Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc Graphics 140V

Intel Arc 140V

The Intel Arc Graphics 140V is a pretty fast integrated graphics adapter that higher-end Intel Lunar Lake processors employ. This is a direct successor to the Arc 8 iGPU; it has 8 Xe² architecture "cores" running at up to 2,050 MHz and 8 ray tracing units at its disposal.

DirectX 12 Ultimate is fully supported here and the iGPU also supports hardware-decoding a long list of popular video codecs such as h.266 VVC, h.265 HEVC, h.264 AVC, AV1 and VP9. It can drive three SUHD 4320p monitors simultaneously via HDMI 2.1, eDP 1.5 and DP 2.1.

Just like it was with Meteor Lake, Intel taps its Foveros technology to build Lunar Lake chips meaning the iGPU and the CPU cores are found on different dies stacked on top of each other or next to each other.

Performance

With the 140V, all 2023 and 2024 games are playable at 1080p on low graphics settings or higher. In our September 2024 testing, we got well over 30 fps in Ghost of Tsushima and almost 40 fps in Baldur's Gate 3. This means the Radeon 780M gets left behind while the Radeon 890M reigns supreme.

Power consumption

Lunar Lake processors' power consumption figures are relatively modest at around 20 W to 30 W, with up to about a half of that getting consumed by the integrated GPU.

Gen13 / Xe² Series

Arc 140V 8 @ 2.05 GHz
Arc 130V compare 7 @ 1.85 GHz
CodenameLunar Lake iGPU
ArchitectureXe²
Pipelines8 - unified
Raytracing Cores8
Core Speed2050 (Boost) MHz
Memory TypeLPDDR5x
Max. Amount of Memory16 GB
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0
technology3 nm
Displays3 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesSUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VVC/VP9/AV1 decoding
Date of Announcement24.09.2024
PredecessorArc 8-Core
CPU in Arc 140VGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V8 x 3300 MHz, 30 W? MHz2050 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V8 x 2200 MHz, 17 W? MHz2000 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V8 x 2200 MHz, 17 W? MHz2000 MHz
min. - max.? - 1950 MHz1950 - 2050 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.7 pt (11%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3336     avg: 4214     median: 4322 (11%)     max: 4721 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2955     avg: 3956     median: 4062 (8%)     max: 4415 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 28837     avg: 32512     median: 33323 (31%)     max: 35866 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 42294     avg: 54027     median: 54327 (13%)     max: 61591 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5930     avg: 8617     median: 8832 (13%)     max: 9375 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 6790     avg: 9591     median: 9819 (9%)     max: 10476 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
304545 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 6982     avg: 7500     median: 7525 (9%)     max: 8028 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 10811     avg: 11714     median: 11730.5 (14%)     max: 12919 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 10499     avg: 11372     median: 11325.5 (9%)     max: 12772 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
39055 Points (11%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
38502 Points (21%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 36668     avg: 39025     median: 39024.5 (51%)     max: 41381 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
31.5 fps (10%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 18243     avg: 19179     median: 19178.5 (14%)     max: 20114 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 121.6     avg: 125.6     median: 125.6 (41%)     max: 129.67 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 127.7     avg: 161.4     median: 164.8 (10%)     max: 175.3 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 26.6     avg: 28.1     median: 28.5 (11%)     max: 28.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 60.6     avg: 62.4     median: 61.5 (11%)     max: 66.1 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 145.4     avg: 156.1     median: 158.6 (12%)     max: 161.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 94.9     avg: 121     median: 127.6 (12%)     max: 133.9 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 166.3     avg: 180.3     median: 180.3 (4%)     max: 194.3 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 206     avg: 231.5     median: 231.5 (10%)     max: 257 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 442.3     avg: 472.9     median: 472.9 (4%)     max: 503.4 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 187.9     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 449 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 21831     avg: 28859     median: 29485.5 (8%)     max: 30547 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 19700     avg: 42489     median: 30550 (8%)     max: 207733 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 842     avg: 860     median: 859.5 (3%)     max: 877 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 1934     avg: 1979     median: 1979 (3%)     max: 2024 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 6554     avg: 6646     median: 6645.5 (6%)     max: 6737 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28.8     avg: 36.6     median: 36.3 (5%)     max: 44 Watt
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
30.6 Watt (4%)
05101520253035Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
0.9 fps per Watt (73%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 33.1     avg: 44.2     median: 44.9 (13%)     max: 54.1 Watt
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28.6     avg: 41.8     median: 40.8 (5%)     max: 51.6 Watt
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.3549     avg: 0.6     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.72 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
73.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
15.1
low 1920x1080
23.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered

The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered

2025
low 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset + Quality FSR 1920x1080
16.7
low 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
142.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
68.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
lowest, XeSS Quality 1920x1080
21.1
low 1920x1080
43.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
25.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
23.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
low 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Preset 1280x720
57
low 1920x1080
33.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
25.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
22.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080 cinem.
15.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
low 1280x720 cinem.
20.3
low 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
49.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
29.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
27.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
51.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
37.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
27.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
54 64.3 68.6 71.4 72.1 75.3 75.7 82.4 82.7 84.4 85.2 85.7 85.7 86.3 89.7 90 92.1 95.9 99 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.2 62.2 68.7 68.9 70.7 71.6 75.7 75.9 76.2 76.8 77.4 79 79.2 80 81.5 83.8 84.9 85.4 87 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.4 45.9 47.3 51.9 54 54.8 55.3 56.7 56.8 59 59.5 59.9 60.1 60.4 60.4 61.2 61.5 64.6 65 66.4 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.8 16.5 17.2 17.6 17.7 18.8 19.1 19.1 19.1 19.2 19.2 19.7 20 20 20.1 20.2 21.2 21.2 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
10.9  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
33.5 34.8 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28.7 29.7 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.2 25.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.4 19.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
28.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
75.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
55.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
43.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
45.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
31.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
29.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
7.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
5.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
65.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
48.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
28.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
254  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
154.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
146.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
74.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
56.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
37.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
88.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
62.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
55.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
44.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
43 44 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
40 42 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30 31 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27 29 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Preset 1280x720
43
low 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
24.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
95 114 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
68 82 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59 59 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
129
low 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
87.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
85.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
53.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
31.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
30.5 34.2 38.7 39.1 39.6 40.3 40.5 40.7 41.3 41.4 41.6 41.6 41.7 43.5 43.5 43.8 43.9 44.2 45.4 45.4 45.5 45.7 46.3 46.5 46.5 46.6 46.8 47.3 47.4 47.6 47.7 47.8 48 49.1 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.3 27.4 31.7 32.1 32.6 32.6 35.1 35.2 35.4 35.6 35.6 35.7 36.2 36.5 36.5 36.8 37 37.2 37.4 37.4 37.5 37.5 37.6 37.7 38 38.1 38.3 38.3 38.5 38.7 38.7 38.8 39.3 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20 22.1 24.7 25.6 26 26.5 27.2 27.7 28.3 28.4 28.6 29.7 30.7 30.7 31.4 31.7 31.7 31.8 31.9 31.9 32 32.4 32.5 32.7 32.9 32.9 32.9 33.3 33.3 33.4 33.4 33.4 33.9 34.4 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.5 18.3 19.1 19.5 23.3 23.4 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.5 25 25.9 26.2 26.4 26.5 26.9 26.9 26.9 27.8 28.1 28.2 28.5 28.5 28.7 28.8 28.9 29 29 29.2 29.2 29.6 29.7 29.9 30.1 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
10.4 13.9 16.6 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
67.7
58.8
66.6
68.5
68.8
72.5
68.7
59.2
58.9
51
69.5
64.3
60.2
64.6
67.6
69.4
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
10.2
10.8
11.1
9.9
9.8
9.9
10.7
Steam Deck 1280x800
76.1
Ultra Preset (FSR2 on) 1920x1080
30.9
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
19.9
24.8
15.9
25.3
22.2
28
24.7
15.6
25.7
20
24.5
27.8
25.6
19.4
23.5
19
26.8
26.2
25.3
25.2
24.5
25
22.8
21.9
27.3
26.6
low 1920x1080
23.7 33.8 34.2 35.2 35.7 36.6 36.6 37.6 38 38.1 38.1 38.2 39.1 39.5 39.6 39.7 40.2 40.3 40.4 40.8 40.9 41 41.7 41.8 42.4 42.6 43 43.6 45.5 47 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.6 26.3 26.5 27.7 28.4 28.6 29.9 30.3 30.4 30.5 30.6 30.9 30.9 31 31.4 31.5 31.9 32.1 32.4 32.5 32.5 32.8 33.5 33.5 33.6 33.7 35.4 35.4 35.7 35.9 36.8 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17 22.5 23.6 24.5 25.2 25.7 25.8 26.2 27.3 27.5 27.5 27.7 27.8 27.9 28.1 28.2 28.4 28.7 28.8 28.9 28.9 29.2 29.8 29.9 29.9 30 30.2 31.3 31.4 31.8 32.2 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.6 21.9 23 23.2 24 24.1 25.5 25.6 25.7 25.8 25.9 26 26.3 27 27 27.3 27.4 27.4 27.8 27.8 28 28.3 28.7 28.9 29.1 29.1 29.5 30.8 31 31.3 31.6 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
19.1 20.3 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
66.4
49.3
51.7
58.5
58.8
57.9
73.3
54.5
72.8
56.8
55.8
62.3
64.1
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
53  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
46.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
40.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
36.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
42.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
39.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
49.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
46.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
41.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
35.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
25.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
61.7 79.2 94.1 96 99.2 101 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56.4 78 86 89.9 91.3 93.9 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.1 55.9 60.9 63.1 64.8 66.4 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.5 18.6 18.7 18.8 19.2 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
24.3 26.5 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.7 23.6 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.5 22.4 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.7 20.9 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
46.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
34.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
62.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
63.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
44.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
41.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
79.1 85.3 96.2 101 104.5 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
75.7 78.8 88.5 90 95.1 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.8 63.9 64.5 66.5 69.3 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.6 19.9 21.1 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
132.5
132.4
154.8
149.5
172.2
low 1920x1080
56.5 61.5 72.1 72.2 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42.1 50.1 53.3 55.1 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.2 31.8 35.4 36 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.6 26.8 27.6 28 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
100.3
96.9
101.2
111.4
109.5
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
138.1 179.7 186.4 193.4 194.3 194.7 196.8 201 205 212 215 216 222 223 225 225 227 228 228 229 234 236 236 236 237 238 245 247 248 ~ 217 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55.5 56.2 69.8 70 74.6 75.1 77.1 77.4 77.8 78.5 79.9 80.2 80.2 80.2 80.2 81 81.7 82.3 82.8 82.9 83.3 84 84.4 84.8 84.8 86.5 86.7 86.8 87 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.3 52.6 59.5 61 62.1 63 65 65.1 65.2 65.7 67 67.2 67.4 67.7 67.9 68 68.4 68.5 68.8 69.5 69.8 70.1 70.4 71.8 71.9 72.2 72.8 72.9 73.2 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39 48.8 51.1 54 54.7 55.4 55.9 56.1 56.2 56.9 56.9 57.4 57.6 57.7 57.8 58 58 58 58.5 58.7 59.4 59.6 59.8 59.9 60.4 60.5 60.6 61.7 62.5 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
48.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
25.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
47 76 77 77 78 80 82 83 89 92 94 94 96 97 99 107 ~ 86 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31 44 46 46 47 48 51 51 52 52 52 57 57 59 62 63 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
28 39 42 42 44 45 45 45 48 48 48 49 52 54 56 58 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26 36 38 39 39 42 42 43 44 44 45 45 48 49 50 52 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
35 38 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
38.9 40.6 40.8 41 42.4 42.4 42.5 43.2 43.3 43.3 43.6 43.8 44 44.1 44.8 45.7 46.2 46.7 47.1 47.8 48.1 48.6 48.9 50.2 51.2 51.9 51.9 53.5 53.8 55.2 56.4 56.6 57 57 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.1 34.4 34.6 35.1 35.3 35.6 35.8 35.9 35.9 36.1 36.4 36.5 36.5 36.7 36.7 36.7 37.4 37.6 37.9 37.9 38.5 38.9 39.3 39.6 39.6 39.7 40.1 41.5 42.4 42.6 43.5 43.7 43.8 44.3 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.5 28.5 28.8 29.1 29.4 29.8 29.8 30.1 30.9 31.2 31.3 31.9 32.2 32.2 32.7 33.3 33.6 34.6 34.9 35.2 35.3 35.4 35.7 35.8 36 36.8 36.9 37.1 37.2 37.5 37.6 37.7 37.7 37.9 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24.6  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
54.1 63 68.2 71.7 72.3 74.9 75.6 76.9 79.4 80.5 80.5 80.8 83.5 84 84.4 84.6 84.8 85 85.9 86.1 86.3 86.6 86.6 86.7 86.9 87.6 87.7 88.5 88.6 91 93.3 97.1 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.6 36.9 37.9 39.9 40.9 41.5 41.7 42.3 42.8 45.7 46 46.1 46.2 46.4 46.7 46.7 46.8 47.2 47.2 47.9 47.9 47.9 48.1 48.2 48.3 48.4 48.9 49.3 49.4 49.5 49.8 51.3 87.6 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23 29.1 29.1 29.7 29.9 30 30.3 31.5 31.7 32 32.1 32.3 32.4 32.8 33.1 33.2 33.3 34 34.2 34.2 34.4 34.4 34.4 34.4 34.7 35 35 35.4 35.7 36.4 36.5 37.2 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22.2 25.2 25.5 26.1 26.6 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15.9  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
86.2 89.8 92.1 93.1 94.6 95.8 96 96.2 97 97.2 97.5 97.5 98.1 98.3 98.3 98.4 98.6 98.6 100.7 101.2 101.4 101.6 101.6 101.9 102.8 103 103.5 104.1 104.3 105.1 105.4 107.5 116.9 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55.8 58 59.7 59.7 64.4 65.1 66.3 68.2 70.3 72.3 72.4 76.4 82.5 83.4 86.4 87 87.8 88.2 88.4 88.6 88.8 89 89.3 89.5 90.3 91.6 94 96 96.2 98.9 99.3 99.9 101.7 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.1 45.2 48.4 52 52.2 56.6 63.9 63.9 66.2 67.1 67.2 68.5 68.5 71.1 72.1 73.8 74.2 74.5 75 75.1 78.2 78.6 82.6 83 84 84.1 84.8 84.9 87.7 87.8 87.9 88.2 88.5 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.3 40.9 54.8 60 62.9 65.6 65.6 69.1 70.1 71.2 71.9 73.8 75.2 79.7 80.3 80.4 80.4 80.5 80.7 81.1 82 82.2 82.4 83 83.6 84.5 84.7 84.9 85.2 86 86 87.4 93 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
49.3  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
83 119 158 161 167 168 ~ 143 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
70 90 107 109 115 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36 51 61 62 62 64 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19 27 28 28 28 29 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
0 (!) 110.5 114.4 136 137.2 139.5 141.6 141.9 149.3 149.8 149.9 149.9 151 151.1 151.1 151.8 153.4 154.3 154.9 156.2 156.7 156.9 158.7 158.8 161.1 161.6 163.4 167.4 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
91.1 108 111.3 124.7 130.2 131.6 133.4 136 137.5 139.9 140 140.4 140.5 140.8 143.2 143.9 147.1 149.3 149.4 149.8 150.1 152.4 152.5 153 154.2 155.6 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32 47.1 49.5 50.1 50.6 50.6 58 58.3 59.4 59.6 60.5 60.8 62 62.3 62.8 66.1 66.3 66.9 67.4 68.9 69 71.6 72.3 74.5 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.4 22.6 22.9 23.4 23.7 24.6 25.2 25.3 25.6 25.8 26.3 26.3 26.7 26.7 27 27.3 27.3 27.3 27.5 27.6 27.7 27.8 28.4 28.7 28.9 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
17.6 18.2 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
120.6
132.7
134.2
129.8
152
139.1
148
116
121.3
106.2
119.1
116.2
138.5
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
135.2
142.8
146.7
136.3
158.4
142.7
151.1
136.6
128.1
120.9
123.5
152.5
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2573.36650.8
Doom: The Dark Ages23.619.1
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered18.5
Assassin's Creed Shadows18
Civilization 7142.268.739.5
Monster Hunter Wilds19.85
Kingdom Come Deliverance 243.431.325.1
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle23.418.3
Stalker 21918.815.9
Call of Duty Black Ops 637362624
Until Dawn33.523.116.712.8
God of War Ragnarök25.825.721.920.6
Final Fantasy XVI20.52016.514.8
Space Marine 222.220.719.518.4
Star Wars Outlaws15.9
Black Myth: Wukong20
Once Human49.529.827.126.1
The First Descendant51.337.427.523.8
F1 248175571910.9
Senua's Saga Hellblade 218.615.712.1
Ghost of Tsushima34292520
Horizon Forbidden West29.628.822.122
Dragon's Dogma 22017.9
Last Epoch75.655.543.336
Skull & Bones46373027
Helldivers 245.23531.229.7
Enshrouded8.177.756.745.33
Palworld65.348.728.426.5
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown254154.5146.6
Ready or Not74.356.537.624.3
The Finals88.362.655.544.5
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora19181511
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 202344413128
Alan Wake 217.517.114.5
Lords of the Fallen24.32320.516.9
Total War Pharaoh105755950
Assassin's Creed Mirage40373427
Counter-Strike 287.485.253.231.7
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty4436302614
Baldur's Gate 33931282720
Lies of P5346.840.436.3
The Crew Motorfest40352925
Armored Core 642.439.63632.6
Atlas Fallen49.746.341.833
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart35.530.625.119
F1 2389835918
Star Wars Jedi Survivor25232119
Resident Evil 4 Remake46.534.530.922
Company of Heroes 362.145.73534.4
Atomic Heart63.244.230.321.1
Returnal40393530
Hogwarts Legacy41.23523.318.5
F1 2293866420
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands66503327
Strange Brigade21779675748.125.2
Far Cry 58651464337
X-Plane 11.1147383424.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark8247332515.9
Dota 2 Reborn10082727549.3
The Witcher 3143985627
GTA V144139602618
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
19
21
16
4
15
26
11
2
24
26
4
1
32
11
1
1
5
2

3
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 02. 11:32:27

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 01 Jul 2025 05:34:46 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.04s ... 0.041s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.041s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.041s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12693 +0.031s ... 0.072s

#8 got single benchmarks 12693 +0.098s ... 0.171s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.171s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.74s ... 0.911s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.911s

#12 Got 1345 rows for game benchmarks. +0.242s ... 1.153s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.153s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.039s ... 1.192s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.484s ... 1.677s

#16 return log +0.005s ... 1.682s

Notebook reviews with Intel Arc Graphics 140V graphics card

Dell Pro 14 Premium review: Flagship OLED subnotebook for business

Dell Pro 14 Premium review: Flagship OLED subnotebook for business

Dell is hitting the giant reset button for all of its laptops this year. With the Latitude name dead and gone, can the new Dell Pro 14 Premium take up the mantl...
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V | Intel Arc Graphics 140V | 14.00" | 1.3 kg
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 convertible review: Not necessarily better than the older Inspiron

Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 convertible review: Not necessarily better than the older Inspiron

The Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 is leaner and more balanced than the Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 that it's supposed to replace. While it mostly succeeds, it's not quite the...
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | Intel Arc Graphics 140V | 16.00" | 2 kg
Dell 16 Plus laptop review: A wave goodbye to the Inspiron series

Dell 16 Plus laptop review: A wave goodbye to the Inspiron series

The Dell 16 Plus is the manufacturer's latest mass market midrange model complete with Intel Lunar Lake and a 1600p IPS display. The name and branding may be al...
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V | Intel Arc Graphics 140V | 16.00" | 1.8 kg
Dell 14 Plus laptop review: New name with a familiar feel

Dell 14 Plus laptop review: New name with a familiar feel

Don't let the new shorter name confuse you. The Dell 14 Plus is an evolution of the Inspiron with all the basic features that home users need for a reasonable s...
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V | Intel Arc Graphics 140V | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 convertible review: Superb efficiency with Intel Lunar Lake

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 10 convertible review: Superb efficiency with Intel Lunar Lake

The new Core Ultra 7 258V processor doesn't offer huge raw performance benefits over last year's options, but it's significantly more efficient with much faster...
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | Intel Arc Graphics 140V | 14.00" | 1.4 kg

Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 review: Minor updates in all the right places

Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Multimedia talent featuring a brilliant OLED—almost without a catch: Acer Swift 16 AI laptop review

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake: Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, 13.00", 0.9 kg
  Review » Lunar Lake vs. Snapdragon inside a convertible - Microsoft Surface Pro OLED for Business review

LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 16.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » Lightweight with power and 20 hours of endurance - LG Gram Pro 16 laptop review

Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 1,000-nit OLED at 120 Hz inside a convertible - Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 review

HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » A high-end business 2-in-1 for high earners: HP EliteBook X Flip G1i review

Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Intel takes on Qualcomm: Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 review

Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » Closest Windows competitor to the MacBook Air 13: Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 laptop review

Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake: Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, 15.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake review - A slap in the face for Windows on ARM

HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 laptop review - HP's new business flagship is a great total package

Dell Pro 13 Premium PA13250: Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, 13.30", 1.1 kg
  Review » Dell Pro 13 Premium review: The almost perfect business laptop

Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 review - The high-end convertible suffers due to weak 4K OLED

MSI Claw 8 AI+: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 8.00", 0.8 kg
  Review » MSI Claw 8 AI+ review - The best gaming handheld thanks to Intel Lunar Lake?

Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 15.30", 1.4 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X9 15 Aura Edition Laptop Review - The MacBook Air rival is very good, even without a TrackPoint

Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14 Gen 10 review: First laptop with a 32 MP under-display webcam

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition laptop review: The X1 Carbon is finally back

MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 13.30", 1 kg
  Review » MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo laptop review: Great graphics performance for under 1 kg

HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 convertible review: Lighter than expected

Dell XPS 13 9350: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 13.40", 1.2 kg
  Review » Dell XPS 13 9350 laptop review: Intel Lunar Lake is the perfect fit

Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405 laptop in review: Intel's M1 moment in a business laptop

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 15.30", 1.5 kg
  Review » Intel Core Ultra 7 256V performance debut: Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15 Aura laptop review

Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » Intel Lunar Lake iGPU analysis - Arc Graphics 140V is faster and more efficient than Radeon 890M

  Review » Intel Lunar Lake iGPU analysis - Arc Graphics 140V is faster and more efficient than Radeon 890M

  Review » Intel Lunar Lake CPU analysis - The Core Ultra 7 258V's multi-core performance is disappointing, but its everyday efficiency is good

  Review » Intel Lunar Lake CPU analysis - The Core Ultra 7 258V's multi-core performance is disappointing, but its everyday efficiency is good

Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
  Review » Intel Lunar Lake CPU analysis - The Core Ultra 7 258V's multi-core performance is disappointing, but its everyday efficiency is good

  Review » Intel Lunar Lake CPU analysis - The Core Ultra 7 258V's multi-core performance is disappointing, but its everyday efficiency is good

SCHENKER Lunar Lake Engineering Sample: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
  Review » Intel Lunar Lake CPU analysis - The Core Ultra 7 258V's multi-core performance is disappointing, but its everyday efficiency is good

Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 laptop review - Excellent everyday laptop with Intel Lunar Lake

LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 16.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G

Dell 14 Plus: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Dell 14 Plus

MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 13.30", 1 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ILL10: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ILL10

Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405CSA: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405CSA

Samsung Galaxy Book5 360: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 15.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book5 360

Asus VivoBook 14 Flip TP3407SA: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 14 Flip TP3407SA

Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14

Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10

Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition

MSI Summit 13 AI+ Evo A2VM: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » MSI Summit 13 AI+ Evo A2VM

MSI Prestige 14 AI+ Evo C2VMG: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 AI+ Evo C2VMG

MSI Prestige 16 AI+ Evo B2VMG: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 16 AI+ Evo B2VMG

Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51, Ultra 7 256V: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51, Ultra 7 256V

Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro NP960: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro NP960

Fujitsu FMV Note U: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu FMV Note U

Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA, Ultra 7 256V: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA, Ultra 7 256V

Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51

MSI Prestige 13 AI+ Evo A2VMG: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 13.30", 1 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 13 AI+ Evo A2VMG

Dell XPS 13 9350: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 13.40", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 13 9350

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 15.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9

Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51

HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14

HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14-fh0000: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14-fh0000

Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X

Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406

Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G13: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G13

MSI Claw 8 AI+: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 8.00", 0.8 kg
  External Review » MSI Claw 8 AI+

Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
  External Review » Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 15.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura

Dell Pro 14 Premium: Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » Dell Pro 14 Premium perfectly exemplifies one of the major benefits of Intel Lunar Lake

Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 16.00", 2 kg
   » Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 trades away CPU performance in favor of faster graphics and quieter fan noise

Dell 16 Plus: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 16.00", 1.8 kg
   » Avoid overpaying for the Dell 16 Plus by customizing your order instead

   » Dell 16 Plus vs. Inspiron 16 Plus: Older option is both faster and cheaper with the exact same display

HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 convertible with 2.8K OLED touchscreen and Core Ultra 7 256V drops to all-time low price

Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » OLED-equipped Lenovo ThinkPad X9 14 with 32GB RAM is already 34% off

MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 13.30", 1 kg
   » 2.2-lbs ultrabook gets partially handcrafted limited edition: MSI Prestige 13 AI+ Ukiyo-e Edition unveiled

Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, 16.00", 1.5 kg
   » Acer Swift 16 AI review verdict: Brilliant OLED and a great bang for the buck

Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » Lenovo ThinkPad X9 OLED laptop with 32GB RAM and Core Ultra 7 gets biggest discount yet

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1 kg
   » Huge performance upgrade for featherweight sub 1 kg system: Lenovo will offer Arrow Lake H in ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 laptop

   » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 with 2.8K OLED and 32GB RAM gets big price cut

Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » Lenovo's Yoga 7 14 Convertible is not only much cheaper than the Yoga 9, but also better in some respects

Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » Looks of a Yoga, quality of a ThinkPad, feature-set of a ThinkBook: Lenovo's ThinkPad X9-14 blurs the line

Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake: Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, 15.00", 1.7 kg
   » Microsoft should let Surface Laptop 7 buyers choose between Intel and Qualcomm

HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » HP EliteBook Ultra G1i boasts quiet cooling but has to make compromises

Dell Pro 13 Premium PA13250: Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, 13.30", 1.1 kg
   » Almost perfect with a score of 90%: Verdict on the Dell Pro 13 Premium

Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » Lenovo should equip the Yoga 9 flagship convertible with a better 4K OLED display

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1 kg
   » Now with haptic Sensel touchpad: Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 receives customization option

MSI Claw 8 AI+: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 8.00", 0.8 kg
   » The MSI Claw 8 AI+ gaming handheld's hardware is good, but its software still needs some fine-tuning

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1 kg
   » Surprising additions: Lenovo officially launches more options for ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 15.30", 1.5 kg
   » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Aura Edition laptop with long battery life and 120 Hz display hits record-low price after 31% discount

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1 kg
   » Price about to drop: More options for Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 incoming, including IPS screens and Ultra 5 CPUs

   » ThinkPad X1 Nano successor: With a sub 1 kg weight, the Lenovo X1 Carbon Gen 13 is the X1 Nano replacement

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 15.30", 1.5 kg
   » Lenovo Slim 7i Gen 9 laptop with 14-inch touch OLED display and good battery life tumbles to new historic-low price

   » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x Gen 9 with beautiful 3K OLED display and long battery life drops to record-low price

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1 kg
   » Finally good battery life with Intel: Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 shows off Intel's efficiency progress

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 15.30", 1.5 kg
   » Lenovo Slim 7i 14 Gen 9 (2024) OLED laptop drops to new lowest-ever price of less than $650

   » Long-lasting Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Aura Edition price reaches new record low after 32% discount

Dell XPS 13 9350: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 13.40", 1.2 kg
   » Latest Dell XPS 13 9350 laptop with 20-hour battery life and 120 Hz display is now up to $500 cheaper than MSRP

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 15.30", 1.5 kg
   » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Aura Edition is battery life beast and now cheaper than ever after 23% discount

Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » Intel efficient once again: Asus ExpertBook P5 achieves 16 hours of battery life with Lunar Lake

Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 0.00"
   » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED laptop with long battery life and Core Ultra 7 155H is selling at affordable price

Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
   » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED laptop with long battery life and Core Ultra 7 155H is selling at affordable price

Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
   » Intel Arc 140T graphics delivers 60 percent performance boost over Lunar Lake variant

Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
   » Intel Arc 140T graphics delivers 60 percent performance boost over Lunar Lake variant

Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » Intel Lunar Lake sees up to 20% performance boost in Linux vs. Windows with iGPU caveats

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 14.00", 1 kg
   » Confusing customers with naming: Why you should be very careful when choosing the CPU of any 2025 laptop with Intel processors

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake: Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, 13.00", 0.9 kg
   » Microsoft's Windows-on-ARM approach for private users damages the reputation of Surface devices

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-11- 6)