Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 is a mid-tier, Turing-based, desktop GPU. The GTX 1660 relies on the TU116 chip with 1,408 shader units, 48 ROPs, 88 TMUs and a 192-bit-wide memory bus (clocked at 2 GHz = 8 GHz effectively 12 GHz, bandwidth: up to 192.1 GB/s).

The TU116 chip and other Turing-based GPUs are produced using the 12-nm manufacturing process. However, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti does not offer the latest features such as DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) and Real Time Ray Tracing. Nevertheless, there are some architectural improvements when it comes to floating point and integer performance. These operations can now be carried out simultaneously. Other notable features include Adaptive Shading, unified cache, DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) as well as H.265 encoding and decoding (PlayReady 3.0).

At Full HD resolution, the GeForce GTX 1660 is slightly faster than the old GeForce GTX 1060, but clearly slower than the old GeForce GTX 1070 (and GTX 1660 Ti). Therefore, the GTX1660 is well suited for demanding games of 2019 in 1080p and high - max details (see gaming benchmarks below).

The energy consumption of the GeForce GTX 1660 amounts to 120 watts (like the 1660 Ti or GTX 1060).

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1600 Series
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) compare 1536 @ 1500 - 1770 MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) compare 1408 @ 1530 - 1785 MHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compare 1536 @ 1455 - 1590 MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) 1408 @ 1530 - 1785 MHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q compare 1536 @ 1140 - 1335 MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop) compare 1024 @ 1530 - 1725 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compare 1024 @ 1350 MHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile compare 1024 @ 1395 - 1560 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) compare 896 @ 1485 - 1665 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compare 1024 @ 1035 - 1200 MHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 1020 - 1245 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
CodenameTuring TU116
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1408 - unified
Core Speed1530 - 1785 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed8000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory6144 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1, Shader 6.4
Transistor Count6600 Million
technology12 nm
Date of Announcement14.03.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.nvidia.com/en-gb/geforce/gra...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
47 pt (48%)
3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 5985     avg: 5985     median: 5985 (126%)     max: 4738 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
min: 5502     avg: 5502     median: 5502 (126%)     max: 4378 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 478810     avg: 478810     median: 478810 (110%)     max: 436117 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 45665     avg: 45665     median: 45665 (116%)     max: 39492 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 12629     avg: 12629     median: 12629 (106%)     max: 11956 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 13847     avg: 13847     median: 13847 (100%)     max: 13827 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 19912     avg: 19912     median: 19912 (114%)     max: 17450 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 20696     avg: 20696     median: 20696 (109%)     max: 18967 points
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 53031     avg: 53031     median: 53031 (144%)     max: 36878 Points
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 +
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 +
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 +
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 +
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 +
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 +
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 +
3ds Max (3dsmax-05) 1900x1060 +
SPECviewperf 13 Solidworks (sw-04) +
Siemens NX (snx-03) +
Medical (medical-02) +
Maya (maya-05) +
Energy (energy-02) +
Creo (creo-02) +
Catia (catia-05) +
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) +
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
min: 10237     avg: 10237     median: 10237 (106%)     max: 9659 Points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Horizon Zero Dawn

Horizon Zero Dawn

2020
low 1280x720
130  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
82  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
67  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Death Stranding

Death Stranding

2020
low 1280x720
138  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
86.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
53.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
292  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
160  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
128  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
89.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
66.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
37.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

2020
low 1280x720
297.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
141.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
92  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
61.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
43  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
22.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
257  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
138  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
115  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
71.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
211  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
82.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
39.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
121  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
79.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
47.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
130  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
24.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
53.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
111  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
89  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
70  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
49.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
159  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
56.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 1920x1080
56.2
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 3840x2160
12.6
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
160  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
119  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
51.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
114  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
67  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080