Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

Intel Arc 8-Core

The Intel Arc iGPU with 8 cores (ID 7D55) is an integrated graphics adapter in Meteor Lake SoCs based on the Xe LPG architecture (similar to the dedicated Arc GPUs, but with a focus on efficiency). It offers all 8 Xe cores (128 Xe vector engines), 8 ray tracing units, 8 samplers and 4 pixel backends.

The Arc name may only be used if at least 16 GB RAM is used in dual channel mode. Otherwise, the only iGPU is called "Intel Graphics" and is also significantly slower.

According to Intel, performance has been doubled compared to the previous generation (probably still in Alder Lake).

The iGPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (probably DX 12_2 like the desktop Arc GPUs). The graphics unit also supports XeSS AI Super Sampling.

The media engine of Meteor Lake is in the SOC tile and supports up to 8k60 10-bit HDR encode and decode of MPEG2, AVC, VP9, HEVC and AV1. The display engine is also in the SoC tile and supports HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 2.1 20G with up to 8K60 HDR.

The GPU Tile of the Meteor Lake chip is manufactured at TSMC on 5nm (5N process).

Arc LPG Series

Arc 8-Core 8 @ 2.3 GHz
Arc 7-Core compare 7 @ 2.2 GHz
Graphics 4-Core compare 4 @ 1.95 GHz
CodenameMeteor Lake iGPU
ArchitectureXe LPG
Pipelines8 - unified
Raytracing Cores8
Core Speed2300 (Boost) MHz
CacheL1: 1.5 MB
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.3
technology5 nm
DisplaysHDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.0 20G
Date of Announcement14.12.2023
CPU in Arc 8-CoreGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H16 x 3800 MHz, 45 W? MHz2350 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H16 x 3800 MHz, 28 W? MHz2300 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H16 x 3800 MHz, 28 W? MHz2250 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H14 x 3600 MHz, 28 W? MHz2200 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2200 - 2350 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.2 pt (10%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2178     avg: 3531     median: 3580 (10%)     max: 4176 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2018     avg: 3212     median: 3269 (7%)     max: 3770 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 397122     avg: 410287     median: 408060 (41%)     max: 427906 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 78589     avg: 142909     median: 159691 (19%)     max: 163878 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 18794     avg: 30631     median: 31438 (30%)     max: 37020 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 31876     avg: 42601     median: 44014 (11%)     max: 52200 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5203     avg: 7535     median: 7815.5 (12%)     max: 9084 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5568     avg: 8203     median: 8513 (8%)     max: 9692 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 88046     avg: 185752     median: 196127 (22%)     max: 264739 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 4294     avg: 6018     median: 6363 (7%)     max: 6686 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 13461     avg: 25851     median: 27400 (26%)     max: 29487 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 25821     avg: 33139     median: 34198.5 (13%)     max: 36983 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7756     avg: 11786     median: 12326 (15%)     max: 13943 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 8064     avg: 11751     median: 12275.5 (9%)     max: 13716 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 38739     avg: 41084     median: 41223 (12%)     max: 43259 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 33028     avg: 36137     median: 36546 (20%)     max: 39184 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 42967     avg: 47870     median: 47115 (52%)     max: 53214 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 34184     avg: 36632     median: 36442 (48%)     max: 38214 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 17.1     avg: 19     median: 19.5 (6%)     max: 20.1 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
88.2 fps (29%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 42.7     avg: 42.9     median: 42.9 (11%)     max: 43 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 3.29     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 3.56 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 18.2     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (3%)     max: 19.9 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 15.9     avg: 16.4     median: 16.4 (4%)     max: 16.9 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 54.9     avg: 56.5     median: 56.5 (15%)     max: 58 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 0.67     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.91 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 22.7     avg: 22.9     median: 22.9 (9%)     max: 23.1 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 48.2     avg: 49.8     median: 49.8 (8%)     max: 51.3 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 49.7     avg: 49.8     median: 49.8 (8%)     max: 49.8 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 44.8     avg: 45.2     median: 45.2 (12%)     max: 45.6 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 5.9     avg: 6.2     median: 6.2 (1%)     max: 6.43 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 18.2     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (3%)     max: 19.9 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 25     avg: 27.4     median: 27.4 (5%)     max: 29.7 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 59.5     avg: 61     median: 61 (7%)     max: 62.5 fps
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 5.27     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (2%)     max: 5.69 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 29.3     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (4%)     max: 29.6 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 71.6     avg: 74.2     median: 74.2 (8%)     max: 76.8 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 46.4     avg: 47.5     median: 47.5 (7%)     max: 48.5 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 5.56     avg: 5.8     median: 5.8 (1%)     max: 5.94 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 14.7     avg: 16.7     median: 17.6 (5%)     max: 17.8 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 86.9     avg: 88.1     median: 87.6 (9%)     max: 89.9 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 5.5     avg: 6.1     median: 6.3 (1%)     max: 6.4 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 24.5     avg: 26     median: 26 (9%)     max: 27.6 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 17.7     avg: 18.4     median: 18.1 (9%)     max: 19.5 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 21.6     avg: 23.4     median: 22.6 (6%)     max: 26.1 fps
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
min: 11     avg: 11.6     median: 11.6 (3%)     max: 12.1 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 5.37     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (1%)     max: 6.24 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 4.23     avg: 5.8     median: 5.7 (4%)     max: 7.07 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 35.4     avg: 38     median: 37.7 (5%)     max: 41 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 4.25     avg: 5     median: 4.9 (1%)     max: 6.03 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 17.9     avg: 18.6     median: 18.5 (8%)     max: 19.8 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 10     avg: 11.1     median: 11.2 (7%)     max: 11.7 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 12.9     avg: 14.4     median: 14.8 (5%)     max: 15.5 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 15259     avg: 17638     median: 18259 (13%)     max: 19892 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 97.07     avg: 107     median: 108 (36%)     max: 115.68 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 126.9     avg: 151.3     median: 151.9 (9%)     max: 176.3 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 30.6     avg: 37.3     median: 38.6 (14%)     max: 41.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 74     avg: 83     median: 83.4 (15%)     max: 91.5 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 180     avg: 203.5     median: 206.4 (15%)     max: 233.2 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 143     avg: 155     median: 155 (15%)     max: 167.07 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
215 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
331 fps (14%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 727     avg: 772     median: 772.2 (6%)     max: 817.4 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 277.2     median: 287 (7%)     max: 1992 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 16.7     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 176.8 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 17911     avg: 31967     median: 34397.5 (9%)     max: 39941 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 16515     avg: 31367     median: 32858 (8%)     max: 37129 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 549     avg: 670     median: 683.5 (2%)     max: 747 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2319     avg: 2665     median: 2671.5 (5%)     max: 2927 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 6270     avg: 7207     median: 7537 (6%)     max: 7963 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 35     avg: 50.6     median: 50.3 (7%)     max: 69.6 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 27     avg: 44.2     median: 44.1 (6%)     max: 61 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 29.7     avg: 47.7     median: 46.7 (10%)     max: 64.6 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra
min: 0.3826     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (45%)     max: 1.108 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 0.4246     avg: 0.6     median: 0.5 (44%)     max: 1.207 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 38.8     avg: 57.6     median: 55.5 (16%)     max: 76.7 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 40.7     avg: 56.8     median: 54.6 (7%)     max: 74.1 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.1867     avg: 0.3     median: 0.2 (1%)     max: 0.4816 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 27     avg: 38.1     median: 38 (61%)     max: 46.3 dB(A)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
48.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
45.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
12.2 13.6 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
lowest, XeSS Quality 1920x1080
14.5
low 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset + Quality FSR 1920x1080
32.2
low 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
low 1920x1080
22.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
33.1
low 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Preset 1280x720
51
low 1920x1080
40.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
46.2
low 1920x1080
75.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
55.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
43.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Settings 1280x720
119.2
low 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
12
low 1920x1080
0 (!) 20.3 ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Super Resolution off) 1280x720
28.7
low 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
26.8
low 1920x1080 cinem.
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
15.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
10.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
low 1280x720 cinem.
23.8
low 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
33
low XeSS 68 1280x720
48
low 1920x1080
35.6 44.4 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24.2 29.9 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.6 28.2 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.5 24.2 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
76.5
62.5
low 1920x1080
40.7 49.4 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26.6 33.8 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.3 27.2 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19 23.9 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
72.3
60.2
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
55 65.6 66.5 69.1 71.8 75.2 77.5 82 84.3 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.2 56 56.3 57.1 63 64.7 66.2 69.3 73.8 74 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.9 42.7 43 48.4 48.4 48.7 51.8 53 54.8 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!) 12 12.2 14 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
33.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
25.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
0 (!) 30.6 52 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.1 34 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.5 29 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.2 25 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
0 (!)
low 1920x1080
69  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
22.5
low 1920x1080
45.8 73.9 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
39.1 52.4 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
33.9 46.4 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.6 40.3 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
59.3
low 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
39.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
27.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
40.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
37.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
152.6 183.9 208 ~ 182 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
111.5 128.6 142.8 ~ 128 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
108.6 120.9 134.2 ~ 121 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
60.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
46.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
45.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
99.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
68.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
60.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
46.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
35.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
82.7 93.1 101.4 116 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62.5 70.6 74.8 77.6 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.6 53.6 53.6 58.9 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.5 40.6 47 52 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
136.5
167.2
low 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
111.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
84.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
52.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
31.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
11.3 16.7 18.5 21.7 23.3 23.3 23.6 25.8 27.6 27.8 28.1 28.3 29.4 29.4 29.5 29.8 30.9 31 31.5 31.5 31.7 32 32.4 32.9 33.9 34.1 34.3 34.3 34.7 34.7 35.7 36.4 36.4 36.5 37.9 38 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.4 15.2 16.3 19 21.5 22.8 23.1 23.4 23.8 24.2 24.8 25.1 25.1 25.3 25.4 25.7 26.3 26.3 26.3 26.5 26.7 26.8 27.8 27.9 28 28.4 28.9 29.5 29.5 29.6 30.2 31 31.4 31.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.3 14.3 14.8 15.1 16.3 16.9 17.8 19 20.4 20.8 21.5 21.9 21.9 22.1 22.5 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.9 22.9 23.4 23.4 23.9 24 24 24 24.1 24.6 25 25.2 26 26.2 26.7 27.6 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13 13.5 14.2 17 18.4 18.9 19.3 19.5 19.7 19.8 20.5 20.6 20.7 20.7 21.1 21.2 21.4 21.6 21.9 22 22 22.1 23.3 23.7 23.8 24.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
9.2 13.1 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
53.8
49
46.1
37.3
44.3
45.6
47.6
34.5
38
48.9
47.4
50.5
48.3
58
48.5
40.4
40.9
42.1
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
7.3
5.7
Steam Deck 1280x800
34.1
52
48.8
41.1
Ultra Preset (FSR2 on) 1920x1080
22.3
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
16.8
22.3
13.8
13.1
18.9
21.9
18.6
20.5
19.6
9.6
19.5
22.1
20.3
15.7
15.2
low 1920x1080
21 22.1 22.8 23 24.5 27.4 27.8 29.1 29.3 30.8 30.9 31.7 31.9 32.4 32.9 33.7 33.8 33.8 34.6 36.9 36.9 37.9 39.3 39.6 40.3 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.3 17.6 19.5 20.6 21 22.8 22.8 22.9 23.5 24.2 24.3 24.8 25 25.6 25.9 26.4 27.4 28.2 28.8 29.6 29.7 29.7 30.2 30.3 30.7 31.1 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.4 15.8 16.5 16.8 20 20.6 20.7 21.1 21.2 21.2 21.4 21.6 21.7 22.6 22.9 23.7 24.1 25 25.2 25.3 25.4 26.7 26.8 27.5 27.7 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.2 14.7 16.3 19 19.1 19.3 19.9 20.3 20.4 20.7 21 21.1 22 22.1 22.2 23.4 23.6 24.1 24.4 24.4 24.4 25.2 25.7 26.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
10.4 14 17.7 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
5.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
52.6
52.2
50.5
33.8
46.7
42.2
53.9
48.5
48.1
57.6
56.4
40.8
31.8
Low Preset FSR 2.2 Balanced 1920x1080
35.8
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
56.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
48.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
41.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Starfield

Starfield

2023
med. 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
45.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
45.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
28.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
21.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
15.2 17.3 37.4 44.1 48.6 48.6 57.3 57.3 64.4 64.6 67.9 68.2 68.2 69.8 70.9 71.5 71.5 71.9 72.3 73.1 73.4 77 80.1 82.1 83.2 89.3 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15 25.1 35.4 36.3 52.5 52.5 59 59.4 59.5 60.5 61.2 62.1 62.9 63.1 65.1 65.6 65.8 66.8 66.9 70.2 74.2 75.3 76.3 79.8 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.6 25.6 26.6 27.1 35.5 35.5 35.9 37.6 38.7 39.5 40.7 41.1 41.2 43.1 44.8 44.9 46.1 47.1 47.5 50.4 50.7 50.9 54.5 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.5 10 10.7 11.4 11.5 11.8 12.1 12.2 12.6 12.7 13.5 14 14.3 14.7 15 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
93.7
110.9
73.4
72.4
113.9
88.3
88.3
123.1
115.7
113.4
low 1920x1080
39.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
62.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
29.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
45.7 61 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35.4 44.1 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.6 30.9 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.7 22.2 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
69
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
25.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
56.2 57.8 59.1 64.5 68.8 71 72.1 72.4 72.7 73.1 73.9 76.3 77.2 77.7 78.2 78.3 80.6 84.9 96.1 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.6 53.5 53.9 57.5 58.2 62.2 65.1 65.6 66.6 67 68.6 70.8 70.9 71.4 71.6 71.7 73.8 77 87 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.8 40.9 43.5 44 46.7 51.1 52.9 53.3 53.7 55 55.1 55.7 55.9 56.2 65.2 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.1 9.3 11.9 12.1 14 14.1 14.4 14.7 14.9 15 15.3 16.1 16.9 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
127.2
86.6
120.3
107.7
120.5
113.4
120.8
107.4
136
120.1
104.5
120.9
115.8
94.7
88
low 1920x1080
41.5 44.9 47.3 47.4 49 49.2 50.4 50.7 50.8 51.2 53.3 53.8 54.6 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.7 35.3 36.3 37.3 39.5 40 40.6 41.2 42.6 42.7 43.4 44.5 45 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22 24.7 25.7 26.4 27 27.6 29.1 29.9 30 30.1 30.7 31.5 31.6 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.7 20.2 20.2 21.2 21.9 22.3 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 25 25.1 25.9 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
16.6  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
87
81.2
82.5
80.8
83.8
82.1
96.1
86.6
80
77.4
84.4
87.6
60
low 1920x1080
67.7 73 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51.8 56.8 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.7 44.8 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.6 39.2 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
80
86.6
med. 1920x1080
31.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
27 33.7 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24 31.2 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.3 24 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.9 17.3 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
35.2
38.7
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
61.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
37.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
32.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
42.9
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
94.8 143.5 143.6 145.9 147.5 161.1 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.8 73.9 75.9 80.4 80.6 83.5 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.3 56.4 60 63.2 63.8 65.3 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.3 26.2 26.9 28.8 29.6 31 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
0 (!) 58 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33 35 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28 (!) 30 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26 27 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
139.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
68.5 93 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.5 41.9 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.7 28.7 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.9 22.6 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
55.8
65.7
low 1280x720
130  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
65 69 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
39 41 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
37 39 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
35 36 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
52.2 63.1 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.9 37.6 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25 27.1 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.7 21.7 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
69 79.3 131.4 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33 38.3 62.5 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31 35.8 49.5 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27 30.5 48.2 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
88.4
63.2
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
120 121 121 124.9 129.8 131.2 131.8 141 141.6 141.9 143.6 144 145.6 146.1 147.3 151.6 154.8 156 159.4 162.1 163 165.4 165.9 166 168 171 173.8 176 177.4 178 179.5 188 188.9 189 190.2 204 205 207 208 ~ 161 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51.1 52.7 53 54 56 57 59 59.5 60.6 61.3 61.9 63.2 66 67.6 67.7 67.8 68 70 70.5 70.6 71 71 71.1 71.8 72 72.5 73 73.4 75.4 76 77.4 78 80.3 82 84 85.2 86 87.7 88 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39 40 41 41.4 43.8 45.7 48 49.9 50.4 52 52.4 52.5 53.3 54 54.9 55.4 56.4 57.2 57.8 57.8 58.9 59 59 59 59 59.1 59.6 59.7 61.4 61.7 62 64 64 66.7 69 69.3 71 72.3 74 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.1 31 32 33.4 33.9 35 35.6 37.4 38.8 38.9 40.7 41 41 41 43.2 43.7 43.8 44 44.3 45.4 46 46.1 46.7 46.8 47 47 47.3 48.5 48.9 49 50 50.3 52 52.5 53 53.2 55 56 58 58.9 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25 25.7 34.9 42 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.2 15 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
47 51 54 54 56 57 59 61 62 63 63 63 63 64 65 67 67 68 68 69 69 69 72 76 77 79 84 91 91 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30 31 33 33 35 36 36 36 37 37 37 38 38 39 39 39 39 40 40 40 42 43 44 45 45 46 47 48 52 54 54 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22 28 29 30 31 32 33 33 34 34 34 35 35 35 35 35 36 36 37 37 37 37 38 40 41 41 42 43 43 45 48 49 50 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25 26 27 28 28 31 31 32 32 32 32 32 32 33 33 34 34 34 34 35 35 35 36 38 38 38 39 40 40 41 45 46 46 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
28 32 33 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
38
45
50
low 1280x720
46.1 46.2 47.1 47.4 47.5 47.6 49 49.3 49.9 50.3 50.5 50.8 50.9 51.3 51.4 51.6 51.9 52 52.2 52.4 52.5 52.6 52.7 52.7 53 53.4 53.9 54 54.4 54.5 54.9 55 55.4 55.4 56 56.1 56.9 58 58.7 61.5 63.1 64.9 65.5 66.4 66.6 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.1 31.2 35.8 36 36 37.5 37.7 38.3 38.7 38.8 38.9 39.2 39.4 39.7 39.8 39.9 39.9 40.1 40.4 40.4 40.6 40.7 40.8 40.8 41 41.1 41.1 41.3 41.6 41.8 42 42.5 44 45.1 45.1 46 46.4 46.6 46.7 46.9 47.4 47.6 49.7 49.8 51.9 52.1 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.9 29.9 30.2 30.2 30.8 30.8 31.2 31.3 31.4 31.6 31.7 32 32.1 32.1 32.4 32.7 33.4 33.5 33.5 33.7 33.8 34.1 34.4 34.5 34.6 35 35.2 35.7 35.8 36.1 36.8 36.9 37.6 37.8 37.8 38.2 38.2 38.9 39.5 40.1 40.5 40.5 42.2 42.3 43.9 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19.3 34.4 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
35.6 42.8 43.8 45.2 45.5 47.6 49.2 51.5 51.9 52.8 53.8 56.6 56.9 57.2 58.1 58.5 59.1 60.8 61 61.3 63 63.3 64 64.8 65 65.3 66.1 66.8 68.4 69.1 69.3 70 73.6 75.3 77 79.2 80.1 82.9 83.3 84.1 85.9 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28 28.2 28.7 29.4 29.7 29.7 30.3 31.6 32.1 32.1 33 33.4 33.5 34.6 34.8 35.8 35.9 36 36.1 36.2 36.3 36.5 36.5 36.8 37 37.3 37.4 37.6 37.9 38 38 38 38.8 40.2 40.3 40.3 41 41.3 43.4 45 45.2 45.3 45.9 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.7 17 18.2 18.4 19.2 19.2 19.4 20.7 20.9 21 21.2 21.8 23 23.2 23.9 24.1 24.1 24.1 24.4 24.4 24.4 24.6 24.9 25.4 26.1 26.1 26.4 26.4 26.5 26.5 26.6 26.8 27 27.2 27.5 28.6 28.9 29.2 30.5 30.6 30.6 30.8 31.6 31.7 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
12.6 13.4 14 15.9 19.8 20.5 23 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
7.7 9 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
78.3 89.9 91.5 92.1 92.8 93.2 95.1 98.4 98.4 98.6 98.9 98.9 98.9 99.3 99.4 100.3 100.9 100.9 101.1 101.2 101.2 101.5 101.5 101.7 101.8 102.1 102.4 102.5 102.7 103.2 103.2 103.5 103.8 104.1 104.6 104.7 105 105.7 106.2 106.5 106.5 106.8 107.4 110.5 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
36.2 54.2 55.8 58.2 62.8 65.4 69.4 71.4 75.6 75.9 76.9 78 79.2 80.6 81.9 82.3 83 83.2 83.4 83.5 84.1 84.3 89.4 89.7 89.8 90.4 90.8 90.9 92.6 92.8 92.9 93.1 93.3 93.5 94 94.1 94.1 94.9 95.3 95.5 96.5 96.9 97.4 99.9 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.9 39.8 42.3 47 54.8 57.7 61.5 61.9 62.6 63.2 64.1 64.1 65.2 66.8 67.2 67.2 67.4 69.3 69.3 70.3 72 72.3 74 74.5 74.9 74.9 75.7 76 76.5 76.7 76.8 77.3 77.8 77.9 78.4 79 79.1 80.6 83 83.3 84.6 85.2 85.2 87.8 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.2 41.8 43.7 45.5 53.3 56.8 59.6 60.3 60.4 60.6 60.8 62.1 63 63.6 63.6 63.9 65.2 66.5 66.6 66.6 67.1 68.3 68.7 71.1 71.1 72.3 73.2 73.4 73.6 73.6 74 74 74.4 74.4 74.6 75.4 75.6 76 78 79.8 80.2 80.5 80.6 80.9 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.9 31.8 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
92 120 126 126 128 131 131.2 131.3 132 132.9 133 135 135.1 135.6 140.2 141 141.5 142.7 152 152 156 157 157 158 160 ~ 138 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
59 68 73 76.8 78 78 79.1 80 80 81.2 85.1 88.1 88.2 88.4 89 89 91.5 92 93 97 97 99 100 ~ 85 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36 40 40 40.4 42 42.4 44 44.5 44.8 46.8 47 48 48 49 50 51 51 51.7 54.1 54.3 54.3 56 57 57 58 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.5 18.4 19.2 20.1 20.4 20.5 20.8 20.8 20.9 21.8 22.6 23 23.1 23.3 23.8 23.9 24 24 24.5 24.5 24.6 25.1 25.2 25.5 25.5 25.6 25.9 26 26.1 28 43.1 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
53.8
51.7
53.9
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
50.6 99.1 101.3 102.4 110.5 112.2 124.1 126.5 133.8 134.9 136.9 139.1 141 144 144.9 145.4 147.3 152.9 153.3 157.8 158.1 158.7 158.8 160.3 160.3 161 162.9 162.9 163.3 163.6 165.2 166.5 166.9 169.3 171.5 174.1 175 ~ 145 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
51.1 59.9 85.7 90.4 93.8 106.9 107.7 111 114 120.8 121.7 124.1 129.8 131.5 131.8 133.9 134.8 135.8 139.5 139.5 140.1 145.9 147.9 148 148.1 148.2 151.8 151.9 152.8 154.1 154.9 156.7 158.8 160.2 160.9 164.4 168.4 169.3 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.1 22.6 23.9 24.2 24.3 26.2 31.3 32.2 32.3 32.8 33.1 33.4 33.5 33.6 33.9 34.5 34.8 35.2 35.4 35.9 36.2 36.3 36.9 37.5 37.6 39.6 39.9 40.3 40.6 41.2 41.2 41.3 43.2 43.5 43.5 44.7 48.6 48.9 51.2 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.6 10 10.3 11 11.4 12 12.1 12.3 12.7 13.1 13.3 13.7 13.8 13.9 14 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.3 14.6 14.6 14.7 14.7 15.8 15.9 15.9 16 16.2 16.5 16.6 17.1 17.5 17.8 18.3 19.2 20.2 20.6 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
9.2 12.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9.1  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
5
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
121.8
108.9
118.4
156
139.7
90.4
69.3
123.9
111
101
120.9
111.9
124.3
119.9
109.8
127.9
123.7
112.9
103.5
45.1
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
130.9
130.5
128.3
167.5
152.7
62.9
138.3
119.5
122.2
134.6
107.4
131.8
142.8
131.1
121.4
138.3
134.6
124.8
119.5
45.6
84.5
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Assassin's Creed Shadows121110
Civilization 748.345.420.3
Monster Hunter Wilds1311.3
Kingdom Come Deliverance 224.9
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle12.9
Stalker 222.3
Call of Duty Black Ops 62422
Until Dawn40.227.218.914
EA Sports FC 2575.855.44543.1
God of War Ragnarök10.610.410.110
Final Fantasy XVI1019.116.115.4
Space Marine 219.316.51614.7
Star Wars Outlaws16.515.91310.8
Black Myth: Wukong2016127
Once Human40272522
The First Descendant45302421
F1 2472634810
Senua's Saga Hellblade 217.814.912.1
Ghost of Tsushima33.62825.219
Horizon Forbidden West28312421
Alone in the Dark69564929
Dragon's Dogma 21814.5
Last Epoch60464034
Skull & Bones36322721
Helldivers 239.23027.527.2
Enshrouded272216.8
Palworld40.637.129.527.3
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown182128121
Ready or Not60.446.945.832.5
The Finals99.568.960.546.4
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora18161411
EA Sports WRC35.826.624.722.4
Lords of the Fallen20.21816.314.2
Total War Pharaoh98715344
Assassin's Creed Mirage34333025
Counter-Strike 2111.184.552.131.8
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty3025222011
Baldur's Gate 331252221145.42
Lies of P56.948.141.733.2
The Crew Motorfest32302521
Starfield11.5
Armored Core 65040.136.232.2
Atlas Fallen45.945.739.529.2
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart28.42925.921.1
F1 2363594012
Resident Evil 4 Remake39.630.526.718.4
Company of Heroes 362.250.13938.6
Sons of the Forest29.82119.418.7
Atomic Heart53402820
Returnal37363228
Hogwarts Legacy25.719.315.6
F1 2273665113
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands5040282316.6
GRID Legends70544338
Dying Light 231.129.9
God of War30282115
Far Cry 661.937.732.127.2
F1 2021139745827
Horizon Zero Dawn29342927
F1 2020139.176.960.541.2
Borderlands 381402822
Total War: Three Kingdoms130594633
Far Cry New Dawn67403836
Metro Exodus58362621
Shadow of the Tomb Raider93453935
Strange Brigade1617057453215
Far Cry 56740373531
X-Plane 11.1154423527
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark633625178
Dota 2 Reborn10183706731
The Witcher 3138854824
GTA V1451333615119.14
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
19
23
19
6
23
33
10
2
36
26
3
1
40
16
1
1
6
2

