Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon R7 M340

The AMD Radeon R7 M340 is a low-end dedicated graphics card for laptops. It could be based on a new derivative of the Tonga chip and therefore support DirectX 12, Vulkan and FreeSync. According to our informations the chip will be clocked at 1021 MHz and featuring 5 compute cores. That would turn out to be slower than the R5 M335 and M330 (but faster than the M320). The gaming performance should be therefore somewhere in the ballpark of the old Radeon R5 M255 (see for gaming benchmarks).

Radeon R7 M300 Series

Radeon R7 M380 compare 640 @ 0.92 GHz128 Bit @ 2000 MHz
Radeon R7 M370 compare 384 @ 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 3600 MHz
Radeon R7 M360 compare 384 @ 1.13 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
Radeon R7 M340 320 @ 1.02 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
CodenameMeso Pro DDR3
ArchitectureGCN
Pipelines320 - unified
Core Speed1021 MHz
Memory Speed2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL 4.3
technology28 nm
FeaturesDirectX 12, Mantle, OpenGL 4.3, OpenCL 1.2, Vulkan
Date of Announcement16.06.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.5 pt (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 31086     avg: 44959     median: 41700 (5%)     max: 62092 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 5029     avg: 5320     median: 5272.5 (5%)     max: 5704 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 6037     avg: 7115     median: 6153 (2%)     max: 10116 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1061     avg: 1163     median: 1091.5 (2%)     max: 1407 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1173     avg: 1379     median: 1208.5 (1%)     max: 1926 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 40343     avg: 44050     median: 42388 (5%)     max: 51082 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2209     avg: 2427     median: 2268 (3%)     max: 2961 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2074     avg: 2492     median: 2148 (2%)     max: 3597 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
specvp11 sw-02 +
specvp11 proe-05 +
specvp11 maya-03 +
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
specvp11 ensight-04 +
specvp11 catia-03 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 25.28     avg: 26.8     median: 26.8 (9%)     max: 28.34 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 31.32     avg: 33.8     median: 33.5 (2%)     max: 36.97 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
38.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF FXAA 1366x768
26.9
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
54.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
44.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
25.8
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
20.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
28.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
23.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
low 1280x720
25.6 29.3 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
36.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
35.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
82.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
52.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1366x768
69.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
44 57 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.2 40 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.7 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
25.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare