Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M

The Nvidia GeForce GT 330M is the successor of the GT 230M and technically a faster clocked GT 240M (but it should still maintain the power envelope of the GT 230M as the naming suggests). Therefore, the GT330M is a mid-range laptop graphics card that offers DirectX 10.1 effects.

The performance of the GT 330M is similar to the GeForce GT 240M and therefore located in the range of the Mobility Radeon HD 4650. The card supports DirectX 10.1 and all the features of the GT 230M / 240M (as it is based on the same GT216 core). The modern ATI Radeon HD 5650 offers DirectX 11 effects and performs better. 

Modern and demanding DirectX 10 and 11 games (like Crysis or Risen) can only be played fluently with medium detail settings and resolution settings. Less demanding games like Sims 3 run in high details and resolutions. See the gaming list below for detailed benchmarks.

The 48 shader cores of the GT216 are based on the desktop GTX 200 architecture and are therefore a bit improved compared to the 48 cores of the GeForce 9700M GTX. According to Nvidia, the micro architecture was improved regarding battery runtime and performance. The stream processors / shaders are 1-dimensional (1D) and can therefore not directly compared to the 5D shaders of current AMD / ATI cards like the Mobility Radeon HD 5650.

To use the calculation performance of the GeForce GT 330M for other applications, the card supports CUDA, OpenCL, and Direct Compute. For example encoding videos using the stream processors is considerably faster than using a fast CPU.

The GT330M supports the hardware decoding of HD videos using the integrated PureVideo HD engine. The integrated VP4 video processor is able to fully decode H.264, VC-1, MPEG-2, and MPEG-4 ASP (e.g., DivX, xVID). Hardware decoding of MPEG-1 encoded videos is not supported, but this can be handled by every CPU without high load. In conjunction with an Core i5-520M, the GT 330M decoded H.264 with 1-6%, VC1 in 5-10%, and WMV with 3-9% CPU load (1080p over HDMI on a Sony Vaio Z11). 

 

As with the GT 230M, the performance depends on the used graphics memory. With slow DDR2, the card can be up to 20% slower than with faster memory. Usually the GT 330M is paired with cheap and relatively fast DDR3 memory. GDDR3 would be a bit faster. GDDR5 is not supported according to Nvidia.

A low power version of the GT 330M is also available for laptop manufacturers featuring a minimal slower clock rate and less power consumption (Codename N11P-LP).

GeForce GT 300M Series

GeForce GT 335M compare 72 @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 330M 48 @ 0.58 GHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 325M compare 48 @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 320M compare 24 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
CodenameN11P-GE1
ArchitectureGT2xx
Pipelines48 - unified
Core Speed575 MHz
Shader Speed1265 MHz
Memory Speed1066 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR2, GDDR3, DDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
Transistor Count486 Million
technology40 nm
FeaturesDirectX Compute Support (Windows 7), CUDA, OpenCL, HybridPower, PhysX
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement10.01.2010
Information182 Gigaflops calculation power
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 2159     avg: 2496     median: 2657.5 (1%)     max: 2800 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 1738     avg: 2039     median: 2134 (1%)     max: 2244 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 21859     avg: 26741     median: 26029.5 (27%)     max: 32183 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 16182     avg: 18198     median: 18934 (10%)     max: 19604 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 11076     avg: 12591     median: 12982.5 (14%)     max: 13457 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06
min: 6243     avg: 7064     median: 7285 (10%)     max: 7553 points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 5382     avg: 6063     median: 6232 (8%)     max: 6574 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 +
3DMark 06
min: 7121     avg: 7130     median: 7129.5 (9%)     max: 7138 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 +
3DMark 06
min: 6247     avg: 6654     median: 6677 (9%)     max: 7013 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x720 +
3DMark 06
min: 7355     avg: 7357     median: 7356.5 (10%)     max: 7358 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 4     avg: 6.1     median: 6.4 (81%)     max: 6.5 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 4.6     avg: 6     median: 6.4 (81%)     max: 6.5 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2103     avg: 3416     median: 3409 (2%)     max: 4250 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 13.24     avg: 15.3     median: 15.5 (5%)     max: 17.51 fps
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
high 1360x768
58.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
41.7 46.6 ~ 44 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
32.3 37.6 38.3 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
26.8 31.1 32.2 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
108.8 153 158 162 171 ~ 151 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1360x768
31.7 32.7 39 39.3 39.9 41.4 56 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
21.8 22 26.5 27.2 28.5 29.7 33 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.8 16 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 800x600
23.1 33 36.4 36.6 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1360x768
23 23.2 25.1 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1600x900
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
49.7 51 52 52 57 59.5 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
23 25 26 27 28 32.1 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
17.3 20 20 21.4 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9 11 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 800x600
107.6 112 ~ 110 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
high 1366x768
27 30 30.5 33 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
41 47 56.6 58.8 70.5 71 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
23 25.7 26.3 27.7 28 28 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.8 17.5 17.7 21.2 22 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
83.1  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
31.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
low 800x600
52.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
33.2 38 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
20.4 27 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.3 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
61.1 62.6 68.9 79 80.4 85 98.4 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
33 42 42.6 43.4 47.4 48 50 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
28 29.1 32.3 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
58 59.8 59.8 59.9 60 60 60 98.5 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
ultra 1280x1024
15.9 19 20.9 25.6 26 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
233 233.4 279 ~ 248 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
61.9 68 98.5 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1280x1024
31.8 48.9 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
59.5 73.4 75 153 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
51.9 56 61.6 62 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
29.4 32 33 33 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

