Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce MX230

NVIDIA GeForce MX230

The Nvidia GeForce MX230 is an entry-level dedicated  laptop graphics card with DirectX 12 support (FL 12_1) based (most likely) on the Pascal architecture (and not Maxwell as the older MX130). Similar to the faster MX250, the MX230 is based on the GP108 chip.

Features

The GP108 chip is manufactured in a 14 nm FinFET process at Samsung (LPP) and offers a number of new features, including support for DisplayPort 1.4 (ready), HDMI 2.0b, HDR and improved H.265 video de- and encoding (PlayReady 3.0). 4K HDR with Netflix, however, wont run due to the minimum 3 GB graphics memory that is required. Compared to the bigger Pascal chips, the small GP108 does not support Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) for VR and G-Sync. A full list of improvements and the new Pascal desktop GPUs is available in our dedicated Pascal architecture article.

Performance

Thanks to the newer Pascal architecture, the MX230 is significantly faster than the old GeForce MX130 (Maxwell based). Demanding games of 2019 run only in lowest resolution and detail settings and may stutter (e.g. Anno 1800 or Rage 2 ran with under 30fps in our benchmarks). Less demanding games like Overwatch, Fifa 19 or Rocket League, however, can be played in higher detail and resolution settings without stuttering (see benchmarks below).

Power Consumption

The MX230 is manufactured in 14nm at Samsung and due to the low shader count and 64 Bit memory bus, the power consumption is rather low. Therefore, the chip can be also used for small and thin laptops. In our power tests, the faster MX250 needed 22% more power (Furmark load) and the old MX130 even 38% more. The integrated UHD Graphics 620 needed on average only 17% less power at a much lower performance.

GeForce MX200 Series

GeForce MX250 compare 384 @ 1.52 - 1.58 GHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
GeForce MX230 256 @ 1.52 - 1.53 GHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
CodenameN17S-G0
ArchitecturePascal
Pipelines256 - unified
Core Speed1519 - 1531 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7000 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Transistor Count1.8 Billion
technology14 nm
FeaturesVulcan 1.1, GPU Boost 3.0, Optimus, PhysX, CUDA, GeForce Experience, GameWorks
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement20.02.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.geforce.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1.1 pt (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 163728     avg: 178637     median: 183041 (21%)     max: 189141 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 13376     avg: 15921     median: 15796.5 (4%)     max: 17999 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
46.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
28  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
73.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
39.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
34.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
55.5 61 67.7 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.3 16.6 19.2 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.8 7.9 9 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.5 4.9 5.1 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
24.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
24.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
43  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
71  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
22.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
32  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
25.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
4.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
3.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
45.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
30.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
69.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
38.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
122.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
29.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
36.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
46  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
FIFA 19

FIFA 19

2018
low 1280x720
80.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
58.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
32  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
48  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
34.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
31  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
235  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
48.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
31.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
84.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Destiny 2

Destiny 2

2017
low 1280x720
44.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
50  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
58.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
96  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
91.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
62.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
152.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
77.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
med. 1920x1080
34.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
35.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
63  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
86  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
90 101 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
78.3 83 ~ 81 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
35.9 39.1 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.6 23 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
56.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x768
18.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
85.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1366x768
101.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
84.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
126.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
113  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
44  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
38  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
45.9 48.4 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
26.4 28.4 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.5 15.9 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.7 9.9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
71.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
64.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
171.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
110  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
58.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
35.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
146.4 148.5 151.5 168.1 170.7 ~ 157 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
71.3 81.4 81.9 82.8 90.6 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
61.8 70.2 72.7 79.2 79.8 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.2 27.4 28 31.2 31.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
150.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
74.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
55.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
178.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
127.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
90.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
64.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
142.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
114.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
96.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
234.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
111.7  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
85.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GRID 201946.819.212.4
Ghost Recon Breakpoint2814139
FIFA 2073.162.455.646.4
Borderlands 339.61610.17.4
Control34.8117.5
F1 201962252012
Total War: Three Kingdoms611685
Rage 224.510.284.1
Anno 180024.48.14.92.1
The Division 24313106
Dirt Rally 2.07122.917.510.4
Anthem22.712.311.19.8
Far Cry New Dawn32151312
Metro Exodus25.94.83.34.5
Apex Legends45.817.814.412.4
Just Cause 430.917.412.710.9
Darksiders III69.319.815.913.4
Battlefield V38.320.21612
Farming Simulator 19122.348.623.817.6
Hitman 229.313.410.79.9
Call of Duty Black Ops 436.818.913.811.7
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey2613106
Forza Horizon 446211612
FIFA 1980.558.652.652.2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider3210107
F1 201848231812
Monster Hunter World34.112.910.98.3
Far Cry 531151312
World of Tanks enCore23554.417.9
X-Plane 11.1148.436.332.9
Kingdom Come: Deliverance31.513.811.67
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark2611.47.4
Fortnite84.733.219.515.6
Destiny 244.923.92217.5
Middle-earth: Shadow of War5018129
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)58.523.82117.3
Team Fortress 29691.468.862.9
Rocket League152.677.772.7
Prey90.934.725.321.3
Ghost Recon Wildlands35.515.2133.5
For Honor632118.715
Civilization VI8645.614.710.6
Overwatch96813820
Doom56.445.919.315.6
Ashes of the Singularity18.410.69
Rainbow Six Siege85.961.932.222.5
World of Warships101.284.152.833.2
Dota 2 Reborn126.71135843.2
Batman: Arkham Knight44381611
The Witcher 34727159
GTA V71.564.526.910.6
Sims 4171.911060.548.7
Thief58.739.435.618.3
BioShock Infinite157827329
Tomb Raider150.874.455.426.1
Counter-Strike: GO178.1127.190.764.9
Diablo III142.6114.296.152.6
StarCraft 2234.3111.785.941.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
9
24
15
10
34
10
13
1
41
9
7
43
7
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 17. 08:53:17

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.058s ... 0.059s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.059s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.059s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9571 +0.043s ... 0.102s

#7 got single benchmarks 9571 +0.035s ... 0.137s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.137s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.737s ... 0.875s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.875s

#11 Got 257 rows for game benchmarks. +0.029s ... 0.903s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.903s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.05s ... 0.953s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +2.369s ... 3.322s

#15 return log +0.045s ... 3.366s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce MX230 graphics card

Dell Inspiron 14 3493 in Review: Dell's 14-Inch Laptop Neglects the GPU Department

Dell Inspiron 14 3493 in Review: Dell's 14-Inch Laptop Neglects the GPU Department

Dell's 14-inch laptop shines with decent or even good battery life, an NVMe SSD and a powerful Ice Lake Core i7 processor. The dedicated GeForce MX230 graphics ...
Intel Core i7-1065G7 | NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | 14.00" | 1.8 kg
Lenovo IdeaPad C340-15IWL laptop review: Lenovo's convertible pleases with long battery life

Lenovo IdeaPad C340-15IWL laptop review: Lenovo's convertible pleases with long battery life

With the IdeaPad C340-15IWL, Lenovo delivers a well-equipped 15.6-inch convertible, which also offers very good battery life. The IPS touchscreen display can be...
Intel Core i5-8265U | NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | 15.60" | 2 kg
ASUS VivoBook 14 X412FJ Laptop Review: A compact 14-inch machine with performance issues

ASUS VivoBook 14 X412FJ Laptop Review: A compact 14-inch machine with performance issues

The VivoBook 14 scores well for its quad-core i5 processor, dedicated GPU, 8 GB of dual-channel RAM, SSD and matte IPS screen. However, there are some significa...
Intel Core i5-8265U | NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
Lenovo IdeaPad S340-14IWL

Lenovo IdeaPad S340 (i7-8565U, MX230) Laptop Review

In its current incarnation, the IdeaPad S340 presents itself with an attractive design and good hardware equipment. The optional dedicated MX graphics unit is a...
Intel Core i7-8565U | NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | 14.00" | 1.6 kg
Asus VivoBook 14 (i5-8265U, MX230, FHD) Laptop Review

Asus VivoBook 14 (i5-8265U, MX230, FHD) Laptop Review

The new all-rounder from Asus arms itself with a mid-range graphics card to tackle the multimedia world. The new VivoBook is not only slim and sleek but is also...
Intel Core i5-8265U | NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | 14.00" | 1.5 kg

Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IML-81TL002EMH: Intel Core i7-10510U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IML-81TL002EMH

Acer TravelMate P2 TMP215-52G-NX.VLUEX.005: Intel Core i7-10510U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate P2 TMP215-52G-NX.VLUEX.005

Lenovo Ideapad C340-14IML-81TK0022MJ: Intel Core i3-10110U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad C340-14IML-81TK0022MJ

Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF

Dell Vostro 15 3591 i5-1035G1, MX230: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Dell Vostro 15 3591 i5-1035G1, MX230

Acer Aspire 3 A315-55G-55WZ: Intel Core i5-10210U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A315-55G-55WZ

Acer Aspire 3 A315-55G-54BN: Intel Core i5-10210U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A315-55G-54BN

Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE

Dell Inspiron 15 5593, i5-1035G1: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 5593, i5-1035G1

Lenovo Ideapad L340-15IWL-81LG005GGE: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad L340-15IWL-81LG005GGE

Lenovo Ideapad L340-15IWL-88IPL301158: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad L340-15IWL-88IPL301158

Asus VivoBook 14 X412FJ-EB023T: Intel Core i5-8265U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 14 X412FJ-EB023T

Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IWL-81N8002UGE: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IWL-81N8002UGE

Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB118T: Intel Core i5-8265U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB118T

Lenovo Ideapad S340-14IWL-81N70056GE: Intel Core i7-8565U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad S340-14IWL-81N70056GE

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA GeForce MX230 Graphics Card
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2018-12-18)