: 6977 (2%)     max: 9405 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 650     avg: 998     median: 982 (2%)     max: 1260 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 712     avg: 1056     median: 1016 (1%)     max: 1360 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 2289     avg: 2505     median: 2504.5 (1%)     max: 2720 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1356     avg: 1625     median: 1589 (1%)     max: 1872 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 5416     avg: 7321     median: 6074 (8%)     max: 10473 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 25.4     avg: 31.3     median: 31.6 (2%)     max: 37.14 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 24     avg: 25.1     median: 25.1 (3%)     max: 26.1 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 31.7     avg: 34     median: 34 (1%)     max: 36.2 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 48.7     avg: 53.7     median: 53.7 (3%)     max: 58.7 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 85.6     avg: 91.2     median: 91.2 (1%)     max: 96.8 fps
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 11.2     avg: 16.9     median: 16.5 (2%)     max: 25 Watt
0510152025Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 13.2     avg: 14.5     median: 13.9 (2%)     max: 16.3 Watt
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 14.3     avg: 15.4     median: 15.4 (3%)     max: 16.5 Watt
05101520Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
5.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
14.5
low 1280x720
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
7.6
low 1280x720
10.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
New World

New World

2021
low 1280x720
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
37.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
13.5
low 1280x720
4.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
6.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
15.3 30.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
4.1 19.2 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
12
low 1280x720
5.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
15.6 16.3 18.7 20.3 32 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.2 9.7 12.1 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.7 10.2 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
8
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
91.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
14.2 15.2 16.1 17.3 20 21 23.4 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!) 10.2 10.2 11.4 12.4 14.5 15.9 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.9 9 9.1 10.5 12.5 13.2 14.6 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
5.3 5.4 9 10.7 12.4 14.3 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
1.9 3 4.5 5 5.8 6.7 ~ 4 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0.8 2 4.6 ~ 2 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
35.2 48.1 50.1 53.1 54 67.9 79.8 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.4 21.5 22.4 22.4 23.5 26.9 27.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.9 10.8 11.1 12.8 14.9 15.8 19.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.3 8.4 10.4 11.5 13.8 14.4 18.3 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
8.4 11.3 20.1 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
7.8 9.2 10 ~ 9 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
3.5 4.8 ~ 4 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
2.4 2.7 ~ 3 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
6.6 11.4 15.2 17.4 26 26.8 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.5 12 13.3 26.1 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
3.4 3.5 10.8 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
8.9
8.5
5.8
23.2
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
9.5
13.6
5.2
23.6
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
71.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
18.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
35  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
106  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
15.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
45.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
44.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
32.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
21.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands5.436.634.25
Farming Simulator 2220.5
Back 4 Blood12.8
Alan Wake Remastered10.6
New World17
F1 202137.615.812.7
Monster Hunter Stories 218.8
Mass Effect Legendary Edition4.39
Serious Sam 46.75
F1 20202314.710.56.41
Borderlands 3127.964.68
Apex Legends5.2
Strange Brigade2110913.3
Far Cry 53111
World of Tanks enCore91.213.3
X-Plane 11.11181111
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1042
Dota 2 Reborn55231312
The Witcher 313943
GTA V17156
Sims 471.218.3
BioShock Infinite3520.615.5
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm10615.3
Tomb Raider45.425.516.1
Diablo III44.632.621.414.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
17
5
3
16
1

14


6








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 10:07:32

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 05:33:38 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.051s ... 0.052s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.052s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.052s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10640 +0.03s ... 0.082s

#7 got single benchmarks 10640 +0.029s ... 0.111s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.111s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.842s ... 0.953s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.953s

#11 Got 171 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.971s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.971s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.017s ... 0.989s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.715s ... 1.704s

#15 return log +0.046s ... 1.75s

Notebook reviews with Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) graphics card

Intel NUC11 Essential Kit - Atlas Canyon

Intel NUC11 Essential Kit alias Atlas Canyon with Intel Pentium Silver N6005 and Intel Celeron N4505 review

Intel's NUC11 Essential Kit is based on an Intel Jasper Lake SoC and is perfect for office work. We took a closer look at the mini PC with an Intel Pentium Silv...
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) | | 530 g
Intel NUC11 Essential Kit - Atlas Canyon

Intel NUC11 Essential Kit alias Atlas Canyon with Intel Pentium Silver N6005 and Intel Celeron N4505 review

Intel's NUC11 Essential Kit is based on an Intel Jasper Lake SoC and is perfect for office work. We took a closer look at the mini PC with an Intel Pentium Silv...
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) | | 530 g
Lenovo V14 Gen 2 Intel review

Lenovo V14 Gen 2 laptop review: Passively cooled, affordable & upgradeable

The Lenovo V14 G2 only costs 329 dollars (256 GB), is equipped with passive cooling and offers a good keyboard and various expandability options. With its Intel...
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) | 14.00" | 1.3 kg
Newsmay AC8

Newsmay AC8 Mini PC in review: A silent office PC with the Pentium N6005

We took a closer look at the Newsmay AC8 based on Jasper Lake, so as to reveal what you can expect from the compact, fanless Mini PC. The Newsmay AC8 cuts a fin...
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) | | 534 g
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34 Review: Silent, long-lasting 14-inch laptop

Acer Swift 1 SF114-34 Review: Silent, long-lasting 14-inch laptop

Acer’s 14-inch laptop scores some major points thanks to its great battery life, silent operation, keyboard backlight and matte IPS screen. The quad-core Pentiu...
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) | 14.00" | 1.3 kg

Asus Vivobook 13 Slate: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  Review » Asus Vivobook 13 Slate tablet PC in review: OLED at its best

Acer Chromebook Spin 314 CP314-1H: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook Spin 314 CP314-1H

Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1

Acer Chromebook 315 CB315-4HT: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook 315 CB315-4HT

Nokia PureBook Fold 14: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 14.10", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Nokia PureBook Fold 14

Lenovo IdeaPad 1 15, Pentium Silver N6000: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 1 15, Pentium Silver N6000

HP Tablet 11-be0097nr: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 11.00", 0.6 kg
  External Review » HP Tablet 11-be0097nr

Acer Aspire 1 A114-33-P2EY: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 1 A114-33-P2EY

Asus BR1100CKA-GJ0100RA: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 11.60", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus BR1100CKA-GJ0100RA

HP Chromebook 14a-na1005ns: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Chromebook 14a-na1005ns

Asus Vivobook 13 Slate: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 13 Slate

Acer Aspire 3 A315-35-P9GR: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A315-35-P9GR

Acer Chromebook 317 CB317-1HT-P5PF: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 17.30", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook 317 CB317-1HT-P5PF

Asus BR1100FKA-BP0491RA: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus BR1100FKA-BP0491RA

Acer Aspire 3 A317-33-P1QX: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A317-33-P1QX

Acer Swift 1 SF114-34 P2VU: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 1 SF114-34 P2VU

Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » Acer Swift 1: Well-priced 14-inch laptop with outstanding battery life

Asus Vivobook 13 Slate: Intel Pentium Silver N6000, 13.30", 1.4 kg
   » Asus Vivobook 13 Slate tablet PC in review: OLED goes low budget

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2021-01-12)