5
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 03. 08:01:17

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 01 Jul 2025 05:34:46 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12086 +0.034s ... 0.064s

#8 got single benchmarks 12086 +0.15s ... 0.214s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.214s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.538s ... 1.752s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0.001s ... 1.753s

#12 Got 1832 rows for game benchmarks. +0.315s ... 2.067s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 2.067s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.051s ... 2.119s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.856s ... 2.975s

#16 return log +0.006s ... 2.982s

Notebook reviews with Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU graphics card

MSI Summit E13 AI Evo convertible review: Serious throttling issues with Core Ultra 7

MSI Summit E13 AI Evo convertible review: Serious throttling issues with Core Ultra 7

The latest Summit E13 A1MTG shows what happens when you put a Core Ultra-H CPU in a laptop originally designed for a Core-U series processor. It may sound very ...
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | 13.30" | 1.3 kg
Eurocom Blitz Ultra laptop review: Easy-to-service professional solution

Eurocom Blitz Ultra laptop review: Easy-to-service professional solution

The Blitz Ultra is an understated 16-inch thin-and-light designed for easy deployment amongst government or private applications. While its looks are inoffensiv...
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | 16.00" | 1.9 kg
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ mini-PC review - A potential desktop killer at just 622 grams

Asus NUC 14 Pro+ mini-PC review - A potential desktop killer at just 622 grams

The Asus NUC 14 Pro+ promises to deliver impressive performance in a compact form factor, with the latest processors and massive power. But how does it perform ...
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | 622 g
Geekom GT1 Mega in review

Geekom GT1 Mega review: Geekom's first AI mini PC does not convince in all aspects

The Geekom GT1 Mega promises powerful performance in a mini PC form factor and is aimed at users who need a lot of performance in the smallest of spaces. Equipp...
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | 693 g
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen 5 Hybrid 2-in-1 review: Dual-boot Windows 11 and Android 13

Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen 5 Hybrid 2-in-1 review: Dual-boot Windows 11 and Android 13

The hybrid Windows-Android approach can effectively replace your existing laptop and tablet all at once. However, the 2-in-1 Lenovo machine isn't necessarily be...
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | 14.00" | 1.7 kg

Khadas Mind 2: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 0.4 kg
  Review » Khadas Mind 2 review: Portable mini PC now with Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Thunderbolt 4 and USB4

Honor MagicBook Art 14: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.60", 1 kg
  Review » Honor MagicBook Art 14 laptop review - Great OLED subnotebook with vapor-chamber and innovative camera

Medion S17431-MD62640: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 17.30", 2.1 kg
  Review » Medion S20 laptop review: 17-inch multimedia notebook with Intel Core Ultra 7

HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11: Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » HP Elite x360 1040 G11 2-in-1 review: For the business road warrior

Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.50", 1.4 kg
  Review » Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 review: New 2.8K 120 Hz display with Arc 8 graphics

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24): Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 15.30", 1.7 kg
  Review » Schenker XMG Evo 15 (M24) laptop review - German Ultrabook with bright display and excellent maintenance options

Medion S10 OLED: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » Medion S10 OLED review: The multimedia laptop with an OLED panel and Core Ultra 7

Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » Mini-LED on a 16-inch convertible: Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 review

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 laptop review - The affordable subnotebook with lots of stamina

LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP review - Light and powerful

MSI Claw: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 7.00", 0.7 kg
  Review » MSI Claw review - The gaming handheld with an Intel Core Ultra processor disappoints

Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.20", 1.3 kg
  Review » Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) laptop with a 3:2 screen review - Let down by some minor issues

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.20", 1 kg
  Review » Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 laptop review - The 980-gram magnesium ultrabook with an impressive OLED panel

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 0.9 kg
  Review » Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti with Intel Core Ultra 9 185H in review: AI mini-PC with touch display, camera and OCuLink

Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.40", 1.2 kg
  Review » Dell XPS 13 9340 laptop review - The compact subnotebook with long runtimes and quite a few flaws

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 review - The multimedia laptop with a 120 Hz display and Core Ultra 7

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 review - Perhaps the best Meteor Lake laptop with a long battery life

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 review – Expensive everyday laptop with OLED touch screen

LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 17.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » LG Gram 17 (2024) laptop review - Small improvements and a new Core Ultra 7

Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 review: Smaller and lighter with faster Arc graphics

Acemagic F2A: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 0.8 kg
  Review » Acemagic F2A review: AI mini-PC gets Intel's Meteor Lake Core Ultra 7 155H processor along with 32 GB of DDR5 RAM and Wi-Fi 7

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Laptop Review: Samsung's alternative to the Apple MacBook Air 15

AcePC Wizbox AI: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 0.8 kg
  Review » AcePC Wizbox AI mini PC review: Intel Meteor Lake goes mini

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 laptop review: Dropping GeForce RTX for integrated Intel Arc

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14 G9 laptop review: New smaller size with integrated Co-Pilot key

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14 laptop review: Intel Arc confronts Radeon 780M

MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.30", 1 kg
  Review » MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo laptop review - Core Ultra 7 and OLED weighing under 1 kg

Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » Asus Zenbook Duo OLED (2024) convertible review: Multitasking champion with Core Ultra 9

HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 2-in-1 Convertible HP Spectre x360 16 (2024) laptop review: A powerful Core-Ultra allrounder with OLED

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 laptop review: First major refresh in three years

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED review - The 1.2-kg subnotebook with 120-Hz OLED and Core Ultra 7

HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » HP Spectre x360 14 review - High-end convertible now with a larger 120-Hz OLED

MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » MSI Prestige 16 B1MG laptop review: From Core i7 Xe to Core Ultra 7 Arc

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » Acer Swift Go 14 review - The Meteor Lake Core Ultra 7 impresses with its AI core

  Review » Intel Meteor Lake Analysis - Core Ultra 7 155H only convinces with GPU performance

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  Review » Intel Meteor Lake Analysis - Core Ultra 7 155H only convinces with GPU performance

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH9, Ultra 9 185H: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH9, Ultra 9 185H

VAIO SX14-R: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » VAIO SX14-R

HP Elite x360 1040 G11: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Elite x360 1040 G11

LG Gram SuperSlim 15 2024: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 15.60", 1 kg
  External Review » LG Gram SuperSlim 15 2024

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH9

Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G7 IML: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G7 IML

Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid

Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.50", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H

HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11: Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11

Honor MagicBook Art 14: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.60", 1 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook Art 14

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IMH9

Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML

Asus Vivobook S15 S5506: Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, 15.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S15 S5506

Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9

Acer TravelMate P6 TMP614-73: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate P6 TMP614-73

Panasonic Toughbook 40 Mk2: Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, 14.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Panasonic Toughbook 40 Mk2

Acer Swift Go 16 OLED SFG16-72, Core Ultra 7 155H: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 16 OLED SFG16-72, Core Ultra 7 155H

Medion S10 OLED: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Medion S10 OLED

Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1

Acer Swift Go 16 OLED SFG16-72: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 16 OLED SFG16-72

Lenovo ThinkBook 13x IMH G4, Ultra 9 185H: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 13x IMH G4, Ultra 9 185H

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED S5406MA, Ultra 7 155H: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED S5406MA, Ultra 7 155H

MSI Modern 15 H AI C1MG: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 15 H AI C1MG

HP EliteBook 1040 G11: Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 1040 G11

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA, Ultra 9: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA, Ultra 9

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6+ IMH: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6+ IMH

MSI Prestige 16 AI EVO B1MG: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 16 AI EVO B1MG

Acer Swift Go 14 OLED SFG14-73: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 OLED SFG14-73

Asus VivoBook S 16 OLED S5606MA: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S 16 OLED S5606MA

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED S5406MA, Ultra 9 185H: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED S5406MA, Ultra 9 185H

MSI Summit E13 AI Evo A1M: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » MSI Summit E13 AI Evo A1M

Lenovo Yoga 7 14IML9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 14IML9

Huawei MateBook 14 2024: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.20", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook 14 2024

Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA, Ultra 7: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA, Ultra 7

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.20", 1 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72, Ultra 9: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72, Ultra 9

Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.40", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7

Dell XPS 14 9440: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.50", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 14 9440

LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 17.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED Q425: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED Q425

LG gram Pro 17Z90SP: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 17.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro 17Z90SP

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9

LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360, Ultra 7 155H: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360, Ultra 7 155H

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16

MSI Claw: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 7.00", 0.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Claw

HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng

Lenovo Yoga 9 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 9 14IMH9

HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng

MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72

Medion E15443: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Medion E15443

MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.30", 1 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo

Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » Lightweight Acer Swift Go 14 laptop gets 33% price cut, drops below $600

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 Gen 9 reaches record-low price bringing 120 Hz OLED panel and discrete GPU below $650

   » Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 Gen 9 OLED laptop is now retailing for 47% less than list price with latest discount

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
   » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED laptop with Core Ultra 7 155H CPU, 16 GB of RAM and long battery life scores massive discount

Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
   » Asus Vivobook S 16 (S5606CA) launched with latest Intel Core Ultra 200H Arrow Lake mobile CPUs and Lumina OLED display

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
   » 2025 Asus Zenbook 14 OLED notebooks now come with Intel Core Ultra 200H and Ryzen AI 300 APUs

Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » Dell Inspiron 16 convertible with 2.5K Mini-LED screen and 32 GB RAM drops to record-low price

MSI Claw: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 7.00", 0.7 kg
   » MSI Claw 8 AI+ vs ROG Ally X: Lunar Lake APU reportedly allows MSI to close gap in both performance and battery life

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 Gen 9 laptop with 16-inch 120 Hz OLED panel and RTX 3050 records big 38% price drop

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » Lenovo Slim 7i Gen 9 laptop with 14-inch touch OLED display and good battery life tumbles to new historic-low price

   » Lenovo Slim 7i 14 Gen 9 (2024) OLED laptop drops to new lowest-ever price of less than $650

   » Long-lasting Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Aura Edition price reaches new record low after 32% discount

Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.40", 1.2 kg
   » Latest Dell XPS 13 9350 laptop with 20-hour battery life and 120 Hz display is now up to $500 cheaper than MSRP

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
   » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 12 with 120Hz OLED and 32GB RAM gets whopping 50% discount

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Aura Edition is battery life beast and now cheaper than ever after 23% discount

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 Gen 9 with 16-inch OLED display and excellent battery life is now 36% off list price

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED laptop with long battery life and Core Ultra 7 155H is selling at affordable price

   » Intel Arc 140T graphics delivers 60 percent performance boost over Lunar Lake variant

Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.50", 1.4 kg
   » Framework Laptop Brick System expands notebook with Lego feet, wheels, cable holders and more

Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.40", 1.2 kg
   » Compact Dell XPS 13 9340 with Core Ultra 7 and 120Hz hits lowest price ever

   » Sleek Dell XPS 14 9440 with Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and 100% sRGB InfinityEdge display records big 33.3% discount

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.50", 1.6 kg
   » Latest Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i Gen 9 with 1200-nit mini LED display and RTX 4060 is on sale at noticeable discount

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 multimedia laptop with RTX 4060 and 120 Hz screen is now down by massive 27% vs list price

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » Lenovo Slim 7i price drops to irresistible new level bringing 14-inch laptop to $661 less than its list price

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » Acer Swift Go 14 OLED price dips to historic low again as Meteor Lake laptop records 20% discount

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 0.9 kg
   » Minisforum reveals the AMD-powered AtomMan X7 Pt with OCuLink support, liquid cooling, and up to 64 GB of memory

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » Sleek Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5i with 120Hz OLED, 32GB RAM, Core Ultra 9 and RTX 4050 gets first discount

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 0.9 kg
   » Minisforum unveils the all-AMD AtomMan G7 Pt mini PC with a 16-core Ryzen 9, RX 7600M XT discrete GPU, and up to 96 GB of memory

Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.40", 1.2 kg
   » Dell's new design on the XPS 13 is a mistake and it's less fun to use in everyday life

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » Xiaomi's RedmiBook Pro 16 is a real price-performance champion and one of the best multimedia laptops without dGPU

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.5 kg
   » Samsung's Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 is too expensive and limited to 16 GB of RAM

AcePC Wizbox AI: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 0.8 kg
   » Our first Meteor Lake mini PC review: AcePC Wizbox AI shows solid gains over Raptor Lake

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
   » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 12 with 2.8K OLED, Core Ultra 7 and 32GB RAM already discounted by 51%

Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
   » Asus Zenbook Duo OLED (2024) currently the best multi-screen device on the market

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » The new Asus Zenbook 14 OLED 2024 has one major flaw

HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » HP Spectre x360 14 convertible with 2.8K 120 Hz OLED touchscreen and Meteor Lake processor discounted by up to 32%

   » HP's new Spectre x360 14 convertible impresses with a great OLED panel and quiet cooling

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » Acer Swift Go 14 - Smooth gaming on the office laptop with and without XeSS thanks to Meteor Lake

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-05-15)