Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M is an entry level dedicated laptop graphics card presented in 2010. It is based on the GF119 or GF108 core, which are both related to the Fermi architecture. Depending on the version, it features a 64 Bit memory bus and higher clock rates (GF119 version) or a 128 Bit memory bus and slower clock rates. Theoretically, the card also supports fast GDDR5 memory, but due to cost limitations, DDR3 will be used by the laptop manufacturers.

Compared to the GT 420M, the 520M offers only 48 instead of 96 shader cores. 

  • GF108 - core 600/1200 MHz, 128 Bit 900 MHz DDR3
  • GF119 - core 740/1480 MHz, 64 Bit 800 MHz DDR3

Architecture

The GF119 offers 48 ALUs, 8 texture units and a 64 Bit memory interface for DDR3-VRAM. Therefore, it is similar to a half GF108 (GeForce GT 540M) but already manufactured with optimized transistors. As a difference the amount of raster-operation-processors (ROP) stayed the same counting 4. The GF119 is the smalles chip of the Fermi generation and is used for low end laptops.

Performance

As an entry level card, the GT 520M has to compete against the Intel HD Graphics 3000 in the current Sandy Bridge processors. In our tests, the card was only slightly faster, but the better driver support did make a difference. However, demanding games like Battlefield 3 or The Witcher 2 are not playable. Other modern games only run in low details, and therefore gamers wont be pleased with the performance. Low demanding games like Fifa 12, however, are playable with high detail settings.

Features

As the other 500M series chips, the 520M supports Bitstream HD Audio (Blu-Ray) output via HDMI. That means the card is able to transfer Dolby True HD and DTS-HD bitstream-wise without quality loss to a HiFi receiver.

The GT520M offers the PureVideo HD technology for video decoding. The included Video Processor 4 (VP4) in the GF108 chip supports feature set C and therefore the GPU is able to fully decode MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4 Part 2 (MPEG-4 ASP - e.g., DivX or Xvid), VC-1/WMV9, and H.264 (VLD, IDCT, Motion Compensation, and Deblocking). The newer GF119 supports already the next generation VP5 (feature set D) with faster decodes, HD-to SD transcodes, lower power decodes and 4K x 4k resolution H.264 decode support.

Furthermore, the GPU is able to decode two 1080p streams simultaneously (e.g. for Blu-Ray Picture-in-Picture).

Through CUDA, OpenCL, and DirectCompute 2.1 support, the GeForce GT 520M can be of help in general calculations. For example, the stream processor can considerably faster encode videos than a fast CPU can. Furthermore, physics calculations can be theoretically done by the GPU using PhysX (e.g. supported by Mafia 2 or Metro 2033) but the performance wont be sufficient for this.

The power consumption of approximately 17 Watt (including board and memory) allows the usage of the 520M in small laptops. Furthermore, Optimus is supported (if implemented by the manufacturer) for automatic switching to the processor graphics card to save power.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GT 500M Series
GeForce GT 555M (compare) 144 @ 525 - 753 (Boost) MHz128, 192 Bit @ 785-900 MHz
GeForce GT 550M (compare) 96 @ 740 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
GeForce GT 540M (compare) 96 @ 672 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
GeForce GT 525M (compare) 96 @ 600 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
GeForce GT 520MX (compare) 48 @ 900 MHz64 Bit @ 900 MHz
GeForce GT 520M 48 @ 740 / 600 MHz64 / 128 Bit @ 800 / 900 MHz
CodenameN12P-GP/LV
ArchitectureFermi
Pipelines48 - unified
Core Speed740 / 600 MHz
Shader Speed1480 / 1200 MHz
Memory Speed800 / 900 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 / 128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3 (GDDR5)
Max. Amount of Memory1536 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
technology40 nm
FeaturesPhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, Optimus, DirectCompute, OpenCL, DirectX11, OpenGL 4.1
Date of Announcement05.01.2011

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
...
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
...
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
min: 11778     avg: 19118.3     median: 20926 (138%)     max: 24651 Points
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
min: 11351     avg: 12200.8     median: 12227 (225%)     max: 13147 Points
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 8461     avg: 9069.7     median: 9098 (283%)     max: 9337 Points
3DMark 06 +
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPECviewperf 11
Siemens NX 1920x1080 +
Tcvis 1920x1080 +
SolidWorks 1920x1080 +
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 +
Maya 1920x1080 +
Lightwave 1920x1080 +
Ensight 1920x1080 +
Catia 1920x1080 +
Windows 7 Experience Index - Gaming graphics
min: 6.4     avg: 6.4     median: 6.4 (123%)     max: 6.5 points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Graphics
min: 4.6     avg: 5     median: 4.7 (80%)     max: 5.8 points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
44.4 47.5 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.2 17.7 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.8 10.9 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
25.1 27.6 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.2 18 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11.4 11.5 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
20 21 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.5 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8.6 11 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 12

Fifa 12

2011
low 800x600
196.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
95 95.4 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
23 63 64.9 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2011

F1 2011

2011
low 800x600
66 69 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
36 43 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23 24 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
55 57.8 60 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21 22 22.1 26.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
45.2 67.7 91.5 94.9 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
29.5 35.6 35.8 42.4 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
18.6 23 23.1 31.1 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.6 12.6 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
15  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9  fps    + Compare
high 1600x900
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
low 800x600
30.9 33 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
20.3 21 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16 16.2 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5 5.4 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
low 1024x768
62.4 77.5 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
6.4 6.4 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.9 3.9 ~ 4 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 800x600
64  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
38  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
162 232 240.9 250.2 252.2 ~ 227 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
84.8 96 96.5 103.4 123.4 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
64.3 68.8 72 76.4 79.9 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Civilization 5

Civilization 5

2010
low 1024x768
20.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
28.4 34 36.4 36.4 37.4 37.7 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
21.5 24 24 26 27.4 27.6 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
18.5 19 20.5 22 23 23.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13 13.6 13.9 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
113 137 137.2 144 149 150 ~ 138 fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
24 25 26.8 27 28.8 32 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
19 19 19 19 19.6 20.4 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10 10 10.3 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Just Cause 2

Just Cause 2

2010
ultra 1920x1080
6.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 800x600
31.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
17.1  fps    + Compare
high 1600x900
8.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
64  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
30 34 34 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22 25 25.7 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16 18 18.3 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8 8.9 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Stalker: Call of Pripyat

Stalker: Call of Pripyat

2010
ultra 1920x1200
6.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 800x600
65.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
34.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
43.1 49.9 53.8 54 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
16.4 19 19.8 23 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.5 12.8 14.3 14.9 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
89.2  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
28.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
low 800x600
37.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
22.1 24.4 25.1 26 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.6 17.4 20.6 21.5 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
39.4 40.5 65.4 65.6 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
34 36.9 43.7 44.8 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
18.9 19.1 21.2 22.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
98  fps    + Compare
ultra 1280x1024
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
med. 1024x768
53  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
110.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
44.6  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
28.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

2008
low 800x600
38.8 51.6 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
28.3 28.5 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
19.6 19.8 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
76.7  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
32.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
low 800x600
122  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
65.6  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
27.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
239 245 ~ 242 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
44 47.2 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15 16.2 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
48.8 133.5 142.2 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
34.9 57.2 60.5 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
low 1024x768
47.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
30.7  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
25.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
65 72.6 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
26 29.5 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
16 16.7 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.9 4 ~ 4 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
59 64.4 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
25 28.9 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
15 15.2 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.7 4 ~ 4 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
low 800x600
148 154 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
41 43 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
23 25 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8 8 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
18 18.6 18.9 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
138 149.1 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Quake 4

Quake 4

2005
ultra 1024x768
61  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
196.5 199 ~ 198 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
67.9 69 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
19 28.6 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Counter-Strike Source

Counter-Strike Source

2004
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.11

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M graphics card

Acer TravelMate TimelineX 8481TG-2464G38nkk: Intel Core i5-2467M, 14", 1.8 kg
  Review » Review Acer TravelMate TimelineX 8481TG Notebook

Asus P43SJ-VO006X: Intel Core i5-2410M, 14", 2.3 kg
  Review » Review Asus P43SJ-VO006X Notebook

Asus U30SD-XA1: Intel Core i5-2410M, 13.3", 2.2 kg
  Review » Review Asus U30SD-XA1 Subnotebook

Asus U36SD-RX114V: Intel Core i5-2410M, 13.3", 1.7 kg
  Review » Review Asus U36SD-RX114V (SSD) Subnotebook

Dell XPS 14z: Intel Core i5-2410M, 14", 2 kg
  Review » Review Dell XPS 14z Notebook

LG P420-N.AE21G: Intel Core i5-2410M, 14", 2 kg
  Review » Review LG P420-N.AE21G Notebook

MSI CX640-i547W7P: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.6", 2.5 kg
  Review » Review MSI CX640 Notebook (GT 520M)

Samsung 300V3A-S02: Intel Core i5-2410M, 13.3", 2 kg
  Review » Review Samsung 300V3A-S02DE Notebook

Samsung QX412-S01DE: Intel Core i5-2520M, 14.1", 2.2 kg
  Review » Review Samsung QX412-S01DE Notebook

Acer Aspire 3750G-2312G50Mnkk: Intel Core i3-2310M, 13.3", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3750G-2312G50Mnkk

Acer Aspire 4743G-482G50Mnkk: Intel Core i5-480M, 14", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 4743G-482G50Mnkk

Acer Aspire 5742G-384G64Mnkk: Intel Core i3-380M, 15.6", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5742G-384G64Mnkk

Acer Aspire 5750G-2313G32Mikk: Intel Core i3-2310M, 15.6", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5750G-2313G32Mikk

Acer Aspire 5830TG-6402: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.6", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5830TG-6402

Acer TravelMate 5760G-2416G64Mnsk: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.6", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate 5760G-2416G64Mnsk

Acer TravelMate 8481G: Intel Core i7-2617M, 14", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate 8481G

Acer TravelMate 8481G-2464G12ikk: Intel Core i5-2467M, 14", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate 8481G-2464G12ikk

Acer TravelMate 8481TG-2634G38nkk: Intel Core i7-2637M, 14", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate 8481TG-2634G38nkk

Acer TravelMate 8481TG-2674G38nkk: Intel Core i7-2677M, 14", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate 8481TG-2674G38nkk

Acer TravelMate 8481TG-2678G38nkk: Intel Core i7-2677M, 14", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate 8481TG-2678G38nkk

Acer TravelMate TimelineX 8481TG-2464G38nkk: Intel Core i5-2467M, 14", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate TimelineX 8481TG-2464G38nkk

Alienware M17x R3, GT 520M, i7-2720: Intel Core i7-2720QM, 17.3", 4.3 kg
  External Review » Alienware M17x R3, GT 520M, i7-2720

Asus A43SJ-VX068V: Intel Core i3-2310M, 14", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus A43SJ-VX068V

Asus K53SJ-SX084V: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.6", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus K53SJ-SX084V

Asus K53SJ-SX383: Intel Core i3-2310M, 15.6", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Asus K53SJ-SX383

Asus P43SJ-VO006X: Intel Core i5-2410M, 14", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus P43SJ-VO006X

Asus P53SJ-SO002X: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.6", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus P53SJ-SO002X

Asus U30SD-RO111V: Intel Core i3-2310M, 13.3", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus U30SD-RO111V

Asus U30SD-XA1: Intel Core i5-2410M, 13.3", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus U30SD-XA1

Asus U31SD-A1: Intel Core i3-2310M, 13.3", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus U31SD-A1

Asus U31SD-RX080V: Intel Core i5-2410M, 13.3", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus U31SD-RX080V

Asus U36S: Intel Core i5-2410M, 13.3", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus U36S

Asus U36SD-A1: Intel Core i7-2620M, 13.3", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus U36SD-A1

Asus U36SD-RX013V: Intel Core i5-2410M, 13.3", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus U36SD-RX013V

Asus U36SD-RX057X: Intel Core i5-2450M, 13.3", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus U36SD-RX057X

Asus U36SD-RX113V: Intel Core i5-2410M, 13.3", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus U36SD-RX113V

Asus U36SD-RX114V: Intel Core i5-2410M, 13.3", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus U36SD-RX114V

Asus U36SD-RX135V: Intel Core i5-2410M, 13.3", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus U36SD-RX135V

Asus U36SD-RX146V: Intel Core i7-2620M, 15.6", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus U36SD-RX146V

Asus U36SD-RX167V: Intel Core i7-2620M, 13.3", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus U36SD-RX167V

Asus U36SD-RX377: Intel Core i5-2430M, 13.3", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus U36SD-RX377

Asus U36SD-XA1: Intel Core i5-2410M, 13.3", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus U36SD-XA1

Asus U40S: Intel Core i5-2520M, 14", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus U40S

Asus U40SD: Intel Core i5-2430M, 14.1", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus U40SD

Asus U43SD: Intel Core i5-2520M, 14", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus U43SD

Asus X53SJ-SX534V: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.6", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus X53SJ-SX534V

Dell XPS 14z: Intel Core i5-2410M, 14", 2 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 14z

Fujitsu LIFEBOOK SH-561: Intel Core i5-2410M, 13.3", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu LIFEBOOK SH-561

HP Pavilion g6-1145ef: Intel Core i3-370M, 15.6", 2.6 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion g6-1145ef

Lenovo IdeaPad Z570: Intel Core i3-2310M, 15.6", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Z570

Lenovo IdeaPad Z570-102468G: Intel Core i3-2330M, 15.6", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Z570-102468G

Lenovo IdeaPad Z570-A1: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.6", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Z570-A1

LG P420-N.AE21G: Intel Core i5-2410M, 14", 2 kg
  External Review » LG P420-N.AE21G

LG P430-K.AN51G: Intel Core i5-2520M, 14", 1.9 kg
  External Review » LG P430-K.AN51G

LG P530-K.AE31G: Intel Core i7-2620M, 15.6", 2.2 kg
  External Review » LG P530-K.AE31G

LG P530-K.AN51G: Intel Core i5-2520M, 15.6", 2.2 kg
  External Review » LG P530-K.AN51G

LG P530-K.AN61G: Intel Core i7-2620M, 15.6", 2.2 kg
  External Review » LG P530-K.AN61G

MSI CX480: Intel Core i5-2410M, 14", 2.2 kg
  External Review » MSI CX480

MSI CX640: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.6", 2.5 kg
  External Review » MSI CX640

MSI CX640-018UK: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.6", 2.6 kg
  External Review » MSI CX640-018UK

MSI CX640-021FR: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.6", 2.6 kg
  External Review » MSI CX640-021FR

MSI CX640-071US : Intel Core i3-2310M, 15.6", 2.6 kg
  External Review » MSI CX640-071US

MSI CX640-i547W7P: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.6", 2.5 kg
  External Review » MSI CX640-i547W7P

MSI FX720-014UK: Intel Core i5-2410M, 17.3", 2.8 kg
  External Review » MSI FX720-014UK

Novatech Nspire Pro 2540: Intel Core i5-2540M, 15.6", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Novatech Nspire Pro 2540

Packard Bell EasyNote TS44-HR-060FR: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.6", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Packard Bell EasyNote TS44-HR-060FR

Samsung 300E7A-S01FR: Intel Core i5-2430M, 17.3", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung 300E7A-S01FR

Samsung 300V3A-SO2DE: Intel Core i5-2410M, 13.3", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Samsung 300V3A-SO2DE

Samsung QX412-S01DE: Intel Core i5-2520M, 14.1", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung QX412-S01DE

Samsung RC520-S06PL: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.6", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung RC520-S06PL

Samsung RC720-S01PL: Intel Core i3-2310M, 17.3", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Samsung RC720-S01PL

Samsung RV420-S07: Intel Core i3-2310M, 14", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Samsung RV420-S07

Samsung RV518-S02BG: Intel Core i3-2310M, 15.6", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Samsung RV518-S02BG

Samsung RV520-S01: Intel Core i3-2310M, 15.6", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung RV520-S01

Samsung SF511-S01PL: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.6", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung SF511-S01PL

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Class 3

Class 4