Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
 
 
 
 

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850

The AMD ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 is a slower clocked desktop HD 3850 and manufactured in 55 nm. It supports DirectX 10.1 in hardware and also features the Avivo HD video engine to help the CPU decode videos. The card is intended to be used in large laptops.

 

The performance of the graphics card is between the GeForce 8700M GT and the 8800M GTS. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 of the successor generation performed similar but with a much lower power consumption. Therefore, the performance should be sufficient for DirectX 9 games in medium to high details (see games list beyond).

The RV670 chip has 64 5-dimensional unified shaders with 16 ROPs, 16 TMUs, and 32 TAUs.

The Avivo HD video engine helps the cpu in decoding HD videos (MPEG-2, H.264, VC-1). The HD 3850 houses the UVD+ (Unified Video Decoder) that is capable of decoding MPEG-2, H.265/AVC, and VC-1 nearly fully. The UVD2 in the HD 4000 generation is capable of full bitstream decoding and two video streams can be decoded at once (which UVD+ can not).

Compared to desktop graphics cards, the HD 3850 is similar to the Radeon HD 3850 but features a much lower clock speed, leading to a worse performance.

The power consumption of the HD 3800 series lies between 35-55 Watt.

 

ManufacturerATI
Mobility Radeon HD 3800 Series
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 compare 640 @ 0.66 GHz256 Bit @ 850 MHz
Mobility Radeon HD 3850 320 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 750 MHz
CodenameM88
ArchitectureRV6xx
Pipelines320 - unified
Core Speed580 MHz
Memory Speed750 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
Transistor Count666 Million
technology55 nm
FeaturesHDMI, Dual-Link DVI (wenn vom Hersteller verbaut), HDCP, PCI-Express 2.0
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement01.12.2007
Information55nm, Display Port with external transmitter
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityrade...

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 1653     avg: 1880     median: 1879.5 (2%)     max: 2106 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
1928 Points (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
18761 Points (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
8816 Points (13%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06
6114 points (11%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 6075     avg: 6095     median: 6095 (11%)     max: 6115 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
2756 points (13%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
32.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
27  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
21.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium 1920x1200
19.5
Low 1920x1200
29.6
High 1920x1200
11.2
Med 0xAF 0xAA 1400x1050
24.1
High 0xAF 0xAA 1400x1050
15.6
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1600x1200
31.6
Med 0xAF 0xAA 1600x1200
22.1
High 0xAF 0xAA 1600x1200
13.2
Very High 1024x768
14.3
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
37.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
23.8  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
19.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
High 1920x1200
9.7
Medium 1920x1200
17.6
Low 1920x1200
33.5
Med 0xAF 0xAA 1400x1050
22.1
High 0xAF 0xAA 1400x1050
13.3
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1600x1200
36.2
Med 0xAF 0xAA 1600x1200
19.9
High 0xAF 0xAA 1600x1200
11.3
Very High 1024x768
12.7
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
144  fps    + Compare
med. 800x600
22  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
343.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 22. 05:55:54

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 Sep 2021 16:01:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.059s ... 0.059s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.059s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.059s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 595 +0.015s ... 0.074s

#7 got single benchmarks 595 +0.006s ... 0.08s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.08s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.095s ... 0.175s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.175s

#11 Got 10 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.177s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.177s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.177s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.052s ... 0.23s

#15 return log +0.067s ... 0.297s

Gaming Performance

This benchmarks were conducted with an AMD Puma platform (with a Turion 64 Ultra at 2.4 GHz). Therefore, a fast Core 2 Duo should perform better.

Crysis: 1024x768, medium: 24 fps -> barely playable
World in Conflict: 1024x768, Medium: 30 fps -> playable
Medal of Honor: Airborne: 1024x768, High: 35 fps -> playable

Notebook reviews with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 graphics card

MSI Megabook GT735: AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82, 17.00", 3.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Megabook GT735

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6800M *
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 6700M *
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6600M *
Radeon RX 6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *

Class 2

GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) *
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 5600M
Quadro P5000
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU *
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Radeon Pro 5600M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q *
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro M5500
Quadro P4000
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M *
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile *
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q *
T1200 Laptop GPU *
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
T600 Laptop GPU *
T500 Laptop GPU *
GeForce GTX 980M
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
Radeon Pro Vega 20
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
GeForce GTX 970M
GeForce MX450 *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Vega M GL / 870
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *

Class 3

Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
GeForce GTX 965M
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro M2200
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro M1200
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 640
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
GeForce MX150
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon RX 540 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M470X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
Quadro M620 *
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Radeon R9 M470 *
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs *
Vega 8 R5000 *
GeForce MX230
Vega 8 R4000 *
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GeForce MX130
GeForce 940MX
Quadro M520
Vega 8
Vega 7 *
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
GeForce 930MX
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Radeon R7 M445
Quadro M500M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
GeForce 930M
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 530
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 645
GeForce MX110 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
GeForce 920MX
Iris Graphics 540
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) *
Radeon R7 M460 *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon R8 M445DX
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M440
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 520
Radeon 610
Vega 6 *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
UHD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
Radeon R5 M430
Vega 3 *
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520
Iris Graphics 6100
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) *

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics 6000
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) *
HD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics 605
HD Graphics 505
HD Graphics 5300
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
Radeon R4 (Beema)
Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics 500
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)
HD Graphics (Braswell)
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

Class 5

Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
Radeon R6 (Mullins)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2016-01-26)