NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) graphics card review

With the GeForce GTX 1650 Super, there's an inexpensive Turing GPU from Nvidia that is equipped with the TU116 graphics chip. The power consumption is 100 watts, which makes operation without an additional power supply impossible. You can find out how well the GeForce GTX 1650 Super does against an AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT in this short review.

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Klaus Hinum, ✓ Brian Burriston (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), Published 02/03/2021 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

Nvidia's cheapest Turing graphics card is still named GeForce GTX 1650, but the GeForce GTX 1650 Super is now another inexpensive entry-level model. The biggest changes compared with the non-Super version of the GTX 1650 are in the installed graphics chip and VRAM. We're already familiar with the graphics chip from the GeForce GTX 1660 or the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, although the number of shaders is a bit lower in the GeForce GTX 1650 Super at 1,280. In terms of VRAM, the faster GDDR6 is now also available, but it still only has 4 GB. Nevertheless, the GeForce GTX 1650 Super has no problem surpassing the GeForce GTX 1650 in terms of performance.

Due to its compactness, the graphics card is suitable for small cases. Power consumption is specified at 100 watts, which closes the gap between the GeForce GTX 1650 and the GeForce GTX 1660. The KFA2 model that we tested has a 6-pin power connector internally and offers one DVI-D, one DisplayPort 1.4, and one HDMI 2.0b port externally. The manufacturer's warranty is two years with KFA2.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super for desktops is an entry-level gaming graphics card based on the Turing architecture. The chip, which has been named TU116, was introduced in November 2019. The GTX 1650 series does not offer ray tracing and tensor cores, unlike the more powerful RTX 2000 cards (e.g. RTX 2060). Performance is slightly better than with the GeForce GTX 1650 and comparable with the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT.

There have also been significant improvements in the Turing architecture in terms of the CUDA cores. Float and INT operations can now be executed simultaneously, the cache has been unified and improved, and Adaptive Shading has been introduced. As a result, Nvidia speaks of an up to 50% higher performance per core compared to Pascal.

The new entry-level card benefits from the advantages of the TU116 chip, since the newer NVENC video encoding delivers more performance compared to Pascal.

Nvidia specifies a power consumption of 100 watts TGP (Total Graphics Power) for the graphics card. The TU11 chip is manufactured by TSMC in a 12 nm FFN process.

GeForce GTX 1600 Series

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)	1536 @ 1.5 - 1.77 GHz	192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)	1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz	192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	1536 @ 1.46 - 1.59 GHz	192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)	1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz	192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)	1280 @ 1.53 GHz	192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	1536 @ 1.14 - 1.34 GHz	192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	1024 @ 1.35 - 1.49 GHz	128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop)	896 @ 1.49 - 1.67 GHz	128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	1024 @ 1.38 - 1.56 GHz	128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	1024 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz	128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	1024 @ 1.02 - 1.25 GHz	128 Bit @ 8000 MHz

Architecture

Turing

Pipelines

1280 - unified

Core Speed

1530 MHz

Shader Speed

1785 MHz

Memory Speed

14000 MHz

Memory Bus Width

192 Bit

Memory Type

GDDR6

Max. Amount of Memory

4 GB

Shared Memory

API

DirectX 12_1, Shader 6.5, OpenGL 4.6

Power Consumption

125 Watt

technology

12 nm

Date of Announcement

29.10.2019

v1.33

log 11. 10:05:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 10 Jul 2025 05:37:28 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 start showIntegratedCPUs +0.024s ... 0.025s

#5 return log +0.011s ... 0.036s

Our test system based on the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

A current AMD platform based on the Asus X570 ROG Crosshair VIII Hero Wi-Fi serves as the test system. The CPU (AMD Ryzen 9 5900X) offers good CPU performance, and we use an AIO (Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora 360 mm) for cooling. The 32 GB of RAM comes from Corsair and clocks at 4,000 MHz. We use the Acer Predator XB321HK as a monitor. It doesn't limit us due to its UHD capability. At this point, we would like to thank AMD for providing the test platform and Corsair for the RAM kit.

Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro DDR4-4000 2x 16 GB

For the upcoming benchmarks and tests, we use the following system:

Lian Li O11 Dynamic
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Nvidia driver 460.79)
Asus X570 ROG Crosshair VIII Hero Wi-Fi (BIOS 2402, default settings, XMP 1 for DDR4-4000)
Corsair RM1000X 1,000-watt power supply
Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro DDR4-4000 RAM kit 2x 16 GB
Corsair MP600 2 TB M.2 PCIe 4.0 SSD
Crucial MX500 2 TB (for games)

Synthetic benchmarks

As you could already guess, our KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super ranks with a clear lead over the GeForce GTX 1650. However, a respectable gap to the GTX 1660 remains. At the same time, we also used an AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT for comparison, since it's part of the same performance class. The GTX 1650 Super is unable to outperform its AMD counterpart in most benchmarks. Nevertheless, it remains to be seen whether the result shown here will also be carried over to the gaming tests.

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	15563 Points +33%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	14328 Points +23%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	13569 Points +16%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	11688 Points
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	9203 Points -21%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	7179 Points +40%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	6843 Points +33%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	6247 Points +22%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	5135 Points
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	4152 Points -19%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	5958 Points +29%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	5422 Points +17%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	4891 Points +6%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	4632 Points
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	3538 Points -24%

Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	22914 Points +3%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	22323 Points
1920x1080 1080p High
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	6637 Points +3%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	6468 Points
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	2721 Points +18%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	2305 Points
3840x2160 4k Optimized
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	3905 Points +5%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	3724 Points
7680x4320 8k Optimized
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	1597 Points +47%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	1087 Points

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	68.9 fps
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	63.6 fps -8%
Extreme Preset DX11
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	73 fps +2%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	71.9 fps

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	60.9 fps +13%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	54.1 fps
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	51.2 fps 0%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	51.1 fps

SiSoft Sandra 2016
GP Financial Analysis (FP High/Double Precision)
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	87.5 KOPT/s +42%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	61.8 KOPT/s
GP Cryptography (Higher Security AES256+SHA2-512)
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	44.21 GB/s
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	42.08 GB/s -5%
Image Processing
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	1100 MPix/s +86%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	592 MPix/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	19723 Points +10%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	17849 Points

Gaming benchmarks

The Witcher 3 frame times (Ultra preset)

The Witcher 3 frame rates (Ultra preset)

In our gaming benchmarks, the KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super does well, and with a few exceptions, the graphics card masters almost all games in 1080p and maximum details. However, our test sample has to admit defeat against the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT. The performance gain compared with a GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly noticeable, but it also varies from game to game.

We used The Witcher 3 with the Ultra preset for the frame rates and frame times. It's noticeable here that the FPS can't be kept constant. Nevertheless, we have to say that it's not a noticeable performance drop. There are a few outliers in the recorded frame times now and then, although the smooth gameplay is not significantly affected by this.

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	59.5 (53^min - 68^max) fps +36%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	58.3 fps +34%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	55.5 (50^min - 63^max) fps +27%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	43.6 fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	40.4 (35^min - 46^max) fps -7%

Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	92 (83^min - 104^max) fps +23%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	88 (77^min - 107^max) fps +17%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	82 (73^min - 93^max) fps +9%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	75 (66^min - 87^max) fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	59 (52^min - 68^max) fps -21%

Far Cry New Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	87 (69^min - 108^max) fps +23%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	80 (64^min - 96^max) fps +13%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	79 (62^min - 102^max) fps +11%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	71 (55^min - 86^max) fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	58 (47^min - 70^max) fps -18%

Anno 1800 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality (DX11)
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	40.6 (36^min - 45^max) fps +31%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	34.9 (32^min - 40^max) fps +13%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	33.6 fps +8%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	31 fps

Crysis Remastered - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:SM
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	45.6 (33.6^min, 35.4^P0.1, 37.1^P1 - 67^max) fps +38%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	40.8 (32.2^min, 32.5^P0.1, 34^P1 - 58.7^max) fps +24%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	37.5 fps +14%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	33 fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	27.6 (22.5^min, 22.7^P0.1, 23.3^P1 - 41.4^max) fps -16%

Dirt 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	53.1 (27.2^min, 41^P0.1, 43.1^P1 - 66.5^max) fps +15%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	50 (32.9^min, 38.2^P0.1, 42.8^P1 - 60.2^max) fps +8%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	46.3 (35.4^min, 36.8^P0.1, 39.2^P1 - 56.1^max) fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	34.2 (25.1^min, 25.9^P0.1, 29^P1 - 41.2^max) fps -26%

Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War - 1920x1080 Highest Settings
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	57.2 (23^min, 25.4^P0.1, 33^P1 - 220^max) fps +55%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	52.5 (17.8^min, 27.2^P0.1, 39^P1 - 194^max) fps +42%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	49.6 fps +34%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	37 fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	35.6 (26.2^min, 26.6^P0.1, 27.9^P1 - 62.8^max) fps -4%

Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	39.2 (6.1^min, 22^P0.1, 32.7^P1 - 135^max) fps +31%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	36.6 (6.64^min, 20.8^P0.1, 30.6^P1 - 183^max) fps +22%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	32.5 fps +8%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	30 fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	23.7 (6.33^min, 11.5^P0.1, 19.6^P1 - 58.8^max) fps -21%

F1 2020 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	94.3 (78^min - 111^max) fps +26%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	89.8 (73^min - 106^max) fps +20%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	88 (64^min - 111^max) fps +17%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	75 (61^min - 91^max) fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	60.3 (49^min - 72^max) fps -20%

Death Stranding - 1920x1080 Very High Preset
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	84.3 (75.2^P1) fps +26%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	80.2 fps +20%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	77.6 (69^P1) fps +16%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	67 fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	52.7 (25.1^P1) fps -21%

Mafia Definitive Edition - 1920x1080 High Preset
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	72.5 fps +25%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	64.9 fps +12%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	59.9 fps +3%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	58 fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	45.2 fps -22%

Watch Dogs Legion - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (DX12)
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	35.8 (21.71^min, 27.9^P1 - 52.79^max) fps +71%
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	31.4 (16.64^min, 21.23^P1 - 82^max) fps +50%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	29.4 (15.39^min, 18.11^P1 - 75.52^max) fps +41%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	21.2 (11.04^min, 15.31^P1 - 67.16^max) fps +1%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	20.9 (10.71^min, 12.73^P1 - 75.52^max) fps

Horizon Zero Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultimate Quality
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	57 (21^min - 116^max) fps +6%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	57 (38^min - 108^max) fps +6%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	54 fps 0%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	54 (35^min - 8339^max) fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	36 (23^min - 62^max) fps -33%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	80 fps +27%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	72 fps +14%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	65 fps +3%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	63 fps

Yakuza Like a Dragon - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	64.7 (28^min, 36^P0.1, 43.3^P1 - 121^max) fps +22%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	59 (15.9^min, 31.2^P0.1, 39^P1 - 112^max) fps +11%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	55.3 fps +4%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	53 fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	40.6 (24^min, 24.2^P0.1, 25.6^P1 - 83.3^max) fps -23%

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	187	185	132	62.9	44.1	44
The Witcher 3 (2015)	206.8	130.7	80.3	43.6		29.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	182.8	166.7	156.8	141.1		78.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	250	147	86	67		30
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	126	67.8	47.3		34.2	19
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	149	138	106			87.8
Far Cry 5 (2018)	156	89	81	75	52	27
Monster Hunter World (2018)	206	95	77	49	35	24
Strange Brigade (2018)	258	114	94.4	80.7	59.1	32.9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	181	86	73	63	40	19
Battlefield V (2018)	121	72	58	57	42	24
Apex Legends (2019)	142	69	82	81	61	32
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	135	83	78	71	52	28
Metro Exodus (2019)	135	64.4	47	36.6	28.5	16.1
The Division 2 (2019)	104	83	66	49	33	16
Anno 1800 (2019)	165	110	60	31	21	13
Control (2019)	171	62	45		28	13
Borderlands 3 (2019)	161	81.5	52.8	39.8	23.3	7.87
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019)		84.2	73.7	65.6	44.3	21
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019)	129	71	45	14	11
Doom Eternal (2020)	235	115	96
F1 2020 (2020)	257	134	108	75	55	31
Death Stranding (2020)	116	84	68	67	46	22
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)	125	74	62	54	39	9
Crysis Remastered (2020)	161	72	41	33	22	13
Serious Sam 4 (2020)	138.9	71.7	53.2	24.3	21.1	15.4
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020)	120	61	58		38	20
Star Wars Squadrons (2020)	257.9	139	128.1	118.5	83.7	31.2
FIFA 21 (2020)	180.9	180.2	179.9	176.7	163.5	109.5
Watch Dogs Legion (2020)	110	71.3	60.6	20.9	14.3	8.09
Dirt 5 (2020)	139	69.1	54	46.3	35.6	21
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020)	88	53	26	15	13	5
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War (2020)	126	77	56	37	26	2
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020)	107	61.8	59.1	53	34.3	16.7
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020)	116	82	67	59	48	34
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020)	78	44	36	30	18	7
Hitman 3 (2021)	185	105	87	79	51	25
Outriders (2021)	168	89.5	70.3	55.4	36.6	29.5
Resident Evil Village (2021)	234	100	90.1	77.7	50.6	20.9
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021)	111			109	89.3	45.4
Days Gone (2021)	143	82.2	72	52.1	36.8	20
Monster Hunter Stories 2 (2021)	144	144	143		118	70.9
F1 2021 (2021)	308	157	127	80.9	57.7	32.1
Deathloop (2021)	105	62.8	49.6	3.03	24.9
New World (2021)	136	66.6	60.8	47.2	33.7	21.2
Alan Wake Remastered (2021)		91.9	86.4		84	54.8
Far Cry 6 (2021)	145	80	69	59	6
Back 4 Blood (2021)		128	113	102	63.7	30
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021)	98	67	67	65	31	15
Riders Republic (2021)	130	75	58	51	34
Call of Duty Vanguard (2021)	85.7	63.1	74.6	63.7	53.6	38.9
Forza Horizon 5 (2021)	180	88	77	31	26	18
Battlefield 2042 (2021)	133	74.2	62.2	20.1	4.87
Farming Simulator 22 (2021)	294	136	102	79.4	58.6	34.8
Halo Infinite (2021)		73.4	71.3	68.9	63.6	36.3
God of War (2022)	66.1	53.4	42.3	27.2	19.3	5.08
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022)	99	91	88	68	31	17
Dying Light 2 (2022)	69.1	34.8	28.2		18.5	8.62
GRID Legends (2022)	170	116	96	66	50	25
Elden Ring (2022)	58.9	52.2	45	37.2	27.6	14.4
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	67.4	53.3	41.1	32.1	18.5	3.3
Elex 2 (2022)	60.9	54.8	47.1		25.9	9.86
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022)	73.3	76.8	75.8	75.2	45.1	15.1
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	99.2	79.9	49.8	35.2	22.1	10.8
Vampire Bloodhunt (2022)	193.7	104.3	100.8	95.8	53.1	20.9

Emissions of the KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650

If you decide to buy a GeForce GTX 1650 Super, you will probably mainly look at the graphics card's power consumption. The model is quite efficient at 100 watts, despite the fact that the non-Super model only requires 75 watts. This is also reflected in our measurement results. Our test system only needs 87 watts in idle usage. In the stress test, this value increases to 229 watts, which is, however, significantly lower compared to the test system with the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT.

Power consumption while gaming is even a bit higher at 241 watts, but it can still be classified as low in comparison. In contrast to the GeForce GTX 1650, power consumption is almost 40 watts higher. Nevertheless, the KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super is an energy-efficient graphics card for small systems. There's no cause for concern in terms of temperatures, as our test sample only reached 70 °C (~158 °F) in the stress test. However, the cooling unit still deserves criticism. It's audible under load, and the KFA2 model unfortunately does not have a fan-stop mode for 2D use.

Test system power consumption (when gaming - The Witcher 3 Ultra preset)

Power Consumption
1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor)
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (Idle: 84.76 W)	260.4 (255^min - 277^max) Watt * -8%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (Idle: 83.93 W)	250.2 (246^min - 262^max) Watt * -4%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (Idle: 79.88 W)	248.6 (240^min - 259^max) Watt * -3%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (Idle: 86.5 W)	240.7 (237^min - 247^max) Watt *
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (Idle: 85.5 W)	202.9 (202^min - 204^max) Watt * +16%
1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor)
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (Idle: 83.93 W)	259.1 (242^min - 295^max) Watt * -13%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (Idle: 79.88 W)	247.8 (242^min - 282^max) Watt * -8%
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (Idle: 84.76 W)	247.6 (241^min - 322^max) Watt * -8%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (Idle: 86.5 W)	228.7 (223^min - 271^max) Watt *
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (Idle: 85.5 W)	200.4 (193^min - 230^max) Watt * +12%

* ... smaller is better

Verdict - Small, compact, and energy-efficient

In review: The KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super is an energy-efficient graphics card that is suitable for the home living room PC. With the TU116 graphics chip, the GTX 1650 Super offers the advantages of the GTX 1660 series when it comes to the NVENC video encoding. In terms of price, this graphics card is currently very difficult to categorize, since the problematic availability of graphics cards has now also reached the entry-level models, and even here, we can already see significantly increasing prices. For example, prices starting at 160 Euros (~$192) can be found on the second-hand market.

In terms of pure performance, the GeForce GTX 1650 Super ranks directly behind a GeForce GTX 1660. The VRAM of 4 GB is a bit tight if you're looking for something for the long term. At the moment, however, many games can be played smoothly in 1080p even with this graphics card without having to sacrifice details. Only a few games require a reduction in details in order to achieve smooth frame rates.

If you're looking for a small and yet powerful graphics card, there's currently no way around the GeForce GTX 1650 Super.

Objectively speaking, the KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super is a solid graphics card for the entry level. However, the built-in cooling system deserves some criticism. A fan-stop mode for 2D use would be appreciated, and a lower noise level in 3D applications would make the graphics card more attractive.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy

4.6 pt (14%)

AMD Radeon HD 8180

0.05426 -99%

...

AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)

4.21 -8%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile

4.33 -5%

AMD Radeon R9 290X

4.38 -4%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M SLI

4.42 -3%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

4.42 -3%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

4.47 -2%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU

4.47 -2%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU

4.48 -2%

AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop)

4.56 0%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)

4.57

4.59 0%

4.59 0%

4.64 2%

4.7 3%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

4.84 6%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop)

4.86 6%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)

4.88 7%

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU

4.92 8%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

5 9%

...

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

33.3 629%

100%

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score

min: 5099 avg: 5191 median: 5202.5 (14%) max: 5261 Points

+ 4 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	5099
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	5184
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	5221
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX (1-Click OC)	i9-14900K 253 W / 253 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 100 W 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	5261

GPU TDP ?	TDP 100 W
98%	100%

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics

min: 4632 avg: 4637 median: 4633 (9%) max: 4651 Points

+ 4 benchmarks and specifications - Hide comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	4632
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	4633
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX (1-Click OC)	i9-14900K 253 W / 253 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 100 W 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	4633
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	4651

GPU TDP ?	TDP 100 W
100%	100%

Qualcomm Adreno 618

112 -98%

...

NVIDIA Quadro P3200

4155 -10%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop)

4194 -10%

AMD Radeon RX 5500M

4209 -9%

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU

4256 -8%

AMD Radeon RX 6500M

4372 -6%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU

4448 -4%

AMD Radeon R9 Nano

4511 -3%

AMD Radeon RX 6550M

4546 -2%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU

4631 0%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)

4637

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

4687 1%

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

4712 2%

AMD Radeon RX 590 (Desktop)

4872 5%

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)

4932 6%

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

4967 7%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

5058 9%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

5089 10%

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

5132 11%

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU

5151 11%

...

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

46337 899%

100%

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics

min: 450349 avg: 605764 median: 653824 (66%) max: 665060 Points

+ 4 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	450349
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX (1-Click OC)	i9-14900K 253 W / 253 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 100 W 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	650505
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	657142
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	665060

GPU TDP ?	TDP 100 W
91%	100%

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics

min: 221403 avg: 240031 median: 245383 (29%) max: 247955 Points

+ 4 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	221403
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX (1-Click OC)	i9-14900K 253 W / 253 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 100 W 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	245370
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	245396
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	247955

GPU TDP ?	TDP 100 W
97%	100%

3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score

min: 44256 avg: 49356 median: 50912.5 (48%) max: 51344 Points

+ 4 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	44256
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	50706
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	51119
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX (1-Click OC)	i9-14900K 253 W / 253 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 100 W 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	51344

GPU TDP ?	TDP 100 W
95%	100%

3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics

min: 63896 avg: 67460 median: 68198.5 (17%) max: 69545 Points

+ 4 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	63896
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX (1-Click OC)	i9-14900K 253 W / 253 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 100 W 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	67819
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	68578
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	69545

GPU TDP ?	TDP 100 W
99%	100%

3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score

min: 11050 avg: 11467 median: 11574 (17%) max: 11671 Points

+ 4 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	11050
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	11544
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX (1-Click OC)	i9-14900K 253 W / 253 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 100 W 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	11604
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	11671

GPU TDP ?	TDP 100 W
98%	100%

3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics

min: 11688 avg: 12125 median: 12206 (11%) max: 12400 Points

+ 4 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	11688
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX (1-Click OC)	i9-14900K 253 W / 253 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 100 W 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	12187
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	12225
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	12400

GPU TDP ?	TDP 100 W
99%	100%

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics

min: 278896 avg: 306260 median: 313924 (35%) max: 318296 Points

+ 4 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	278896
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	312787
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX (1-Click OC)	i9-14900K 253 W / 253 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 100 W 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	315062
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	318296

GPU TDP ?	TDP 100 W
96%	100%

3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid

40490 Points (38%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	40490

3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score

56328 Points (22%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	56328

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score

min: 17833 avg: 18832 median: 19053 (23%) max: 19387 Points

+ 4 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	17833
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	18949
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX (1-Click OC)	i9-14900K 253 W / 253 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 100 W 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	19157
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	19387

GPU TDP ?	TDP 100 W
98%	100%

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU

min: 17849 avg: 18136 median: 18224.5 (14%) max: 18247 Points

+ 4 benchmarks and specifications - Hide comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	17849
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	18218
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX (1-Click OC)	i9-14900K 253 W / 253 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 100 W 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	18231
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	18247

GPU TDP ?	TDP 100 W
99%	100%

AMD Radeon HD 6250

171.8 -99%

...

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

17543 -3%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

17562 -3%

AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)

17625 -3%

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU

17690 -2%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

17711 -2%

AMD Radeon RX 6500M

17889 -1%

AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop)

17919 -1%

AMD Radeon R9 390X

17944 -1%

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

18037 -1%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)

18136

AMD Radeon RX 570 (Desktop)

18967 5%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

19016 5%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M SLI

19109 5%

AMD Radeon RX 580 (Desktop)

19274 6%

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)

19467 7%

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)

19503 8%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q

19881 10%

Nvidia RTX A2000

19978 10%

NVIDIA Quadro P5000

20096 11%

...

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

129772 616%

100%

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +

3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total

min: 57390 avg: 62121 median: 64463 (19%) max: 64511 Points

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +

3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX

min: 52466 avg: 55647 median: 57106 (31%) max: 57368 Points

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications - Hide comparison chart

ATI Radeon HD 3200

62 -100%

...

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI

51344 -8%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

51396 -8%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

52230 -6%

AMD Radeon RX 6500M

52733 -5%

NVIDIA Quadro P5000

52917 -5%

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU

53510 -4%

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

54416 -2%

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)

54830 -1%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop)

55279 -1%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)

55647

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

57962 4%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)

58491 5%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

58633 5%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

58792 6%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)

60089 8%

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)

60334 8%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q

60439 9%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)

60862 9%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)

61609 11%

...

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

173912 213%

100%

3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard

min: 84609 avg: 86965 median: 86964.5 (95%) max: 89320 Points

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications - Hide comparison chart

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500

133.4 -100%

...

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

85585 -2%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti

85740 -1%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

85743 -1%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

85774 -1%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

85804 -1%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop)

85875 -1%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

86046 -1%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

86188 -1%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

86191 -1%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)

86965

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super

87172 0%

100%

3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +

3DMark 06

min: 46823 avg: 59017 median: 64150 (84%) max: 66078 Points

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX

min: 53.7 avg: 54.3 median: 54.1 (16%) max: 55 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

min: 50.2 avg: 62.2 median: 66.3 (16%) max: 70 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp12 snx-02 +

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

min: 7.98 avg: 8.8 median: 8.9 (1%) max: 9.64 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp12 showcase-01 +

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

min: 53 avg: 56.7 median: 56.5 (10%) max: 60.6 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp12 mediacal-01 +

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

min: 25.53 avg: 34.4 median: 33.5 (9%) max: 44.2 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp12 maya-04 +

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

min: 110 avg: 115 median: 116 (32%) max: 119 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp12 energy-01 +

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

min: 5.17 avg: 5.5 median: 5.6 (5%) max: 5.72 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp12 creo-01 +

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

min: 37.62 avg: 42 median: 42.8 (17%) max: 45.6 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp12 catia-04 +

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

min: 53 avg: 56.5 median: 57.3 (9%) max: 59.1 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp12 3dsmax-05 +

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

min: 119 avg: 129.3 median: 134 (20%) max: 135 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +

SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04

min: 67.8 avg: 89.8 median: 98.5 (26%) max: 103 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp13 snx-03 +

SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03

min: 14.26 avg: 15.9 median: 16 (2%) max: 17.4 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp13 showcase-02 +

SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02

min: 53.2 avg: 55.4 median: 56.5 (10%) max: 56.6 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp13 medical-02 +

SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02

min: 30.5 avg: 33.8 median: 35.4 (6%) max: 35.6 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp13 maya-05 +

SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05

min: 161 avg: 165.3 median: 167 (19%) max: 168 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp13 energy-02 +

SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02

min: 7.61 avg: 7.6 median: 7.6 (2%) max: 7.64 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp13 creo-02 +

SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02

min: 114 avg: 119 median: 120 (18%) max: 123 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp13 catia-05 +

SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05

min: 76.3 avg: 79 median: 79.4 (9%) max: 81.2 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp13 3dsmax-06 +

SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06

min: 119 avg: 129 median: 133 (21%) max: 135 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +

SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k

26.2 fps (6%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp2020 snx-04 4k +

SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k

min: 10.64 avg: 11.6 median: 11.6 (1%) max: 12.5 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp2020 medical-03 4k +

SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k

min: 4.96 avg: 5.6 median: 5.3 (3%) max: 6.58 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp2020 maya-06 4k +

SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k

min: 85.6 avg: 87.9 median: 88.4 (13%) max: 89.8 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp2020 energy-03 4k +

SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k

11 fps (2%)

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp2020 creo-03 4k +

SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k

min: 43.66 avg: 45.9 median: 46.4 (21%) max: 47.5 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp2020 catia-06 4k +

SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k

min: 13.3 avg: 13.4 median: 13.4 (9%) max: 13.4 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +

SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k

min: 27.5 avg: 28.8 median: 29.3 (10%) max: 29.6 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU

min: 1405 avg: 1411 median: 1410.5 (5%) max: 1416 Samples/s

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU

min: 2972 avg: 2994 median: 2993.5 (5%) max: 3015 Samples/s

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result

min: 9510 avg: 9521 median: 9521 (8%) max: 9532 points

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *

min: 225 avg: 226.9 median: 226.9 (31%) max: 228.7 Watt

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

show legend

Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *

min: 220 avg: 230.4 median: 230.4 (32%) max: 240.7 Watt

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

show legend

Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor

0.2 fps per Watt (15%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *

278 Watt (35%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

show legend

Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark

1740 MHz (69%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

- Range of benchmark values

- Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.33

log 11. 10:05:54

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 10 Jul 2025 05:37:28 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 getting avg benchmarks for device 10646 +0.02s ... 0.021s

#5 got single benchmarks 10646 +0.018s ... 0.039s

#6 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#7 min, max, avg, median took s +1.022s ... 1.061s

#8 return log +0s ... 1.061s

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024)	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	46823
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024)	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	64150
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024)	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	66078

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)

GeForce GTX 1600 Series

Our test system based on the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Synthetic benchmarks

Gaming benchmarks

Emissions of the KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650

Verdict - Small, compact, and energy-efficient

Benchmarks

Game Benchmarks

F1 25