Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M is a high-end DirectX 12-compatible graphics card for laptops unveiled in March 2014. Similar to the GTX 780M, it is based on the 28 nm GK104 chip (Kepler architecture), but features a higher core clock rate. As of spring 2014, it is the fastest laptop graphics card on the market.

Architecture

The Kepler architecture is the successor to the Fermi architecture that first appeared in laptops with the GeForce 400M series. The GK104 Kepler core offers eight shader blocks, called SMX, that are clocked at the same speed as the central core. In the GTX 880M, all eight blocks are active for a total of 1536 CUDA cores and 128 TMUs. The chip can access up to 8 GB of GDDR5 memory connected via a 256-bit interface.

Performance

Due to the higher core clock, the computing power has been increased by about 15 percent compared to the GeForce GTX 780M. However, the memory bandwidth stagnates, so the average performance gain is lessened. Our benchmarks show an increase of about 10 percent, making the GTX 880M the fastest mobile graphics card as of spring 2014. The GPU has enough power to run demanding games of 2013/2014 fluently with Full HD resolution and maxed out graphical settings.

Features

The feature set includes support for up to 4 active displays. Furthermore, high resolution monitors of up to 3840x2160 pixels can be connected using DisplayPort 1.2 or HDMI 1.4a (if available). HD-Audio codecs, such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD, can be transmitted via bitstream mode through the HDMI port. However, as most laptops will feature Optimus, the integrated GPU will likely have direct control over the display ports and may limit the feature set available by the Nvidia Kepler cards.

The 5th generation PureVideo HD video processor (VP5) is also integrated in the GK104 core and offers hardware decoding of HD videos. Common codecs such as MPEG-1/2, MPEG-4 ASP, H.264 and VC1/WMV9 are fully supported up to 4K resolutions while VC1 and MPEG-4 are supported up to 1080p. Two streams can be decoded in parallel for features such as Picture-in-Picture. Another novelty is the inclusion of a dedicated video encoding engine similar to Intel QuickSync that can be accessed by the NVENC API.

New features of the GTX 800M series include Battery Boost (longer battery life while playing games), Shadowplay (recording of in-game videos) and Game Stream (stream PC games on the Nvidia Shield console).

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the GeForce GTX 880M should be similar or slightly above the GTX 780M, leading to a TDP of more than 100 W. Therefore, only large desktop replacements can support the power demands of the GTX 880M.

GeForce GTX 800M Series

GeForce GTX 880M SLI compare 3072 @ 0.95 GHz2x 256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 860M SLI compare 1280 @ 1.03 GHz2x 128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 880M 1536 @ 0.95 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 870M compare 1344 @ 0.94 GHz192 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 860M compare 640 @ 1.03 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 850M compare 640 @ 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 2000 - 5000 MHz
CodenameN15E-GX-A2
ArchitectureKepler
Pipelines1536 - unified
Core Speed954 MHz
Memory Speed5000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.3
Power Consumption103 Watt
Transistor Count3.5 Billion
technology28 nm
FeaturesBattery Boost, GameStream, ShadowPlay, GPU Boost 2.0, Optimus, PhysX, CUDA, SLI, GeForce Experience
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement12.03.2014
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.de

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
2.8 pt (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 18199     avg: 19062     median: 19151 (20%)     max: 19781 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 38938     avg: 39963     median: 39891 (10%)     max: 41259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5252     avg: 5457     median: 5482.5 (10%)     max: 5577 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5825     avg: 6060     median: 6101 (7%)     max: 6251 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 105465     avg: 166979     median: 135032 (16%)     max: 262047 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7816     avg: 8296     median: 8319.5 (12%)     max: 8514 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 8114     avg: 8553     median: 8578 (7%)     max: 9003 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 26554     avg: 27835     median: 28022 (8%)     max: 28920 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 27851     avg: 29214     median: 29582 (17%)     max: 29698 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 28118     avg: 29037     median: 29036.5 (38%)     max: 29955 Points
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 4.81     avg: 13.6     median: 5.6 (1%)     max: 30.4 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 14.17     avg: 22.9     median: 18.7 (4%)     max: 35.77 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 1.79     avg: 7.2     median: 1.8 (0%)     max: 17.92 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 17.33     avg: 29.6     median: 20.2 (5%)     max: 51.2 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 2.2     avg: 15.2     median: 21 (19%)     max: 22.46 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 55.4     avg: 60.9     median: 60.3 (21%)     max: 68.6 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 65.7     avg: 101.3     median: 101.4 (6%)     max: 119.8 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
134  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
104  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Disabled 4xAF 1920x1080
67.8
low 1280x720
185  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
159  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
118  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
44  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
146
low 1280x720
140  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
93.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset FXAA 1920x1080
65
Mafia 3

Mafia 3

2016
low 1280x720
55.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
25.6
FIFA 17

FIFA 17

2016
low 1280x720
244  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
208  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
146  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
141  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
54.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
165
low 1280x720
56.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 2xAF 1920x1080
25.1
low 1280x720
73.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium 4x AF Off AA 1920x1080
43.4
low 1280x720
124  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
81.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1920x1080
55.3
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
230  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
198  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
96.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
124
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
79.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
69.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
47
low 1280x720
82.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
77.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Off 1920x1080
46.8
low 1280x720
62.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
57.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Off 4xAF 1920x1080
45.7
low 1280x720
97.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
70.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1920x1080
41.7
low 1280x720
85  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
54
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
74.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TrilinearAF 1920x1080
57.2
low 1024x768
84.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
203.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
137  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
78.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
69.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
17.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
161  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
111.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
17.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
70.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
low 1280x720
110.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
73.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
120.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
84.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
134.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
77.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
241  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
222.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
160.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
73.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
59.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
145.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
81  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
71  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
94.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
58.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
289.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
134.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
102  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
132.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
122.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
173  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
144.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
91.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
83.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Crew

The Crew

2014
low 1280x720
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
118.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
99.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
104.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
95.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
70.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
58.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
123.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
83.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
143.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
94.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
132  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
127  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
120  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
102  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
64.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
63.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
86.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
75.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
207.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
178  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
101.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
68.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
177.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
108.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
low 1280x720
280.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
227.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
189.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
150.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
99.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
80.8 81.6 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72.7 73.5 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
35.5 89.7 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
35.3 92.9 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.9 43.4 52.7 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54.3 54.7 54.9 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
195.5 226 ~ 211 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
119.8 139.6 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
96.3 113.4 114.9 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63.7 70 76.8 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
62.5 88.1 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
53.1 74.3 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.5 40.9 44.4 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.3 30.9 32.9 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
59.9 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
59.8 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.8 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58.7 59 60 60 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
92.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
87.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
76  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Titanfall

Titanfall

2014
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
55.7 62.6 89 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
54.5 62.3 77 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46.1 53.5 59 59.6 71 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.8 40 40.3 41 41 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
59  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
57  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
108.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
52  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
91.6 104.4 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
79.8 88.5 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
66 66.4 71.1 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45.9 46.8 46.8 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
152.8 181 ~ 167 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
125.7 149 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
105.8 112.1 125 ~ 114 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45.4 46.2 51 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
low 1024x768
118  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
115  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
107 109 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
92 94 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
low 1024x768
471  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
347  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
334  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
294  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
245  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
175.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
146.4 152 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.4 37 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
72.7 73.6 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
63.8 65.2 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
57 58 66.2 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.4 53.1 54.3 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
119.7 119.8 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
114 118.2 ~ 116 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
86.1 99.8 105.7 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
55.4 56.8 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
52.8 54.3 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46 46.5 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.4 24.7 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
126.8 145.1 220.6 ~ 164 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
101 107.1 194.8 ~ 134 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
96.7 98.2 187.4 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72.6 76.2 86.2 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
98.1 106.5 112 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
90 97.7 104 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
75.2 75.9 76.6 78 93 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.2 42 42.4 42.6 44 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
189.2 210 217.1 ~ 205 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
158.5 166 178.8 ~ 168 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
122.4 151 152 156.4 160.4 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55.6 64 65.6 65.8 108.5 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
123  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
100  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
85 120.6 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47 80.1 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
337 342.6 ~ 340 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
248.2 250 ~ 249 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
163.3 164 167.5 170 ~ 166 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72.2 73.6 74 74.2 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
135.6 137.6 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
112.4 113 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
81.2 81.5 81.7 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.1 33.2 33.3 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 3

Far Cry 3

2012
low 1024x768
116.2 116.6 ~ 116 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
95.9 106.1 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
81.8 83.9 84.4 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.7 35.7 35.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
58 64.8 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
54.9 59.1 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
47.9 49.3 52.9 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.9 38 46.3 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
218.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
204.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
156.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
105.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
170.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
147.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
137.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
129.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
128.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
128.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
127.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
151  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
112  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
108  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
94  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
113.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
59.2 61.1 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.8 49.1 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
157.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
153.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
94.6 97.9 119.3 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.8 40 40.3 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
103.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
95.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
90.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
193  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
125  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
117  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
84  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
med. 1366x768
220.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
135.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
122.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
176.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
165.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
95.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
64.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
228  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
205  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
136  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
94  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
low 1024x768
220.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
106.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
CPU 1280x1024
29.8
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
150.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
147.1  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
140.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
118.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1360x768
171.7  fps    + Compare
high 1600x900
135.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Titanfall 213410450.846.915.4
Farming Simulator 1718515911881.844
Battlefield 114093.845.54415
Mafia 355.634.520.3
FIFA 1724420814614154.5
Deus Ex Mankind Divided56.939.82311.7
No Man's Sky73.461.438.716.814.2
Mirror's Edge Catalyst12481.24033.211.8
Overwatch23019896.154.530.4
Doom79.469.441.337.4
Need for Speed 201682.277.242.431.714.2
Hitman 201662.457.425.924.211.5
The Division97.270.630.124.8
Far Cry Primal8546413014
XCOM 274.742.627.612.5
Rise of the Tomb Raider84.955.936.332.314.6
Rainbow Six Siege203.613778.856.524.9
Just Cause 378.469.544.840.117.6
Star Wars Battlefront161111.555.948.717.5
Assassin's Creed Syndicate70.760.340.816.613.4
Fallout 4110.473.942.635.414.9
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3120.284.142.538.413.4
Anno 2205134.877.839.88.816.7
FIFA 16241222.2160.273.1
Metal Gear Solid V6059.959.959.126.2
Mad Max145.376.667.924.1
Batman: Arkham Knight8171433014
The Witcher 394.458.434.218.7
Dirt Rally289.8134.810251.641.3
GTA V132.1122.362.726.8
Battlefield Hardline173144.17345.9
Evolve91.383.255.748.6
The Crew60606048.6
Dragon Age: Inquisition118.699.344.431
Far Cry 4104.495.950.540.3
Assassin's Creed Unity70.358.332.223.9
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare123.883.761.539.8
Civilization: Beyond Earth143.394.360.353.6
F1 2014132127120102
The Evil Within64.163.346.4
Ryse: Son of Rome86.175.140.137.4
Alien: Isolation207.3178101.268.9
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor177.6108.96348.3
Fifa 15280.8227.9189.3
Sims 4150.999.68173
Risen 3: Titan Lords63644655
GRID: Autosport21113010870
Watch Dogs75644231
Wolfenstein: The New Order60606059
The Elder Scrolls Online92.587.17657.5
Titanfall60606059.8
Thief69655840
Assassin´s Creed IV: Black Flag62595735
X-Plane 10.25108.95228.522.4
Call of Duty: Ghosts98846847
Battlefield 416713711448
F1 201311811510893
Fifa 14471347334294
Total War: Rome II245175.514937
Saints Row IV73656053
Dota 212011697
Company of Heroes 256544625
GRID 216413412778
Metro: Last Light106978042
BioShock Infinite20516814872
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm12310010364
Tomb Raider34024916674
Crysis 31371138133
Far Cry 31161018336
Hitman: Absolution61575040
Call of Duty: Black Ops 2218.9204.5156.5105.2
Medal of Honor: Warfighter170.4147.9137.459.5
Dishonored129.2128.8128.9127.4
Borderlands 215111210894
Guild Wars 2113.96046
Sleeping Dogs157.8153.110438
Dirt Showdown103.195.190.577.9
Diablo III19312511784
Anno 2070220.3135.5122.5
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim176.2165.295.164.3
Batman: Arkham City22820513694
Total War: Shogun 2220.8106.773
Mafia 2150.3147.1140.9118.7
Metro 2033171.7135.241.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3
37
41

13
41
27
5
30
31
16
12
44
20
6



18
4
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 18:58:51

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 04 Mar 2024 05:34:43 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.061s ... 0.062s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.062s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.062s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 5185 +0.03s ... 0.092s

#7 got single benchmarks 5185 +0.046s ... 0.138s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.138s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.617s ... 0.755s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.755s

#11 Got 489 rows for game benchmarks. +0.02s ... 0.775s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.776s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.061s ... 0.837s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +3.013s ... 3.849s

#15 return log +0.07s ... 3.919s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M graphics card

MSI GT72 Notebook Review

MSI GT72 Notebook Review

Muscleman. Cooler Boost, Super RAID, Matrix Display: MSI uses many fancy words for the GT72. We took the brand-new gaming notebook to check the marketing sloga...
Intel Core i7-4710HQ | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | 17.30" | 3.8 kg
Gigabyte P25X v2 Notebook Review

Gigabyte P25X v2 Notebook Review

Character actor. While most notebook companies rely at most on the GeForce GTX 870M for their 15-inch department, Gigabyte uses Nvidia's top model for the P25X ...
Intel Core i7-4810MQ | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | 15.60" | 2.8 kg
Eurocom X3 (Clevo P157SM) Notebook Review Update

Eurocom X3 (Clevo P157SM) Notebook Review Update

Kepler update. Eurocom updates the 15.6-inch X3 with the latest Nvidia Kepler offerings. We put the beastly GTX 880M GPU to the test under our usual stressful c...
Intel Core i7-4930MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | 15.60" | 3.5 kg
Alienware 17 (GTX 880M) Notebook Review

Alienware 17 (GTX 880M) Notebook Review

Gaming tank. Big, heavy and a case full of fast hardware describes the new Alienware 17. Especially hardcore gamers will be interested in the GeForce GTX 880M, ...
Intel Core i7-4700MQ | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | 17.30" | 4.2 kg
Review Asus G750JZ-T4023H Notebook

Review Asus G750JZ-T4023H Notebook

Juggernaut. The GeForce GTX 880M, still based on Kepler, is currently the fastest available laptop GPU. It rouses the highest expectations of gaming performance...
Intel Core i7-4700HQ | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | 17.30" | 4.3 kg

MSI GT70 2PE-890US: Intel Core i7-4800MQ, 17.30", 3.8 kg
  Review » Review MSI GT70 2PE-890US Gaming Notebook

SCHENKER XMG P704: Intel Core i7-4910MQ, 17.30", 4 kg
  Review » Review Clevo P177SM-A (Schenker XMG P704) Barebones Notebook

MSI GT70 2PE-2089RU: Intel Core i7-4710MQ, 17.30", 3.8 kg
  External Review » MSI GT70 2PE-2089RU

MSI GT70 2PE-1200NL: Intel Core i7-4940MX, 17.30", 3.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GT70 2PE-1200NL

MSI GT72 2PE-006FR Dominator Pro: Intel Core i7-4710HQ, 17.30", 3.8 kg
  External Review » MSI GT72 2PE-006FR Dominator Pro

Asus G750JZ-T4079H: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 17.30", 4.3 kg
  External Review » Asus G750JZ-T4079H

MSI GT72 2PE-072UK: Intel Core i7-4710HQ, 17.30", 3.8 kg
  External Review » MSI GT72 2PE-072UK

MSI GT72-2PE16SR231BW: Intel Core i7-4710HQ, 17.30", 3.8 kg
  External Review » MSI GT72-2PE16SR231BW

MSI GT70 2PE-1862UK: Intel Core i7-4810MQ, 17.30", 3.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GT70 2PE-1862UK

Gigabyte P25X v2: Intel Core i7-4810MQ, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte P25X v2

MSI GT72 2PE-005FR: Intel Core i7-4710HQ, 17.00", 3.8 kg
  External Review » MSI GT72 2PE-005FR

Asus G750JZ-T4023H: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 17.30", 4.3 kg
  External Review » Asus G750JZ-T4023H

Asus G750JZ-T4110H: Intel Core i7-4860HQ, 17.30", 4.8 kg
  External Review » Asus G750JZ-T4110H

MSI GT60 2PE-495RU: Intel Core i7-4800MQ, 15.60", 3.5 kg
  External Review » MSI GT60 2PE-495RU

Asus G750JZ-T4039D: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 17.30", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Asus G750JZ-T4039D

Asus G750JZ-T4089H: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 17.30", 4.8 kg
  External Review » Asus G750JZ-T4089H

Alienware 17 (GTX 880M): Intel Core i7-4700MQ, 17.30", 4.2 kg
  External Review » Alienware 17 (GTX 880M)

Origin PC EON 17-S 2014: Intel Core i7-4930MX, 17.30", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Origin PC EON 17-S 2014

AVADirect Clevo P157SM-A: Intel Core i7-4810MQ, 15.60", 3.3 kg
  External Review » AVADirect Clevo P157SM-A

Asus G750JZ-T4024H: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 17.30", 4.5 kg
  External Review » Asus G750JZ-T4024H

MSI GT70 2PE-1051FR Dominator Pro: Intel Core i7-4800MQ, 17.30", 3.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GT70 2PE-1051FR Dominator Pro

MSI GT60 2PE Dominator Pro: Intel Core i7-4800MQ, 15.60", 3.5 kg
  External Review » MSI GT60 2PE Dominator Pro

MSI GT60-2PE16H11B: Intel Core i7-4800MQ, 15.60", 3.5 kg
  External Review » MSI GT60-2PE16H11B

MSI GT70-2PE16SR231B: Intel Core i7-4800MQ, 17.30", 3.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GT70-2PE16SR231B

Asus G750JZ-XS72: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 17.30", 4.5 kg
  External Review » Asus G750JZ-XS72

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter