Notebookcheck Logo

The First Descendant tech review: Laptop and desktop benchmarks

More than just hype? The First Descendant is a loot shooter that resembles a cross between Destiny and Warframe. Despite being very popular on Steam right now, it has received fairly mixed reviews. We have taken a closer look at the game’s hardware requirements.
The First Descendant

Test systems

XMG Neo 16 E23 (RTX 4090)
XMG Neo 16 E23 (RTX 4090)
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23 (RTX 4080)
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23 (RTX 4080)
XMG Pro 15 E23 (RTX 4070)
XMG Pro 15 E23 (RTX 4070)
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 (RTX 4060 & Radeon 780M)
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 (RTX 4060 & Radeon 780M)
Medion Erazer Scout E20 (RTX 4050)
Medion Erazer Scout E20 (RTX 4050)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14 (Arc 8)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14 (Arc 8)
Philips Evnia 4K Gaming Monitor 329M1RV
Philips Evnia 4K Gaming Monitor 329M1RV
be quiet! Silent Base 802 (RTX 4080 & RX 7900 XT)
be quiet! Silent Base 802 (RTX 4080 & RX 7900 XT)

We currently carry out our gaming benchmarks with these devices. Clicking on the photos will take you to the respective manufacturer's website. More details on their specifications are listed at the end of the article.

Tech

The success enjoyed by The First Descendant at the time of this review, published in July 2024, is not least due to its free-to-play model. However, this approach also has its dark side, as demonstrated by many comments and criticisms. For example, when launching the game for the first time, players need to grant the developers extensive permissions, which could be a potential nightmare from a data privacy perspective. Additionally, the prices of paid contents, such as new characters and skins, are often criticised.

The First Descendant
The First Descendant
The First Descendant
The First Descendant
The First Descendant
The First Descendant

The First Descendant is fantastic gameplay-wise, as far as we can tell from our brief play session. The third-person shooter boasts satisfying controls with fluid movement and solid gunplay, along with an impressive audiovisual package overall. Even though the sci-fi setting feels rather generic in terms of style, the underlying Unreal Engine 5 manages to render beautiful landscapes on the screen.

The First Descendant
The First Descendant
The First Descendant
The First Descendant
The First Descendant
The First Descendant

The graphics menu can likewise match what is offered by larger releases. Whilst the Display tab is straightforward, the Graphics tab provides a whole host of detail settings that can be adjusted conveniently using the provided presets. Also included here are options for ray tracing and upscaling, with the game supporting DLSS, FSR, XeSS and TSR. When using upscaling, you can also enable Frame Generation and Ray Reconstruction. An optional frame rate cap, ranging from 30 to 144 fps, completes the package.

The First Descendant
The First Descendant
The First Descendant

Changes can be applied without requiring a restart, which is deserving of a thumbs-up. The fact that the game needs to prepare its shaders at every launch isn’t overly annoying because the process doesn’t take too long. The game feels quite polished technically. Although it frequently stutters in the initial few seconds, we didn’t encounter any crashes or other major problems.

Benchmark

The game’s opening sequence was chosen for our frame rate measurements. We had the player character sprint along a predefined path and used CapFrameX to record the frame rate for roughly 20 seconds, as shown in the video below. In our view, the game should be reasonably playable at an average frame rate of 40 fps or higher.  

Results


FHD (1,920 x 1,080)

The First Descendant is quite graphically demanding, though not overly so. Some iGPUs will allow you to play the game at Full HD resolution. For instance, both the Radeon 780M and Intel Arc 8 managed to break the 40 fps mark at 1080p with Low preset. On the other hand, modern mid-range graphics chips shouldn’t have any significant issues running the game at higher settings. For example, a GeForce RTX 4050 can handle the Ultra preset.

The First Descendant
    1920x1080 Low Preset     1920x1080 Medium Preset     1920x1080 High Preset     1920x1080 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
215 (59.7min, 141.5P0.1, 170.6P1) fps ∼100%
180.9 (123.4min, 145.8P0.1, 153.4P1) fps ∼100%
157.1 (110.9min, 126.2P0.1, 136.3P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
189.9 (101.2min, 122.5P0.1, 141.9P1) fps ∼88%
181.2 (114.4min, 120.7P0.1, 134.2P1) fps ∼100%
156.6 (85.2min, 106.2P0.1, 118.3P1) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Neo 16 E23
182.8 (51.3min, 106.6P0.1, 134.9P1) fps ∼85%
152.7 (83.4min, 94.2P0.1, 121.4P1) fps ∼84%
130.6 (46.1min, 90P0.1, 109P1) fps ∼83%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
140.7 (41.8min, 44.9P0.1, 81.2P1) fps ∼65%
118.8 (29.6min, 57P0.1, 82.7P1) fps ∼66%
95.1 (52.2min, 54.7P0.1, 72.6P1) fps ∼61%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
115.7 (83min, 86.6P0.1, 93.5P1) fps ∼54%
93.3 (65.9min, 70.2P0.1, 77.9P1) fps ∼51%
79.6 (62.7min, 63.8P0.1, 68.1P1) fps ∼51%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
102 (23.6min, 51.6P0.1, 77.8P1) fps ∼47%
81.1 (29.9min, 61.5P0.1, 65P1) fps ∼45%
67.7 (39.3min, 52.4P0.1, 55.6P1) fps ∼43%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
133.4 (17.5min, 81.6P0.1, 102.9P1) fps ∼100%
83.5 (41.6min, 52.7P0.1, 69P1) fps ∼39%
65.5 (8.19min, 10.1P0.1, 50.3P1) fps ∼36%
56.1 (18.9min, 39.7P0.1, 46.1P1) fps ∼36%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Ultra 7 155H
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14
49.4 (39.6min, 41.2P0.1, 42.6P1) fps ∼37%
33.8 (28.3min, 28.3P0.1, 29.2P1) fps ∼16%
27.2 (14.9min, 17.6P0.1, 23.8P1) fps ∼15%
23.9 (19.7min, 19.8P0.1, 20.6P1) fps ∼15%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
44.3 (29.8min, 30.4P0.1, 38.1P1) fps ∼33%
27.9 (19.7min, 20.1P0.1, 21.6P1) fps ∼13%
21.8 (9.7min, 10.6P0.1, 17.5P1) fps ∼12%
17.9 (5.14min, 6.29P0.1, 13P1) fps ∼11%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

Similarly, you don’t necessarily need a high-end graphics card to run the game at QHD resolution. Even a GeForce RTX 4060 is powerful enough to deliver acceptable frame rates.

The First Descendant
    2560x1440 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
114.1 (53.4min, 85.7P0.1, 96.7P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
89.7 (66.3min, 66.8P0.1, 71.2P1) fps ∼79%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Neo 16 E23
89.4 (66.2min, 69.9P0.1, 73.5P1) fps ∼78%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
61 (39.7min, 44.5P0.1, 50.4P1) fps ∼53%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
50.6 (33.1min, 38.7P0.1, 43.3P1) fps ∼44%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
43.5 (16.9min, 25P0.1, 36.6P1) fps ∼38%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
34.6 (26.9min, 27.4P0.1, 29.3P1) fps ∼30%

UHD (3,840 x 2,160)

However, things get challenging once we reach 4K resolution. For laptops, only Nvidia’s top-end model, the GeForce RTX 4090, can run the game properly at this resolution with Ultra preset. Enabling ray tracing will push system requirements even higher. Nevertheless, on current Nvidia GPUs, performance loss can be mitigated by enabling DLSS (see table). On AMD graphics cards, unfortunately, FSR isn’t enough to offset the performance impact of ray tracing.

The First Descendant
    3840x2160 Ultra Preset     3840x2160 Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + DLSS Quality     3840x2160 Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + FSR Quality
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
62.5 (51.3min, 53.8P0.1, 56.9P1) fps ∼100%
64.3 (50.8min, 53.4P0.1, 56.7P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
58.7 (47.6min, 48.5P0.1, 50.5P1) fps ∼94%
38.2 (32.3min, 32.3P0.1, 33.3P1) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Neo 16 E23
47.9 (38.8min, 38.8P0.1, 41.5P1) fps ∼77%
51.3 (43.5min, 43.7P0.1, 45P1) fps ∼80%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
31.9 (22.2min, 23.6P0.1, 28.2P1) fps ∼51%
35 (26.7min, 27.6P0.1, 30P1) fps ∼54%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
26.4 (21.6min, 21.8P0.1, 23.3P1) fps ∼42%
29.3 (24.2min, 24.7P0.1, 26P1) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
23.1 (19.4min, 19.5P0.1, 20.7P1) fps ∼37%
23.6 (18.8min, 18.9P0.1, 21.4P1) fps ∼37%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
16.1 (13.5min, 13.6P0.1, 14.3P1) fps ∼26%
19.3 (16.7min, 16.8P0.1, 17.3P1) fps ∼30%

Note

Because gaming tests are highly time-consuming and often constrained by installation or activation limits, we are only able to deliver part of the benchmark results at the time of publishing this article. More graphics cards will be added subsequently.

Overview

Show Restrictions
PosModel< PrevNext >The First Descendant
 The First Descendant (2024)
low
1920x1080
Low Preset
med.
1920x1080
Medium Preset
high
1920x1080
High Preset
ultra
1920x1080
Ultra Preset
QHD
2560x1440
Ultra Preset
4K DLSS
3840x2160
Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + DLSS Quality
4K FSR
3840x2160
Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + FSR Quality
4K
3840x2160
Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
347
254
219
192.5
142.7
86.4
84.7
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
324
234
225
191.3
134.9
50.3
75.4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
215
180.9
157.1
114.1
64.3
62.5
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
189.9
181.2
156.6
89.7
38.2
58.7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
182.8
152.7
130.6
89.4
51.3
47.9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
267
167.3
142.2
125.9
89.6
48.4
52.1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
140.7
118.8
95.1
61
35
31.9
NVIDIA Titan RTX
211
128.9
106.5
89.4
60.8
33.9
34.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
214
141.8
110.2
94.2
63.8
35.2
35.9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
165.3n3
108.7n4
89.25n4
79.1n4
50.35n4
28.75n2
26.2n2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
147.6
93.3
76.1
64.5
43.3
24.3
23.9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
194.2
121.9
99.1
84.2
55
29
29.4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
157.25n2
100.9n3
80.6n3
67.7n3
43.6n2
23.6
23.1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
151.7
96.9
78.4
66.1
43.6
23.3
23.8
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
155.1
100.3
89.9
74.1
43.8
12.7
19.4
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
140.6
86.5
68.1
57.7
38.5
20.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)
156.4
96.4
77.3
63.5
40.5
22.1
22.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)
140.8
85.2
68.4
56.1
36.1
19.3
19.4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)
106.5
64.3
51
40.3
24.9
12.4
PosModel< PrevNext >The First Descendant
low med. high ultra QHD 4K DLSS 4K FSR 4K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
133.4
83.5
65.5
56.1
34.6
19.3
16.1
Intel Arc A730M
86
56.4
45.9
39.4
26.7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)
102.8
60.8
46.8
37.2
22.7
10.7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)
90.2
54.5
42.4
32.4
15.3
AMD Radeon 890M
59.1
35
27.8
23.6
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
45.05n2
30.2n2
23.75n2
21.45n2
AMD Radeon 880M
37.6
23.4
17.3
14.7
AMD Radeon 780M
51.75n2
32.75n2
25.5n2
21.2n2
AMD Radeon 760M
36.6
23.1
19
15.4
(-) * Smaller values are better. / n123 Number of benchmarks for this median value / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Details of the test systems

Notebook Graphics card Processor Memory
XMG Neo 16 E23 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @175 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6X) Intel Core i9-13900HX 2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 @175 W TGP (12 GB GDDR6X) Intel Core i9-13950HX 2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Pro 15 E23 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i9-13900HX 2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) & Radeon 780M AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 2 x 8 GB DDR5
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 @100 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-13700H 2 x 8 GB DDR5
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14 Intel Arc 8 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 2 x 16 GB DDR5
Tower PC Graphics card Processor Memory
Asus ROG Strix Z790-F Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 (16 GB GDDR6X)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB GDDR6)
Intel Core i9-13900K 2 x 24 GB DDR5 G.Skill
4K monitor Operating system Nvidia driver AMD driver Intel driver
Philips Evnia 329M1RV Windows 11 556.12 24.6.1 101.5594
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > The First Descendant tech review: Laptop and desktop benchmarks
Florian Glaser, 2024-07-10 (Update: 2024-08-15)