Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-14900K

Intel i9-14900K

The Intel Core i9-14900K is a high-end processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, similar to the Intel Core i9-13900K last year. The base clock is 3.2 GHz and can reach up to 6 GHz under optimal conditions. The total of 32 threads are still divided into 8 P and 16 E cores. The 8 performance cores (P-cores) also offer hyperthreading, which means that a total of 32 threads can be processed simultaneously in conjunction with the 16 energy-efficient E-cores. As before, the K models continue to offer a freely selectable multiplier, which simplifies overclocking. The Intel Core i9-14900K uses the same CPU socket (LGA 1700) as the Intel Core i9-13900K. This means you don't necessarily need a new motherboard, as the 600 series chipsets support the new processors after a BIOS update. There is also still the option of using DDR4 for the RAM.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900K, the Core i9-14900K still offers 8 P-cores, which are relieved by 16 additional E-cores for demanding applications and thus ensure very high multi-thread performance. In comparison, however, the Intel Core i9-14900K can only gain a slight lead. The e-cores primarily take care of background applications. The hybrid architecture relies on the Intel Thread Director, which is responsible for the correct allocation of tasks. Meanwhile, the IPC could only be increased slightly. As an innovation with the Intel Core i9-14900K, the manufacturer is increasingly relying on AI, which is also used for overclocking. With one click in the Intel Extreme Utility, the tool checks the entire system and makes the necessary settings.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i9-13900K, the Intel Core i9-14900K offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, nothing has changed with the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power consumption

The Intel Core i9-14900K is specified with a TDP of 125 watts, which corresponds to the PL1 value. In Boost mode, the processor's performance can increase to up to 253 watts (PL2). However, this requires very good cooling. Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900K, the specified power consumption does not increase if the limits are adhered to. The situation is different if the limits are deactivated. As this value depends on the overall system, we cannot make an exact statement on this.