2008
low 800x600
42.6 48.5 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
28.3 35.5 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
20.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
96.2 98 171 ~ 122 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
64.8 66 79.3 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
72.3 76 76.2 90.6 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
29.7 34.6 35 35.4 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
low 800x600
90 94.4 99 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
45 49.8 50 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
28.3 29 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
225  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
61.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
151 189 ~ 170 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
35 36 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
low 1024x768
38.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
27.5  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
22.1 30.9 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
53.5 53.8 89.9 116.2 117 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
34.6 37.5 39.3 40 40.4 41 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
20.1 21.2 22.1 23 23.1 26.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
High 1680x1050
11.5
Medium 1680x1050
19.4
Low 1680x1050
37.2
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x1024
46.7
Med 0xAF 0xAA 1280x1024
25.2
High 0xAF 0xAA 1280x1024
15.1
Low 1366x768
45.4
Medium 1366x768
27.9
High 1366x768
17.9
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
56.4 56.5 90.6 93 94 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
32.4 34.2 38 38 38.2 42.8 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
18.4 19.1 20.1 20.2 21 21.1 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low 1680x1050
36.9
Medium 1680x1050
19.5
High 1680x1050
10.9
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x1024
49.6
Med 0xAF 0xAA 1280x1024
24.4
High 0xAF 0xAA 1280x1024
13.9
Low 1366x768
46.6
Medium 1366x768
26.9
High 1366x768
16.8
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
55 58 58 60 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
28 29 29 31 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
14.7 16.9 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion

The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion

2006
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
154.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Quake 4

Quake 4

2005
ultra 1024x768
62  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
208  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
157  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
42  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Counter-Strike Source

Counter-Strike Source

2004
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
204.4  fps    + Compare
med. 640x480
203.1  fps    + Compare
high 800x600
180.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
140 140 ~ 140 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Fifa 1158.729.6
Mafia 244363019
StarCraft 2151402714
Metro 2033322410
Battlefield: Bad Company 254272010
CoD Modern Warfare 211036.330
Risen57261911.9
Resident Evil 583.131.717.9
Need for Speed Shift52.4362413
Colin McRae: DIRT 276443012.5
Anno 14046521
Sims 32487640
F.E.A.R. 2905832
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto463220.68
Left 4 Dead12270
Far Cry 27934
Racedriver: GRID944829
Trackmania Nations Forever22561.323.7
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare1706036
Supreme Commander - FA Bench38.627.527
Crysis - GPU Benchmark863923
Crysis - CPU Benchmark783720
World in Conflict - Benchmark5829
Call of Juarez Benchmark16
The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion58
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark154.5
Quake 462
World of Warcraft20815742
Counter-Strike Source125
Doom 3204.4203.1180.6140
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo532
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

7
9
7
4
11
2
2
12
11
2
4
10

1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 15. 12:40:25

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 05:40:26 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.04s ... 0.041s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.041s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.041s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 1532 +0.013s ... 0.055s

#7 got single benchmarks 1532 +0.122s ... 0.176s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.176s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.479s ... 0.655s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.655s

#11 Got 240 rows for game benchmarks. +0.023s ... 0.678s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.678s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.017s ... 0.694s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.76s ... 1.454s

#15 return log +0.064s ... 1.518s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M graphics card

 

Review Sony Vaio VPC-Z13B7E subnotebook

Vaio-Z@Low-Budget. At 1400 Euros, speaking of low cost sounds like heresy. But for a Vaio in the Z series this is an affordable price. How big the difference is...
Intel Core i5-460M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M | 13.10" | 1.4 kg
 

Review Sony Vaio VPC-Z13Z9E (i7, FHD, Quad-SSD) subnotebook

Flash-giant meets color-collosus. The Z13 has four SSD-memories on board, together with 256 GB of capacity. In the Raid 0, these ensure for flow-rates which wou...
Intel Core i7-640M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M | 13.10" | 1.4 kg
 

Review Samsung RF510 Notebook

Matt Multimedian. Multimedia performance with Core i5-460M & GeForce GT 330M, paired with office qualities like a matt display, low emissions and good input dev...
Intel Core i5-460M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M | 15.60" | 2.5 kg
 

Review Packard Bell EasyNote TX86 540M Notebook

Glimmer Book. Icy blue, glimmering touchpad, cool aluminum haptics and tail-fin shaped line management. That is exclusive style, says Packard Bell. Tech fans wi...
Intel Core i5-540M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M | 15.60" | 2.5 kg
 

Review Sony Vaio VPC-F12Z Notebook

Quad-Studio. You want to render videos, manipulate pictures or simply enjoy Blu-Rays in Full HD, just like that? You can make yourself comfortable on charming l...
Intel Core i7-740QM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M | 16.40" | 3.1 kg

Sony Vaio VPCZ12: Intel Core i5-520M, 13.10", 1.4 kg
  Review » Review Sony Vaio VPC-Z12 Subnotebook

Samsung NP-R590-JS0YDE: Intel Core i5-450M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  Review » Review Samsung NP-R590 Notebook

Acer Travelmate 8472TG-354G32MNkk: Intel Core i3-350M, 14.10", 2.2 kg
  Review » Review Acer Travelmate 8472TG Notebook

Acer TravelMate 8572TG-434G50Mnkk: Intel Core i5-430M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  Review » Review Acer TravelMate 8572TG Notebook

Toshiba Satellite A660-151: Intel Core i3-330M, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  Review » Review Toshiba Satellite A660-151 Notebook

Medion P7615: Intel Core i3-330M, 17.30", 3.3 kg
  Review » Review Medion P7615 Notebook

Dell Vostro 3700 (i7-720QM, GT 330M): Intel Core i7-720QM, 17.30", 3 kg
  Review » Review Dell Vostro 3700 (i7-720QM, GT 330M) Notebook

Apple MacBook Pro 17 inch 2010-04: Intel Core i5-540M, 17.00", 3 kg
  Review » Review Apple MacBook Pro 17 inch 2010-04 Notebook

Toshiba Qosmio F60: Intel Core i3-330M, 15.60", 2.9 kg
  Review » Review Toshiba Qosmio F60 Notebook

Apple MacBook Pro 15 inch 2010-04 i7: Intel Core i7-620M, 15.40", 2.5 kg
  Review » Review Apple MacBook Pro 15-inch i7 2010-04 Notebook

Sony Vaio VPC-Z11X9E/B: Intel Core i5-520M, 13.10", 1.4 kg
  Review » Review Sony Vaio VPCZ11X9E/B Notebook

Sony Vaio VPC-CW2S1E/L: Intel Core i3-330M, 14.00", 2.3 kg
  Review » Review Sony Vaio VPC-CW2S1E/L Notebook

Samsung NP-R780-JS03DE: Intel Core i5-520M, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  Review » Review Samsung NP-R780-JS03DE Notebook

Sony Vaio VPC-F11Z1/E: Intel Core i7-720QM, 16.40", 3.1 kg
  Review » Review Sony Vaio VPC-F11Z1/E Notebook

Samsung NP-R580-JS03DE: Intel Core i5-520M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  Review » Review Samsung NP-R580-JS03DE Notebook

Toshiba Satellite A660-12Q: Intel Core i3-330M, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A660-12Q

Samsung RF510-S01BG: Intel Core i5-480M, 15.60", 3 kg
  External Review » Samsung RF510-S01BG

Toshiba Satellite P500-1JD: Intel Core i5-480M, 18.40", 4.4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P500-1JD

Samsung RF510-S01US: Intel Core i5-460M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung RF510-S01US

Toshiba Satellite A660-1EG: Intel Core i3-370M, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A660-1EG

Gateway ID49C05C: Intel Core i5-430M, 14.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Gateway ID49C05C

Samsung RF710-E7P-C5460: Intel Core i5-460M, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Samsung RF710-E7P-C5460

Sony Vaio VPC-Z13B7E: Intel Core i5-460M, 13.10", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPC-Z13B7E

Samsung P580-JS00UK: Intel Core i3-330M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung P580-JS00UK

Novatech Novabook Family: Intel Core i5-520M, 17.30", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Novatech Novabook Family

Medion Akoya P7615-MD97561: Intel Core i5-450M, 17.10", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya P7615-MD97561

Sony Vaio VPC-Z13Z9E: Intel Core i7-640M, 13.10", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPC-Z13Z9E

Sony Vaio VPC-Z137GX: Intel Core i5-460M, 13.10", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPC-Z137GX

Samsung RF710-S05: Intel Core i5-460M, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Samsung RF710-S05

Samsung R590-JS01CN: Intel Core i5-520M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung R590-JS01CN

Gateway ID43A03c: AMD Phenom II X3 P820, 14.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Gateway ID43A03c

Samsung P480-JS02CN: Intel Core i5-520M, 14.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung P480-JS02CN

Dell Vostro 3700 (i5-4500M, GT 330M): Intel Core i5-450M, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Dell Vostro 3700 (i5-4500M, GT 330M)

Acer Aspire 4741G-432G32Mn: Intel Core i5-430M, 14.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 4741G-432G32Mn

Fujitsu LifeBook E780-FP: Intel Core i7-620M, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu LifeBook E780-FP

Toshiba Satellite A660-166: Intel Core i5-450M, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A660-166

Acer TravelMate TimelineX 8572G-624G64Mnk: Intel Core i7-620M, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate TimelineX 8572G-624G64Mnk

Samsung RF510-S01: Intel Core i5-560M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung RF510-S01

Toshiba Satellite A665-S6058: Intel Core i5-450M, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A665-S6058

Toshiba Satellite M645-S4080: Intel Core i5-460M, 14.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite M645-S4080

Packard Bell EasyNote NM85-JU-202RU: Intel Pentium P6100, 14.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Packard Bell EasyNote NM85-JU-202RU

Micro Express NBL 5100 : Intel Core i7-640M, 15.60", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Micro Express NBL 5100

Samsung R590-JS02UK: Intel Core i5-450M, 15.60", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Samsung R590-JS02UK

Sony VAIO VPC-Z1390X : Intel Core i5-460M, 13.10", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Sony VAIO VPC-Z1390X

Toshiba Satellite A660-10X: Intel Core i7-720QM, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A660-10X

Acer Aspire 5745PG-354G50Mnks: Intel Core i3-350M, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5745PG-354G50Mnks

Fujitsu LifeBook NH570-MF012DE: Intel Core i7-620M, 18.40", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu LifeBook NH570-MF012DE

Samsung RF710-S03UK: Intel Core i7-720QM, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Samsung RF710-S03UK

Sony Vaio VPC-Z13Z9E/X: Intel Core i7-640M, 13.10", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPC-Z13Z9E/X

Sony Vaio VPCZ13M9E/B: Intel Core i5-460M, 13.10", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPCZ13M9E/B

Acer TravelMate 8572TG-5464G64MN: Intel Core i5-460M, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate 8572TG-5464G64MN

Samsung RF710-S02: Intel Core i7-720QM, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Samsung RF710-S02

Toshiba Satellite P500-1CK: Intel Core i5-430M, 18.40", 4.4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P500-1CK

Samsung R590-JS02AU: Intel Core i5-450M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung R590-JS02AU

Gateway ID49C13u: Intel Core i5-460M, 14.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Gateway ID49C13u

Samsung RF510-SO2DE: Intel Core i5-460M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung RF510-S02

Sony VAIO VPC-Z12C7E/B: Intel Core i7-620M, 13.10", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Sony VAIO VPC-Z12C7E/B

Sony Vaio VPCZ133GM: Intel Core i5-460M, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPCZ133GM

Acer Aspire 5745PG-3882: Intel Core i5-450M, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5745PG-3882

Sony VAIO VPCZ12V9E/X: Intel Core i7-620M, 13.10", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Sony VAIO VPCZ12V9E/X

Sony VAIO VPCZ128GX: Intel Core i5-520M, 13.10", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Sony VAIO VPCZ128GX

Packard Bell Easynote TX86-MS2300: Intel Core i5-540M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Packard Bell Easynote TX86-MS2300

Sony Vaio VPCZ125GX: Intel Core i5-520M, 13.10", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPCZ125GX

Sony Vaio VPC-F12Z1E/BI: Intel Core i7-740QM, 16.40", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPC-F12Z1E/BI

Samsung R590: Intel Core i3-330M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung R590

Packard Bell EasyNote TX86-JO-025FR: Intel Core i5-540M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Packard Bell EasyNote TX86-JO-025FR

Acer Travelmate 8472TG-354G32MNkk: Intel Core i3-350M, 14.10", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Travelmate 8472TG-354G32MNkk

Acer TravelMate 8572TG-434G50Mnkk: Intel Core i5-430M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate 8572TG-434G50Mnkk

Samsung P580 Pro: Intel Core i5-430M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung P580 Pro

Sony Vaio VPCZ12M9E/B: Intel Core i5-520M, 13.10", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPCZ12M9E/B

Gateway ID49C08u: Intel Core i5-450M, 14.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Gateway ID49C08u

Samsung R590-JS01: Intel Core i3-350M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung R590-JS01

Sony Vaio VPCF12M1R: Intel Core i5-520M, 16.40", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPCF12M1R

Toshiba Satellite A660-156: Intel Core i5-430M, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A660-156

Acer Aspire 5745G-434G64BN: Intel Core i5-430M, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5745G-434G64BN

Sony Vaio VPCF127HG: Intel Core i7-740QM, 16.40", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPCF127HG

Toshiba Satellite M645-S4055: Intel Core i5-450M, 14.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite M645-S4055

Sony Vaio VPCZ12: Intel Core i5-520M, 13.10", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPCZ12

Apple MacBook Pro 15 inch 2010-04 i7: Intel Core i7-620M, 15.40", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Apple MacBook Pro 15 inch i7 2010-04

Sony Vaio VPCF12: Intel Core i7-740QM, 16.40", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPCF12

Sony VAIO VPCF12M0E/B: Intel Core i7-740QM, 16.40", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Sony VAIO VPCF12M0E/B

Toshiba Satellite A660-151: Intel Core i3-330M, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A660-151

Medion P7615: Intel Core i3-330M, 17.30", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Medion P7615

Toshiba Satellite A660-15T : Intel Core i7-720QM, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A660-15T

Dell Vostro 3700 (i7-720QM, GT 330M): Intel Core i7-720QM, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Dell Vostro 3700 (i7-720QM, GT 330M)

Toshiba Satellite A660-134: Intel Core i5-430M, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A660-134

