Far Cry Primal Notebook Benchmarks

Stone Age with modern technology. While the fourth iteration was placed in an imaginary region somewhere close to the Himalayas, “Far Cry Primal” jumps back more than 10000 years. We checked the hardware requirements for surviving in the wilderness.

Florian Glaser, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Andreas Osthoff), Published 03/07/2016 🇩🇪

For the original German article, see here.

Graphics

As with the predecessor, “Far Cry Primal” is based on Ubisoft Montreal's own Dunia 2 engine. Therefore, the graphics quality is very similar to the previous title. Not only does “Far Cry Primal” convinces with sharp textures, nice illumination and rich vegetation but the details of the figures and animals are also pretty good. However, there is still room for improvements in terms of effects. Besides the water presentation, the flames are rather second-rate.

However overall, the technology leaves a good impression. “Far Cry Primal” certainly does not have to hide behind other first-person shooters or action blockbusters like “Call of Duty Black Ops 3”, “Rise of the Tomb Raider” or “Just Cause 3”. The title cannot quite match the graphics quality of “Star Wars Battlefront” (Frostbite 3 engine).

The graphics menu is a positive aspect. Changes to the settings are accepted without a restart and “Far Cry Primal” also offers several presets that adjust the overall quality with just one click. If you want to have control over all settings, you will find around 10 individual options in the sub-menu "Quality Settings". Unfortunate: Unlike many competitors, the title only supports the anti-aliasing modes FXAA and SMAA. High-quality versions like MSAA and TXAA are missing completely and have to be enforced via drivers.

Speaking of drivers: We did not have any problems with Nvidia devices with the brand-new ForceWare 362.00. Currently, many players are having problems with launch issues, errors and crashes.

We only had a problem with the activation limit of the gaming platform Uplay (is required for the installation), which – similar to Origin – allows only a certain number of new systems per day. This means that we have to add benchmarks for AMD devices over the next few days.

Otherwise, the technology leaves a sophisticated impression and we did not encounter any serious graphics errors or bugs during the tests. Compared to “Far Cry 4”, we even noticed some small improvements. For instance, you can now skip the annoying intro videos. Subjectively, the loading times are slightly shorter. Another surprise is the moderate file size. While other titles from 2015 and 2016 occupy more than 30 GB, “Far Cry Primal” needs only 16 GB.

The title does not seem to have very high requirements in terms of processor. As long as the CPU is somewhat up to date, the limiting factor will usually be the graphics card. The processor only had a certain influence with minimum settings on our Intel test systems. As far as we can say, graphics cards from AMD and Nvidia are pretty much on par.

Benchmark

We really have to praise the integrated benchmark that runs for almost one minute and shows a camera flight through a heavily vegetated valley. Based on our experience, the frame rate of the benchmark represents actual gameplay very well, so the results are very meaningful. You can enjoy “Far Cry” with anything above 35 fps if occasional stutters are not an issue for you.

Note: The VRAM indicator at the end of the benchmark (see video) should not be trusted. For starters, the value varies from one benchmark run to another, and there are also strange outliers in both directions on some systems. We still checked all presets in FHD with a GeForce GTX 960M (2 GB VRAM). Here are the average results of two runs:

Low @70% VRAM load
Medium @80% VRAM load
High @82% VRAM load
Very High @84% VRAM load
Ultra @94% VRAM load

▶ load Youtube video

Results

As with most first-person shooters, the hardware requirements are quite high. The minimum requirements are already pretty steep. You need at least a mid-range GPU to play “Far Cry Primal” with a notebook. Only a GeForce GT 750M or 940M, manages somewhat smooth game play at 1280x720 pixels and Low preset. Users with older or less powerful entry-level GPUs or mainstream chips like the GeForce GT 740M or HD Graphics 4600 will probably regret the purchase.

You will need a serious gaming notebook if you want to play the title at 1920x1080 pixels. Low details require at least a GeForce GTX 860M and medium settings at least a GTX 960M. You should use a GeForce GTX 870M or better for high graphics settings, while the preset Ultra requires a modern high-end chip (GTX 970M or better).

Currently, 3840x2160 is not smoothly playable on any mobile chip with good graphics settings. Even desktop chips like the GeForce GTX 980 are not powerful enough for a combination of 4K and High. We will have to wait and see if the performance can be improved via updates. All our benchmarks were performed with the official retail version, including day 1 patch (1.1.0).

Far Cry Primal
3840x2160 High Preset AA:SM 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM 1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:SM 1920x1080 Low Preset 1280x720 Low Preset
AMD Radeon R9 Fury, 4790K XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro	37 (33^min) fps ∼37% 68 (52^min) fps ∼46% 91 (69^min) fps ∼59% 102 (74^min) fps ∼59% 115 (84^min) fps ∼68% 116 (84^min) fps ∼61%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980, 6700K Desktop PC	29 (27^min) fps ∼29% 63 (49^min) fps ∼42% 88 (75^min) fps ∼57% 99 (85^min) fps ∼57% 118 (101^min) fps ∼69% 135 (102^min) fps ∼71%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 4700MQ Schenker W504	20 (18^min) fps ∼20% 46 (36^min) fps ∼31% 62 (53^min) fps ∼40% 69 (59^min) fps ∼40% 82 (70^min) fps ∼48% 98 (75^min) fps ∼51%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 4700MQ Schenker W504	16 (15^min) fps ∼16% 36 (28^min) fps ∼24% 50 (44^min) fps ∼32% 56 (49^min) fps ∼32% 66 (59^min) fps ∼39% 86 (66^min) fps ∼45%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M, 4700MQ Schenker W504	14 (13^min) fps ∼14% 30 (23^min) fps ∼20% 41 (35^min) fps ∼27% 46 (38^min) fps ∼27% 54 (45^min) fps ∼32% 85 (65^min) fps ∼45%
AMD Radeon R7 370, 4790K MSI Gaming R7 370 2GB	13 (9^min) fps ∼13% 33 (23^min) fps ∼22% 47 (39^min) fps ∼31%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950, 6700K Desktop PC	12 (11^min) fps ∼12% 32 (23^min) fps ∼21% 46 (40^min) fps ∼30% 51 (46^min) fps ∼29% 59 (54^min) fps ∼35% 110 (93^min) fps ∼58%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ MSI GE72 965M Ti	10 (9^min) fps ∼10% 29 (22^min) fps ∼19% 41 (35^min) fps ∼27% 46 (40^min) fps ∼27% 53 (48^min) fps ∼31% 78 (59^min) fps ∼41%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M, 4700MQ Schenker W504	11 (10^min) fps ∼11% 25 (19^min) fps ∼17% 34 (29^min) fps ∼22% 39 (33^min) fps ∼23% 45 (38^min) fps ∼26% 76 (58^min) fps ∼40%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ Schenker XMG A505	9 (8^min) fps ∼9% 22 (17^min) fps ∼15% 32 (27^min) fps ∼21% 36 (32^min) fps ∼21% 42 (38^min) fps ∼25% 77 (65^min) fps ∼40%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M, 4700MQ Schenker W504	8 (7^min) fps ∼8% 18 (14^min) fps ∼12% 26 (22^min) fps ∼17% 29 (25^min) fps ∼17% 34 (29^min) fps ∼20% 59 (46^min) fps ∼31%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ MSI PE60 2QD	19 (14^min) fps ∼13% 26 (23^min) fps ∼17% 29 (26^min) fps ∼17% 61 (51^min) fps ∼32%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M, 4340M Schenker M504	6 (5^min) fps ∼6% 15 (12^min) fps ∼10% 22 (20^min) fps ∼14% 25 (23^min) fps ∼14% 29 (27^min) fps ∼17% 56 (49^min) fps ∼29%
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 6700HQ MSI CX72 6QD	12 fps ∼8% 14 fps ∼8% 30 (27^min) fps ∼16%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P Asus N551ZU-CN007H	19 (16^min) fps ∼13% 26 (19^min) fps ∼17% 29 (20^min) fps ∼17% 40 (30^min) fps ∼21%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M, 4702MQ Schenker M503	9 (7^min) fps ∼6% 12 (11^min) fps ∼8% 13 (12^min) fps ∼8% 16 (14^min) fps ∼9% 29 (23^min) fps ∼15%
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, 5700HQ MSI GP62 2QD	12 (11^min) fps ∼8% 13 (13^min) fps ∼8% 15 (15^min) fps ∼9% 30 (27^min) fps ∼16%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M, 2970M MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD	21 (18^min) fps ∼11%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M, 4200M HP Envy 15-j011sg	9 (8^min) fps ∼6% 10 (9^min) fps ∼6% 11 (10^min) fps ∼6% 21 (19^min) fps ∼11%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M, 4200M MSI CX61-i572M	6 fps ∼4% 6 fps ∼3% 15 fps ∼8%
Intel HD Graphics 4600, 4700MQ Schenker W504	7 (6^min) fps ∼4% 8 (7^min) fps ∼5% 15 (12^min) fps ∼8%

Overview

Test Systems

Desktop PCs	Custom Nvidia	Custom AMD
Mainboard	Asus Z170-A	Asus Z97-Deluxe
Processor	Intel Core i7-6700K (Skylake)	Intel Core i7-4790K (Haswell)
Graphics Card	Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 (4 GB GDDR5), PNY GeForce GTX 950 (2 GB GDDR5)	XFX Radeon R9 Fury (4 GB HBM), Sapphire Radeon R9 290X (4 GB GDDR5), Sapphire Radeon R9 280X (3 GB GDDR5), MSI Radeon R7 370 (2 GB GDDR5)
Memory	2x 8 GB DDR4-2133	2x 4 GB DDR3-1600
Storage 1	Crucial MX100 SSD (256 GB)	Intel SSD 530 (240 GB)
Storage 2	Crucial M500 SSD (480 GB)	OCZ Trion 100 SSD (480 GB)
Storage 3	OCZ Trion 100 SSD (480 GB)	-
Storage 4	OCZ Trion 150 SSD (960 GB)	-
Operating System	Windows 10 Pro 64-bit	Windows 10 Home 64-bit

Schenker Notebooks	Schenker W504	Schenker XMG A505	Schenker M504	Schenker M503	Schenker S413
Mainboard	Intel HM87	Intel HM87	Intel HM86	Intel HM86	Intel HM87
Processor	Intel Core i7-4700MQ (Haswell)	Intel Core i7-4720HQ (Haswell)	Intel Core i5-4340M (Haswell)	Intel Core i7-4702MQ (Haswell)	Intel Core i7-4750HQ (Haswell)
Graphics Card	Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M (8 GB GDDR5), GTX 970M (6 GB GDDR5), GTX 880M (8 GB GDDR5), GTX 870M (6 GB GDDR5), GTX 860M (4 GB GDDR5)	Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M (2 GB GDDR5)	Nvidia GeForce GTX 850M (2 GB DDR3)	Nvidia GeForce GT 750M (2 GB DDR3)	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Memory	2x 4 GB DDR3-1600	2x 4 GB DDR3-1600	2x 4 GB DDR3-1600	2x 4 GB DDR3-1600	2x 8 GB DDR3-1600
Storage 1	Samsung SSD 840 EVO (250 GB)	Micron M600 SSD (128 GB)	Intel SSD 520 (240 GB)	Intel SSD 520 (240 GB)	Crucial M4 SSD (256 GB)
Storage 2	Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD (500 GB)	HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HDD (1000 GB)	-	-	-
Operating System	Windows 10 Pro 64-bit	Windows 10 Home 64-bit	Windows 7 Pro 64-bit	Windows 7 Pro 64-bit	Windows 8 Pro 64-bit

MSI Notebooks	MSI GE72	MSI PE60	MSI GP62	MSI CX61	MSI CX61
Mainboard	Intel HM170	Intel HM170	Intel HM86	Intel HM86	Intel HM86
Processor	Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Skylake)	Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Skylake)	Intel Core i7-5700HQ (Broadwell)	Intel Celeron 2970M (Haswell)	Intel Core i5-4200M (Haswell)
Graphics Card	Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M 2016 (2 GB GDDR5)	Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M (2 GB GDDR5)	Nvidia GeForce 940M (2 GB DDR3)	Nvidia GeForce 920M (2 GB DDR3)	Nvidia GeForce GT 720M (2 GB DDR3)
Memory	1x 8 GB DDR4-2133	2x 4 GB DDR4-2133	1x 8 GB DDR3-1600	1x 8 GB DDR3-1600	1x 8 GB DDR3-1600
Storage 1	Toshiba THNSNJ128G8NU SSD (128 GB)			Toshiba MQ01ABF050 HDD (500 GB)	WDC Scorpio Blue HDD (1000 GB)
Storage 2	WDC WD10JPVX HDD (1.000 GB) / OCZ Trion 100 SSD (480 GB)	-	-	-	-
Operating System	Windows 10 Home 64-bit				Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit

other Notebooks	HP Envy 15	Asus N551ZU
Mainboard	Intel HM87	AMD K15.1
Processor	Intel Core i5-4200M (Haswell)	AMD FX-7600P (Kaveri)
Graphics Card	Nvidia GeForce GT 740M (2 GB DDR3)	AMD Radeon R9 M280X (4 GB GDDR5)
Memory	1x 8 GB DDR3-1600	2x 4 GB DDR3-1600
Storage 1	Samsung SSD 830 (256 GB)	HGST Travelstar 5K1000 (1000 GB)
Storage 2	-	-
Operating System	Windows 10 Home 64-bit	Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit

4K Monitors	Nvidia driver	AMD driver	Intel driver
2x Asus PB287Q	ForceWare 362.00	Crimson 16.2.1	15.40.10.64.4300

4K Monitors

Nvidia driver

AMD driver

Intel driver

2x Asus PB287Q

ForceWare 362.00

Crimson 16.2.1

15.40.10.64.4300

Loading Comments

Comment on this article

Editor of the original article: Florian Glaser - Managing Editor Gaming Laptops - 633 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2009

I discovered my interest in computers in my childhood, growing up with MS-DOS and Windows 3.1 in the early 1990s. I was especially fascinated with computer games, even from an early age. From Monkey Island through Lands of Lore to Doom, I tried every game I could get my hands on. I have been working for Notebookcheck since 2009 with my focus mostly being on high-performance gaming laptops.

Translator: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1702 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

I grew up with modern consumer electronics and my first computer was a Commodore C64, which encouraged my interest in building my own systems. I started working as a review editor for Notebookcheck during my dual studies at Siemens. Currently, I am mainly responsible for dealing with business laptops and mobile workstations. It’s a great experience to be able to review the latest devices and technologies and then compare them with each other.

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Far Cry Primal Notebook Benchmarks

Florian Glaser, 2016-03- 7 (Update: 2024-08-15)

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > Far Cry Primal (2016)
Pos	Model	low 1280x720 Low Preset	med. 1920x1080 Medium Preset SMAA	high 1920x1080 High Preset SMAA	ultra 1920x1080 Ultra Preset SMAA	4K 3840x2160 High Preset SMAA
32	NVIDIA Titan RTX	116	104	95	88	88
43	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)	139ⁿ²	125.5ⁿ²	115.5ⁿ²	107ⁿ²	90ⁿ²
56	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop)	119	106	97	90	74
61	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)	123ⁿ²	111.5ⁿ²	101ⁿ²	93.5ⁿ²	69.5ⁿ²
76	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)	157	136	129	121	64
77	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	102	91	83	78	62
81	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)	125ⁿ²	112.5ⁿ²	103ⁿ²	96ⁿ²	64.5ⁿ²
84	AMD Radeon VII	125	111	101	94	69
85	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)	120	108	99	89	59
86	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop)	125ⁿ³	113ⁿ³	103ⁿ³	95ⁿ³	59ⁿ³
95	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)	154	141	125	106.5ⁿ²	49.5ⁿ²
100	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)	118ⁿ²	107ⁿ²	98ⁿ²	90.5ⁿ²	55.5ⁿ²
106	AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)	120	107	98	91	52
113	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)	119	107	97	91	50
116	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64	115ⁿ⁷	104ⁿ⁷	94ⁿ⁷	87ⁿ⁷	49ⁿ⁷
117	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	157	138	125ⁿ³	107ⁿ³	49ⁿ³
126	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)				98	41
129	AMD Radeon RX Vega 56	124	111	101	94	40
136	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)	156ⁿ³	131ⁿ³	116ⁿ³	94ⁿ³	41ⁿ³
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Far Cry Primal
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	4K
139	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q			92	87	41
141	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	118ⁿ³	103ⁿ³	88.5ⁿ⁸	82.5ⁿ⁸	37ⁿ⁵
144	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)	124	113	102	88	41
145	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)	129	115	106	86	40
162	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	154	126	112	83	40
164	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q			92	76	34
170	AMD Radeon R9 Fury	116	102	91	68	37
171	AMD Radeon R9 Nano	143	112	98	71	36
172	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980	135	99	88	63	29
182	AMD Radeon RX 590 (Desktop)	122	106	96	68	34
183	AMD Radeon RX 580 (Desktop)	110.5ⁿ²	91ⁿ²	82ⁿ²	61ⁿ²	30.5ⁿ²
184	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)	153	107	94	68	32
188	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop)	127.5ⁿ²	94.5ⁿ²	84.5ⁿ²	69.5ⁿ²	28ⁿ²
189	AMD Radeon RX 570 (Desktop)	124	96	85	59	29
192	AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop)	133	95	85	59	28
193	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	116ⁿ⁵	87ⁿ⁵	76ⁿ⁷	59ⁿ⁷	25ⁿ⁴
202	AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)	85	75	69	55	25
211	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop)	120	80	70	51	22
218	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970	112	100	80	54.5ⁿ²	27
219	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q		81	71	53	22
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Far Cry Primal
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	4K
227	AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)				54	26
249	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M	98ⁿ³	71ⁿ³	63ⁿ³	46ⁿ³	20.5ⁿ²
260	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960	115	60	53	37	16
262	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile			53	40	17
263	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)	135	61	54	41
268	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	90ⁿ⁴	56ⁿ⁴	49.5ⁿ⁴	36ⁿ⁴	16
272	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680	103	67	59	42	17
284	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)	125	57	51	38	15
285	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	94.5ⁿ²	48ⁿ²	42ⁿ²	30.5ⁿ²
288	AMD Radeon R7 370			47	33	13
290	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M	85	46	41	30	14
294	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950	110	51	46	32	12
306	AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)	106	48	43	29	13
309	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M	93.5ⁿ⁴	45.5ⁿ⁴	40.5ⁿ⁴	28ⁿ⁴	11ⁿ²
313	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M	76	39	34	25	11
315	AMD Radeon HD 8970M	101	50	44	35
330	AMD Radeon Pro 460	74	35	32	21
334	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M	72ⁿ⁴	33.5ⁿ⁴	29.5ⁿ⁴	21.5ⁿ⁴	9ⁿ²
346	AMD Radeon Pro 555	76	31	28
347	AMD Radeon Pro 455	70	32	30	20
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Far Cry Primal
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	4K
348	NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)	67.5ⁿ²	30.5ⁿ²	27ⁿ²	19.5ⁿ²	7ⁿ²
352	NVIDIA GeForce MX150	61ⁿ²	27.5ⁿ²	24ⁿ²	18
363*	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100	30	11	10	7
365	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M	59	29	26	18	8
373	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M	53.5ⁿ⁴	24.5ⁿ⁴	22ⁿ⁴	16.5ⁿ⁴
374	AMD Radeon Pro 450		29	26	17
381	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M	56	25	22	15	6
385	AMD Radeon R9 M280X	40	29	26	19
473	NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M	29	13	12	9
475	NVIDIA GeForce MX130	39	18	16	12
476	NVIDIA GeForce 940MX	32ⁿ⁵	14ⁿ⁵	13ⁿ⁴	10ⁿ²
480	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	32	16	14
481	NVIDIA GeForce 940M	29ⁿ²	13	12
498	AMD Radeon R7 M445	27	12	10
518	AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)	31	14
528	NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M	21	10	9
529	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650	32	15
530	NVIDIA GeForce 930M	27
531	Intel Iris Graphics 550	26.5ⁿ²	13ⁿ²	10
532	AMD Radeon 530	21	11
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Far Cry Primal
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	4K
539	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640	28	13
540	NVIDIA GeForce 920MX	24	11	9
541	Intel Iris Graphics 540	22ⁿ³	11ⁿ³	8
577*	AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)	15	9	8
578	NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M	21	10
580	AMD Radeon R7 (Kaveri)	10	5
582*	AMD Radeon R7 M460	22	10	8	7
585	AMD Radeon R7 M360	20ⁿ²	9ⁿ²	7.5ⁿ²	7
587	NVIDIA GeForce 920M	21
592	AMD Radeon R7 M440	20.6	9.9	8.9
600	AMD Radeon 520	21	9	8
608	Intel UHD Graphics 630	24.5ⁿ²
611	Intel HD Graphics 630	19
614	Intel HD Graphics 530	16
617	AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)	13	8
618	Intel UHD Graphics 620	19
619	Intel HD Graphics 620	18ⁿ²	9ⁿ²	8
620	AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)	13.5ⁿ²	7
654	Intel HD Graphics 5600	16	8
680	AMD Radeon HD 8650G	17
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Far Cry Primal
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	4K
685	NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M	15
689	AMD Radeon R5 M330	19	9	8	5
690	AMD Radeon R5 M430	19	9
691	AMD Radeon R5 M255	22	10	8
694	NVIDIA GeForce 910M	16	8	7	5
696	Intel HD Graphics 520	15ⁿ²	7ⁿ²	6	4
699	NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M	15	6	6
720	Intel HD Graphics 4600	13ⁿ²	6ⁿ²
755	Intel HD Graphics 615	12	5
797	Intel HD Graphics 515	11	5
799	Intel HD Graphics 610	11
800	Intel HD Graphics 4400	12
834	Intel HD Graphics 505	3
835	Intel HD Graphics 5300	8	3
850	AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)	10	5
926	Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)	9

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.