CodenameRaptor Lake
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-R

Series: Raptor Lake-R Raptor Lake

Intel Core i9-14900K « 3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K compare2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900 compare2 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700 compare1.5 - 5.4 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500 compare2.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T compare1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock Rate3200 - 6000 MHz
Level 2 Cache32 MB
Level 3 Cache36 MB
Number of Cores / Threads24 / 32
8 x 6.0 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)125 Watt
Manufacturing Technology10 nm
Die Size257 mm2
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketLGA 1700
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
GPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Starting Price$589 U.S.
Announcement Date10/17/2023
Product Link (external)ark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
51.1 pt (85%)
AMD E1-2100
2.32 -95%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
48.1 -6%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
48.4 -5%
Intel Core i9-13900K
49 -4%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
49.1 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
49.1 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
49.5 -3%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
49.9 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
50 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
50.4 -1%
Intel Core i9-14900K
51.1
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
51.5 1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
52 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D
52.1 2%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 18%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 134     avg: 136.5     median: 137 (77%)     max: 138 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 2112     avg: 2189     median: 2146.5 (40%)     max: 2352 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 37606     avg: 39400     median: 39399.5 (37%)     max: 41193 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2174     avg: 2263     median: 2262.5 (95%)     max: 2351 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
900 Points (98%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
15466 Points (38%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5924     avg: 6103     median: 6103 (39%)     max: 6282 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
03106209301240155018602170248027903100341037204030434046504960527055805890Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 317     avg: 324.5     median: 324.5 (90%)     max: 332 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
72.2 Points (93%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 4.02     avg: 4     median: 4 (95%)     max: 4.21 Points
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
12643 points (76%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
94801 points (69%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
144156 Points (92%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
18511 Points (23%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
74.5 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.1 s (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
16108 points (26%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 145144     avg: 146282     median: 145207 (83%)     max: 149570 MIPS
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7772     avg: 7893     median: 7932 (93%)     max: 7934 MIPS
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 75.9     avg: 181.2     median: 181.2 (61%)     max: 286.5 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 257.5     avg: 345.5     median: 345.5 (80%)     max: 433.5 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 40.8     avg: 41.4     median: 41.1 (72%)     max: 42.8 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.8 GB/s (82%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
5.8 GB/s (100%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
26.7 GB/s (70%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 135     avg: 143     median: 144.5 (2%)     max: 147 Seconds
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 80     avg: 84.6     median: 85 (1%)     max: 87 Seconds
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3425     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (7%)     max: 0.3504 sec
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 20532     avg: 22354     median: 22657.5 (48%)     max: 22928 Points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
5.5 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
12 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
280.3 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 11403     avg: 101267     median: 111512 (86%)     max: 114209 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 28497     avg: 31204     median: 31391 (77%)     max: 32853 Points
+ 25 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 89084     avg: 104553     median: 105332 (86%)     max: 111347 Points
+ 25 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 88682     avg: 104672     median: 105402 (86%)     max: 110989 Points
+ 25 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 90865     avg: 104818     median: 105098 (87%)     max: 110670 Points
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 27678     avg: 28978     median: 29112 (74%)     max: 30462 Points
+ 25 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 48193     avg: 52120     median: 52422.5 (93%)     max: 56087 Points
+ 38 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 19418     avg: 22303     median: 22575 (95%)     max: 23721 Points
+ 38 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 3108     avg: 3214     median: 3243 (81%)     max: 3294 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 20435     avg: 21326     median: 21397 (83%)     max: 21790 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2985     avg: 3078     median: 3104 (99%)     max: 3150 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 19463     avg: 20452     median: 20693 (85%)     max: 20754 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2243     avg: 2347     median: 2369 (93%)     max: 2370 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 24552     avg: 25148     median: 25199 (45%)     max: 25867 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2177     avg: 2237     median: 2247 (10%)     max: 2280 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 23151     avg: 24582     median: 24467 (77%)     max: 25496 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9620     avg: 9873     median: 9872.5 (99%)     max: 10009 points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 82660     avg: 87853     median: 88108.5 (88%)     max: 91119 points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 413     avg: 415     median: 414 (0%)     max: 418 ms
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 332     avg: 334.7     median: 334 (92%)     max: 338 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 371     avg: 388.3     median: 386 (69%)     max: 410 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2490     avg: 2566     median: 2584 (97%)     max: 2611 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
537 Watt (93%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
548 Watt (100%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0306090120150180210240270300330360390420450480510540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 64.1     avg: 83.8     median: 77.6 (51%)     max: 151.2 Watt
+ 46 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
11.5 Points per Watt (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 01. 22:58:00

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 01 Aug 2025 05:43:50 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.036s ... 0.037s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.037s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 15092 +0.026s ... 0.063s

#7 got single benchmarks 15092 +0.184s ... 0.248s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.248s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +1.964s ... 2.211s

#10 return log +0.009s ... 2.22s

Reviews for the Intel Core i9-14900K processor

PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB in review

PowerColor Reaper AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB Review: 7% lower performance than RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB for $80 less

With the Radeon RX 9060 XT, AMD hopes to take the Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti head on while undercutting the price, hopefully with no availability qualms. We tak...
Intel Core i9-14900K | AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB | 32.00"
MSI RTX 5060 Ti 16G Ventus 2X Plus in review

MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16G Ventus 2X Plus Review: Fast 1080p and smooth 1440p gaming provided you can get one at $429 MSRP

The RTX 5060 Ti marks the arrival of the GB206 GPU, which aims to distill the goodness of the Blackwell architecture at even cheaper price points. We put the MS...
Intel Core i9-14900K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | 32.00"
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Founders Edition in review

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Founders Edition Review: $549 Blackwell goodness under imminent threat from AMD RDNA 4

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Founders Edition based on the GB205 GPU brings Blackwell benefits to the masses with its $549 pricing. While the RTX 5070 FE comes a...
Intel Core i9-14900K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 | 32.00"
MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Ventus 3X OC in review

MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 16G Ventus 3X OC Review: Near-perfect mainstream Blackwell GPU provided you can get one at $749 MSRP

The MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Ventus 3X OC offers the full RTX 5070 Ti experience with excellent performance that beats the GeForce RTX 4080 FE and the AMD Radeon...
Intel Core i9-14900K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | 32.00"
Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5080 OC Edition in review

Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5080 OC Edition Review: 13% gains over the RX 7900 XTX for 30% increased pricing over the RTX 5080 FE

The Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5080 Founders Edition is an SFF GPU based on Nvidia's latest GB203 Blackwell GPU. The Prime RTX 5080 OC offers slightly higher clocks...
Intel Core i9-14900K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 | 32.00"

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Founders Edition: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, 32.00"
  Review » Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Founders Edition Review: $999 card effectively makes the RX 7900 XTX redundant

Intel Arc B580: Intel Arc B580, 0.00", 0.8 kg
  Review » Intel Arc B580 Limited Edition desktop GPU review: Intel's answer to AMD Radeon RX and Nvidia GeForce RTX

MSI MAG 274QRF QD E2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, 27.00", 4 kg
  Review » MSI MAG 274QRF QD E2 Review: Impressive, bang-for-the-buck QHD 180 Hz gaming monitor

Thermaltake TH420 V2 Ultra EX ARGB: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, 28.00"
  Review » Thermaltake TH420 V2 Ultra EX ARGB AiO Review: Throttle-free cooling performance for enthusiast PC builds without breaking the bank

Alienware AW2725DF: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, 27.00", 10 kg
  Review » Alienware AW2725DF QD-OLED Gaming Monitor Review: Blazing fast QHD 360 Hz goodness for that competitive edge

ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 7800 XT: AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT, 0.00"
  Review » Asus TUF Gaming Radeon RX 7800 XT OC review: A serious challenger to the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Super for less than 600 Euros?

  Review » Sparkle Intel Arc A380 Elf desktop graphics card review - What can you expect from Intel's 129-Euro budget GPU?

  Review » ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC desktop graphics card review - Intel's budget GPU for 1,080p gaming for under US$200

  Review » AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX with 24 GB VRAM review: Already available for less than 1000 Euros

  Review » KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 Super SG review: massive Nvidia desktop graphics card can use four fans for cooling

  Review » Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super 16 GB under review: Increased performance for the same money - promises, promises ...

  Review » Intel Core i9-14900K and Intel Core i5-14600K review - With 6 GHz out of the box against AMD's X3D processors

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
   » Asus launches gold-plated RTX 5090 Dhahab Edition GPU starting at $7,000

Intel Arc B580: Intel Arc B580, 0.00", 0.8 kg
   » Intel Xe2 Battlemage GPUs on the chopping block as Nvidia high-end slated to remain unchallenged

MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 16G Ventus 3X OC: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, 32.00"
   » RX 9070 XT vs RTX 5070 Ti battle in 55 games shows 5% performance delta with some big wins and losses for Radeon GPU

   » Zotac launches space-saving Solid Core RTX 5080 and 5070 Ti GPUs

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Founders Edition: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, 32.00"
   » Zotac launches space-saving Solid Core RTX 5080 and 5070 Ti GPUs

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Founders Edition: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, 32.00"
   » GeForce RTX 5070 benchmark result sees it matching the wrong RTX 4090

MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 16G Ventus 3X OC: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, 32.00"
   » CyberPowerPC to protect customers from Nvidia's mistake by ensuring RTX 50 GPUs with full ROPs in gaming PCs

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
   » Overpowered GeForce RTX 5090D takes huge lead over RTX 4090 in benchmark chart and doubles DirectX 12 test result

MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 16G Ventus 3X OC: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, 32.00"
   » Abysmal RTX 5070 launch stock appears on horizon as latest leak points to possible supply shortage

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
   » Strange GeForce RTX 50-series benchmark issues solved but new problem for gamers arises

MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 16G Ventus 3X OC: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, 32.00"
   » Defective RTX 5070 Ti reportedly suffers up to double-digit performance loss

   » RTX 5070 Ti trails RTX 4070 Ti and narrowly shakes off RTX 4070 in early benchmark results

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
   » GeForce RTX 5090 drops below RTX 4090 in high-end graphics card benchmark chart

   » GeForce RTX 5090 fails to topple RTX 4090 in GPU compute benchmark while RTX 5080 struggles against RTX 4070 Ti

   » RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 generational benchmark performance gains comparatively eclipsed by GeForce 40 series in PassMark

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Founders Edition: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, 32.00"
   » Serious RTX 5090 and RTX 5090D driver issues reportedly turn GPUs into expensive paperweights

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
   » Serious RTX 5090 and RTX 5090D driver issues reportedly turn GPUs into expensive paperweights

   » GeForce RTX 5090 sells for extraordinary 193% markup in the US as Japanese consumers face similar reseller predicament

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Founders Edition: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, 32.00"
   » Nvidia blasted as "F-tier" as Edward Snowden blows his whistle over RTX 5080 and RTX 5090 VRAM amounts

Intel Arc B580: Intel Arc B580, 0.00", 0.8 kg
   » New Intel driver update tips 3 new Arc Battlemage GPUs: B580 Pro and B770 on the cards

   » New Intel driver update tips 3 new Arc Battlemage GPUs: B580 Pro and B770 on the cards

   » New Intel driver update tips 3 new Arc Battlemage GPUs: B580 Pro and B770 on the cards

   » $219 Intel Arc B570 GPU challenges AMD RX7600 XT performance in new Geekbench leaks

   » Asus Tuf A16 gaming laptop with insane battery life and more GPU power than RTX 4060 is now $380 less than list price

   » Intel Arc B580 vs Arc A770 gaming test appears online: Battlemage GPU offers better ray tracing performance

   » Intel Arc B580 vs Arc A770 gaming test appears online: Battlemage GPU offers better ray tracing performance

   » RX 7900 XT and RX 7800 XT price drops and potential RTX 40 shortage makes now perfect time to buy high-end GPU

   » RX 7900 XT and RX 7800 XT price drops and potential RTX 40 shortage makes now perfect time to buy high-end GPU

   » Intel's new graphics drivers boost gaming performance by up to 24% for Lunar Lake and Arc GPUs

   » Intel's new graphics drivers boost gaming performance by up to 24% for Lunar Lake and Arc GPUs

   » Flagship RX 7900 XTX leaves RTX 4080 Super far behind in price/performance with current lowest-ever price

   » Asus TUF Gaming Radeon RX 7800 XT OC in a duel against the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Super

   » AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX in our current review - AMD's top model impresses with a good price-performance ratio

   » Last update for the 1700 socket - We tested the Intel Core i9-14900K and Intel Core i5-14600K

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Mobile CPU Comparison
Comparison of all mobile CPU series

» Mobile Processors - Benchmarklist
Benchmarklist of all known CPUs that are used in laptops (desktop and laptop CPUs)

Other CPUs of the series Raptor Lake-R

» Intel Core i9-14900K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 6 GHz
» Intel Core i7-14700K
   20x 2.5 GHz - 5.6 GHz
» Intel Core i9-14900
   24x 2 GHz - 5.8 GHz
» Intel Core i7-14700
   20x 1.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core i5-14600K
   14x 3.5 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core i5-14500
   14x 2.6 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core i5-14500T
   14x 1.7 GHz - 4.8 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 5 245
   14x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
   96x 2.5 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
   64x 2.7 GHz - 4.2 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
   16x 4.3 GHz - 5.7 GHz
» Intel Core i9-14900K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 6 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.7 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13900K
   24x 3 GHz - 5.8 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
   16x 4.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
   12x 4.4 GHz - 5.6 GHz
- Intel Core i7-14700K
   20x 2.5 GHz - 5.6 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-01- 8)