Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 3000 Ada Generation, not to be confused with the A3000, P3000 or RTX 3000 Turing Generation, is a higher-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 4,608 CUDA cores and 8 GB of ECC GDDR6 VRAM (error correction can be turned off if desired). It would be fair to say that this is a GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop in disguise; consequently, the graphics card is fast enough for many games at 1440p with quality set to High. Brought into existence in 2023, the RTX 3000 leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and Nvidia's Ada Lovelace architecture to achieve very decent performance combined with moderate power consumption. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 35 W to 140 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional use rather than gaming. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here (up to 16,384 versus 10,752); under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a smarter technique is used to determine what is transparent and what isn't), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI tasks.

The RTX 3000 Ada features 36 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 144 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 4,608 CUDA cores, making it ~11% inferior to the RTX 3500 Ada Generation as long as we disregard clock speed differences. (The 3500 also has more VRAM). The RTX 3000 comes with 8 GB of 128-bit wide ECC GDDR6 memory for throughput of ~256 GB/s. The fact that error correction is present here proves that the graphics adapter is indeed targeted at professional users, and it can be disabled if desired.

Just like Ampere-based cards, the RTX 3000 makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs can potentially prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

Having reviewed the Dell Precision 5480 and its 50 W RTX 3000 Ada in September 2023, we can firmly say the graphics card is in the same league as the RTX 4060 Laptop and the RTX 4050 Laptop, despite sharing most of its specifications with the RTX 4070 Laptop. 48 seconds in the Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA test and a 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score of less than 30,000 points are nothing to write home about. The GPU's gaming talents are not mind-blowing, either, although it is certainly capable enough for 1080p gaming.

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 20 TFLOPS" of performance, a very noticeable improvement over 14.5 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 2000 Ada Generation. Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the graphics card is. A 100 W RTX 3000 Ada might be able to come close to the average RTX 4070 Laptop.

One other thing worth mentioning is that enabling error correction appears to reduce the amount of video memory that is available to applications and games by up to a gigabyte.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is especially the case for the RTX 3000, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 35 W while the highest is 300% higher at 140 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). This is the kind of delta that we've be seeing on consumer-grade laptops featuring the latest GeForce RTX cards.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 3000 Ada is built with makes for very decent energy efficiency, as of mid 2023.

RTX Ada Generation Laptop GPU Series

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
ArchitectureAda Lovelace
Pipelines4608 - unified
TMUs144
ROPs48
Raytracing Cores36
Tensor / AI Cores144
CacheL2: 32 MB
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth256 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement21.03.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.com
PredecessorQuadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 8254     avg: 9034     median: 8811 (23%)     max: 10036 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 7959     avg: 8689     median: 8351 (17%)     max: 9757 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 34703     avg: 40239     median: 40238.5 (38%)     max: 45774 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 58392     avg: 70502     median: 70502 (17%)     max: 82612 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 18368     avg: 19637     median: 18847 (28%)     max: 21697 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 20233     avg: 21691     median: 20908 (19%)     max: 23931 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 25317     avg: 27267     median: 27083 (33%)     max: 29401 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 28283     avg: 30499     median: 29411 (23%)     max: 33802 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 40     avg: 44     median: 44 (7%)     max: 48 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 23     avg: 26     median: 27 (10%)     max: 28 Seconds
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 159.9     avg: 176.8     median: 183.9 (46%)     max: 186.49 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 163.39     avg: 173.7     median: 174.9 (26%)     max: 182.76 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 88.34     avg: 94.2     median: 92 (16%)     max: 102.41 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
84.8 fps (22%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 133.1     avg: 143.9     median: 143 (39%)     max: 155.73 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
19 fps (17%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 123.21     avg: 144.6     median: 150.3 (60%)     max: 160.25 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 174.33     avg: 197.6     median: 198.5 (33%)     max: 220.09 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 162.23     avg: 179.5     median: 179.2 (48%)     max: 197.11 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 296.88     avg: 318.8     median: 312.1 (35%)     max: 347.37 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 88.94     avg: 92.9     median: 90.7 (15%)     max: 99.04 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 111.4     avg: 153.3     median: 168.5 (29%)     max: 179.9 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 260.1     avg: 281.8     median: 274.5 (31%)     max: 310.61 fps
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 56.97     avg: 60.1     median: 58.3 (19%)     max: 64.93 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 245.25     avg: 267.7     median: 255.2 (37%)     max: 302.58 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 273.29     avg: 308.7     median: 310.7 (35%)     max: 342.09 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 189.32     avg: 199     median: 191.7 (30%)     max: 215.94 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k
min: 70.11     avg: 74     median: 74 (22%)     max: 77.86 fps
specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p
min: 177.22     avg: 185.4     median: 185.4 (39%)     max: 193.56 fps
specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
196.5 fps (38%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 285.92     avg: 297     median: 290.6 (35%)     max: 314.39 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 55.19     avg: 80.8     median: 90.4 (25%)     max: 96.95 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 310.86     avg: 312.5     median: 312.3 (33%)     max: 314.35 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 49.86     avg: 55     median: 57.2 (9%)     max: 57.85 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 113.79     avg: 129.1     median: 136.7 (47%)     max: 136.89 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 78     avg: 80.2     median: 78.9 (39%)     max: 83.77 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 75.05     avg: 80.7     median: 80.9 (21%)     max: 86.19 fps
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
77.2 fps (19%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 183.57     avg: 188.3     median: 189.8 (19%)     max: 191.49 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 19.91     avg: 30.1     median: 33.8 (22%)     max: 36.49 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 131.97     avg: 137.2     median: 138.8 (20%)     max: 140.78 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 20     avg: 37.3     median: 41.2 (6%)     max: 50.62 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 51.74     avg: 60.8     median: 55.8 (25%)     max: 74.79 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 44.03     avg: 44.7     median: 44.9 (29%)     max: 45.26 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 47.43     avg: 50.7     median: 51.6 (17%)     max: 53 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 235     avg: 260     median: 257 (15%)     max: 288 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 637     median: 900 (22%)     max: 905 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 91678     avg: 93566     median: 92413 (24%)     max: 96607 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 85312     avg: 88785     median: 88420 (22%)     max: 92623 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 79.8     avg: 97.2     median: 97.2 (13%)     max: 114.6 Watt
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
86.5 Watt (12%)
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 90.4     avg: 91.8     median: 91.8 (20%)     max: 93.1 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra
min: 0.854     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (78%)     max: 0.871 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
0.9 fps per Watt (75%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
125.4 Watt (37%)
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
120.3 Watt (15%)
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
0.5 fps per Watt (2%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 49.9     avg: 50     median: 50 (80%)     max: 50.1 dB(A)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
87.2 104.6 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
72.7 87.9 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60.7 74.2 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.1 64.3 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
39.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
112
114
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
26.2
33.2
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
65.7
low 1920x1080
92 130.6 ~ 111 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
78.8 111.8 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70.1 98.4 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
68.8 96.7 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
68.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
176.8
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
162.7 183.6 226 ~ 191 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
159.6 168 212 ~ 180 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
127.5 133.4 161.1 ~ 141 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.4 51.1 62.8 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
229
244
293
low 1920x1080
153.9 156 194 ~ 168 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
125.4 131.4 157.7 ~ 138 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88 88.5 110 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
69 70.2 87.9 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
60.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
250.1
275.4
low 1920x1080
92.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
72.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
282 400 415 ~ 366 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
182.4 191.3 246 ~ 207 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
151.4 160.1 192.8 ~ 168 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
132.5 140.7 172.6 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
118.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
115 154 155 ~ 141 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
105 116 133 ~ 118 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
104 106 130 ~ 113 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
96 101 118 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
93  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
109.9 131.3 152 ~ 131 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
102.1 109.7 126.8 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.7 87.1 102 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
128.8 155.1 189.4 ~ 158 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91.9 108 128.7 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72.9 78.9 97 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
71.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
168 175.7 176.2 ~ 173 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
151.3 159.9 160.8 ~ 157 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
136 148.2 151.5 ~ 145 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
123.3 142.9 143.3 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
344 364.1 ~ 354 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
242.5 249.5 ~ 246 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
145.8 150.1 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
78.7 79.5 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
182.2 183.2 ~ 183 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
176 177 ~ 177 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
163.2 164.1 ~ 164 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
88.2 96.6 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
76.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
175.1
177.1
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
180
178.6
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty9680675839.6
Baldur's Gate 311195848368.7
F1 221911801415540.7
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands168138967660.5
Cyberpunk 2077 1.692.372.461.256.2
Strange Brigade366207168149118.6
Far Cry 514111811310593
X-Plane 11.1113111389
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1581108371.3
Dota 2 Reborn173157145137
The Witcher 335424614879
GTA V1831771649276.1
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


3
9


6
6


7
5

3
5
2

2
6



For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 28. 12:46:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 Jun 2025 05:36:34 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.048s ... 0.049s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.049s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.049s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11603 +0.014s ... 0.063s

#8 got single benchmarks 11603 +0.019s ... 0.082s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.082s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.808s ... 0.891s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.891s

#12 Got 122 rows for game benchmarks. +0.059s ... 0.95s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.95s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.956s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.125s ... 1.081s

#16 return log +0.005s ... 1.086s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU graphics card

HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 workstation review: Light with performance done right

HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 workstation review: Light with performance done right

One of HP's lightest 16-inch workstations gets new processor options for noticeably faster performance than before. Otherwise, this is visually the same design ...
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 1.8 kg
Dell Precision 5490 workstation review: Now with Intel Meteor Lake-H vPro

Dell Precision 5490 workstation review: Now with Intel Meteor Lake-H vPro

One of Dell's smallest Precision laptops gets the Intel AI treatment. Otherwise, raw performance hasn't improved by significant or even moderate margins over la...
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 14.00" | 1.6 kg
Nvidia RTX 3000 Ada performance debut: Dell Precision 5480 workstation review

Nvidia RTX 3000 Ada performance debut: Dell Precision 5480 workstation review

Not much has changed from a visual standpoint, but the GPU update from last year's Precision 5470 is significant and worth considering for power users who want ...
Intel Core i9-13900H | NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 14.00" | 1.6 kg

HP ZBook Studio 16 G11: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Studio 16 G11

Dell Precision 5000 5490: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Dell Precision 5000 5490

Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED W7604: Intel Core i9-13980HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED W7604

Dell Precision 5480: Intel Core i9-13900H, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Dell Precision 5480

HP Zbook Power G10: Intel Core i9-13900H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » HP Zbook Power G10

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-03- 1)