Notebookcheck Logo

Intel HD Graphics 530

Intel HD Graphics 530

The Intel HD Graphics 530 (GT2) is an integrated graphics unit, which can be found in various desktop and notebook processors of the Skylake generation. The "GT2" version of the Skylake GPU offers 24 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at up to 1150 MHz (depending on the CPU model). Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the HD 530 has to access the main memory (2x 64bit DDR3L-1600 / DDR4-2133).

Performance

The exact performance of the HD Graphics 530 depends on various factors like TDP, L3 Cache, memory (DDR3/DDR4) and maximum clock rate of the specific model. The fastest desktop versions (Core i7-6700K) can compete with a dedicated GeForce 920M and will handle modern games (as of 2015) in low or medium settings.

Features

The revised video engine now decodes H.265/HEVC completely in hardware and thereby much more efficiently than before. Displays can be connected via DP 1.2 / eDP 1.3 (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 60 Hz), whereas HDMI is limited to the older version 1.4a (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 30 Hz). However, HDMI 2.0 can be added using a DisplayPort converter. Up to three displays can be controlled simultaneously.

Power Consumption

The HD Graphics 530 can be found in several notebook and desktop processors of different TDP classes (35 - 91 W).

Gen. 9 Series

Iris Pro Graphics P580 compare 72 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 compare 72 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 24 @ 0.35 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 610 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 compare 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 compare 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
CodenameSkylake GT2
ArchitectureGen. 9 Skylake
Pipelines24 - unified
Core Speed350 - 1150 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4
technology14 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement05.08.2015
CPU in HD Graphics 530GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-6700K4 x 4000 MHz, 91 W350 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i7-67004 x 3400 MHz, 65 W350 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i7-6920HQ4 x 2900 MHz, 45 W350 MHz1050 MHz
min. - max.350 MHz900 - 1150 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.4 pt (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 33064     avg: 38022     median: 33851 (4%)     max: 47150 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 5731     avg: 7593     median: 7652 (8%)     max: 10384 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 6155     avg: 7859     median: 7500 (2%)     max: 10598 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 637     avg: 876     median: 878 (2%)     max: 1112 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 672     avg: 941     median: 935 (1%)     max: 1202 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1162     avg: 1355     median: 1362 (1%)     max: 1549 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 8504     avg: 10716     median: 11309 (15%)     max: 11840 Points
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 2.38     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (1%)     max: 2.54 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 3.28     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (2%)     max: 3.52 fps
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 16.01     avg: 16.7     median: 16.7 (13%)     max: 17.47 fps
specvp11 proe-05 +
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 21.9     avg: 22.3     median: 22.2 (17%)     max: 22.59 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 22.54     avg: 23.3     median: 23.3 (25%)     max: 24.05 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 3.2     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (2%)     max: 3.39 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 7523     avg: 8622     median: 8926 (6%)     max: 9569 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 35.45     avg: 41     median: 40.5 (14%)     max: 46.98 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 34.51     avg: 41.7     median: 42.3 (2%)     max: 47.32 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 97.8     median: 97.8 (98%)     max: 97.9 %
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 34.1     avg: 36.7     median: 37.1 (5%)     max: 39 Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
14.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
11.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
28.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
20.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
14  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
9.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
45  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
FIFA 18

FIFA 18

2017
low 1280x720
65.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1920x1080
4.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
30  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
16.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
90  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
82  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
41.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
55.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
25.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
30.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
23.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
28.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Off FXAA 1366x768
21.6
low 1280x720
15.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
90  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
57  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
5.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
35.3
low 1280x720
29.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
18.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Mafia 3