Sony Vaio VPCF11ZIE/BI: Intel Core i7-720QM, 16.40", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPCF11ZIE/BI

Sony Vaio VPC-F11C4E: Intel Core i7-720QM, 16.40", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPC-F11C4E

Acer Aspire 5745G-434G50Mi: Intel Core i5-430M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5745G-434G50Mi

Samsung R780-JSIBUK: Intel Core i5-520M, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Samsung R780-JSIBUK

Toshiba Satellite A505-S6035: Intel Core i7-720QM, 16.00", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A505-S6035

Sony VAIO VPCF11S1E: Intel Core i7-720QM, 16.40", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Sony VAIO VPCF11S1E

Acer Aspire 5745: Intel Core i7-720QM, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5745

Sony Vaio VPCZ116GG/B: Intel Core i5-430M, 13.10", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPCZ116GG/B

Toshiba Qosmio F60-10X: Intel Core i3-330M, 15.60", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio F60-10X

Toshiba Qosmio F60-10U: Intel Core i5-430M, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio F60-10U

Sony Vaio VPCCW2S1R/L: Intel Core i3-330M, 14.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPCCW2S1R/L

Samsung R780-JS0BUK: Intel Core i5-430M, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Samsung R780-JS0BUK

Sony Vaio VPCZ117: Intel Core i7-620M, 13.10", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPCZ117

Apple MacBook Pro 17 inch 2010-04: Intel Core i5-540M, 17.00", 3 kg
  External Review » Apple MacBook Pro 17 inch 2010-04

Sony Vaio VPC-Z11X9E/B: Intel Core i5-520M, 13.10", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPC-Z11X9E/B

Apple MacBook Pro 15 inch 2010-04: Intel Core i5-520M, 15.40", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Apple MacBook Pro 15 inch 2010-04

Samsung R780-JS02FR: Intel Core i5-430M, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Samsung R780-JS02FR

Toshiba Satellite P500-15E: Intel Core i5-430M, 18.40", 4.4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P500-15E

Fujitsu Lifebook NH570: Intel Core i5-430M, 18.40", 3.6 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu Lifebook NH570

Toshiba Qosmio F60-10J: Intel Core i5-430M, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio F60-10J

Toshiba Qosmio F60: Intel Core i3-330M, 15.60", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio F60

Sony Vaio VPCZ11Z9E/B: Intel Core i7-620M, 13.10", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPCZ11Z9E/B

Sony Vaio VPC-CW2S1E/L: Intel Core i3-330M, 14.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPC-CW2S1E/L

Sony Vaio VPC-Z11X9E/B: Intel Core i5-520M, 13.10", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPC-Z11X9E/B

Sony Vaio VPC-Z115GG/BI: Intel Core i5-520M, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPC-Z115GG/BI

Sony Vaio VPC-F1190X: Intel Core i7-820QM, 16.40", 3 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPC-F1190X

Samsung R780 Aura Core i5-520M: Intel Core i5-520M, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Samsung R780 Aura Core i5-520M

Toshiba Satellite P500-16R: Intel Core i5-430M, 18.40", 4.4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P500-16R

Sony Vaio VPCZ116GX/S: Intel Core i5-520M, 13.30", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPCZ116GX/S

Samsung R480-JT02: Intel Core i5-430M, 14.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Samsung R480-JT02

Samsung NP-R580-JS03DE: Intel Core i5-520M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung NP-R580-JS03DE

Medion P6622: Intel Core i3-330M, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Medion P6622

Sony Vaio VPC-CW2S1E/R: Intel Core i3-330M, 14.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPC-CW2S1E/R

Sony Vaio VPC-F11Z1/E: Intel Core i7-720QM, 16.40", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPC-F11Z1/E

Sony Vaio VPCZ114GX/S: Intel Core i5-520M, 13.10", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPCZ114GX/S

Sony Vaio VPCZ11Z9E: Intel Core i7-620M, 13.10", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPCZ11Z9E

Sony Vaio VPC-F11M1E: Intel Core i5-520M, 16.40", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPC-F11M1E

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter