X-Plane 11 Benchmarks

Advanced flight simulation. The X-Plane series is a stalwart in the commercial flight simulation market, and X-Plane 11 marks the latest iteration. It uses an advanced physics engine that mixes hard-coded data with aerodynamics to simulate realistic flight. When cranking up the settings the engine is heavily taxing on the graphics card and processor, which is particularly notable for its reliance on single-threaded CPU performance. The scope and scale of the game make it an ideal candidate for assessing system performance.

Craig Ward, Published 05/23/2018 🇫🇷 🇩🇪

Introduction

The simple but customisable graphics tweaks. No relation to our benchmark presets. (Source: Own)

X-Plane 11 is the 2018 sequel to 2012’s popular X-Plane 10 and is a competing product to Microsoft's Flight Simulator in the consumer market. However, the 32-bit engine in Microsoft's product is showing its age, and this has allowed the more advanced 64-bit X-Plane engine to surpass it in technical prowess and scalability.

Developed by Laminar Research in South Carolina, USA, X-Plane 11 runs on Windows, MacOS, and Linux (X-Plane 10 also had a mobile version for Android and iOS). The base version of the game comes with a set of 19 stock aircraft at varying levels of detail and immersion and a set of global scenery that covers most of the earth from 74 degrees north to 60 degrees south latitude. There are runway locations for over 34,000 airports around the world, including small grass strips in rural bush areas, and community developers are creating and submitting free airport layouts (buildings, vehicles, etc.) for inclusion in the game. Those who want more detail and immersion can choose between a multitude of high-quality payware aircraft and extremely detailed airports. Alternatively, there are a considerable number of freely available airport layouts online to install to add some life to the places from which you take off and land.

As a highly detailed open-world flight simulator, the plane models, environment, and objects place a significant toll on systems. The highly advanced physics engine that accurately simulates factors such as airflow based off of the angles, lines, and engineering data of the plane models also places a heavy strain on the system. X-Plane is a good game for benchmarking because of a multitude of options for increasing visual detail, shadow quality, object count, and view distance which mean that the game scales well over a range of hardware (although graphics options have been simplified in the newest version). There is also an inbuilt testing system that allows us to run scenarios in a consistent environment.

Default X-Plane 11 Boeing 747 overhead panel. (Source: Laminar Research)

Default X-Plane 11 Cessna 172SP cockpit at night. (Source: Laminar Research)

Default X-Plane 11 KingAir C90B cockpit. (Source: Laminar Research)

Default X-Plane 11 Vancouver airport. (Source: Laminar Research)

Default X-Plane 11 Miami airport. (Source: Laminar Research)

Default X-Plane 11 Olaya Herrera Airport airport. (Source: Laminar Research)

Graphics

Most of the games we benchmark on Windows use the Microsoft DirectX graphical API due to its dominance on the platform. Since Microsoft Flight Simulator was a Windows product, X-Plane captured early market share on MacOS and used OpenGL due to good compatibility with the operating system. Laminar Research still uses OpenGL and its cross-platform nature is well suited to producing versions for Windows, MacOS, and Linux without having to rewrite huge parts of the code base from scratch. Having some OpenGL games in the test line up is essential to show performance over different graphical APIs since there are some differences between the level of GPU manufacturers support for non-DirectX APIs. For much of the last decade, Nvidia’s drivers gave better OpenGL performance on Windows, although this has improved in the last couple of years with AMD’s OpenGL support closing the gap with Nvidia. Unfortunately, AMD drivers do still perform comparatively worse on OpenGL than on DirectX when in Windows.

The X-Plane 11 landscape is made of ground textures laid over a detailed terrain mesh, but the world itself is full of 3D objects such as trees, houses, cars, and street lamps in towns, or terminals, fuel pumps, and support vehicles on airports. With a view distance that can be set to show several kilometers around the player, there is an opportunity for thousands of objects on screen at any one time, and these can place a heavy load on the system — the processor is a particular bottleneck. The airplanes themselves are equally as taxing (if not more so), due to high-poly models with detailed curves and 3D cockpits that have numerous knobs and dials to manipulate and a real depth to the instrument panel when viewed off center. Shadows place a heavy load on GPUs, and while X-Plane 11 has a more traditional descriptions in the setting menu, older versions of the game called the highest shadow setting “melt your GPU” as an example of how taxing shadows can be.

The advanced weather model simulates stratus or cumulus clouds at varying degrees of thickness and heights above sea level. The clouds aren’t solid objects and rendering them on screen is taxing, since they are a collection of smaller particles. Raindrops and the streaking they cause on windshields are beautiful, but again these also add an additional load to the system.

XPlane 11 Boeing 737-800 night. (Source: Own)

XPlane 11 Boeing 737-800 day. (Source: Own)

XPlane 11 Boeing 737-800 nose cone. (Source: Own)

XPlane 11 Boeing 737-800 cockpit. (Source: Own)

Benchmark

The benchmark isn’t available via the in-game menu, but X-Plane 11 has benchmark functionality that allows us to load a consistent set of tests on each system with the results outputting to a log file. It loads the test in the demo area with default scenery, making it the same for every user. While X-Plane 11 is a full retail game available via Steam or standalone via the developer’s website, there is a free demo which includes the KSEA airport and surrounding area, and this includes the benchmark location so readers can compare their system without having to purchase the game. Do note that the KSEA area is one of the more resource intensive parts of the game, but that the default aircraft are generally lighter on frame rates than third party models.

