Notebookcheck Logo

Intel UHD Graphics 770

Intel UHD Graphics 770

The UHD Graphics 770 is an integrated graphics card (IGP, GT1) in Alder Lake and Raptor Lake SoCs that offers 32 execution units (EUs) and a clock speed of up to 1.65 GHz (depending on the CPU model).

The performance depends on the CPU model it is integrated in and the used memory. The gaming performance is even on fast models only suited for low demanding games in 720p and low detail settings. Higher demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Dying Light 2 (see benchmarks below) did not run well in our tests.

The GPU supports up to 4 displays with eDP 1.4b (5k120), DisplayPort 1.4a (8k60) and HDMI 2.1 (4k60). 

The Alder Lake SoCs are manufactured in the "Intel 7" named process (enhanced 10nm at Intel).

Gen. 12 / xG Series

UHD Graphics 770 32/ cores @ 0.3 - 1.55 GHz
UHD Graphics 750 compare
CodenameAlder Lake xG
ArchitectureAlder Lake
Pipelines32 / Pixel- / Vertexshader
TMUs16
ROPs8
Core Speed300 - 1550 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryno
Power Consumption15 Watt
technology10 nm
Date of Announcement04.01.2022
CPU in UHD Graphics 770GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i9-14900K24 x 3200 MHz, 125 W300 MHz1650 MHz
Intel Core i9-13900K24 x 3000 MHz, 125 W300 MHz1650 MHz
Intel Core i7-14700K20 x 2500 MHz, 125 W300 MHz1600 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz1350 - 1650 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1 pt (3%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 768     avg: 863     median: 856 (2%)     max: 930 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 666     avg: 744     median: 738 (2%)     max: 798 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 116280     avg: 139293     median: 119185 (12%)     max: 179804 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 46258     avg: 54274     median: 52927 (6%)     max: 61769 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 14271     avg: 16270     median: 16618 (16%)     max: 17404 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 14455     avg: 16122     median: 16443 (4%)     max: 16983 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2163     avg: 2518     median: 2494.5 (4%)     max: 2790 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2363     avg: 2664     median: 2655 (2%)     max: 2900 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 58760     avg: 76751     median: 78188 (9%)     max: 89577 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
7086 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
1891 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
12747 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
12097 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3665     avg: 3969     median: 3957 (5%)     max: 4181 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 3268     avg: 3445     median: 3428 (3%)     max: 3591 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 12664     avg: 14563     median: 14821 (4%)     max: 15865 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 10089     avg: 11562     median: 11740 (6%)     max: 12456 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 27996     avg: 31647     median: 32024.5 (35%)     max: 34544 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 20029     avg: 21659     median: 21770 (28%)     max: 23428 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 6.8     avg: 8.9     median: 8.9 (3%)     max: 11 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
34.9 fps (12%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
38.5 fps (17%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
48.3 fps (9%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 35.6     avg: 38.4     median: 38.4 (10%)     max: 41.1 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 3.2     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (0%)     max: 3.45 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 8.53     avg: 10     median: 10 (2%)     max: 11.5 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 4.98     avg: 5.1     median: 5.1 (1%)     max: 5.18 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 19.7     avg: 22.4     median: 22.4 (6%)     max: 25.1 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 0.19     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.2 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 15.4     avg: 16.1     median: 16.1 (6%)     max: 16.7 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 20.8     avg: 22.1     median: 22.1 (4%)     max: 23.4 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 24.7     avg: 27.3     median: 27.3 (4%)     max: 29.8 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 43.3     avg: 46.5     median: 46.5 (12%)     max: 49.7 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 5.77     avg: 6     median: 6 (1%)     max: 6.2 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 8.53     avg: 10.1     median: 10.1 (2%)     max: 11.6 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 5.46     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (1%)     max: 5.57 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 27.4     avg: 31     median: 31 (4%)     max: 34.6 fps
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 1.36     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (0%)     max: 1.4 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 22.5     avg: 23.6     median: 23.6 (3%)     max: 24.6 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 30.5     avg: 32.2     median: 32.2 (4%)     max: 33.8 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 24.3     avg: 27     median: 27 (4%)     max: 29.7 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 5.83     avg: 6.1     median: 6.1 (1%)     max: 6.56 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 3.5     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (1%)     max: 3.54 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 34.5     avg: 41.2     median: 43 (5%)     max: 44.4 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 1.38     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (0%)     max: 1.4 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 14.1     avg: 14.8     median: 15 (5%)     max: 15.1 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 7.92     avg: 8.9     median: 9.2 (5%)     max: 9.36 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 9.43     avg: 10.7     median: 11.1 (3%)     max: 11.3 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 5.4     avg: 5.8     median: 5.8 (1%)     max: 6.24 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 1.32     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (1%)     max: 1.35 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 12.2     avg: 15.1     median: 16 (2%)     max: 16.3 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 0.76     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (0%)     max: 1.51 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 7.73     avg: 8.8     median: 9.1 (4%)     max: 9.17 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 4.61     avg: 5.3     median: 5.5 (4%)     max: 5.6 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 5.53     avg: 6.4     median: 6.6 (2%)     max: 6.69 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 14423     avg: 14758     median: 14633.5 (10%)     max: 15343 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 77.93     avg: 87     median: 89.4 (29%)     max: 91.49 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 77.94     avg: 86.3     median: 86.9 (5%)     max: 94.6 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
11.1 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
27 fps (5%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
76.8 fps (6%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
65 fps (6%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
86.4 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
161.8 fps (7%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
236.1 fps (2%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
118.7 fps (3%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 7482     avg: 7843     median: 7796 (2%)     max: 8346 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 8422     avg: 8874     median: 8988 (2%)     max: 9023 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 356     avg: 470.8     median: 487 (2%)     max: 663 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 1086     avg: 1217     median: 1232 (2%)     max: 1293 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 1432     avg: 1546     median: 1543 (1%)     max: 1667 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.3     avg: 40.4     median: 40.6 (5%)     max: 41.4 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
77.1 Watt (11%)
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
77.1 Watt (17%)
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 49     avg: 63.3     median: 65.3 (8%)     max: 73.8 Watt
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
42.6 dB(A) (61%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
23.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
10.1
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1920x1080
34.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1920x1080
11.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset + Quality FSR 1920x1080
14.3
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
19.8 21.1 21.2 21.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17 18 18.1 18.1 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.2 12.8 12.9 12.9 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
31.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
35.3
low 1920x1080
28.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
69.2
low 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
23
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
8.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
22.8
med. 1920x1080
89.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
58.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
53.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
25.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
45.4
low 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset LowAA 1280x720
21.8
low 1920x1080
39.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
70.5
low 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Adaptive Quality Off) 1280x720
20
low 1920x1080
51.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
79
low 1920x1080
8 8.8 9.1 9.3 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.1 6.8 7 7.1 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.3 5.9 6.1 6.1 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5 5.2 5.2 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
16.7
13.5
15.1
15.4
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
5.2
4.5
5.2
5
low 1920x1080
8.2 8.9 9.7 10.2 10.8 ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
7 7.5 7.9 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.1 6.9 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
18.9
16.6
13.1
16.9
14.4
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
17.3
low 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
34.4
low 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
20.2
low 1920x1080
8.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
11.5
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
45.9
Diablo 4

