Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

The 4.6 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 is a relatively powerful integrated graphics adapter that the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 and the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE chips feature, as of Sep 2024. It has 1,536 unified shaders running at up to 1,500 MHz. The slower 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 used in the more affordable flavors of the Snapdragon X computing platform runs at lower clock speeds while delivering the same features and having the same hardware configuration as what the luckier 4.6 TFLOPS model offers.

Architecture

The underlying architecture is reportedly (Chips and Cheese) in many respects the same as what was used in the Adreno 730, rendering the iGPU DirectX 12-compatible but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-compatible. Ray tracing is only supported via Vulcan 1.3. The highest OpenGL version supported is ES 3.2. The iGPU enjoys access to fast enough RAM but has comparatively small and slow caches to work with. AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded; with VP9, only decoding is possible.

The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p rather than SUHD 4320p.

Performance

The 4.6 TFLOPS of peak performance that the X1-85 delivers pale in comparison with the slowest professional current-generation Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that is good for up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

If our Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 review is any indication, the 4.6 TFLOPS model is in many use cases almost as good as the Intel Arc 8, allowing the former to deliver playable experience in many 2023 and 2024 games such as Baldur's Gate 3 at 1080p on low graphics settings. Just like it is with AMD, Intel and Nvidia products, a lot depends on the power targets of a specific system.

It is worth mentioning that Qualcomm's graphics drivers aren't quite as polished as what AMD, Intel and especially Nvidia have to offer, leading to severe visual artifacts in certain games. A lot of games wont start at all.

Power consumption

As the most powerful Qualcomm chips for laptops, the X Elite X1E-84-100 as well as the X Elite X1E-00-1DE can consume up to 80 W (including the on-package RAM) depending on the system and the power profile chosen. That means the iGPU actually has a chance to show its full might by eating up to 50 W.

Considering TSMC's N4P process is employed, it's reasonable to say power efficiency is going to be better than average with this iGPU, as of late 2024. Apple is still king in this area with its M-series CPUs and GPUs, of course.

Snapdragon X Series

Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 1536 @ 1.5 GHz? Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS compare 1536 @ 1.25 GHz? Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS compare 768 128 Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS compare 768 128 Bit @ 8448 MHz
Pipelines1536 - unified
Core Speed1500 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed8448 MHz
Memory TypeLPDDR5x
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption40 Watt
technology4 nm
Displays3 Displays (max.)
FeaturesSUHD 2160p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/AV1 encoding and decoding
Date of Announcement26.10.2023
CPU in Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE12 x 3800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-10012 x 3800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
2181 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1989 Points (4%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
6446 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
6982 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
6978 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
7487 Points (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
7061 Points (5%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
24058 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
23042 Points (13%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
19 fps (6%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
8886 points (6%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
27.1 fps (2%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
419 fps (10%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
32.9 fps (6%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
23854 points (6%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
27014 points (7%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
603 Samples/s (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1385 Samples/s (2%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
6476 points (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
24.5 Watt (3%)
05101520253035Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
35.8 Watt (5%)
0510152025303540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
38.8 Watt (9%)
0510152025303540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra
0.6 fps per Watt (51%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
0.6 fps per Watt (51%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
45 Watt (13%)
051015202530354045Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
39 Watt (5%)
0510152025303540Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
91.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
91.1
low 1920x1080
23.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
14
low 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
65.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
66  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
143  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
37  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
36.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
56.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
88.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
68.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
107  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
73  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
103  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
95.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Total War Pharaoh91.163.6
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty23.121.818.816.6
Baldur's Gate 3272219.319
F1 2265.96043.332
Shadow of the Tomb Raider66282623
Strange Brigade143564841
Far Cry 537313027
X-Plane 11.1136.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark56.827.817.8
Dota 2 Reborn88.268.86152.8
The Witcher 3107734122
GTA V10395.449.522.4
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
3
6
1
4
2
5
4
5
1
6
3







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 10. 16:59:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 10 Jul 2025 05:37:28 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.044s ... 0.045s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.045s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.045s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12659 +0.015s ... 0.06s

#8 got single benchmarks 12659 +0.009s ... 0.069s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.069s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.584s ... 0.653s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.653s

#12 Got 42 rows for game benchmarks. +0.009s ... 0.661s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.661s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.008s ... 0.669s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.106s ... 0.775s

#16 return log +0.004s ... 0.779s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-09-27)