AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (16 core, 32 threads) Review
AMD Ryzen Threadripper with up to 32 cores
Last year’s Threadripper Zen architecture APUs brought a decent performance bump on previous AMD chips. These first-generation chips were built on the 14 nm FinFET fabrication process and included the 1950X, which was the first 16-core consumer-grade AMD APU. AMD followed this in April 2018 with nine Ryzen processors built on the new Zen+ architecture, including the Ryzen 7 2700X and the Ryzen 5 2600X. Zen+ is built with 12 nm processes, which should bring significantly better performance with the same power consumption as last year’s Ryzen APUs. The new Threadripper APUs also benefit from improved cache latencies and turbo boost functionality. These second-generation chips implement Extended Frequency Range 2 (XFR2) and Precision Boost 2 (PBO), the combination of which should allow the APUs to graduate their clock frequencies as more cores are used. This should mean that these new APUs can maintain turbo clock speeds for longer than last year’s chips.
The second-generation AMD Ryzen Threadripper APUs will be available from the August 11, 2018. AMD will be releasing four Ryzen Threadripper models that are divided into two categories, the X series and the WX series. The X series is aimed at gamers while the WX series is designed with content creators and innovators in mind, with the former rated at up to 180 W thermal design power (TDP) and the latter up to 250 W TDP.
Prices start at $649, with the most expensive 32-core and 64-thread APU costing $1,799 at launch. The entry-level Threadripper APU is the Ryzen 2920X, which has 12 cores and 24 threads. This means that AMD has eliminated octa-core APUs from its Threadripper range, but the Ryzen 7 2700X fills this gap. Unfortunately, AMD has not released any budget options based on the X399 platform; last year’s Threadripper APUs should drop in price though.
The new Threadripper APUs come in stylish and elaborately designed packaging, which is impressive at first glance.
All APUs arrive without a heatsink. AMD and Cooler Master have collaborated to create the Wraith Ripper, a heatsink that is designed to cool up to 250W TDP APUs. The Wraith Ripper costs about 100 Euros (~$114).
Overview of the new AMD Ryzen Threadripper APUs
| Model | Cores - Threads | Base Clock | Turbo clock | TDP | Launch Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2nd generation | |||||
| Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | 12-24 | 3.5GHz | 4.3GHz | 180W | $649 |
| Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | 16-32 | 3.5GHz | 4.4GHz | 180W | $899 |
| Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | 24-48 | 3.0GHz | 4.2GHz | 250W | $1,299 |
| Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | 32-64 | 3.0GHz | 4.2GHz | 250W | $1,799 |
| 1st generation | |||||
| Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | 8-16 | 3.5GHz | 4.2GHz | 180W | $549 |
| Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | 12-24 | 3.5 GHz | 4.2 GHz | 180 Watt | €829 |
| Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | 16-32 | 3.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz | 180 Watt | €1,039 |
AMD has supplied us with the following hardware for our benchmarks and tests:
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X APU
- ASUS ROG ZENITH EXTREME (BIOS 0064, Default Settings, XMP 1 for DDR4-3200
- 2 x G.Skill DIMM 16 GB DDR4-3200 kit (14-14-14-34)
- Wraith Ripper heatsink
- Enermax Liqtech TR4 240 - AIO liquid cooling
Additional hardware used in our test system:
- XFX AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Antec 1,200 W power supply
- ADATA SX910 512 GB
- Western Digital 2 TB USB 3.0 HDD
Processor benchmarks
We expected the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X to have excellent multithreaded performance because of its 16 cores, which is confirmed by benchmark scores. The 2950X is a clear improvement over the Threadripper 1950X and even outscores the 10-core Intel Core i9-7900X. Despite being similarly priced, the 2950X outperforms the Core i9-7900X in the Cinebench R15 multithread benchmark because of its superior core count. In practical terms, the 2950X performs about 45% better in multithreaded applications than the Core i9-7900X.
Unfortunately, the 2950X falls short on single-core performance. Our test APU is on par with the Ryzen 7 2700X and 10% behind the Core i9-7900X. AMD does not conceal this shortcoming either, with AMD presenting a similar comparison table in their product briefing. We have included their comparison tables above. These values were confirmed during our tests.
Please note: We conducted our benchmarks with the Wraith Ripper heatsink. Using AIO cooling would tease out a bit more performance without overclocking.
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
| Intel Core i9-7900X -1! | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
| Intel Core i7-8700K -2! | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1800X -3! | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1700X -4! | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Intel Core i7-8700K | |
| Intel Core i9-7900X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | |
| Intel Core i9-7900X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
| Intel Core i7-8700K | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
| Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | |
| wPrime 2.10 | |
| 32m | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | |
| Intel Core i7-8700K | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | |
| Intel Core i9-7900X | |
| 1024m | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
| Intel Core i7-8700K | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
| Intel Core i9-7900X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | |
| X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 | |
| Pass 1 | |
| Intel Core i7-8700K | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
| Intel Core i9-7900X | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
| Pass 2 | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | |
| Intel Core i9-7900X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
| Intel Core i7-8700K | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
| WinRAR - Result | |
| Intel Core i7-8700K | |
| Intel Core i9-7900X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
| TrueCrypt | |
| AES Mean 100MB | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | |
| Intel Core i9-7900X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
| Intel Core i7-8700K | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
| Twofish Mean 100MB | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | |
| Intel Core i9-7900X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
| Intel Core i7-8700K | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
| Serpent Mean 100MB | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | |
| Intel Core i9-7900X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
| Intel Core i7-8700K | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Intel Core i7-8700K | |
| Intel Core i9-7900X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Intel Core i9-7900X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
| Intel Core i7-8700K | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | |
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | |
| Intel Core i9-7900X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
* ... smaller is better
We have little to say on throttling, simply because there wasn’t any. Our test APU performed consistently in a loop of the Cinebench R15 multithreaded benchmark. The Wraith Ripper performed well too and kept the 2950X sufficiently cool throughout.


















































