Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 690

Qualcomm Adreno 690

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm, the 690 is up to 60% faster than the previous generation. In our tests with the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s, the Adreno 690 was only on par with a low en Intel UHD Graphics iGPU and not well suited for 3D games.

The chip is manufactured in 5nm at Samsung (5LPE) and suited for fanless laptops.

Adreno 600 Series

Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12
Power Consumption7 Watt
technology5 nm
Date of Announcement06.12.2018
CPU in Adreno 690GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 38 x 2400 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.9 pt (3%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
909 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
811 Points (2%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 8602     avg: 9818     median: 9818 (9%)     max: 11034 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 13768     avg: 16708     median: 16707.5 (4%)     max: 19647 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2758     avg: 2835     median: 2834.5 (4%)     max: 2911 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2837     avg: 2933     median: 2932.5 (3%)     max: 3028 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
14652 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
3067 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3063     avg: 3085     median: 3077 (4%)     max: 3115 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2898     avg: 2930     median: 2912 (2%)     max: 2979 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
558 points (0%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 13.4     avg: 13.7     median: 13.7 (1%)     max: 14 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17     avg: 19.7     median: 19.7 (3%)     max: 22.3 Watt
0510152025Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
15.8 Watt (2%)
0123456789101112131415161718Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
16.4 Watt (4%)
012345678910111213141516171819Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
42.4
low 1280x720
0 (!) 20.7 21.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!) 18 18.9 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!) 16.1 16.3 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
19  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
57.1 57.5 58.7 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
54.5 54.5 55.2 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.8 45.9 47 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.4 40.2 40.7 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
0 (!) 35 38.6 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
0 (!) 31.5 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!) 19.1 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!) 8.5 ~ 4 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
0 (!)
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
0 (!)
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
29.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
29.4
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 222622.51712.6
X-Plane 11.11141211
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1912.37.29
Dota 2 Reborn58554437
The Witcher 32516104
GTA V29.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
5
1

4
1

4
1

2
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.29
log 22. 09:47:58

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 05:38:53 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.032s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.032s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11411 +0.034s ... 0.066s

#8 got single benchmarks 11411 +0.01s ... 0.076s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.076s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.417s ... 0.493s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.493s

#12 Got 40 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.499s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.499s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.502s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.063s ... 0.565s

#16 return log +0.003s ... 0.568s

Notebook reviews with Qualcomm Adreno 690 graphics card

Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 OLED tablet review: Outperforming the Microsoft Surface Go 3

Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 OLED tablet review: Outperforming the Microsoft Surface Go 3

Like it or not, Windows ARM is here to stay regardless of all the criticisms. The Robo & Kala TW220 directly targets the Microsoft Surface Pro 9 ARM by offering...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 | Qualcomm Adreno 690 | 12.60" | 712 g
Microsoft Surface Pro 9 ARM review - The high-end ARM convertible disappoints

Microsoft Surface Pro 9 ARM review - The high-end ARM convertible disappoints

Microsoft offers its new Surface Pro 9 now also with an ARM processor, which brings some advantages such as integrated 5G connectivity and fanless operation. On...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 | Qualcomm Adreno 690 | 13.00" | 883 g
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s G1 Laptop review: Introducing the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3

Lenovo ThinkPad X13s G1 Laptop review: Introducing the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3

For the first time, Lenovo is introducing a ThinkPad laptop with an ARM processor to the market. The ThinkPad X13s is silent and offers a long battery life than...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 | Qualcomm Adreno 690 | 13.30" | 1.1 kg

Huawei MateBook E Go 2023: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx, 12.35", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook E Go 2023

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, 13.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM

Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, 13.30", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, 13.00", 0.9 kg
   » Microsoft Surface Pro 9 5G Windows convertible receives steep $610 discount

Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, 13.30", 1.1 kg
   » Lenovo ThinkPad X13s review: Qualcomm still has a lot of work to do

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2022-11-28)