Notebookcheck Logo

Final Fantasy XVI review: Laptop and desktop benchmarks

Not for the faint-hearted.

Almost a year after the PS5 release, Square Enix has launched the highly acclaimed Final Fantasy XVI for PC. We examined the graphics card requirements for various resolutions and configurations.
Final Fantasy XVI

Test systems

XMG Neo 16 E23 (RTX 4090)
XMG Neo 16 E23 (RTX 4090)
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23 (RTX 4080)
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23 (RTX 4080)
XMG Pro 15 E23 (RTX 4070)
XMG Pro 15 E23 (RTX 4070)
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 (RTX 4060)
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 (RTX 4060)
Medion Erazer Scout E20 (RTX 4050)
Medion Erazer Scout E20 (RTX 4050)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14 (Arc 8)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14 (Arc 8)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (Radeon 780M)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (Radeon 780M)
Philips Evnia 4K gaming monitor 329M1RV
Philips Evnia 4K gaming monitor 329M1RV
be quiet! Silent Base 802 (RTX 4080 & RX 7900 XT)
be quiet! Silent Base 802 (RTX 4080 & RX 7900 XT)

We ran our gaming benchmarks on these devices. Clicking on the various images will take you to the respective producer's website. Further details on the devices' specifications are listed at the end of the article.

Tech

Final Fantasy XVI (Metacritic score on PS5: 8.4 or 87), which has been well-received by both players and the press, is now making its debut on PC. Similar to Dragon's Dogma 2, another 2024 release with a comparable theme, the graphics are decent to good, but not top-tier. For instance, many textures could use more sharpness even at the highest quality settings. On the other hand, the RPG boasts stunning effects (spells etc.).

Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI

Atmospherically, the title hardly faces any criticism. The exciting and dynamic opening quickly immerses you in the game and its world. It's clear that the developers put a lot of effort into the storytelling and staging of Final Fantasy XVI. This is further enhanced by a well-executed combat system that feels very fluid and makes the gameplay especially enjoyable.

Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI

Technically, however, Square Enix could still improve a lot of things. During the video sequences—regardless of the hardware used—we noticed some frustrating stuttering. Additionally, shader compilation can take several minutes the first time the game is launched, even on high-performance systems (although other loading times are pleasantly short).

Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI

We also suspect that the selected upscaling settings may not always be applied correctly. Additionally, the game isn't exactly compact—Final Fantasy XVI occupies nearly 130 GB of storage space, which is quite a lot.

Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI

Meanwhile, there is praise for the numerous graphics options (see screenshots). In addition to four presets, the game offers support for various upscaling techniques. As expected for a modern title, DLSS, FSR, and XeSS are supported (with frame generation available upon request). However, Super Resolution is automatically activated in the presets, suggesting high system requirements. The built-in FPS limit can also be adjusted between 30 and 240. Helpful text explanations clarify the individual settings, and another positive aspect is that changes are applied without the need for a restart.

Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI
Final Fantasy XVI

Benchmark

In contrast to Final Fantasy XV, the latest installment does not include an integrated benchmark, so we had to rely on a sequence we ourselves determined for performance testing. After completing the tutorial mission and combat training, the main character is free to explore a castle-like environment. Using the CapFrameX tool, we recorded a fixed route for approximately 20 seconds. You can view the exact sequence in the following video. Based on our experience, the game is playable from an average of 40 FPS.

Results


FHD (1,920 x 1,080)

Final Fantasy XVI is generally too demanding for integrated graphics processors (iGPUs). Even more powerful options, such as the Radeon 780M or the Intel Arc 8 (which we experienced crashes on), struggle to run the game smoothly at a resolution of 1,280 x 720 pixels with minimal detail settings. To achieve a satisfactory experience at Full HD, a dedicated mid-range GPU is recommended. For example, a GeForce RTX 4050 can handle 1,920 x 1,080 resolution at high settings with over 40 FPS. For Ultra settings, an RTX 4060 or better is advisable.

Final Fantasy XVI
    1920x1080 Low Preset (Super Resolution off)     1920x1080 Medium Preset (Super Resolution off)     1920x1080 High Preset (Super Resolution off)     1920x1080 Ultra Preset (Super Resolution off)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
152.1 (68.2min, 85.4P0.1, 110P1) fps ∼100%
148.4 (69.2min, 85P0.1, 108.4P1) fps ∼100%
129.3 (62.4min, 70.6P0.1, 95.8P1) fps ∼100%
115.7 (55.5min, 68.5P0.1, 88.5P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
138.3 (60.3min, 71P0.1, 98.5P1) fps ∼91%
130.8 (54.6min, 74.1P0.1, 93.8P1) fps ∼88%
115.7 (60.7min, 68.9P0.1, 83.9P1) fps ∼89%
103.3 (61min, 64.3P0.1, 75.1P1) fps ∼89%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Neo 16 E23
129.7 (47.3min, 58.7P0.1, 89.3P1) fps ∼85%
123.4 (53.7min, 69.4P0.1, 88.5P1) fps ∼83%
109.4 (59.3min, 63.8P0.1, 76.1P1) fps ∼85%
98.5 (49.7min, 53.2P0.1, 72.3P1) fps ∼85%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
102.4 (46.7min, 50P0.1, 63.7P1) fps ∼67%
94.6 (34.9min, 38P0.1, 60.7P1) fps ∼64%
89.5 (42.4min, 47.4P0.1, 61.8P1) fps ∼69%
80.3 (31.3min, 41.1P0.1, 51.9P1) fps ∼69%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
73.8 (38.6min, 39.7P0.1, 49.2P1) fps ∼49%
70.8 (33.6min, 37.7P0.1, 48P1) fps ∼48%
61.8 (32min, 33.9P0.1, 43P1) fps ∼48%
55.4 (32.5min, 33P0.1, 40.1P1) fps ∼48%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
64.7 (27min, 31.7P0.1, 45.1P1) fps ∼43%
61.7 (31.8min, 37P0.1, 44.5P1) fps ∼42%
53.8 (29.3min, 31.3P0.1, 38.4P1) fps ∼42%
48.8 (26.6min, 31.3P0.1, 34.7P1) fps ∼42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
54.4 (20.6min, 24P0.1, 38P1) fps ∼36%
49 (24min, 25.5P0.1, 32.8P1) fps ∼33%
42.3 (13.4min, 17.9P0.1, 30.1P1) fps ∼33%
39 (9.92min, 14.9P0.1, 23.7P1) fps ∼34%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Ultra 7 155H
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14
20.3 (12.9min, 13P0.1, 14.2P1) fps ∼13%
19.1 (10.7min, 11.2P0.1, 12.7P1) fps ∼13%
16.1 (11.2min, 11.2P0.1, 11.6P1) fps ∼12%
15.4 (8.76min, 9.43P0.1, 10.9P1) fps ∼13%
AMD Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
15.5 (5.83min, 6.68P0.1, 10.6P1) fps ∼10%
15.1 (9.81min, 9.89P0.1, 10.8P1) fps ∼10%
13 (3.86min, 4.29P0.1, 9.25P1) fps ∼10%
11.5 (6.4min, 6.41P0.1, 8.33P1) fps ∼10%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

GeForce RTX 4070 or higher is a must for comfortable gameplay at 2,560 x 1,440 pixels and maximum details. However, with DLSS set to Quality, an RTX 4060 is sufficient.

Final Fantasy XVI
    2560x1440 Ultra Preset (Super Resolution off)     2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS     2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality FSR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
85.2 (45.9min, 55.6P0.1, 66.1P1) fps ∼100%
115.2 (61.6min, 66P0.1, 86.1P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
79.7 (47.7min, 54.9P0.1, 59.7P1) fps ∼94%
99.3 (58.5min, 63.1P0.1, 71.1P1) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Neo 16 E23
69.6 (39.9min, 42.9P0.1, 52.3P1) fps ∼82%
97.1 (46.9min, 55.1P0.1, 68.9P1) fps ∼84%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
58.5 (35.5min, 37.1P0.1, 41.3P1) fps ∼69%
80.7 (43.2min, 47.8P0.1, 54.4P1) fps ∼70%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
40 (24.2min, 25.8P0.1, 29.5P1) fps ∼47%
55.6 (29.9min, 34.4P0.1, 40.2P1) fps ∼48%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
34.4 (22.2min, 22.8P0.1, 26.3P1) fps ∼40%
47.9 (10.5min, 10.6P0.1, 33.6P1) fps ∼42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
26.5 (14.2min, 14.6P0.1, 17.7P1) fps ∼31%
37.5 (16.7min, 17.5P0.1, 24.1P1) fps ∼33%

UHD (3,840 x 2,160)

Most laptop GPUs struggle with 4K displays. A GeForce RTX 4090 is currently the only graphics card that can adequately handle 3,840 x 2,160 pixels with the Ultra preset active. With upscaling in play, one can get by with an RTX 4080 or faster options.

Final Fantasy XVI
    3840x2160 Ultra Preset (Super Resolution off)     3840x2160 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS     3840x2160 Ultra Preset + Quality FSR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
50.8 (33.5min, 38P0.1, 41.4P1) fps ∼100%
74.5 (44.4min, 49.2P0.1, 57P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
47.1 (33.1min, 35.2P0.1, 37.5P1) fps ∼93%
66.8 (46min, 47.9P0.1, 51.7P1) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Neo 16 E23
40.1 (27.1min, 28.3P0.1, 32.5P1) fps ∼79%
59.9 (34.7min, 40.2P0.1, 45.5P1) fps ∼80%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
32.4 (22.8min, 23.5P0.1, 25.5P1) fps ∼64%
49.8 (30.6min, 32.7P0.1, 35.5P1) fps ∼67%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
21.1 (6.8min, 7.38P0.1, 14.4P1) fps ∼42%
29.8 (11min, 11P0.1, 21.6P1) fps ∼40%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
17.9 (12.9min, 13P0.1, 14.4P1) fps ∼35%
27.6 (10.1min, 12.9P0.1, 19.7P1) fps ∼37%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
11.6 (7.13min, 7.24P0.1, 8.05P1) fps ∼23%
14.9 (6.58min, 6.71P0.1, 9.34P1) fps ∼20%

Note

Since gaming tests are very time-consuming and often limited by installation and activation restrictions, we can only provide a selection of benchmarks for the publication of the articles. Additional graphics cards will be tested and included later.

Overview

Show Restrictions
PosModel< PrevNext >Final Fantasy XVI
 Final Fantasy XVI (2024)
low
1920x1080
Low Preset (Super Resolution off)
med.
1920x1080
Medium Preset (Super Resolution off)
high
1920x1080
High Preset (Super Resolution off)
ultra
1920x1080
Ultra Preset (Super Resolution off)
QHD DLSS
2560x1440
Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS
QHD FSR
2560x1440
Ultra Preset + Quality FSR
QHD
2560x1440
Ultra Preset (Super Resolution off)
4K DLSS
3840x2160
Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS
4K FSR
3840x2160
Ultra Preset + Quality FSR
4K
3840x2160
Ultra Preset (Super Resolution off)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
152.1
148.4
129.3
115.7
115.2
85.2
74.5
50.8
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
138.3
130.8
115.7
103.3
99.3
79.7
66.8
47.1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
129.7
123.4
109.4
98.5
97.1
91.6
70.4n2
59.9
77.5
40.1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
102.4
94.6
89.5
80.3
80.7
58.5
49.8
32.4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75.1n2
72.8n2
63.4n2
57.4n2
56.95n2
40n3
25.8n2
20.5n2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
61.5
43.2
24.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
64.7
62.85n2
54.3n2
49.6n2
47.9
34.4
27.6
17.9
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
62.1
59.9
53.3
54.4
13.2
48.7
10.3
23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
54.4
49
42.3
39
37.5
26.5
14.9
11.6
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
20.3
19.1
16.1
15.4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
17.4
16.4
15
14.1
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
20.5
20
16.5
14.8
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
14.7
13.6
11.7
11.5
AMD Radeon 780M
15.5
15.1
13
11.5
AMD Radeon 740M
10.1
9.63
8.89
7.82
AMD Radeon 610M
6.28
(-) * Smaller values are better. / n123 Number of benchmarks for this median value / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Test system details

Laptop Graphics card Processor RAM
XMG Neo 16 E23 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @175 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6X) Intel Core i9-13900HX 2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 @175 W TGP (12 GB GDDR6X) Intel Core i9-13950HX 2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Pro 15 E23 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i9-13900HX 2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 2 x 8 GB DDR5
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 @100 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-13700H 2 x 8 GB DDR5
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14 Intel Arc 8 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 2 x 16 GB LPDDR5-7467
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Radeon 780M AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme 16 GB LPDDR5-6400
Tower PC Graphics card Processor RAM
Asus ROG Strix Z790-F Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 (16 GB GDDR6X)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB GDDR6)
Intel Core i9-13900K 2 x 24 GB DDR5 G.Skill
4K monitor Operating system Nvidia driver AMD driver Intel driver
Philips Evnia 329M1RV Windows 11 565.90 24.9.1 101.6079
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Final Fantasy XVI review: Laptop and desktop benchmarks
Florian Glaser, 2024-10- 6 (Update: 2024-10- 6)