We use X-Plane version 11.11 and classify our tests as follows:

X Plane 11 high UHD – Resolution: 3840 x 2160, Settings: High (fps_test=3).
X Plane 11 high 1080p – Resolution: 1920 x 1080, Settings: High (fps_test=3).
X Plane 11 med 1080p – Resolution: 1920 x 1080, Settings: Med (fps_test=2).
X Plane 11 low 720p – Resolution: 1280 x 720, Settings: Low (fps_test=1).

While we will detail the process for windows here, the procedure can be followed by users running Mac OS and Linux by using the Terminal and replacing ‘xplane.exe’ with ‘./X-Plane-i686’ or similar. Benchmarks are run from the command line, and you need to have navigated to the X-Plane 11 install folder before proceeding.

To perform each benchmark, we run the following strings via the command line:

X-Plane 11 high UHD - X-Plane.exe --fps_test=3 --load_smo=Output/replays/test_flight_c4.fdr --pref:_is_full_ALL=1 --pref:_x_res_full_ALL=3840 --pref:_y_res_full_ALL=2160 --pref:_bpp_full_ALL=32
X-Plane 11 high 1080p - X-Plane.exe --fps_test=3 --load_smo=Output/replays/test_flight_c4.fdr --pref:_is_full_ALL=1 --pref:_x_res_full_ALL=1920 --pref:_y_res_full_ALL=1080 --pref:_bpp_full_ALL=32
X-Plane 11 med 1080p - X-Plane.exe --fps_test=2 --load_smo=Output/replays/test_flight_c4.fdr --pref:_is_full_ALL=1 --pref:_x_res_full_ALL=1920 --pref:_y_res_full_ALL=1080 --pref:_bpp_full_ALL=32
X-Plane 11 low 720p - X-Plane.exe --fps_test=1 --load_smo=Output/replays/test_flight_c4.fdr --pref:_is_full_ALL=1 --pref:_x_res_full_ALL=1280 --pref:_y_res_full_ALL=720 --pref:_bpp_full_ALL=32

‘X-Plane.exe’ starts the software. ‘--fps_test=N’ is used to specify which benchmark you want to run, where N is replaced with the test number (1 = low, 2 = medium, 3 = high). These numbers can be further modified with more digits to control other effects such as weather or day/night, but we ignore these for the benchmark to reduce the number of variables. The astute will notice that we use fps_test=3 in two of the benchmark strings above. This is because we use the high preset for both our highest fidelity 1080p benchmark and for our UHD/4K benchmark.

‘--load_smo=PATH’ will take a replay file and perform a 102-second live run to record fps, instead of using the default 90-second benchmark. We do this to obtain a result that is more representative of the in-game performance since the default benchmark simply spends 30 seconds showing the forward view with cockpit panel, 30 seconds of forward view without 3D cockpit panel, and 30 seconds of forward view without cockpit panel while the simulation is paused. The replay file is a default one that comes with the game and shows the CirrusJet cockpit panel as it flies over KSEA airport while systems are in use.

The pref setting allows us to specify a set of preferences which we use to ensure the benchmark resolution is fixed regardless of the screen resolution of the test device. ‘--pref:_is_full_ALL=1’ specifies that we want the benchmark to be run at full screen to help protect against differences in how drivers handle windowed or full-screen software. Laminar Research says that due to the way X-Plane handles resolutions this setting won’t cause any difference in result, but we use it anyway for consistency. ‘--pref:_x_res_full_ALL=HORIZONTAL --pref:_y_res_full_ALL=VERTICAL’ provides a fixed resolution where horizontal and vertical are replaced with pixel numbers. If you look closely at the strings written above you will see that we use 3840 x 2160 (UHD/4K), 1920 x 1080 (FullHD), and 1280 x 720 (HD) to be consistent with the resolutions we use for our other game benchmarks. ‘--pref:_bpp_full_ALL=32’ forces a resolution change even if it doesn’t match one supported by the driver based on the resolution of any connected displays. It won't show a resolution higher than the monitor can show and an external 3840 x 2160 UHD/4K display was used for benchmarking.

Results can be found on the ‘fps=’ line in the log.txt file created in the X-Plane 11 directory.

Results

X-Plane 10 had a reputation of bogging down powerful systems with top-of-the-line processors and graphics cards, especially once the user had loaded their favorite third-party aircraft, weather plugins, and scenery mods. But the stock game itself scaled reasonably well to low-performance hardware, and this shows true in X-Plane 11 as well.

If we take the entry-level Maxwell-based Nvidia GT 940MX — which was most frequently used on ultrabook models with dedicated GPUs and on more bulky consumer notebooks which wanted to be able to claim “Dedicated Nvidia graphics!” or “Play games with incredible detail!” — then we see that it hit 56 fps on 720p low, or 36 fps on 1080p medium. Of course the downside is that those low settings don’t look very good, and the medium option can have some more substantial frame rate drops near airports or cities, but if you can’t afford to upgrade (or don’t want to) then you can still get your flight sim fix… even if it is the ‘Zero Sugar’ version.