Diablo 4

2023
low 1920x1080
24.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
45.8
low 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
12.1
low 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1280x720
19.8
low 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1280x720
15.4
low 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
21.6
low 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
17.1
low 1920x1080
7.8 (!)  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
12.6 (!)
low 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
36.5
low 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
31.8
low 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (without FSR Upscaling) 1280x720
20.3
low 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
21.5
low 1920x1080
14.3 (!)  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
21.4 (!)
low 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Basic Quality Preset T2X SMAA 1280x720
26
low 1920x1080
7.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
9.9
low 1920x1080
8.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
13.4
low 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
10.8
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
26.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
49.4
low 1920x1080
16.4 17.2 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
33
31.3
low 1920x1080
10.2 11.8 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
22.2
18.6
low 1920x1080
39.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
63.7
low 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
32.8
low 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Quality 1280x720
18.7
low 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality) 1280x720
45
low 1280x720
33.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
19.2
low 1280x720
43  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
24
low 1280x720
34.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
23
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
31.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
17.4
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
70.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
70.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
low 1280x720
49  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920x1080
27.4
low 1280x720
26 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
28.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
51.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
19.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low-End TAAAA 1920x1080
13.2
low 1280x720
28  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
27.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
59.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
74.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
32.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
40.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
38.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
41  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
31.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
61.4 66.1 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.6 23.1 27.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.2 17.7 21.1 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.6 15.9 17.2 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
37  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
19
low 1280x720
28.5 51.4 53.5 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.7 32.7 33.8 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.8 29.7 30.7 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
21.3 24.2 26.2 26.3 27.2 28.2 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.3 12.9 13.3 14.3 14.6 14.6 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.9 10.2 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
102.4 105.8 153.1 154.6 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
74.4 78.4 95.4 96.1 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38 43 43.9 44.2 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.4 40 40.7 40.8 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
41.8 53.5 54.1 58 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
34.2 37.9 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.5 17.9 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
25
25
16.6
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
95 102.4 125 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
84.7 90.8 99.9 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12 12.3 16.1 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.3 7 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
62.2
53.9
50.5
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
53.9
50.2
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2523.41913.8
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered
Assassin's Creed Shadows
Civilization 734.819.2
Monster Hunter Wilds
Kingdom Come Deliverance 211.6
Stalker 2
Final Fantasy XVI
Space Marine 27.85
F1 24211813
Alone in the Dark31.221.516.713.6
Last Epoch28.122.618.912.6
Helldivers 213.610
Palworld118.84
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown89.658.653.6
Ready or Not25.520.219.4
The Finals2416.514.3
EA Sports WRC10.4
Total War Pharaoh39.729.618.916.6
Assassin's Creed Mirage13
Counter-Strike 251.73417.6
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty9765
Baldur's Gate 31077
Lies of P11.49.97
Armored Core 621.816.914.2
Atlas Fallen11
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart8.4
F1 2322.920.613.8
Diablo 424.620.916.6
The Last of Us7.1
Resident Evil 4 Remake12.4
Sons of the Forest9.64
Atomic Heart15.210.9
Hogwarts Legacy11.1
Dead Space Remake7.79
The Witcher 3 v421.316.7
High On Life20.512.7
The Callisto Protocol11.98.2
Need for Speed Unbound13.211
Spider-Man Miles Morales14.3
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 20221711
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection7.17
A Plague Tale Requiem8.79
The Quarry8.05
F1 2226.723.817.113
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands1713.78.5
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6119.7
GRID Legends39.933.428.117.7
Elden Ring20.61916
Dying Light 211.3
Rainbow Six Extraction221616
Battlefield 204233.915.7
Forza Horizon 5431816
Back 4 Blood34.717.413.4
Far Cry 631.113.811.2
F1 202170.329.92415.2
Mass Effect Legendary Edition70.933.6
Hitman 3491915.7
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla2613
Dirt 528.511.99.7
Crysis Remastered51.423.36.37
Flight Simulator 202019.6
Horizon Zero Dawn281411
Death Stranding27.315.614.914.3
F1 202059.127.22012.4
Gears Tactics74.426.916.912.4
Doom Eternal32.415.914.5
Hunt Showdown40.716.1
Control38.111
The Division 24117
Metro Exodus31.213.6
Strange Brigade64231816
Far Cry 537171614
X-Plane 11.1144292612
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark26149
Dota 2 Reborn12986423914.2
The Witcher 35236188.61
GTA V10792136
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
46
20
5
1
49
3
3
36
2

14
3




2


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 31. 12:02:27

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 31 Jul 2025 05:47:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.031s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10972 +0.049s ... 0.08s

#8 got single benchmarks 10972 +0.031s ... 0.111s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.111s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.909s ... 2.019s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 2.02s

#12 Got 271 rows for game benchmarks. +0.021s ... 2.04s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 2.04s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.085s ... 2.125s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.633s ... 2.758s

#16 return log +0.006s ... 2.764s

Notebook reviews with Intel UHD Graphics 770 graphics card

HP Pro Mini 400 G9 Mini-PC review: Compact workstation impresses with good efficiency thanks to Intel Core i5-14500T

HP Pro Mini 400 G9 Mini-PC review: Compact workstation impresses with good efficiency thanks to Intel Core i5-14500T

HP has the Pro Mini 400 G9 series in its portfolio as a small workstation that can handle a wide range of tasks. The modular design enables many different basic...
Intel Core i5-14500T | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | 1.2 kg
HP Elite Mini 800 G9 review: Quiet NUC mini-PC with Intel Core i5-14500, DDR5 RAM and modular design

HP Elite Mini 800 G9 review: Quiet NUC mini-PC with Intel Core i5-14500, DDR5 RAM and modular design

HP's latest Elite Mini 800 G9 series model has been given a CPU upgrade. We put the mini-PC, which is suitable for a wide range of office tasks, through its pac...
Intel Core i5-14500 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | 1.3 kg
HP Pro Mini 400 G9

HP Pro Mini 400 G9 Mini-PC review: NUC PC with good efficiency thanks to Intel Core i5-13500T and modular design

HP offers the Pro Mini 400 G9 as a cheaper alternative to the Elite Mini 800 G9. The manufacturer remains true to the modular design and relies on special energ...
Intel Core i5-13500T | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | 1.2 kg
HP Elite Mini 800 G9 Mini-PC review - Modular NUC PC with Intel Core i5-13500, 16 GB DDR5 RAM and quiet cooling

HP Elite Mini 800 G9 Mini-PC review - Modular NUC PC with Intel Core i5-13500, 16 GB DDR5 RAM and quiet cooling

With the Elite Mini 800 G9, HP sells compact PCs that are suitable for versatile office tasks. We take a closer look at the Mini-PC based on the Intel Core i5-1...
Intel Core i5-13500 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | 1.3 kg
Dell OptiPlex Micro Plus 7010 review: Desktop Core i7-13700 in a mini PC package

Dell OptiPlex Micro Plus 7010 review: Desktop Core i7-13700 in a mini PC package

If you want to maximize processor performance while minimizing form factor, then the OptiPlex Micro Plus 7010 has you covered. It runs a bit hot to say the leas...
Intel Core i7-13700 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | 1.2 kg

Alienware m16 R1 Intel: Intel Core i7-13700HX, 16.00"
   » Open-box Alienware m16 R2 (2024) RTX 4070 gaming laptop in pristine condition is now on sale at enticing price

   » Outstanding Alienware m16 R2 RTX 4070 gaming laptop is now up to 32% cheaper than list price

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024): Intel Core i7-14700HX, 16.00"
   » Speedy Acer Predator Helios 18 gaming laptop with RTX 4090 and 250 Hz mini-LED display drops back to record-low price

Pre-Sample: Intel Core i7-12700H, 0.00"
   » First Intel Alder Lake-P Core i7-12700H Cinebench scores leave both AMD Cezanne Zen 3 and Apple M1 Max in the dust

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2022-07- 8)