Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 640

Qualcomm Adreno 640

The Qualcomm Adreno 640 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SoC. The chip will be available from early 2019 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 640 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 630, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 845 SoC. The enhanced performance is achieved by the Adreno 640 having 50% more FP16 and FP32 compute units (ALUs) than the Adreno 630, while its 7 nm FinFET manufacturing process makes it 20% more efficient too.

The Adreno 640 will also support the Vulkan 1.1 API, something which is possible for other Adreno 600 series GPUs too.

Adreno 600 Series

Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
technology10 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement12.02.2018
CPU in Adreno 640GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8608 x ? MHz, 5 W250 MHz675 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus8 x ? MHz, 5 W250 MHz675 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8558 x 2840 MHz, 5 W? MHz585 MHz
min. - max.? - 250 MHz585 - 675 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 97354     avg: 108080     median: 106829 (12%)     max: 118129 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 5268     avg: 7441     median: 7659 (33%)     max: 8661 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 6358     avg: 9988     median: 10199 (22%)     max: 12070 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 3969     avg: 6014     median: 6182 (31%)     max: 6981 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5184     avg: 7016     median: 7072.5 (21%)     max: 8218 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 8.5     avg: 17.5     median: 17 (3%)     max: 39 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 16     avg: 40.5     median: 42 (3%)     max: 47 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 22     avg: 40.2     median: 42 (5%)     max: 48 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 35     avg: 64.4     median: 69 (1%)     max: 79 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 50     avg: 94.7     median: 99.5 (6%)     max: 112 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 85     avg: 158.9     median: 166 (1%)     max: 185 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 204205     avg: 204715     median: 204715 (26%)     max: 205225 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 10504     avg: 18251     median: 14922.5 (15%)     max: 40654 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 4244     avg: 11804     median: 5422.5 (9%)     max: 44840 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
7.8 Watt (3%)
012345678Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
high
30 30 30 40 40 40 59 60 60 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
59 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 61 62 ~ 57 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
60 120 ~ 90 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
28 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 60 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
28 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
120  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
60 120 ~ 90 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet30
PUBG Mobile43
World of Tanks Blitz60
Arena of Valor6057
Shadow Fight 36060
Battle Bay60
Dead Trigger 290
Asphalt 9: Legends3633
Temple Run 2120
Subway Surfers90
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
2




3
5
1

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 17. 01:05:44

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.048s ... 0.049s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.049s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.049s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9446 +0.016s ... 0.065s

#7 got single benchmarks 9446 +0.079s ... 0.144s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.144s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.425s ... 0.569s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.569s

#11 Got 68 rows for game benchmarks. +0.04s ... 0.61s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.61s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.615s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.167s ... 0.782s

#15 return log +0.08s ... 0.862s

Notebook reviews with Qualcomm Adreno 640 graphics card

Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro

Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro review – High-end tablet with color e-ink display and camera

Of course, you can read books in color on the Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro, but you can also do so much more than that: Thanks to pen input, you can draw or take n...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | Qualcomm Adreno 640 | 10.30" | 450 g
Xiaomi Pad 5 Tablet review - Android-Alternative to the cheapest iPad

Xiaomi Pad 5 Tablet review - Android-Alternative to the cheapest iPad

A lot of performance, 120 Hz display and a chic design in the style of the Apple iPad Air: The 11-inch Xiaomi Pad 5 offers all that for 400 Euros (~$450) and is...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 | Qualcomm Adreno 640 | 11.00" | 511 g
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro smartphone review: Lots of power and features at a bargain price

Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro smartphone review: Lots of power and features at a bargain price

An excellent price-performance ratio - not only is this characteristic of Xiaomi's Redmi series, but it's even more so when it comes to the manufacturer's Poco ...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 | Qualcomm Adreno 640 | 6.67" | 215 g
Realme X3 SuperZoom Smartphone Review - Scores some major points thanks to attention to detail

Realme X3 SuperZoom Smartphone Review - Scores some major points thanks to attention to detail

The two main features of the Realme X3 SuperZoom are the 5x periscope zoom and a 120 Hz screen. On paper, the powerful Realme smartphone with the Snapdragon 855...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus | Qualcomm Adreno 640 | 6.60" | 202 g
Test OnePlus 8 Pro vs. OnePlus 7T Pro: is it worth the camera upgrade?

Camera comparison OnePlus 8 Pro vs. 7T Pro: Test results completely different than expected

Old against new. Similar to the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, the OnePlus 8 Pro has risen to the camera elite this year. But are the differences to the previous 7T Pro big ...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus | Qualcomm Adreno 640 | 6.67" | 206 g

Google Pixel 4 XL: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  Review » Google Pixel 4 XL Smartphone Review: Longer battery life thanks to a larger battery

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Z Flip review - The better foldable smartphone

Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Review - Smartphone with a strong battery

Samsung Galaxy A90 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Smartphone Review - Cutting corners for 5G

Asus ROG Phone 2: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.59", 0.2 kg
  Review » Asus ROG Phone 2 Smartphone Review – 120-Hz display and improved air triggers

Google Pixel 4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 5.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Google Pixel 4 Review: no longer at the smartphone forefront

LG G8X ThinQ: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » LG G8X ThinQ Smartphone Review: A convertible among smartphones

Sony Xperia 5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  Review » Sony Xperia 5 Smartphone Review: A handy handset despite having a 6-inch display

OnePlus 7T Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » OnePlus 7T Pro Smartphone Review – the fastest charger

OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition Smartphone Review - Flagship with 90 Hz Display

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 10.50", 0.4 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Tablet Review: Top technology at a premium price

Samsung Galaxy Fold: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 7.30", 0.3 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G Smartphone Review: A foldable handset with an air of confidence

OnePlus 7T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  Review » OnePlus 7T smartphone review: A large package of improvements

Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.39", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Redmi K20 Pro) Smartphone Review: Not another Mi 9 with a pop-up camera

LG G8s ThinQ: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.20", 0.2 kg
  Review » LG G8S ThinQ Smartphone Review: Innovative or outdated?

Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » Asus ZenFone 6 (ZS630KL): Reviewing the King of Stamina

Sony Xperia 1: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Sony Xperia 1 Smartphone Review: It takes more than just a fancy display to challenge established flagships

ZTE Axon 10 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.47", 0.2 kg
  Review » ZTE Axon 10 Pro Smartphone Review: The flagship killer from China

Nubia Red Magic 3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.65", 0.2 kg
  Review » Nubia Red Magic 3 Smartphone Review: 8K videos and active cooling

Vivo IQOO: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.41", 0.2 kg
  Review » Vivo IQOO Smartphone Review

OnePlus 7: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.41", 0.2 kg
  Review » OnePlus 7 Smartphone: Phone with dual-camera setup in review

OnePlus 7 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » OnePlus 7 Pro Smartphone Review

Xiaomi Black Shark 2: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.39", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Smartphone Review

Xiaomi Mi 9: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.39", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Mi 9 Smartphone Review

Xiaomi Pad 5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Pad 5

Xiaomi Poco F3 Pro: unknown, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco F3 Pro

Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro

Sharp Aquos Zero 2: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.40", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Sharp Aquos Zero 2

Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 7.90", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha

Microsoft Surface Duo: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 8.10", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Duo

Vivo iQOO 5 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.41", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO 5 Pro

Realme X3 SuperZoom: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme X3 SuperZoom

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Z Flip

Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite

Asus ROG Phone 2 Elite ZS660KL: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.59", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Phone 2 Elite ZS660KL

Meizu 16T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Meizu 16T

Oppo Reno Ace: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno Ace

ZTE Nubia Red Magic 3S: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.65", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Numbia Red Magic 3S

OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition

Google Pixel 4 XL: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Google Pixel 4 XL

Google Pixel 4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 5.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Google Pixel 4

Oppo Realme X2 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Realme X2 Pro

Vivo IQOO Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.41", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo IQOO Pro

OnePlus 7T Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus 7T Pro

Xiaomi Mi 9 Pro 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.39", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 9 Pro 5G

OnePlus 7 Pro 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus 7 Pro 5G

Vivo NEX 3 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.89", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo NEX 3 5G

Vivo Nex 3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.89", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Nex 3

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 10.50", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860

Samsung Galaxy A90 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A90 5G

LG G8X ThinQ: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » LG G8X ThinQ

Sony Xperia 5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Sony Xperia 5

OnePlus 7T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus 7T

Asus ZenFone 6 Edition 30: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenFone 6 Edition 30

Meizu 16s Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.20", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Meizu 16s Pro

Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.39", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro

ZTE Nubia Z20: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.42", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Nubia Z20

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.39", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro

Samsung Galaxy Note10+ 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G

Asus ROG Phone 2: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.59", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Phone 2

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 LTE SM-T865: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 10.50", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 LTE SM-T865

ZTE Nubia Red Magic 3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.65", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Nubia Red Magic 3

Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.39", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 5G

Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.39", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro

Sharp Aquos R3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.20", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Sharp Aquos R3

Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL

OnePlus 7 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus 7 Pro

OnePlus 7: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.41", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus 7

Meizu 16s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.20", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Meizu 16s

Lenovo Z6 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.39", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Z6 Pro

Oppo Reno 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno 5G

Oppo Reno 10x Zoom: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno 10x Zoom

LG G8s ThinQ: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.20", 0.2 kg
  External Review » LG G8s ThinQ

Xiaomi Black Shark 2: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.39", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Black Shark 2

Samsung Galaxy Fold: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 7.30", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Fold

ZTE Axon 10 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.47", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Axon 10 Pro

Sony Xperia 1: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Sony Xperia 1

LG G8 ThinQ: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  External Review » LG G8 ThinQ

LG V50 ThinQ: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » LG V50 ThinQ

Xiaomi Mi 9 Alita: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 9 Alita

Xiaomi Mi 9: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.39", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 9

Lenovo Z5 Pro GT: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Z5 Pro GT

Vivo Apex 2019: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Apex 2019

Xiaomi Pad 5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, 11.00", 0.5 kg
   » Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 tablet with 120Hz QHD display and Snapdragon 860 gets 21% discount for a limited time

   » Xiaomi Pad 6 and Pad 6 Pro tablets debut with appealing price tags and solid hardware

Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro: The review results in overview

Oppo Realme X3 SuperZoom: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.60", 0.2 kg
   » Realme X3 SuperZoom: The hardware looks better at a second glance

Realme X3 SuperZoom: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.60", 0.2 kg
   » Realme X3 SuperZoom: The hardware looks better at a second glance

Google Pixel 4 XL: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Pixel 4 and Pixel 4 XL: Google keeps its smartphones interesting

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Z Flip: More high-class for less money

Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's battery life is not its only strength

Samsung Galaxy Fold: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 7.30", 0.3 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G: Foldable and not as expensive as an iPhone

OnePlus 7T Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » OnePlus launches the 7T Pro and its McLaren special edition in London

OnePlus 7T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.55", 0.2 kg
   » Still normal or already Pro? What we noticed while testing the OnePlus 7T.

Samsung Galaxy Fold: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 7.30", 0.3 kg
   » Breaking a Galaxy Fold's screen more than once could cost as much as a whole premium phone

   » The Samsung Galaxy Fold could be over US$2000 in India

OnePlus 7T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.55", 0.2 kg
   » The OnePlus 7T and 7T Pro will launch with Android Q

OnePlus 7T Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » The OnePlus 7T and 7T Pro will launch with Android Q

Samsung Galaxy Fold: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, 7.30", 0.3 kg
   » The Samsung Galaxy Fold US release is slated to be 100% offline

   » Galaxy Fold sells out in Korea 24 hours after going on sale

   » Galaxy Fold event scheduled for September 6 says fresh rumor

   » Samsung re-opens reservations for the Galaxy Fold in the US and UK

   » Samsung's Galaxy Fold set to launch September 6 in South Korea

   » Samsung Galaxy Fold 2 could feature horizontal hinge and bigger external screen

   » Revised Samsung Galaxy Fold will officially relaunch in September for US$1,980

   » The Samsung Galaxy Fold is reportedly "good to go", according to expert Korean testers

   » Samsung Galaxy Fold (in new revamped form) allegedly caught in live images on Indian transport system

   » Samsung CEO admits the Galaxy Fold's launch was "embarrassing"

   » Next-gen Galaxy Folds could have punch-hole cameras

   » The new Samsung Galaxy Fold release date is to be confirmed later in June 2019

   » Samsung's improvements for the Galaxy Fold already being tested by Korean carriers

   » Samsung Galaxy Fold relaunch date imminent

   » Samsung Galaxy Fold has no official release date yet

   » Leaked email hints at new Samsung Galaxy Fold release date

   » Opinion: Criticism of the Galaxy Fold unfairly undermines Samsung's achievement

   » First Galaxy Fold teardown reveals masterpiece of Samsung design

   » Video of Samsung Galaxy Fold shows it posting incredible results in AndroBench 5 thanks to its UFS 3.0 storage

   » Samsung smooths over reported Galaxy Fold crease crisis

   » The Samsung Galaxy Fold does not have an Exynos variant

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > Qualcomm Adreno 640 Graphics Card
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2018-12- 8)