Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

The 4.6 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 is a relatively powerful integrated graphics adapter that the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 and the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE chips feature, as of Sep 2024. It has 1,536 unified shaders running at up to 1,500 MHz. The slower 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 used in the more affordable flavors of the Snapdragon X computing platform runs at lower clock speeds while delivering the same features and having the same hardware configuration as what the luckier 4.6 TFLOPS model offers.

Architecture

The underlying architecture is reportedly (Chips and Cheese) in many respects the same as what was used in the Adreno 730, rendering the iGPU DirectX 12-compatible but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-compatible. Ray tracing is only supported via Vulcan 1.3. The highest OpenGL version supported is ES 3.2. The iGPU enjoys access to fast enough RAM but has comparatively small and slow caches to work with. AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded; with VP9, only decoding is possible.

The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p rather than SUHD 4320p.

Performance

The 4.6 TFLOPS of peak performance that the X1-85 delivers pale in comparison with the slowest professional current-generation Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that is good for up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

If our Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 review is any indication, the 4.6 TFLOPS model is in many use cases almost as good as the Intel Arc 8, allowing the former to deliver playable experience in many 2023 and 2024 games such as Baldur's Gate 3 at 1080p on low graphics settings. Just like it is with AMD, Intel and Nvidia products, a lot depends on the power targets of a specific system.

It is worth mentioning that Qualcomm's graphics drivers aren't quite as polished as what AMD, Intel and especially Nvidia have to offer, leading to severe visual artifacts in certain games. A lot of games wont start at all.

Power consumption

As the most powerful Qualcomm chips for laptops, the X Elite X1E-84-100 as well as the X Elite X1E-00-1DE can consume up to 80 W (including the on-package RAM) depending on the system and the power profile chosen. That means the iGPU actually has a chance to show its full might by eating up to 50 W.

Considering TSMC's N4P process is employed, it's reasonable to say power efficiency is going to be better than average with this iGPU, as of late 2024. Apple is still king in this area with its M-series CPUs and GPUs, of course.

Snapdragon X Series

Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 1536 @ 1.5 GHz? Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS compare 1536 @ 1.25 GHz? Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS compare 768 128 Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS compare 768 128 Bit @ 8448 MHz
Pipelines1536 - unified
Core Speed1500 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed8448 MHz
Memory TypeLPDDR5x
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption40 Watt
technology4 nm
Displays3 Displays (max.)
FeaturesSUHD 2160p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/AV1 encoding and decoding
Date of Announcement26.10.2023
CPU in Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE12 x 3800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-10012 x 3800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
91.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
91.1
low 1920x1080
23.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
14
low 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
65.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
66  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
143  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
37  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
56.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
88.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
68.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.8  fps    + Compare