Stepping up to the replacement for the GT 940MX, the newer Pascal-based Nvidia MX150, we find that the base game without addons is playable at 1080p high with 47 fps average. When looking at the results graph, please keep in mind that at the time of writing we have only tested X Plane 11 with two MX150 devices, one running the original full-fat 25-watt version, and the other with the reduced 10-watt TDP variant (approx. 36% slower clock speed) so that 47 fps average is split between two results of 41.8 fps and 52.3 fps.

Our benchmarks show that those wanting to view their high-resolution cockpit panels at 4K/UHD can do so with an Nvidia GTX 1050 Ti (notebook) or AMD RX 470 (desktop). But the reality is that these cards will struggle with the higher-polygon count in third-party aircraft, and the benefits of a more expensive GPU will become apparent. In our experience getting good quality third-party aircraft with fully functional flight and navigation systems and bulking up the game with paid or free scenery/airports is one of the most rewarding and addicting aspects of a simulation game such as this.

With 75 fps on '1080p high,' the Nvidia GTX 1070 appears to be a good sweet-spot compromise between price and performance. The GTX 1080 only gained one additional frame per second when using the same processor, likely due to the games tendency to suffer CPU bottlenecks.

X-Plane 11 Cessna 172SP external on approach. (Source: Own)

X-Plane 11 Cessna 172SP window reflections. (Source: Own)

X-Plane 11 Cessna 172SP cockpit on approach. (Source: Own)

X-Plane 11.11
3840x2160 high (fps_test=3) 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) 1920x1080 med (fps_test=2) 1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), i7-7740X Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition	75.6 fps ∼47% 86.8 fps ∼46% 104 fps ∼45% 117 fps ∼44%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition	66.1 fps ∼41% 75.3 fps ∼40% 88 fps ∼38% 102 fps ∼39%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition	66.4 fps ∼41% 74.6 fps ∼40% 90 fps ∼39% 98 fps ∼37%
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop), 4790K AMD Radeon RX 480 8 GB Reference	38.7 fps ∼24% 51.3 fps ∼27% 58.7 fps ∼26% 61.3 fps ∼23%
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop), 4790K MSI RX 470 Gaming X 4GB	38.5 fps ∼24% 52.1 fps ∼28% 60.5 fps ∼26% 66.3 fps ∼25%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ MSI GE72 7RE-046	45.3 fps ∼28% 61.2 fps ∼33% 69.9 fps ∼31% 77.3 fps ∼29%
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 4790K XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB	22.1 fps ∼14% 43.8 fps ∼23% 49.6 fps ∼22% 61.8 fps ∼23%
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 6700HQ MSI CX72 6QD	33.4 fps ∼18% 35.9 fps ∼16% 56.5 fps ∼21%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M, 2970M MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD	9 fps ∼6% 23.3 fps ∼12% 24.8 fps ∼11% 23.2 fps ∼9%

CPU Scaling

To test if X-Plane 11 still exhibited the heavy reliance on CPU power that its predecessor showed we performed some benchmarks using four different processors paired with the Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti. For AMD these were the budget-range Ryzen 3 1200 (4C/4T), and their previous consumer flagship, the Ryzen 7 1800X (8C/16T). In the Intel camp, we have the i7-7740X (4C/8T) and the i7-4790K (4C/8T), the latter of which was arguably the most highly recommended CPU in PCs built for X-Plane 10 due to a mixture of favorable single core performance and a release year that fitted well within the games lifespan.

The Ryzen 3 1200 showing the lowest fps isn’t surprising given that it has the slowest clock speeds and the fewest threads. What is interesting is how the Ryzen 7 1800X gets beaten by the Kaby Lake i7-7740X and the much older (2014) Haswell i7-4790K. This is because the rendering process is all loaded on a single core (OpenGL shows threading and object handling problems here), and these two Intel CPUs both have high clock speeds on architectures with good IPC levels. There isn't much separating the clock speeds of the two Intel chips, so we are attributing most of the difference in frame rates to the generational IPC improvements made over time.

Laminar research says that X-Plane is multithreaded and they split out what they can onto additional threads to try and free up processing time for the main thread. We tested this using the Ryzen 7 1800X by limiting cores. We saw increasing performance for each additional core up to six active cores, but there was no additional gain for activating the seventh and eighth cores. This improved FPS was showing that extra cores allowed tasks not associated with the primary rendering thread to be offloaded. X-Plane 11 is currently being ported from OpenGL to Vulkan, which has several features that allow for significantly improved multithread performance. Frame rates on processors such as the 1800X will likely increase after this happens.

X-Plane 11.11
3840x2160 high (fps_test=3) 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) 1920x1080 med (fps_test=2) 1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), Intel Core i7-7740X	75.6 fps ∼47% 86.8 fps ∼46% 104 fps ∼45% 117 fps ∼44%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), Intel Core i7-4790K	67.6 fps ∼42% 74.5 fps ∼40% 90 fps ∼39% 101 fps ∼38%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 7 1800X	61.7 fps ∼38% 71 fps ∼38% 88 fps ∼38% 98 fps ∼37%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 3 1200	45.7 fps ∼28% 52.2 fps ∼28% 61.6 fps ∼27% 68.4 fps ∼26%

Summary

X-Plane 11 is a powerful flight simulator which can push high-end computers to their limits, and this makes it well suited to benchmarking. It nicely complements our standard test suite of games since it runs in Windows on OpenGL, rather than the more common DirectX. The reliance on strong single-core CPU performance also makes it stand out from many other games and helps to highlight the importance of a balanced system when running simulators.

Performance scales well when resolution, graphical quality, and objects are dialed down, showing that those without a top-end PC can still get some enjoyment out of exploring the digital world. If you are building a PC to play X-Plane 11, the advice from previous iterations of picking a CPU based on single core performance still holds strong. This means that Intel’s i5 and i7 models stand out above the competition (e.g., i5-8600K and i7-8700K), although an overclocked Ryzen CPU should still hold up well here. Meanwhile, the port to Vulkan later this year will likely reduce the reliance on using a single thread for rendering and improve frame rates on multi-core processors. This would make AMD's Ryzen or Intel's enthusiast CPUs based on the X-series chipset more appealing.

Appendix I. Graphics Cards

Test systems

Gerät	Grafikkarte	Prozessor	Arbeitsspeicher	Betriebssystem
Desktop-PC I	MSI GeForce GTX 1080 (8 GB GDDR5X) MSI GeForce GTX 1070 (8 GB GDDR5) Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB GDDR5) Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 (4 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-6700K	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
Desktop-PC II	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (11 GB GDDR5X) Asus GeForce GTX 980 Ti (6 GB GDDR5) XFX Radeon R9 Fury (4 GB HBM) Sapphire Radeon R9 290X (4 GB GDDR5) Sapphire Radeon R9 280X (3 GB GDDR5) MSI Radeon R7 370 (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-4790K	2 x 4 GB DDR3	Windows 10 64 Bit
Alienware 17 R4	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 (8 GB GDDR5X)	Intel Core i7-7820HK	1 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
Asus G752VS	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 (8 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-6820HK	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GT62VR	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-6820HK	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GE72	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-7700HQ	2 x 4 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
Asus GL753VD	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 (4 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GL62	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-7700HQ	2 x 4 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
Asus G752VY	Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M (4 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-6700HQ	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GS60	Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M (3 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-6700HQ	2 x 4 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GE72	Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GL72	Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI PE60	Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-6700HQ	2 x 4 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI PL62	Nvidia GeForce MX150 (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI CX72	Nvidia GeForce 940MX (2 GB DDR3)	Intel Core i7-6700HQ	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GP62	Nvidia GeForce 940M (2 GB DDR3)	Intel Core i7-5700HQ	1 x 8 GB DDR3	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI CX61	Nvidia GeForce 920M (2 GB DDR3)	Intel Celeron 2970M	1 x 8 GB DDR3	Windows 10 64 Bit
Asus N551ZU	AMD Radeon R9 M280X (4 GB GDDR5)	AMD FX-7600P	2 x 4 GB DDR3	Windows 10 64 Bit

4K Monitor	Nvidia Treiber	AMD Treiber	Intel Treiber
2 x Asus PB287Q, Philips 328P6VJEB	ForceWare	Crimson

Read all 1 comments / answer

Loading Comments

Comment on this article

Craig Ward - Tech Writer - 397 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

I grew up in a family surrounded by technology, starting with my father loading up games for me on a Commodore 64, and later on a 486. In the late 90's and early 00's I started learning how to tinker with Windows, while also playing around with Linux distributions, both of which gave me an interest for learning how to make software do what you want it to do, and modifying settings that aren't normally user accessible. After this I started building my own computers, and tearing laptops apart, which gave me an insight into hardware and how it works in a complete system. Now keeping up with the latest in hardware and software news is a passion of mine.

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > X-Plane 11 Benchmarks

Craig Ward, 2018-05-23 (Update: 2018-05-23)

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
Pos	Model	low 1280x720 low (fps_test=1)	med. 1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)	high 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)	4K 3840x2160 high (fps_test=3)
1	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	224ⁿ²³	196.9ⁿ²³	148.5ⁿ²³	126ⁿ²³
2	AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX	202.65ⁿ²	163.05ⁿ²	122.75ⁿ²	94.6ⁿ²
3	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super	245.5ⁿ²	215ⁿ²	161.05ⁿ²	136.8ⁿ²
4	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080	226ⁿ⁴	199.3ⁿ⁴	154.9ⁿ⁴	131.1ⁿ⁴
5	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti	169.1ⁿ²	158.1ⁿ²	135.9ⁿ²	115.7ⁿ²
6	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER	224	196.7	150	127.8
7	AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT	179.2	140.4	109.8	81.4
8	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	213.45ⁿ²	192.6ⁿ²	152.45ⁿ²	129.8ⁿ²
9	AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE	159.7ⁿ²	130.55ⁿ²	100.45ⁿ²	75.7ⁿ²
10	AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT	151.1ⁿ²	123.1ⁿ²	99ⁿ²	78.9ⁿ²
11	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	199.45ⁿ⁴⁴	177.55ⁿ⁴⁴	135.6ⁿ⁴⁵	114.2ⁿ²⁴
13	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	217ⁿ¹⁶	189.9ⁿ¹⁶	146.7ⁿ¹⁶	122.5ⁿ¹⁵
14	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti	216ⁿ³	182.8ⁿ³	140.1ⁿ³	118ⁿ³
15	AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT	180.95ⁿ²	148.45ⁿ²	113.05ⁿ²	84.1ⁿ²
16	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER	229.5ⁿ²	196.35ⁿ²	152.15ⁿ²	130.4ⁿ²
18	NVIDIA RTX A6000	109	97	78.1	67.2
19	AMD Radeon RX 7900M			83.7	64.3
21	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	175.7ⁿ²⁰	157.4ⁿ²¹	126.85ⁿ²²	102.65ⁿ¹²
23	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB	159.4	143.2	114.7	98.7
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >X-Plane 11.11
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	4K
25	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080	164ⁿ²	153ⁿ²	122.75ⁿ²	104.9ⁿ²
26	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070	233.5ⁿ²	201.55ⁿ²	156.45ⁿ²	130.1ⁿ²
29	AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT	83.5	67.5	57.8	40.1
30	AMD Radeon RX 6800	155.3ⁿ³	126.7ⁿ³	104ⁿ³	73.1ⁿ³
31	AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT	162.8	129.7	100.2	69.3
32	NVIDIA Titan RTX	140ⁿ³⁰	126ⁿ³⁰	103.5ⁿ³⁰	89.9ⁿ³⁰
33	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti	236.5ⁿ²	207.5ⁿ²	161.6ⁿ²	134.7ⁿ²
34	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G	206	189.3	138.5	114.1
35	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G	219ⁿ³	196.2ⁿ³	149.1ⁿ³	126.2ⁿ³
36	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	146ⁿ⁴³	130.8ⁿ⁴³	103.1ⁿ⁴⁵	85.9ⁿ²⁰
37	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	146.8ⁿ⁵⁶	130.8ⁿ⁵⁷	106.4ⁿ⁵⁹	89.85ⁿ²²
40	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070	132.5ⁿ⁶	113.5ⁿ⁶	93.2ⁿ⁶	82.7ⁿ⁴
41	AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT	72.4ⁿ³	55.8ⁿ³	49.3ⁿ³	35.8ⁿ³
42	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)	128ⁿ³	115ⁿ³	92ⁿ⁴	79ⁿ⁴
43	AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT	104.8ⁿ³	76.2ⁿ³	60.7ⁿ³	47.9ⁿ³
44	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	118ⁿ⁴⁵	103.5ⁿ⁴⁴	83.1ⁿ⁴⁴	63.5ⁿ¹⁷
45	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	144.65ⁿ⁶	127.1ⁿ⁶	102.6ⁿ⁶	88.5ⁿ⁶
46	Intel Arc A770	101.6	90.4	70.7	58.3
47	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	211	194.5	148.6	125.5
49	AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	65.1ⁿ²	51.1ⁿ²	43.7ⁿ²	27.5
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >X-Plane 11.11
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	4K
50	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	139.05ⁿ³⁶	122.3ⁿ³⁶	100ⁿ³⁷	91.7ⁿ³
53	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	149.55ⁿ⁴⁶	129.15ⁿ⁴⁶	102.35ⁿ⁴⁸	100.9ⁿ¹³
55	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop)	125.6ⁿ²	113.6ⁿ²	93.6ⁿ²	69.5ⁿ²
57	AMD Radeon RX 6800M	65.45ⁿ²	56.05ⁿ²	47.85ⁿ²	28.8
58	AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT	118.9ⁿ³	82.6ⁿ³	68.8ⁿ³	48.9ⁿ³
59	AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT	95.45ⁿ²	72.75ⁿ²	65ⁿ²	39.5
61	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	133ⁿ⁴	118ⁿ⁴	95.9ⁿ⁴	86.2ⁿ²
62	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	110ⁿ⁶¹	97.1ⁿ⁶¹	79.3ⁿ⁶¹	66ⁿ¹³
64	AMD Radeon RX 6800S	75.2ⁿ³	60.9ⁿ³	51ⁿ³
65*	AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT	99.9ⁿ⁶	78.15ⁿ⁶	60.15ⁿ⁶	44.55ⁿ⁶
66	Intel Arc A750	98.8	87.1	68.4	56.6
67	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060	151ⁿ⁵	133ⁿ⁵	105ⁿ⁵	88.5ⁿ⁴
68*	AMD Radeon RX 7700S	97.6	79.3	65	46.8
73	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	102ⁿ³	89ⁿ³	75ⁿ³	73
75	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)	110.5ⁿ¹⁰	103ⁿ¹⁰	85.5ⁿ¹⁰	72ⁿ¹⁰
76	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	195.4ⁿ²	180.6ⁿ²	146.2ⁿ²	123.9ⁿ²
80	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)	124.5ⁿ⁶	112ⁿ⁶	91.5ⁿ⁶	79.6ⁿ⁵
83	AMD Radeon VII	149	133	103	88.1
84	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)	80ⁿ⁵	68ⁿ⁵	57.1ⁿ⁵	44.4ⁿ⁵
85	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop)	127	115	92.7	82.2
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >X-Plane 11.11
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	4K
86*	AMD Radeon RX 7600M	93.2	76	62.1
89	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	112.65ⁿ⁴⁸	98.85ⁿ⁴⁸	79.55ⁿ⁴⁸	67.6ⁿ¹²
91	AMD Radeon RX 7600S	85.1	70.1ⁿ²	56.15ⁿ²
92	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	115ⁿ⁴	100.8ⁿ⁴	84.3ⁿ⁴
93	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)	102	88	75.3	67.55ⁿ²
94	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	111ⁿ⁶	96.7ⁿ⁶	81.8ⁿ⁶	67
97	Intel Arc A580	104.1	63.5	63.3	46.8
98	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)	175.5ⁿ⁴	156.3ⁿ⁴	122.45ⁿ⁴	103.85ⁿ⁴
99*	Intel Arc A770M	67.5	59.4	55.5	38.5
100	AMD Radeon RX 6600	112.1ⁿ³	81.3ⁿ³	61.8ⁿ³	35.2ⁿ³
104	AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)	134.3ⁿ³	98ⁿ³	76.7ⁿ³	54.1ⁿ³
105	AMD Radeon RX 6650M	66.4	52.7	46.4
106	AMD Radeon RX 6600M	67.8ⁿ⁷	54.3ⁿ⁷	46ⁿ⁸	29ⁿ³
107	AMD Radeon RX 6700S	65.4	51.7	45.2
108	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	106ⁿ⁸	92ⁿ⁸	78.55ⁿ⁸
110	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	96.45ⁿ⁴	84.85ⁿ⁴	71ⁿ⁴	44.15ⁿ²
113	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64	83ⁿ²	73ⁿ²	61.5ⁿ²	47.75ⁿ²
114	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	83.1	77.3	67.2
121	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	120ⁿ⁶	105ⁿ⁶	87.85ⁿ⁶	71.6ⁿ²
123	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)	101	89	74.5	66.7
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >X-Plane 11.11
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	4K
125*	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	110ⁿ¹¹	99ⁿ¹¹	83ⁿ¹¹	62.4ⁿ²
131	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	95.25ⁿ¹⁸	83.75ⁿ¹⁸	70.45ⁿ¹⁸
132	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050	189ⁿ²	164.85ⁿ²	129.6ⁿ²	102.75ⁿ²
133	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)	98	90	74.6	66.4
134	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop)	113.2ⁿ³	84.8ⁿ³	66ⁿ³	51ⁿ³
136	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q	85.9ⁿ²	79.6ⁿ²	67.85ⁿ²	59.55ⁿ²
138	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	93	79.6	68
139*	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q	102.5ⁿ⁴	90.35ⁿ⁴	76.5ⁿ⁴	61.5ⁿ²
141	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)	164	147.3	117.8	99.9
142	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)	225ⁿ³	197.3ⁿ³	147.4ⁿ³	108.9ⁿ³
144	AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT	76.75ⁿ²	62.5ⁿ²	43.4ⁿ²	42.4ⁿ²
145	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)	77.9ⁿ³	51ⁿ³	43.2ⁿ³	25.1ⁿ³
146	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	139.9ⁿ³⁵	121.8ⁿ³⁵	97.6ⁿ³⁷	97.9ⁿ³
149*	Intel Arc A730M	57.3ⁿ³	47.1ⁿ³	38.6ⁿ³	11.3
151	AMD Radeon RX 5600M	49ⁿ²	37.35ⁿ²	33.5ⁿ²
153	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	101ⁿ¹¹	89ⁿ¹¹	75.2ⁿ¹¹
154	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	106ⁿ²⁷	90.2ⁿ²⁷	75.2ⁿ²⁷	52.7ⁿ⁶
155	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	140.6ⁿ³	116.2ⁿ³	97.1ⁿ³
159	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)	211ⁿ³	180.5ⁿ³	144.9ⁿ³	106.5ⁿ³
160	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	109	96.5	81.1
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >X-Plane 11.11
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	4K
162	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)	224ⁿ³	196.4ⁿ³	150.6ⁿ³	95.4ⁿ³
169	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	102.15ⁿ²²	87.7ⁿ²²	73.1ⁿ²²	66.1ⁿ⁵
172	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	81.25ⁿ⁴	71.65ⁿ⁴	61.6ⁿ⁴
174*	AMD Radeon RX 6550M	53.7	41.2	33
175	AMD Radeon RX 6500M	48.95ⁿ²	40.95ⁿ²	35.1ⁿ²
187	AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop)	61.3	58.7	51.3	38.7
188	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	96	82.1	70.4
190	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	97.25ⁿ⁸	81.4ⁿ⁸	70.3ⁿ⁸	45.8
191*	Intel Arc A370M	36.9ⁿ³	27.8ⁿ³	24ⁿ³	22.2
192	AMD Radeon RX 5500M	52.4ⁿ²	39.9ⁿ²	35.3ⁿ²
201	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	98.7ⁿ⁹	83.9ⁿ⁹	69.6ⁿ⁹	55.3ⁿ²
205	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop)	123	110	89.6	66.9
207	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	83.8ⁿ¹⁸	70.6ⁿ¹⁸	61.95ⁿ¹⁸	76.1
208	Intel Arc A380	100.8	75.6	63.9
210	AMD Radeon RX 5300M	51.5	39.5	34.9
215*	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	91.2ⁿ¹¹	79.2ⁿ¹¹	66.7ⁿ¹¹	49.2ⁿ³
219	AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)	66.3	60.5	52.1	38.5
223*	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	83.5ⁿ³	62ⁿ³	52.1ⁿ³
224*	NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU	105ⁿ³	85.3ⁿ³	66.8ⁿ³	52.4
225*	AMD Radeon 890M	78.2ⁿ³	58.6ⁿ³	46.2ⁿ³
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >X-Plane 11.11
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	4K
226*	NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	91ⁿ³	78ⁿ³	69ⁿ³
229*	Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	52.7ⁿ³⁷	40.8ⁿ³⁸	33.8ⁿ³⁷	26.85ⁿ²
230*	Intel Arc A350M	38.9ⁿ²	30.8ⁿ²	26.85ⁿ²	19.6
231*	Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	47.5ⁿ⁵	38.5ⁿ⁵	32.9ⁿ⁵	22.6
232*	NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU	107.9	92.4	77
233*	NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU	68.1ⁿ³	64.1ⁿ³	57ⁿ³
244	AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH	61.8	52.8	45.5
246	AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20	72.3	58	49.4
247*	AMD Radeon 880M	64.1	51.2	39.8
248*	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS	36.2
249*	AMD Radeon 780M	50.55ⁿ⁵²	37.95ⁿ⁵²	31.5ⁿ⁵¹	26.45ⁿ²
254	NVIDIA GeForce MX550	105.5ⁿ²	88.35ⁿ²	70.2ⁿ²
255	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	77.3ⁿ³	69.9ⁿ³	61.2ⁿ³	39.55ⁿ²
256	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)	98ⁿ²	89ⁿ²	76.5ⁿ²	41.7
257	AMD Radeon 680M	55.75ⁿ³⁴	43.85ⁿ³⁴	35.6ⁿ³⁴	31.1ⁿ²
262*	NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU	75.85ⁿ⁴	66.6ⁿ⁴	58.2ⁿ⁴	29.4
263*	NVIDIA GeForce MX450	78.3ⁿ²¹	63.5ⁿ²¹	57.55ⁿ²⁰	40.8ⁿ²
269*	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q	92.7	80.3	69.4	39.5
270	AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16	65	50.8	43.5
271	AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870	50.4	42.2	36.9	23.6
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >X-Plane 11.11
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	4K
277	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)	72.6	65.2	56.1
278	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	77ⁿ²	64.85ⁿ²	55.65ⁿ²	35.7
284*	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	88.8	80.9	65.1	30.3
289*	AMD Radeon 760M	46.95ⁿ²	34.9ⁿ²	28.75ⁿ²
290*	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	36.7ⁿ¹⁰
292	AMD Radeon 660M	43.8ⁿ⁸	31ⁿ⁸	27.35ⁿ⁸
299	AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)	61.8	49.6	43.8	22.1
303	AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	39ⁿ²	31.6ⁿ²	27.8ⁿ²
318	Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics	36.6ⁿ²	34.65ⁿ²	29.3ⁿ²
321	AMD Radeon Pro 560X	63.7	47.7	42.1	21.4
325	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	42.5ⁿ²¹¹	35.05ⁿ²¹²	31.4ⁿ²¹¹	18.6ⁿ¹¹
326	NVIDIA GeForce MX350	69.2ⁿ¹⁴	56.9ⁿ¹⁴	49.75ⁿ¹⁴	29.4
334	AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)	26.5ⁿ²	20.99ⁿ²	19.02ⁿ²
335	AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)	44.4	30.9	28.7
336	AMD Radeon RX 640	45.5	32.8	30.1
337*	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200	25.2ⁿ²	16.65ⁿ²	15.15ⁿ²
339	AMD Radeon Pro 555	47	33.9	30	14.1
343	NVIDIA GeForce MX250	56.6ⁿ¹⁷	42.9ⁿ¹⁷	40ⁿ¹⁷
344	NVIDIA GeForce MX330	71ⁿ³	50ⁿ³	44.1ⁿ³	21ⁿ²
345	NVIDIA GeForce MX150	57.6ⁿ⁵	47ⁿ⁵	41.8ⁿ⁵	20.6ⁿ²
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >X-Plane 11.11
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	4K
346	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	37.5ⁿ¹⁰⁹	29.1ⁿ¹¹⁰	26.35ⁿ¹⁰⁸	17ⁿ³
347*	Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	36.35ⁿ¹⁰	28.6ⁿ¹⁰	23.5ⁿ¹⁰
348	NVIDIA GeForce GT 710	27.9	16.3	14.8	14.7
355*	AMD Radeon RX 540	29.8	23.3	19.7
369*	AMD Radeon 540X	28.8	21	18.6
376*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 11	41.75ⁿ²	32.2ⁿ²	29.9ⁿ²	16.9ⁿ²
389	Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)	42.15ⁿ¹⁰	32.15ⁿ¹⁰	26.55ⁿ¹⁰
390*	Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	28.3ⁿ¹⁸	16.3ⁿ¹⁷	15.7ⁿ¹⁸
391*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	23.8ⁿ⁷	18.5ⁿ⁷	16.7ⁿ⁷
428*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	31.5ⁿ¹¹	23.7ⁿ¹¹	22ⁿ¹¹
429	Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)	23.1ⁿ⁵	17.2ⁿ⁵	15.9ⁿ⁵
430*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	38.4ⁿ⁵	25.8ⁿ⁵	22.5ⁿ⁵	9.43
431	Intel UHD Graphics 770	51.4ⁿ³	32.7ⁿ³	29.7ⁿ³	12
433*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)	17.6ⁿ³	17.3ⁿ³	16.4ⁿ³
435	Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)	30.7	19.5	18
438	NVIDIA GeForce MX230	48.4	36.3	32.9
441*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	42.8ⁿ⁵⁷	33.5ⁿ⁵⁷	29.6ⁿ⁵⁷	23.3ⁿ⁶
450	AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	40.7ⁿ⁵⁶	31.6ⁿ⁵⁶	28.25ⁿ⁵⁶	24ⁿ²
467	NVIDIA GeForce MX130	41.05ⁿ²	30.65ⁿ²	26.25ⁿ²
468	NVIDIA GeForce 940MX	53.35ⁿ²	34.15ⁿ²	26.25ⁿ²
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >X-Plane 11.11
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	4K
471	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	26ⁿ²⁶	19.5ⁿ²⁶	17.1ⁿ²⁵	12.8
473	Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)	26.3ⁿ⁴	14.2ⁿ⁴	13.2ⁿ⁴
474	NVIDIA GeForce 930MX	49	31.6	29.5
487	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655	25.3ⁿ⁷	18ⁿ⁷	15.9ⁿ⁷
520	NVIDIA GeForce 930M	36.4
521	Intel Iris Graphics 550	19.55ⁿ²	14.45ⁿ²	12.35ⁿ²
522	AMD Radeon 530	18.6ⁿ³	12.3ⁿ³	12.2ⁿ²
524*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	37.8ⁿ²⁰	28.7ⁿ²⁰	25.8ⁿ²⁰	22.5
525	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645	37.4	26.1	22.5
528*	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	41.85ⁿ²	25.05ⁿ²	23.4ⁿ²
531	Intel Iris Graphics 540	23.6	16.9	13.6
538*	Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	19.6ⁿ⁹	12.6ⁿ⁹	11.5ⁿ⁸
577	NVIDIA GeForce 920M	23.2	24.8	23.3	9
592	AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)	35.9	23	20.5
593*	AMD Radeon 610M	35.7ⁿ²	21.95ⁿ²	18.85ⁿ²
595*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	20.1	16.9	14.7
596*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 5	29.9ⁿ²	22.75ⁿ²	20.6ⁿ²
597	Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	25.6ⁿ¹⁰	13.55ⁿ¹⁰	12.7ⁿ¹⁰
598	Intel UHD Graphics 630	20ⁿ¹⁰	14.6ⁿ¹⁰	13.05ⁿ¹⁰	6.96
600*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	18.6ⁿ⁴	15.8ⁿ⁴	14.55ⁿ⁴
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >X-Plane 11.11
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	4K
601	Intel HD Graphics 630	31.3	19.6	17.5	7.1
603	Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)	16.9ⁿ²	9.61	9.24ⁿ²
607	AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)	12.7	8.6
608	Intel UHD Graphics 620	18.7ⁿ⁸³	13.25ⁿ⁸²	12ⁿ⁷⁹	6.6ⁿ⁵
609	Intel HD Graphics 620	23.9	15.2
611*	Qualcomm Adreno 690	21ⁿ²	18.45ⁿ²	16.2ⁿ²
670	AMD Radeon HD 8650G	18.5ⁿ²	18.1	17.1	16.9
681	AMD Radeon R5 M255	22.7	15.7	14.8
682*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 3	20.7ⁿ¹¹	12.8ⁿ¹¹	11.7ⁿ¹¹
686	Intel HD Graphics 520	18.8	12.6
689	NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M	26.1	16	15.1
697	AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)	13.7	9.4
703	Intel HD Graphics 6000	18.2	12.9	11.6
706	Intel Iris Graphics 5100	21	15	13.5	10.2
710	Intel HD Graphics 4600	20.8	13.6
712	Intel HD Graphics 5500	17.1ⁿ³	10.55ⁿ²	9.34ⁿ²
737*	Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)	17.3ⁿ⁷	11.9ⁿ⁶	10.5ⁿ⁷
742	Intel UHD Graphics 617	20.2	14.1	12.8
743	Intel UHD Graphics 615	10ⁿ⁵	7.2ⁿ⁵	6.89ⁿ⁴
744*	Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)	20.8	13.3	12.3
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >X-Plane 11.11
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	4K
745	Intel HD Graphics 615	18.8	12	11	4.3
750	AMD Radeon HD 7660G	15.8	10.2	9.28
787	Intel HD Graphics 515	14.4
788	Intel UHD Graphics 610	10.23ⁿ²	9.02ⁿ²	7.1ⁿ²
789	Intel HD Graphics 610	13.75ⁿ²	7.95	7.28
790	Intel HD Graphics 4400	13.6
791*	AMD Radeon HD 8610G	14.3	9.99	9.03
821	Intel UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)	7.76	4.97	4.64
822	Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)	12.1ⁿ⁶	8.95ⁿ⁵	8.33ⁿ⁵
823	Intel UHD Graphics 605	7.15ⁿ⁵	5.97ⁿ⁴	5.39ⁿ⁴
824	Intel HD Graphics 505	5.5
838	AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)	12.2
840	AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)	7.1
859	AMD Radeon HD 8400	9.07	5.55	4.68
878	AMD Radeon HD 8350G	11.55ⁿ²	6.56	6.08
880	Intel UHD Graphics 600	6.82ⁿ¹⁸	4.86ⁿ¹⁸	4.42ⁿ¹⁸
881	Intel HD Graphics 500	5.5ⁿ³	4.32ⁿ²	3.96ⁿ²
916	Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)	14.3	8
980	AMD Radeon HD 8210	4.69	2.86	2.65