Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M is an upper mid-range, DirectX 12-compatible graphics card for laptops unveiled in March 2014. It is one of the first cards based on Nvidia's new Maxwell architecture (GM107 chip), but is still manufactured in 28 nm. The GTX 850M offers 640 shader units clocked at 876 MHz (+ Boost) as well as 4 GB of GDDR5 memory (128 bit, 5000 MHz effective). In addition, there is a slightly higher clocked version (936 MHz + Boost) using slower DDR3 memory (2000 MHz effective).

Architecture

Compared to Kepler, Maxwell has been optimized in several details to increase power efficiency. Smaller Streaming Multiprocessors (SMM) with only 128 ALUs (Kepler: 192) and an optimized scheduler should lead to better utilization of the shaders. Nvidia promises that a Maxwell SMM with 128 ALUs can offer 90 percent of the performance of a Kepler SMX with 192 ALUs. GM107 features 5 SMMs and thus 640 shader cores, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs (128-bit interface).

Another optimization is the massively enlarged L2 cache (GM107: 2 MB). The larger size can process some of the memory traffic to allow for a relatively narrow memory interface without significantly reducing performance.

Similar to Fermi and Kepler, Maxwell / GM107 supports DirectX 12 with feature level 11_0 only.

Performance

Although the GTX 850M has less shaders, it often outperforms the old Kepler-based GeForce GTX 765M while drawing less power. Despite the lower core clock, the GDDR5 version usually takes the lead over the DDR3 model and sometimes even beats the Kepler variant of the GeForce GTX 860M. Many games of 2013/2014 (Tomb Raider or BioShock Infinite, etc.) can be played fluently in FullHD resolution and high detail settings. However, very demanding games such as Crysis 3 or Battlefield 4 will require lower resolutions and/or details.

Features

GM107 integrates the sixth generation of the PureVideo HD video engine (VP6), offering a better decoding performance for H.264 and MPEG-2 videos. Of course, VP6 supports all features of previous generations (4K support, PIP, video encoding via NVENC API). Unfortunately, HDMI 2.0 is still not supported.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the GeForce GTX 850M should be somewhat below the old GTX 760M at about 40 - 45 Watts. Therefore, the 850M is best suited for 15-inch laptops or larger. The 800M series also supports Optimus to automatically switch between an integrated graphics card and the Nvidia GPU.

GeForce GTX 800M Series

GeForce GTX 880M SLI compare 3072 @ 0.95 GHz2x 256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 860M SLI compare 1280 @ 1.03 GHz2x 128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 880M compare 1536 @ 0.95 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 870M compare 1344 @ 0.94 GHz192 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 860M compare 640 @ 1.03 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 850M 640 @ 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 2000 - 5000 MHz
CodenameN15P-GT
ArchitectureMaxwell
Pipelines640 - unified
Core Speed876 MHz
Memory Speed2000 - 5000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3, GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.4
Transistor Count1.9 Billion
technology28 nm
FeaturesBattery Boost, GameStream, ShadowPlay, GPU Boost 2.0, Optimus, PhysX, CUDA, SLI, GeForce Experience, Adaptive VSync, Ansel
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement12.03.2014
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.geforce.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1.4 pt (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 7761     avg: 11775     median: 12781 (14%)     max: 14681 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 18079     avg: 21703     median: 21873 (6%)     max: 26711 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2391     avg: 2840     median: 2765.5 (5%)     max: 3484 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2798     avg: 3162     median: 3085.5 (3%)     max: 3685 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 45356     avg: 108131     median: 110220 (13%)     max: 190512 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3829     avg: 4389     median: 4495 (6%)     max: 4871 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 3925     avg: 4333     median: 4385.5 (4%)     max: 4682 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 13226     avg: 15654     median: 15862.5 (5%)     max: 17663 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 13877     avg: 14884     median: 14358.5 (8%)     max: 16943 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 14494     avg: 17075     median: 16135 (21%)     max: 21644 Points
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
min: 40     avg: 42.2     median: 41.8 (14%)     max: 45.6 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 4.41     avg: 12.6     median: 12.9 (3%)     max: 20 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 1.32     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (0%)     max: 1.98 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 9.59     avg: 14.7     median: 14.6 (3%)     max: 20.05 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 1.51     avg: 6.2     median: 6.3 (2%)     max: 10.66 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 11.67     avg: 18.2     median: 18.5 (5%)     max: 24.22 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 10.26     avg: 21.7     median: 21.1 (8%)     max: 34.51 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 12.64     avg: 14     median: 14.3 (2%)     max: 14.87 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2459     avg: 6059     median: 6463 (5%)     max: 7310 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 29.52     avg: 51.4     median: 50.7 (17%)     max: 63.3 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 63.2     avg: 79.1     median: 78.8 (5%)     max: 93.2 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
49.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
43.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Off 1920x1080
31.9
low 1280x720
42.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
38.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Off 4xAF 1920x1080
29.1
low 1280x720
54.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1920x1080
25.7
low 1280x720
56  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
29
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
59.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TrilinearAF 1920x1080
28.3
low 1024x768
59.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
6.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
112.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
73.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
47.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9  fps    + Compare