Mafia 3

2016
low 1280x720
7.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 17

FIFA 17

2016
low 1280x720
65  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
54.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
25.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
45.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
18.6
low 1280x768
6.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
16.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
15 17 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
4.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
87.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1366x768
84.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
49.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
45.1 48.7 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30 31.9 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.3 12.7 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
22.1 24.9 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.6 10.4 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
75.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
7.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
med (1/3) 1920x1080
42.9
low 1280x720
12 13 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10 10 11 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
11 12.8 13.4 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
112.8 157.6 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.7 27.4 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.8 13 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
43.6 49.7 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.4 32.8 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.3 13.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
15.3 15.7 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11 11.5 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
33.1 34.2 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.6 22.2 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.4 7.8 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
21.9 22.1 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.6 15.7 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1024x768
57.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
45.7 51.9 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.3 31.9 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.9 15.6 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
29.1 36.8 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
22.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.2 11.8 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
low 1280x720
65.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
153.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
52.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
141.7 171.9 ~ 157 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.4 54.3 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.5 24.1 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5 12.6 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
19.2 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.3 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.8 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.8 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
25 29.2 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.7 16.1 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12.2 13.1 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.2 6.5 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
41.2 42.7 (!) 46.9 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.8 29.9 (!) 30.3 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.3 20.4 (!) 21 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.9 6.2 6.8 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
33.8 39.4 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26 28.2 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.3 16.4 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.4 7.5 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
42.2 45.6 51.8 52.5 54.2 66.6 67.2 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.3 23.7 26.6 26.7 27.7 32 32.1 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.1 19.5 22.4 22.6 23.4 26.9 27.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.5 6.5 6.7 7.1 8 8.1 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1366x768
58.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
32.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
48 65.1 69.4 92 92.6 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.5 33.7 44.8 45 45.8 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
20 23.7 29.9 30 31.2 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.5 12.5 13.2 13.5 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
30 34 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.8 21.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12.1 14.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
106.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
71.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
48.2 52.3 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
37.8 41.2 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
31.6 34.5 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.6 20.5 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Fallout 7614.8
Hitman 211.9
Forza Horizon 418
F1 201828.213.2
The Crew 220.4
Far Cry 5136
Kingdom Come: Deliverance14
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark9.3
Fortnite4519.5
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus
FIFA 1865.529.521.719.2
Ark Survival Evolved4.1
F1 20173017
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)16.3
Team Fortress 2908238.419.8
Dirt 441.9
Rocket League55.130.320.7
Prey25.9
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III30.1
Mass Effect Andromeda15.8
Ghost Recon Wildlands13.4
For Honor23.88.4
Resident Evil 728.912.4
Watch Dogs 215.9
Dishonored 212.1
Farming Simulator 17905720.712.15.8
Battlefield 129.718.37.5
Civilization VI18.97.1
Mafia 37.2
FIFA 176554.8
Mirror's Edge Catalyst25.314
Overwatch45.131
Ashes of the Singularity6.55.2
The Division17.1
Far Cry Primal16
XCOM 216.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider16
Anno 220594.6
FIFA 1687.646.225.8
World of Warships84.849.823.717.5
Metal Gear Solid V4731128.3
Mad Max24109.3
Dota 2 Reborn75.650.823.219.97.2
Batman: Arkham Knight13100
The Witcher 3128.95.33.2
Dirt Rally1352713
Battlefield Hardline4732137.1
Evolve16116.35.7
Dragon Age: Inquisition342284.4
Far Cry 422167.95.8
Assassin's Creed Unity0000
Civilization: Beyond Earth57.722.313.110.9
Alien: Isolation49311510.6
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor3322.5118.5
Fifa 1565.24625.8
Sims 4153.352.926.619.3
GRID: Autosport157522313
Watch Dogs19.213.36.84.8
Thief2715136
Battlefield 44429206
Metro: Last Light3727167
BioShock Infinite5427237
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm58.732.311.7
Tomb Raider73412712
Crysis 33221135.1
Diablo III106.771.76035.3
Mafia 250403320
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
32
17
10
3
28
14
2
26
5
1
28
1




2


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 16:50:16

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 04 Mar 2024 05:34:43 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.064s ... 0.065s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.065s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.065s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 6443 +0.032s ... 0.098s

#7 got single benchmarks 6443 +0.029s ... 0.127s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.127s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.588s ... 0.715s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.715s

#11 Got 271 rows for game benchmarks. +0.014s ... 0.729s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.729s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.043s ... 0.771s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.449s ... 2.221s

#15 return log +0.045s ... 2.265s

Notebook reviews with Intel HD Graphics 530 graphics card

Dell Latitude 14 E5470 6440HQ Notebook Review

Dell Latitude 14 E5470 6440HQ Notebook Review

Workhorse with minor drawbacks. A business device for everyday use: This is where Dell comes in with its Latitude 14 E5470. Security features, strong processor,...
Intel Core i5-6440HQ | Intel HD Graphics 530 | 14.00" | 1.9 kg
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p Notebook Review

Lenovo ThinkPad T460p Notebook Review

Looking for more performance? After one-year of abstinence, Lenovo once again offers a powerful device without ULV hardware within its premium lineup. Thanks to...
Intel Core i5-6440HQ | Intel HD Graphics 530 | 14.00" | 1.9 kg
Schenker F516 Flex i5-6400T (Clevo N350DW) Notebook Review

Schenker F516 Flex i5-6400T (Clevo N350DW) Notebook Review

Solid office notebook. The F516 Flex from Schenker Technologies is a configurable office notebook. Besides a 15.6-inch IPS display, it uses desktop processors, ...
Intel Core i5-6400T | Intel HD Graphics 530 | 15.60" | 2.7 kg
Nexoc B519 (Clevo N350DW) Review

Nexoc B519 (Clevo N350DW) Review

35-watt Skylake. The office notebook Nexoc B519 uses an i5 desktop processor from Intel's current Skylake generation. How does it perform compared to the modern...
Intel Core i5-6600T | Intel HD Graphics 530 | 15.60" | 2.7 kg

Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-315E: Intel Core i3-6100U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-315E

Dell Latitude 14 E5470 K8W10: Intel Core i5-6300HQ, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 14 E5470 K8W10

Asus G752VS-BA184T: Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 17.30", 4.4 kg
  External Review » Asus G752VS-BA184T

Lenovo ThinkPad T460p: Intel Core i5-6440HQ, 14.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T460p

Fujitsu Esprimo Q956-Q0956PXMR1IN: Intel Core i5-6500T, 0.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu Esprimo Q956-Q0956PXMR1IN

Asus X550VX-XX015D: Intel Core i5-6300HQ, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus X550VX-XX015D

Dell Latitude 14 E5470: Intel Core i5-6440HQ, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 14 E5470

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter