Notebookcheck Logo

MSI Claw review - The gaming handheld with an Intel Core Ultra processor disappoints

Expensive and too slow.

MSI is slightly late to the gaming handheld bandwagon by releasing the Claw—an Intel-based model. After several updates over the course of the last few weeks, its performance is now said to have been improved. We have thoroughly tested the compact gamer. Update: Correction of the overall rating

Gaming handhelds are currently all the rage and every major manufacturer is trying to jump on the bandwagon. MSI is no exception, although it has come onto the market quite late with its new Claw and in contrast to most of its competitors which feature an AMD processor, MSI has opted for an Intel Core Ultra model. It is also fitted with a 7-inch IPS display and Hall Effect joysticks and triggers. 

MSI currently has two models on offer: The Claw A1M-036 which comes with the Core Ultra 5 135H, 16 GB RAM and a 512 GB SSD, and the Claw A1M-059 with the more powerful Core Ultra 7 155H, 16 GB RAM and a 1 TB SSD for US$899, which is the one we are testing.

Update: There was a bug with our new rating system, which has been corrected. The overall score in the category Handheld / UMPC is increased from 69 to 77 %. In addition, the panel supports VRR and the corresponding section was corrected.

MSI Claw (Claw Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 16 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 45 W PL2 / Short Burst, 43 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Core: 2250 MHz, RAM: 3200 MHz, 31.0.101.5522
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5x-6400, Dual-Channel, onboard
Display
7.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 315 PPI, Capacitive, TL070FVXS02-0, IPS, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02, 1024 GB 
, 871 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 33 x 294 x 117 ( = 1.3 x 11.57 x 4.61 in)
Battery
53 Wh, 4700 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 6-cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, 65W PSU, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
672 g ( = 23.7 oz / 1.48 pounds), Power Supply: 341 g ( = 12.03 oz / 0.75 pounds)
Price
849 Euro
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors compared

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
77.4 %v8
06 / 2024
MSI Claw
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
672 g33 mm7.00"1920x1080
88.9 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
640 g49 mm7.40"1280x800
66.3 %v8
01 / 2024
Lenovo Legion Go
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
845 g41 mm8.80"2560x1600
87.5 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
611 g21.22 mm7.00"1920x1080
84.9 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M
876 g43 mm8.40"2560x1600
85.2 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Ayaneo Kun
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M
942 g22 mm8.40"2560x1600

Note: We have recently updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here .

Case - The Claw with lit-up joysticks and buttons

The MSI Claw is a typical gaming handheld like the ROG Ally from Asus that, in comparison to the Lenovo Legion Go for example, doesn't feature detachable controllers. The MSI Claw uses a black plastic case with smooth surfaces—only the back has lots of fan grilles. It is generally built well, but you can elicit some creaking noises from the device. Fingerprint marks, on the other hand, aren't a big problem. The two rings around the joysticks as well as the buttons on the right side can additionally be illuminated. Its wide black bezels are a little annoying (especially on the top and bottom of the screen), although its good impression is reinforced by its use of additional case material.

MSI Claw (bottom) vs. Asus ROG Ally (top)
MSI Claw (bottom) vs. Asus ROG Ally (top)
MSI Claw (bottom) vs. Asus ROG Ally (top)
MSI Claw (bottom) vs. Asus ROG Ally (top)

The bezels on the ROG Ally, for example, are just as wide but in turn, its case is a little narrower above and beneath the display. All-in-all, the MSI Claw is a little larger and its grips are formed differently. As a result, its ergonomics are better and you can hold the device easier with larger hands in particular, resulting in it being slightly more comfortable than the ROG Ally.

Weighing in at 672 grams, the MSI Claw is one of the more lightweight handhelds in the comparison field and even when using it for longer periods of time, you shouldn't have any problems with its weight. With the grips included, its case thickness is about 3.4 cm. The included 65-watt power supply weighs 341 grams.

Size comparison

311 mm / 12.2 in 135 mm / 5.31 in 43 mm / 1.693 in 876 g1.931 lbs298 mm / 11.7 in 117 mm / 4.61 in 49 mm / 1.929 in 640 g1.411 lbs325 mm / 12.8 in 140 mm / 5.51 in 22 mm / 0.866 in 942 g2.08 lbs299 mm / 11.8 in 131 mm / 5.16 in 41 mm / 1.614 in 845 g1.863 lbs294 mm / 11.6 in 117 mm / 4.61 in 33 mm / 1.299 in 672 g1.482 lbs280.44 mm / 11 in 111.2 mm / 4.38 in 21.22 mm / 0.835 in 611 g1.347 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Connectivity - Thunderbolt 4

MSI has installed a USB-C port on the top of the device that also supports Thunderbolt 4. We would like to have seen a second USB connection in order to quickly connect external SSDs or USB sticks, for example. This is especially important when the device is connected to the mains or powered alongside an external monitor. We performed part of our test with the gamer connected to an external monitor and it worked great as long as the screen supports power delivery via USB-C. It doesn't have a webcam, but the power button can also be used as a fingerprint scanner.

Top: Volume, 3.5-mm audio, USB-C 4.0 with Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbit/s, DisplayPort ALT mode, Power Delivery 3.0), microSD card reader
Top: Volume, 3.5-mm audio, USB-C 4.0 with Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbit/s, DisplayPort ALT mode, Power Delivery 3.0), microSD card reader

SD card reader

You can expand the device's storage by inserting a microSD card into the slot on the top. In our test using our reference card (Angelbird AV Pro V60), the card reader's transfer rates of over 200 MB/s were very good and even when copying image files from the card, we still measured around 120 MB/s.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (Angelbird AV PRO microSD)
184.04 MB/s +52%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
146.02 MB/s +21%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
132.46 MB/s +9%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
132.4 MB/s +9%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
121 MB/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (20.9 - 201, n=14, last 2 years)
114.5 MB/s -5%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
55 MB/s -55%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
265.8 MB/s +30%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (Angelbird AV PRO microSD)
251.05 MB/s +23%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
204.2 MB/s
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
191.7 MB/s -6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (74.7 - 260, n=13, last 2 years)
167.4 MB/s -18%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
144.57 MB/s -29%

Communication

MSI has equipped the Claw handheld with the Killer BE1750x BE200NGW, a modern Wi-Fi 7 module, meaning the device is prepared for the newest WLAN networks. We don't yet use a corresponding Wi-Fi 7 router in our tests, but its performance using our reference router from Asus was still very good and stable, although it couldn't quite live up to that of larger laptops. In everyday use, we noted no issues with its signal quality and downloading even large games took no time.

Networking
MSI Claw
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1582 (min: 1462) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1524 (min: 1468) MBit/s ∼88%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Quectel FC66E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
917 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
999 (min: 941) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1762 (min: 1653) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1858 (min: 1771) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Go
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1561 (min: 1318) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1711 (min: 862) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1615 (min: 1509) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1789 (min: 1485) MBit/s ∼96%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1648 (min: 1587) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1735 (min: 1708) MBit/s ∼100%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1553 (min: 1302) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1405 (min: 1179) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1532 (min: 1497) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1397 (min: 1288) MBit/s ∼75%
Ayaneo Kun
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
944 (min: 876) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
981 (min: 888) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1607 (min: 1530) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1753 (min: 874) MBit/s ∼94%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
MSI Claw; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1582 (1462-1660)
MSI Claw; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1524 (1468-1593)

Maintenance

The back is secured by a total of six Phillips screws. As is usual on MSI devices, one screw is covered by a sticker labelled with the words Factory Seal. Proper use does not void the handheld's warranty, but since our test device is a store device, we did not want to damage the seal. In order to replace the small M.2 2230 SSD, both the battery and the entire cooling unit must be removed, which makes it necessary to reapply thermal paste when you put it back together again.

Input devices & operation

Its primary input methods are the device's capacitive as well as its "gamepad" controls such as its two joysticks, the D-pad and the additional buttons. The touchscreen itself works perfectly, but using Windows with just a touchscreen (especially a small one) is still very tiring and the initial setup is not terribly fun. Ideally, you should have a monitor available that supplies the device with power and to which a mouse and keyboard can also be directly connected. As soon as you have finished with Windows, everything revolves around the manufacturer's software—in this case, MSI Center M. The launcher can be started automatically when the device is booted up and changes to all settings can be made here. In addition, all important gaming services such as Steam, UPlay, XBox, Epic, EA and Battlenet are already integrated, making it very easy to install games. There is also a quick menu, which can be displayed at any time and can be used to quickly change the most important settings (energy profile, brightness, Wi-Fi connection). The menu is also highly customizable and overall, the Center-M software works flawlessly and appears to be very well developed. Only its real-time monitoring (three different modes) is linked to the top left corner and the FPS display did not work in any of the games we tested.

MSI Center M - overview
MSI Center M - overview
MSI Center M - control mode
MSI Center M - control mode

MSI uses Hall Effect analog sticks and triggers, so there won't be any problems with stick drift. The buttons are slightly louder in total compared to on the ROG Ally and the loud noise when the triggers return to their original position can be a little annoying. However, we didn't note any functional problems when playing games.

Display - 7-inch IPS with a 120-Hz refresh rate

Sub-pixel array
Sub-pixel array
Only slight backlight bleeding
Only slight backlight bleeding

The 7-inch 16:9 IPS screen features a resolution of 1,920 x 1,080 pixels. Its refresh rate is 120 Hz and it supports variable refresh rate like the ROG Ally. All-in-all, the screen makes a good impression, although bright surfaces tend to appear slightly grainy. Its response times are nice and fast and we noted only slight backlight bleeding at full brightness—plus, there is no PWM flickering.

We measured a maximum brightness of 483 cd/m² and an average of 461 cd/m². Its black level is 0.32 cd/m², which results in a very good maximum contrast ratio of almost 1,500:1. 

483
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
TL070FVXS02-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 483 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 461.3 cd/m² Minimum: 25 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Contrast: 1491:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86, calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
69.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
MSI Claw
TL070FVXS02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
ANX7530 U, OLED, 1280x800, 7.4"
Lenovo Legion Go
Legion Go Display, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
FLQ8423-24L0, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
Ayaneo Kun
Ayaneo 2K, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
Display
31%
24%
-2%
20%
25%
Display P3 Coverage
67
99.6
49%
92.1
37%
65.6
-2%
91.9
37%
93.52
40%
sRGB Coverage
94.4
100
6%
99.56
5%
92.1
-2%
99.3
5%
99.4
5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69.4
96.1
38%
90.09
30%
67.9
-2%
81.6
18%
91.2
31%
Response Times
-17%
-122%
-3%
-211%
-154%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
9.2 ?(4.6, 4.6)
9 ?(4.5, 4.5)
2%
20.8 ?(9.4, 11.4)
-126%
10.5 ?(5, 5.5)
-14%
25.5 ?(11.5, 25)
-177%
24.2 ?(13.8, 10.4)
-163%
Response Time Black / White *
6.6 ?(3.1, 3.5)
9 ?(4.5, 4.5)
-36%
14.4 ?(7, 7.4)
-118%
6 ?(2.7, 3.3)
9%
22.73 ?(11.05, 11.67)
-244%
16.2 ?(7.6, 8.6)
-145%
PWM Frequency
360 ?(100)
700
20000
Screen
147%
-37%
-17%
-14%
-20%
Brightness middle
477
485
2%
411
-14%
513
8%
318
-33%
680
43%
Brightness
461
482
5%
413
-10%
474
3%
287
-38%
678
47%
Brightness Distribution
88
98
11%
80
-9%
84
-5%
48
-45%
91
3%
Black Level *
0.32
0.03
91%
0.42
-31%
0.38
-19%
0.1118
65%
0.5
-56%
Contrast
1491
16167
984%
979
-34%
1350
-9%
2844
91%
1360
-9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.6
2
23%
5.94
-128%
3.7
-42%
4.81
-85%
4
-54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.8
5
14%
10.56
-82%
8.3
-43%
6.93
-19%
9
-55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.5
2.95
-97%
1.53
-2%
1
33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.9
2
49%
0.92
76%
5.1
-31%
6.12
-57%
9
-131%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2 110%
1.93 114%
2.14 103%
2.003 110%
2 110%
CCT
7250 90%
6336 103%
8064 81%
7732 84%
7707 84%
7188 90%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
54% / 95%
-45% / -36%
-7% / -11%
-68% / -35%
-50% / -29%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN grayscale calibrated
CalMAN grayscale calibrated
CalMAN saturation calibrated
CalMAN saturation calibrated
CalMAN ColorChecker calibrated
CalMAN ColorChecker calibrated

MSI does not offer any color profiles and during our analysis with the professional CalMAN software (X-Rite i1 Pro 2), the panel showed a slight blue cast in connection with a color temperature that was too cool. Its color deviations, on the other hand, are okay. MSI uses these settings to achieve a higher brightness. With our calibration (profile is available to download for free further above), we were able to improve its grayscale in particular, rendering its color cast a thing of the past—but its maximum brightness was then almost 50 cd/m² lower. The sRGB color space is covered by 95 % and theoretically, you could even edit images on the device, but this is obviously not a realistic use scenario for a gaming handheld. 

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. P3
vs. P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.1 ms rise
↘ 3.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.6 ms rise
↘ 4.6 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8445 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Of course, reflections on the shiny touchscreen are to be expected and on very bright days, it becomes a little hard to use the device. However, in most cases, you should be able to find a position that works. There are no problems when it comes to its viewing angles.

Viewing-angle stability
Viewing-angle stability

Performance - Intel Core Ultra & 16 GB RAM

As previously mentioned, you can get the MSI Claw gaming handheld with the Core Ultra 7 155H or the weaker Core Ultra 5 135H, with the latter then also coming with a slightly weaker iGPU. Both models are equipped with 16 GB RAM and there is no option to manually assign the VRAM.

 
 
 

Testing conditions

MSI offers various energy profiles, whereby the mode AI Engine is active by default. This should automatically select the best settings according to the load scenario and we also used this mode for the following benchmarks and tests. We have listed the TDP and performance values of the various profiles in the following table.

Energy profile TDP mains TDP battery CB R23 multi Time Spy graphics Cyberpunk 2077 1080p Low max. fan noise emissions
Super Battery 20 watts 20 watts 7,270 points 2,581 points 23.3fps 36.6 dB(A)
Balanced 35 watts 30 watts 12,523 points 3,517 points 31fps 45.5 dB(A)
AI 45 -> 43 watts 35 watts 14,463 points 3,491 points 31fps 45.5 dB(A)
Extreme Performance 45 -> 43 watts 35 watts 14,550 points 4,461 points 31fps 48.5 dB(A)

There is also a manual mode in which you can adjust the TDP values, but only within the range of 20-35 watts and thus within the range of the existing profiles. Other handhelds offer more flexibility in this aspect.

Energy profiles
Energy profiles
Manual mode
Manual mode

Processor - Core Ultra 7 155H

The Core Ultra 7 155H from Intel's current Meteor Lake generation is used in a lot of laptops at the moment. Its performance within the MSI Claw is also stable and generally decent, although the Intel processor simply requires more power than other AMD handhelds to deliver comparable performance, which of course isn't ideal for a handheld. In addition, its cooling unit has a lot of work to do, but we will talk more about this in the emissions section a little later. During battery operation, the processor is allowed to consume a maximum of 35 watts, which is why its multi-core performance is around 14 % lower in this case. Further CPU benchmarks can be found in our tech section.

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0125250375500625750875100011251250137515001625175018752000212522502375Tooltip
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1922 (1902.14-1950.08)
Lenovo Legion Go AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme: Ø1914 (1836.13-2049.71)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme; Turbo: Ø2271 (2104.49-2396.5)
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø2092 (2081.49-2100.51)
Ayaneo Kun AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø2405 (2346.87-2439.02)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
83.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Go -2!
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
79.2 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
79.1 pt
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
74.5 pt
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
73.7 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
70.7 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
68.4 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -6!
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
42.5 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
15074 Points +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (9769 - 19007, n=52)
14965 Points +3%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
14960 Points +3%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
14463 Points
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
13224 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
13004 Points -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3984 - 16841, n=17, last 2 years)
12135 Points -16%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
3984 Points -72%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1779 Points +1%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1770 Points
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1733 Points -2%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1731 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1496 - 1815, n=52)
1726 Points -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1088 - 2006, n=16, last 2 years)
1688 Points -5%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1597 Points -10%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5917 Points +23%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
5825 Points +21%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3798 - 7409, n=50)
5795 Points +21%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5168 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
5109 Points +6%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
4805 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1521 - 6577, n=15, last 2 years)
4674 Points -3%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
1521 Points -68%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
692 Points +1%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
684 Points
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
676 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
672 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (601 - 696, n=50)
665 Points -3%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (357 - 787, n=15, last 2 years)
629 Points -8%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
622 Points -9%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
357 Points -48%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1932 - 2880, n=56)
2449 Points +26%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2439 (2346.87min - 2439.02max) Points +25%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2397 (2104.49min - 2396.5max) Points +23%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2101 (2081.49min - 2100.51max) Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2050 (1836.13min - 2049.71max) Points +5%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1950 (1902.14min - 1950.08max) Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (689 - 2533, n=15, last 2 years)
1877 Points -4%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
689 Points -65%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
280 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
268 Points +5%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
264 Points +3%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
256 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (155.1 - 304, n=14, last 2 years)
254 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (99.6 - 268, n=52)
249 Points -3%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
246 Points -4%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (189 - 588, n=13, last 2 years)
281 Seconds * -14%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
246 Seconds *
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
241 Seconds * +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (175 - 381, n=47)
233 Seconds * +5%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
213 Seconds * +13%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
208 Seconds * +15%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
62657 MIPS +17%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
62156 MIPS +16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (41739 - 70254, n=50)
59108 MIPS +10%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
56966 MIPS +6%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
56268 MIPS +5%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
53599 MIPS
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (19684 - 66618, n=14, last 2 years)
50981 MIPS -5%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
19684 MIPS -63%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
6316 MIPS +19%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5682 MIPS +7%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5490 MIPS +3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (4594 - 5621, n=50)
5330 MIPS 0%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5318 MIPS
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3653 - 6143, n=14, last 2 years)
5316 MIPS 0%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
3653 MIPS -31%
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (7732 - 13656, n=55)
12275 Points +17%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
11727 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
10990 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
10872 Points +4%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10464 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (4587 - 13426, n=16, last 2 years)
9530 Points -9%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7778 Points -26%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7427 Points -29%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
4587 Points -56%
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2538 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2530 Points +4%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2530 Points +4%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2433 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1901 - 2473, n=52)
2377 Points -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1348 - 2904, n=16, last 2 years)
2305 Points -5%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2243 Points -8%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2194 Points -10%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
1348 Points -45%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (10017 - 13556, n=52)
12016 Points +19%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
10917 Points +8%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10076 Points
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
9803 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
9589 Points -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3932 - 11975, n=16, last 2 years)
8765 Points -13%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
8389 Points -17%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7743 Points -23%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
4457 Points -56%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1956 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1898 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1896 Points +7%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1780 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1462 - 1824, n=52)
1751 Points -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (875 - 2134, n=16, last 2 years)
1707 Points -4%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1622 Points -9%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
1486 Points -17%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1355 Points -24%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
18.6 fps +27%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
18.4 fps +25%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (9.93 - 21.2, n=50)
16.5 fps +12%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
16.3 fps +11%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
15.8 fps +7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (7.07 - 20.8, n=14, last 2 years)
15.4 fps +5%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
14.7 fps
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
57.8 s * -25%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (41.1 - 92.8, n=14, last 2 years)
55.2 s * -19%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
53.5 s * -16%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
52.3 s * -13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (37.5 - 79.2, n=49)
49.6 s * -7%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
46.2 s *
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
43 s * +7%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.4167 - 0.756, n=15, last 2 years)
0.508 sec * -9%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4945 sec * -6%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4912 sec * -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (0.4457 - 0.53, n=49)
0.4817 sec * -3%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4795 sec * -3%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4665 sec *
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
0.4662 sec * -0%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
0.4447 sec * +5%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1950 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
149.4 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
256 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4805 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
684 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1770 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
14463 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
95.2 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
86.7 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
82.8 pt
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
73.6 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
72.5 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
65.6 pt
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
57 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
25901 KRay/s +140%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
25652 KRay/s +138%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
24067 KRay/s +123%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
21814 KRay/s +102%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
20714 KRay/s +92%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6990 - 26450, n=15, last 2 years)
18926 KRay/s +75%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (6670 - 18470, n=50)
13121 KRay/s +22%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
10795 KRay/s
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
109745 Points +89%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
108496 Points +87%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
102584 Points +77%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
91595 Points +58%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
86738 Points +49%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (42932 - 109745, n=15, last 2 years)
80791 Points +39%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (40905 - 93181, n=50)
69689 Points +20%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
58068 Points
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
4847 MB/s +79%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
4777 MB/s +76%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
4420 MB/s +63%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
4211 MB/s +56%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
3854 MB/s +42%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1403 - 4847, n=15, last 2 years)
3636 MB/s +34%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1940 - 4436, n=50)
3249 MB/s +20%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
2707 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
114294 Points +65%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
113343 Points +63%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
106595 Points +54%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
99496 Points +43%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
95153 Points +37%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (64698 - 94181, n=50)
83035 Points +20%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (41744 - 114294, n=15, last 2 years)
82055 Points +18%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
69419 Points
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
14822 Points +75%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
14596 Points +72%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
14070 Points +66%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
13607 Points +61%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
12936 Points +53%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (4425 - 16980, n=15, last 2 years)
11661 Points +38%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (5639 - 10647, n=50)
9134 Points +8%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
8463 Points
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
58482 Points +107%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
57426 Points +103%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
54962 Points +95%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
48428 Points +71%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
46180 Points +63%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (23380 - 58482, n=15, last 2 years)
42674 Points +51%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (18236 - 47685, n=50)
33893 Points +20%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
28245 Points
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
166333 MB/s +178%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
165008 MB/s +176%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
149047 MB/s +149%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (21547 - 166333, n=15, last 2 years)
86298 MB/s +44%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (45713 - 152179, n=50)
77255 MB/s +29%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
76146 MB/s +27%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
59882 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
57678 MB/s -4%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
1047 MB/s +32%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
958 MB/s +20%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
964 MB/s +21%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (557 - 1250, n=50)
962 MB/s +21%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
899 MB/s +13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (356 - 1112, n=15, last 2 years)
818 MB/s +3%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
796 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
687 MB/s -14%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
13846 KRay/s +142%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
13765 KRay/s +140%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
12875 KRay/s +125%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
11335 KRay/s +98%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
10740 KRay/s +87%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3766 - 14181, n=15, last 2 years)
10004 KRay/s +75%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3569 - 9802, n=50)
6871 KRay/s +20%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
5732 KRay/s
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
49287 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (32719 - 54223, n=50)
46707 MPixel/s -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (19472 - 54726, n=15, last 2 years)
38064 MPixel/s -23%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
37540 MPixel/s -24%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
34764 MPixel/s -29%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
30576 MPixel/s -38%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
29573 MPixel/s -40%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
26622 MPixel/s -46%

System performance

Apart from the still awkward touch operation of Windows, the MSI Claw is a fast device with modern components. We also had no problems with crashes or other limitations during our test. In addition, there were no bottlenecks during the synthetic tests.

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
6907 Points +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (4809 - 7529, n=34)
6673 Points +3%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
6504 Points
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
6439 Points -1%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (5219 - 7471, n=15, last 2 years)
6429 Points -1%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
6330 Points -3%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
5900 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (7605 - 11289, n=34)
10468 Points +9%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
10296 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
10081 Points +5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (8427 - 11262, n=15, last 2 years)
9897 Points +3%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
9610 Points
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
9483 Points -1%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
9247 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
10074 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
8996 Points +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (6042 - 10591, n=34)
8663 Points +4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (7213 - 10031, n=15, last 2 years)
8585 Points +3%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
8346 Points
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
8089 Points -3%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
7323 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
9311 Points
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
8975 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (4985 - 10709, n=34)
8937 Points -4%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
8621 Points -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6350 - 10026, n=15, last 2 years)
8520 Points -8%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
8233 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
7990 Points -14%
CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1718 Points +1%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1693 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1366 - 1903, n=34)
1656 Points -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (840 - 1847, n=13, last 2 years)
1466 Points -13%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1366 Points -19%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1340 Points -21%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
840 Points -50%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1662 Points +1%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1649 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1291 - 1798, n=33)
1581 Points -4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (874 - 1719, n=13, last 2 years)
1452 Points -12%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1429 Points -13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1416 Points -14%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
874 Points -47%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1878 Points +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1519 - 1929, n=33)
1818 Points +1%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1795 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (808 - 2077, n=13, last 2 years)
1547 Points -14%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1278 Points -29%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1272 Points -29%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
808 Points -55%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1538 Points
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1479 Points -4%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1451 Points -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (939 - 1802, n=33)
1402 Points -9%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1309 Points -15%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (759 - 1610, n=13, last 2 years)
1302 Points -15%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
831 Points -46%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
432 Points +57%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
300 Points +9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (252 - 299, n=34)
277 Points 0%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
276 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (188.4 - 323, n=15, last 2 years)
269 Points -3%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
230 Points -17%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
228 Points -17%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
188.4 Points -32%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
277 Points +9%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
255 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (166.4 - 309, n=29)
251 Points -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (107 - 291, n=12, last 2 years)
218 Points -15%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
179.4 Points -30%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
107 Points -58%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
746 ms * -41%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
565 ms * -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (428 - 895, n=15, last 2 years)
576 ms * -9%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
556 ms * -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (517 - 614, n=35)
541 ms * -2%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
529 ms *
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
518 ms * +2%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
6504 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
92447 MB/s +13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (62397 - 96791, n=50)
82943 MB/s +2%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
81717 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
76512 MB/s -6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (32617 - 107929, n=16, last 2 years)
66629 MB/s -18%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
45357 MB/s -44%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
45279 MB/s -45%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
43750 MB/s -46%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
32617 MB/s -60%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
80481 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (60544 - 90647, n=50)
79969 MB/s -1%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25380 - 100208, n=15, last 2 years)
59813 MB/s -26%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
55710 MB/s -31%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
50337 MB/s -37%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
48348 MB/s -40%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
37657 MB/s -53%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
25380 MB/s -68%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
108872 MB/s +44%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
92869 MB/s +23%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25596 - 117883, n=17, last 2 years)
75657 MB/s 0%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75350 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (58692 - 93451, n=50)
72670 MB/s -4%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
50079 MB/s -34%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
49922 MB/s -34%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
49426 MB/s -34%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
49797 MB/s -34%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
25596 MB/s -66%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (116.2 - 233, n=50)
143.2 ns * -3%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
139.6 ns *
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
134.4 ns * +4%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
132.2 ns * +5%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
132.3 ns * +5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (99.8 - 147.6, n=16, last 2 years)
124.5 ns * +11%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
119.5 ns * +14%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
113.7 ns * +19%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
112.6 ns * +19%

* ... smaller is better

DPC latencies

In our standardized latency test (surfing the web, 4K YouTube playback, CPU load), the test device with the current BIOS version showed some limitations when using real-time audio applications.

LatencyMon - overview
LatencyMon - overview
LatencyMon - drivers
LatencyMon - drivers
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2293.5 μs *
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1421.6 μs * +38%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
995 μs * +57%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
744.2 μs * +68%

* ... smaller is better

Storage device

The Claw is fitted with a compact M.2 2230 SSD—in our case one from Kioxia (BG5)—which offers a storage capacity of 1 TB, whereby users have 871 GB free to use after first starting up the device. Although it is a PCIe 4.0 SSD, its maximum transfer rates are only listed as being 3.5 GB/s at best and our benchmark results mostly showed values around the 3 GB/s mark as well. Still, this is completely sufficient for a gaming handheld and even under longer periods of load, we noted no drop in performance. Further SSD benchmarks can be found here.

Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3303 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2935 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 535 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 401 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 75.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 226 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 842 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1873 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 -11!
 
88.9 pt
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
68.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
63.2 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
61.5 pt
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
57.9 pt
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
 
57.9 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -11!
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
44.4 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
42 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
5565 (3733.98min - 5564.79max) MB/s +93%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
4421 (4398.57min - 4420.59max) MB/s +54%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
4132 (2139.64min - 4132.14max) MB/s +44%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (431 - 5565, n=16, last 2 years)
2900 MB/s +1%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2878 (2833.46min - 2878.46max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  (n=1)
2878 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
2106 (2093.38min - 2106.19max) MB/s -27%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
463 (318.56min - 463.17max) MB/s -84%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
431 (334.87min - 430.55max) MB/s -85%
seq write
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
5102 (4976.45min - 5101.6max) MB/s +85%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3804 (1734.97min - 3803.55max) MB/s +38%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (259 - 5102, n=16, last 2 years)
2865 MB/s +4%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2758 (2188.17min - 2758.38max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  (n=1)
2758 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1644 (1600.76min - 1644.1max) MB/s -40%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
1056 (164.42min - 1056.34max) MB/s -62%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
263 (255.13min - 262.56max) MB/s -90%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
259 (118.2min - 258.69max) MB/s -91%
seq q8 t1 read
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
7005 (6255.88min - 7004.74max) MB/s +185%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
6987 (616.14min - 6987.16max) MB/s +184%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
6320 (613min - 6319.71max) MB/s +157%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
5068 (4682.73min - 5068.47max) MB/s +106%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2458 - 7005, n=16, last 2 years)
5024 MB/s +104%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
4274 (3828.24min - 4274.42max) MB/s +74%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
3760 (2910.85min - 3760.19max) MB/s +53%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2458 (2277.98min - 2458.28max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  (n=1)
2458 MB/s 0%
seq q8 t1 write
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
6151 (6074.61min - 6150.81max) MB/s +114%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3894 (3354.39min - 3893.57max) MB/s +36%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (256 - 6151, n=16, last 2 years)
3272 MB/s +14%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2871 (2238.71min - 2871max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  (n=1)
2871 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1790 (1750.28min - 1789.5max) MB/s -38%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
1088 (990.07min - 1088.21max) MB/s -62%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
259 (256.06min - 258.58max) MB/s -91%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
256 (243.34min - 256.39max) MB/s -91%
4k q1 t1 read
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
97.4 (60.76min - 97.44max) MB/s +43%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
72.2 (70.46min - 72.23max) MB/s +6%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
68 (66.96min - 68max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  (n=1)
68 MB/s 0%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
64.2 (61.66min - 64.21max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (37.3 - 97.4, n=16, last 2 years)
58.8 MB/s -14%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
39.1 (33.75min - 39.14max) MB/s -42%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
37.3 (36.41min - 37.3max) MB/s -45%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
33.4 (33.02min - 33.38max) MB/s -51%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
226 (185.56min - 226.08max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  (n=1)
226 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
210 (193.2min - 209.71max) MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
202 (192.69min - 202.49max) MB/s -11%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
192.3 (177.32min - 192.31max) MB/s -15%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
164.6 (149.63min - 164.58max) MB/s -27%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
181.4 (169.88min - 181.36max) MB/s -20%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (112 - 262, n=17, last 2 years)
177.7 MB/s -21%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
151.3 (148.2min - 151.25max) MB/s -33%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
112.3 (81.5min - 112.29max) MB/s -50%
4k q32 t16 read
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
4025 (4006.61min - 4024.99max) MB/s +87%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2148 (2142.5min - 2147.8max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  (n=1)
2148 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1943 (1054.45min - 1942.86max) MB/s -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (86 - 4025, n=16, last 2 years)
1791 MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
984 (894.6min - 983.67max) MB/s -54%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
407 (296.91min - 406.67max) MB/s -81%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
150.3 (144.83min - 150.29max) MB/s -93%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
86 (58.25min - 86max) MB/s -96%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
2871 (1656.3min - 2870.9max) MB/s +430%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
2452 (2245.51min - 2452.41max) MB/s +352%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (89.1 - 3088, n=16, last 2 years)
1216 MB/s +124%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
542 (404.55min - 542.06max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  (n=1)
542 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
434 (400.52min - 433.94max) MB/s -20%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
262 MB/s -52%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
259 (220.73min - 258.5max) MB/s -52%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
89.1 (82.16min - 89.09max) MB/s -84%
AS SSD
Score Total
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
8425 Points +88%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2412 - 8425, n=11, last 2 years)
5339 Points +19%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
4480 Points
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  (n=1)
4480 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3969 Points -11%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
3522 Points -21%
Score Read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
2527 Points +15%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2189 Points
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  (n=1)
2189 Points 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (842 - 2849, n=11, last 2 years)
2065 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1447 Points -34%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1319 Points -40%
Score Write
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
4632 Points +278%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1161 - 4632, n=11, last 2 years)
2165 Points +77%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1814 Points +48%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1623 Points +32%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1225 Points
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  (n=1)
1225 Points 0%
Seq Read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
5260 MB/s +102%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
4140.35 MB/s +59%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (193.2 - 5643, n=12, last 2 years)
3832 MB/s +47%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
3395 MB/s +31%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2601 MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  (n=1)
2601 MB/s 0%
Seq Write
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
4573 MB/s +227%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3282.76 MB/s +135%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (80.9 - 5416, n=12, last 2 years)
3020 MB/s +116%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1397 MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  (n=1)
1397 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1370 MB/s -2%
4K Read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
73.2 MB/s +13%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
64.6 MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  (n=1)
64.6 MB/s 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (34 - 82.8, n=11, last 2 years)
58.9 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
55.21 MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
44.6 MB/s -31%
4K Write
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
218 MB/s +9%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
200 MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  (n=1)
200 MB/s 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (90.7 - 218, n=11, last 2 years)
158.4 MB/s -21%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
150.68 MB/s -25%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
130 MB/s -35%
4K-64 Read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1928 MB/s +3%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1864 MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  (n=1)
1864 MB/s 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (590 - 2260, n=11, last 2 years)
1590 MB/s -15%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
977.4 MB/s -48%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
935 MB/s -50%
4K-64 Write
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
3957 MB/s +347%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (885 - 3957, n=11, last 2 years)
1768 MB/s +100%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1356 MB/s +53%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1335.19 MB/s +51%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
885 MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  (n=1)
885 MB/s 0%
Access Time Read
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
0.122 ms * -79%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.025 - 0.151, n=11, last 2 years)
0.082 ms * -21%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
0.068 ms *
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  (n=1)
0.068 ms * -0%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
0.036 ms * +47%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
0.029 ms * +57%
Access Time Write
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
0.115 ms * -448%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.016 - 0.084, n=11, last 2 years)
0.04055 ms * -93%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
0.024 ms * -14%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
0.021 ms *
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  (n=1)
0.021 ms * -0%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
0.016 ms * +24%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
MSI Claw; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2087 (1879.68-2146.44)

Graphics card

Our test device with the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H features the fast Arc Graphics iGPU with 8 Xe cores that can achieve a maximum clock rate of 2.25 GHz. In the synthetic 3DMark tests, Intel was able to improve its performance considerably compared to the old Iris Xe Graphics G7 and AMD's Radeon 780M was narrowly beaten, too. The iGPU is very well equipped for everyday tasks such as playing back high-resolution videos.

The device's graphics performance remains stable in battery use as well as under continuous load. Further GPU benchmarks can be found here.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
96.1 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
89.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
89.3 pt
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
 
89.2 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
86.7 pt
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
84.9 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
79.7 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -4!
AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
34.5 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
13073 Points +7%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
12795 Points +5%
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12205 Points
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
12162 Points 0%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
12043 Points -1%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (8360 - 13828, n=13, last 2 years)
11914 Points -2%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (8064 - 13716, n=38)
11751 Points -4%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
8618 Points
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
8373 Points -3%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (5568 - 9692, n=42)
8203 Points -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6580 - 9971, n=17, last 2 years)
8028 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
7974 Points -7%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7971 Points -8%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
7865 Points -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3491 Points
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (2018 - 3770, n=45)
3212 Points -8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2058 - 4118, n=17, last 2 years)
2970 Points -15%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2913 Points -17%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2866 Points -18%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2854 Points -18%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2646 Points -24%
Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
37654 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
37459 Points +14%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
34906 Points +7%
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32770 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (13008 - 49672, n=18, last 2 years)
30692 Points -6%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
30147 Points -8%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
22965 Points -30%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (17193 - 37639, n=44)
29774 Points -9%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
20987 Points -36%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
13008 Points -60%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
13008 Points -60%
Geekbench 6.4 - GPU OpenCL
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
35645 Points
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (17911 - 39941, n=44)
31967 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
30626 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
30310 Points -15%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
29920 Points -16%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (23660 - 37620, n=15, last 2 years)
29427 Points -17%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
27153 Points -24%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
26185 Points -27%
3DMark 11 Performance
12271 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7988 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3829 points
Help
Blender - v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (290 - 980, n=15, last 2 years)
454 Seconds * -4%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
446 Seconds * -2%
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
437 Seconds *
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (294 - 692, n=41)
433 Seconds * +1%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
417 Seconds * +5%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
332 Seconds * +24%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
385 Seconds * +12%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
366 Seconds * +16%

* ... smaller is better

Gaming performance

Now it is time to talk about the handheld's gaming performance. In this aspect, the MSI Claw was not able to repeat its good GPU results from the synthetic tests and instead, it fell behind the AMD competition in almost every single game. It was only able to beat the Steam Deck. This means that in its native 1080p resolution, you can only play a lot of games using medium to high details and demanding games such as Cyberpunk 2077 or Baldurs Gate 3 are difficult to run without using upscaling technology—even with low detail settings. Adding to this is the fact that the Intel driver offers fewer features compared to the AMD software (for example Frame Generation) to further improve its performance or depiction quality.

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
91.6 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
90.2 pt
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
90.1 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
87.9 pt
MSI Claw -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
87.8 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
87.7 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -3!
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
66.2 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
33.9 fps +32%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
29.5 (28min, 28P1) fps +15%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
29.4 (27min, 28P1) fps +15%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.5 (24min, 26P1) fps +7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (17.5 - 33.9, n=11, last 2 years)
27.1 fps +6%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.6 fps
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.7 (3.65min, 16.9P1) fps
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.5 (1.496min, 15.9P1) fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.7 (3min, 16.9P1) fps
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
25.3 (3.57min, 16.1P1) fps
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.1 (7.24min, 13.5P1) fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (14 - 32.8, n=16, last 2 years)
24.7 fps
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
19.5 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
28.6 fps +13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
28.3 fps +11%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.7 fps +9%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.3 fps +7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (18.4 - 34.4, n=18, last 2 years)
26.6 fps +5%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.4 fps
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
18.4 fps -28%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
49.1 (35.6min, 38.9P1) fps +7%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
48.6 (29.1min, 38.3P1) fps +6%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
46.3 (8.7min, 11.5P1) fps +1%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
46 fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (30 - 56.1, n=18, last 2 years)
45.7 fps -1%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
42.6 (7.5min, 9.94P1) fps -7%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
30 fps -35%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
78.7 (68.6min) fps +24%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
75.5 (67.6min) fps +19%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (30.8 - 85, n=18, last 2 years)
66.1 fps +4%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
63.6 (41.1min) fps
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
60.4 (54.6min) fps -5%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
59.7 (52.4min) fps -6%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
58.6 (51.9min) fps -8%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
38.9 fps
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
33.8 fps -13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (24.5 - 50.5, n=18, last 2 years)
32.6 fps -16%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
29.9 fps -23%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.6 fps -29%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.7 fps -31%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.5 fps -37%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (11.5 - 28.5, n=13, last 2 years)
20.4 fps +3%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
20.3 fps +3%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (13 - 24.7, n=26)
20.2 fps +2%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
19.8 (16.6min) fps
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
29 fps +32%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.3 (18.4min) fps +25%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.8 (18.7min) fps +13%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
23.8 fps +9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (13.8 - 31.4, n=19, last 2 years)
23.8 fps +9%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
22.1 (9.85min) fps +1%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
21.9 (18.9min) fps
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (7.3 - 27.6, n=34)
21.6 fps -1%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
21.13 fps -4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
42 fps +35%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
41 fps +32%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (31 - 49.5, n=3)
38.8 fps +25%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
38 fps +23%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (24 - 45, n=11, last 2 years)
35.9 fps +16%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
32 fps +3%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
31 fps
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
28 fps -10%
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
36 fps +33%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (27 - 48.2, n=3)
35.2 fps +30%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
35 fps +30%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
33 fps +22%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (12 - 39, n=11, last 2 years)
29.7 fps +10%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
27 fps
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
25 fps -7%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
12 fps -56%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
45 (31min) fps +22%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
44 (31min) fps +19%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
40 fps +8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (23 - 53, n=12, last 2 years)
38.1 fps +3%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
37 fps
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (22 - 50, n=33)
36.8 fps -1%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
36 (32min) fps -3%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
27 fps -27%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43 (31min) fps +26%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
42 (31min) fps +24%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
37 fps +9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (22 - 50, n=12, last 2 years)
35.8 fps +5%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (25 - 46, n=33)
34.6 fps +2%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
34 fps
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
33 (20min) fps -3%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
23 fps -32%
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
31.4 fps +27%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
30.8 fps +24%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (15.7 - 33.5, n=15, last 2 years)
27.4 fps +10%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (16.3 - 31.1, n=26)
25.3 fps +2%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
24.8 fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.5 fps +33%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.1 fps +21%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (13.8 - 29.4, n=14, last 2 years)
23.6 fps +14%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (15.4 - 27.7, n=25)
22.3 fps +8%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
20.7 fps

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

012345678910111213141516171819Tooltip
MSI Claw Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core: Ø16.8 (12.2-19.3)

Our Cyberpunk 2077 loop shows that the MSI handheld's gaming performance remains constant under longer periods of load. We additionally tested its gaming performance using the various energy profiles and have summarized our findings in the following table. The efficient mode Super Battery is well suited for older or less demanding games—otherwise, its performance is not enough.

Game (1080p) Super Battery Balanced AI Extreme Performance
Witcher 3 (Ultra) 20.7fps 25.8fps 25.6fps 25.6fps
Far Cry 5 (Ultra) 28fps 32fps 34fps 33fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (Ultra) 23fps 27fps 27fps 26fps
GTA V (High) 34.2fps 40.8fps 39.6fps 39.6fps
Cyberpunk 2077 (Low) 23.3fps 31fps 30.9fps 31.1fps
Baldurs Gate 3 (Low) 28.7fps 33.1fps 31.7fps 33.3fps
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 158.1 147.9 39.6
The Witcher 3 (2015) 135 51 25.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 98.6 84.1 67.4 63.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 58.5 35.9 25.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 51.6 45.1 38.9
Far Cry 5 (2018) 67 40 37 34
Strange Brigade (2018) 163 71 59 46
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 69 33 31 27
F1 23 (2023) 64.4 59.4 41.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 31.7 24.8 20.7 20.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 30.9 25.3 21.9 19.8
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) 52 34 29 25

Emissions - Annoying fans

Noise emissions

The cooling unit consisting of two fans manages to maintain the Intel processor's high power limits, but the result is a gaming handheld with fans that run practically constantly—even when using the most efficient mode. It is relatively rare that the fans are actually deactivated and normally, there is always a hissing noise—even when the handheld is idling. The situation gets even worse under load and the MSI Claw is then one of the loudest devices. We measured 45-48 dB(A) while gaming and still just under 37 dB(A) when using the most efficient Super Battery mode (20-watt TDP).

Energy profile Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty Stress test max. battery operation
Super Battery 36.6 dB(A) 36.6 dB(A) 36.6 dB(A)
Balanced 45.5 dB(A) 45.5 dB(A) 45.5 dB(A)
AI 45.5 dB(A) 45.5 dB(A) 45.5 dB(A)
Extreme Performance 48.5 dB(A) 48.5 dB(A) 46.3 dB(A)

Noise Level

Idle
25.7 / 31.7 / 31.7 dB(A)
Load
36.6 / 45.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25.7 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.745.543.242.945.62536.734.238.138.240.43132.529.737.333.634.14033.530.232.233.331.55031.730.530.130.429.96333.932.726.927.328.18027.726.42422.82610024.724.124.723.725.412526.222.722.321.825.916025.421.120.920.124.820026.223.322.621.924.825027.323.922.522.225.331530.824.124.317.827.440026.420.819.31525.450029.220.621.112.827.363029.123.218.113.528.580032.223.719.613.330.4100031.825.619.512.132.7125033.226.52212.332.6160035.329.525.211.934.9200036.128.918.912.236.8250039.424.417.512.636.8315034.321.617.11332.7400030.620.214.913.429.4500029.517.514.313.529.9630025.616.714.913.827.4800019.914.614.113.7221000017.614.914.313.919.21250018.216.115.513.720.11600014.914.113.51316.7SPL45.536.631.725.844.5N4.62.21.50.84.3median 29.1median 22.7median 19.3median 13.5median 27.4Delta3.83.43.52.43.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI Claw
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
Noise
12%
15%
11%
9%
1%
off / environment *
25.7
24.7
4%
23
11%
23.3
9%
24.4
5%
Idle Minimum *
25.7
25
3%
23
11%
23.3
9%
24.4
5%
25.31
2%
Idle Average *
31.7
25
21%
23
27%
23.3
26%
24.4
23%
25.31
20%
Idle Maximum *
31.7
25
21%
25
21%
27.3
14%
30.6
3%
34.5
-9%
Load Average *
36.6
31.3
14%
37
-1%
39.2
-7%
36
2%
34.9
5%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
45.5
Load Maximum *
45.5
40.8
10%
37
19%
39.2
14%
39.3
14%
50.78
-12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
46
39.2

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

Fan outlets on the top side
Fan outlets on the top side

The middle area of the Claw heats up considerably, but this doesn't matter because the grips stay nice and cool at all times and we noted no restrictions when playing games. The fan outlets are located on the top and are therefore not in the way. During the stress test, the processor briefly operated at 45 watts and then stabilized at 43 watts.

CPU/iGPU data stress test
CPU/iGPU data stress test
Max. Load
 41.3 °C
106 F
40.9 °C
106 F
39.6 °C
103 F
 
 41.2 °C
106 F
41.3 °C
106 F
39.9 °C
104 F
 
 41.7 °C
107 F
41.8 °C
107 F
39.5 °C
103 F
 
Maximum: 41.8 °C = 107 F
Average: 40.8 °C = 105 F
33.6 °C
92 F
35.9 °C
97 F
33.5 °C
92 F
29.6 °C
85 F
34.8 °C
95 F
31.7 °C
89 F
29.7 °C
85 F
34.1 °C
93 F
31.7 °C
89 F
Maximum: 35.9 °C = 97 F
Average: 32.7 °C = 91 F
Power Supply (max.)  46.6 °C = 116 F | Room Temperature 21.6 °C = 71 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 31.6 °C / 89 F for the devices in the class Handheld / UMPC.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 38.4 °C / 101 F, ranging from 26.6 to 55 °C for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 38 °C / 100 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 31.6 °C / 89 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 31.6 °C / 89 F for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 30.5 °C / 86.9 F (-11.3 °C / -20.3 F).
Surface temperatures stress test (top)
Surface temperatures stress test (top)
Surface temperatures stress test (bottom)
Surface temperatures stress test (bottom)

Speakers

The two stereo speakers on the front do a pretty good job and get very loud. However, it is still difficult to block out the constant fan noise when playing games. The sound is clear but it lacks some punch, which is also the case with the other handhelds. The ROG Ally is on a comparable level, but Valve's Steam Deck OLED performs slightly better.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.946.82538.239.23133.6364033.335.45030.434.16327.334.18022.834.110023.74012521.848.616020.150.420021.95925022.262.631517.866.34001565.250012.870.263013.574.780013.376.8100012.175.8125012.374.3160011.975.9200012.279.1250012.676.231501376.2400013.476.9500013.571.7630013.872.8800013.768.31000013.964.21250013.756.4160001349.8SPL25.887.2N0.871.8median 13.5median 71.7Delta2.47.925.12728.928.725.629.123.430.722.232.918.934.918.135.317.339.517.243.615.548.714.355.8146011.863.512.165.811.167.410.868.910.472.510.172.910.170.410.170.910.771.810.871.211.371.111.569.711.767.21268.612.167.311.965.711.754.411.249.523.382.10.555.4median 11.7median 67.31.27.125.125.526.324.83526.426.830.524.72628.128.720.326.721.328.314.231.415.334.812.639.510.842.811.647.310.550.510.153.710.158.611.162.311.162.710.760.810.558.110.558.510.958.311.158.812.165.611.766.711.753.211.751.711.956.911.851.311.440.323.373.10.428.7median 11.4median 53.71.18.844.347.345.837.239.633.832.435.531.236.937.545.332.535.641.329.830.633.228.528.329.624.424.626.429.621.426.94320.83957.620.752.865.718.861.270.816.767.271.613.369.57013.168.269.111.9667111.866.972.112.469.271.412.368.472.21270.170.312.5707212.669.570.412.867.366.813.268.269.513.271.470.713.272.564.113.371.271.113.172.474.112.872.669.912.167.782.725.481.855.60.651.6median 70.3median 13.1median 68.26.12.66hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI ClawAsus ROG Ally Z1 ExtremeLenovo Legion GoValve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Claw audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Go audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Power management - Short battery life

Power consumption

MSI's gaming handheld isn't particularly efficient. At full brightness, the test device already uses 12 watts when idling. During the stress test, it only reached 65 watts momentarily before balancing out at around 54 watts after several seconds. When gaming, it also reaches around 55 watts, so the included 65-watt power supply is powerful enough.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.18 / 0.42 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 7.8 / 11.5 / 11.8 Watt
Load midlight 53.1 / 64.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI Claw
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3, OLED, 1280x800, 7.4"
Lenovo Legion Go
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
Ayaneo Kun
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
 
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
Power Consumption
42%
-13%
26%
16%
-58%
5%
10%
Idle Minimum *
7.8
4.5
42%
11.5
-47%
4.2
46%
6.66
15%
14
-79%
Idle Average *
11.5
7.21
37%
12
-4%
6.1
47%
7.11
38%
17.56
-53%
8.54 ?(4.2 - 16, n=39)
26%
Idle Maximum *
11.8
9.66
18%
17.4
-47%
6.3
47%
11.7
1%
27
-129%
11.9 ?(4.5 - 49, n=39)
-1%
Load Average *
53.1
22.86
57%
45
15%
56.6
-7%
46.708
12%
38.1
28%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
54.4
Load Maximum *
64.6
27.8
57%
54
16%
67.2
-4%
56.7
12%
101
-56%
84.9 ?(60 - 144.9, n=39)
-31%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42.6
64.1
53.1
83.5

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
MSI Claw; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø53.4 (52.1-64.5)
MSI Claw; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.74 (8.62-11)
MSI Claw; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø54.4 (50.2-56.2)

Runtimes

Charging curve
Charging curve

MSI has installed a 53-Wh battery into the device, so we of course carried out our normal battery tests. During the WLAN test, the two competitors were still on par but in the video test, the Claw handheld had to admit defeat to the ROG Ally with the significantly smaller battery. Much more important, on the other hand, is its battery life when playing games and here, the test ended after around 80 minutes when playing AAA titles. You can play a little longer using Super Battery mode (20-watt TDP), but then you have to reduce the resolution and details further and games like Cyberpunk 2077 no longer run smoothly even in 1080p with low details. For emulators, on the other hand, we would have liked to be able to manually reduce the TDP further in order to make runtimes of several hours possible. It takes 106 minutes to charge the device fully with it switched on; 80 % is available again after around an hour.

Battery Runtime
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd
1h 16min
WiFi Websurfing
7h 46min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
6h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 47min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 16min
MSI Claw
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 53 Wh
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, 50 Wh
Lenovo Legion Go
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 49.2 Wh
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 40 Wh
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 65 Wh
Ayaneo Kun
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
Battery Runtime
20%
-23%
4%
39%
-3%
15%
H.264
527
568
8%
WiFi v1.3
466
559
20%
358
-23%
465
0%
648
39%
602
29%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd
76
Load
76
50
-34%
Witcher 3 ultra
57
72
101

Pros

+ stable case with good joysticks/buttons
+ 120-Hz display
+ good handheld software
+ fast microSD card reader
+ TB4 & Wi-Fi 7

Cons

- inefficient Intel processor
- comparatively weak gaming performance
- loud fans and high fan activity

Verdict - The MSI Claw suffers as a result of the Intel Meteor Lake processor

MSI Claw review. Test device provided by:
MSI Claw review. Test device provided by:

The MSI Claw gaming handheld wasn't able to impress us during our thorough test. In general, its concept is similar to that of the Asus ROG Ally with its 7-inch display, which was released over a year ago. However, MSI hasn't gone for a chip from AMD—instead, it relies on an Intel Meteor Lake processor. This brings a few problems and shows why other manufacturers haven't taken the same route. Despite its higher power consumption, its gaming performance is slightly worse than on other AMD handhelds and at the same time, its cooling unit has its work cut out for it. The fans are practically always active and in total, the Claw is one of the loudest handhelds on the market.

In other fields such as its joysticks/buttons and its gaming software, on the other hand, the MSI Claw left a good impression on us. Its screen is good overall, but an additional USB connection would've been beneficial. In theory, its M.2 2230 SSD can be swapped out but in order to do so, you would have to take apart the entire case and when putting it back together, you'd even have to reapply some new thermal paste.

The MSI Claw gaming handheld impressively demonstrates that the current Intel CPUs are not suitable for gaming handhelds. Due to its weaker gaming performance compared to the AMD competition as well as its higher price, the Intel handheld is not worthy of our recommendation.

It seems that MSI has already identified this problem and only three months after the release of the Claw, it has already announced its successor, which will be fitted with a larger display in combination with a more efficient Intel Lunar Lake processor and a faster iGPU. However, it will take a good few months before this model is released.

Due to its high price of over US$800, it makes absolutely no sense to go for the Claw handheld. The larger Legion Go costs only US$750 (with the smaller SSD) and even the ROG Ally can already be found for below US$700. Furthermore, its successor—the ROG Ally X—is already being brought out next month, and it will feature significant improvements (more comfortable case, 80-Wh battery, 1-TB M.2 2280 SSD, 24 GB RAM, 2x USB) for just under US$1,000. The latest Steam Deck OLED with a 1-TB SSD is a lot cheaper too, costing around US$630.

Update: There was a bug with our new rating system, which has been corrected. The overall score in the category Handheld / UMPC is increased from 69 to 77 %.

Price and availability

Currently, our test configuration of the MSI Claw but with a 512-GB SSD can be purchased from Amazon for a reduced price of US$649.

Note: We have recently updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here .

MSI Claw - 06/19/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
81 / 98 → 83%
Mechanical Inputs
67%
Pointing Device
100%
Connectivity
58 / 68 → 85%
Weight
80 / 69-83 → 81%
Battery
78%
Display
69%
Games Performance
48 / 75 → 64%
Application Performance
83 / 92 → 90%
Temperature
87%
Noise
73%
Audio
79 / 91 → 87%
Average
70%
77%
Handheld / UMPC - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Read all 4 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > MSI Claw review - The gaming handheld with an Intel Core Ultra processor disappoints
Andreas Osthoff, 2024-06-17 (Update: 2024-06-26)