Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G720 MP7

ARM Mali-G720 MP7

The ARM Mali-G720 MP7 (or MC7) is a mid-range GPU for smartphones and tablets, which can be found in this form for the first time in the MediaTek Dimensity 8400. Compared to the similar Immortalis-G720, the raytracing support is only optional in the Mali variant. The Dimensity 8400 seems to have not implemented it.

It uses 7 of the 16 possible cores and is based on the latest 5th generation GPU architecture. According to ARM, it offers 15 percent higher performance than the previous generation with the same number of cores and can access 40 percent more memory bandwidth.

In our test of the Dimensity 8400 in the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro, the GPU performed at around the same level as an Adreno 735 in the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3.

The Mali-G720 GPUs support Variable Rate Shading (VRS), Deferred Vertex Shading (DVS) and optional hardware-based ray tracing. The GPU is manufactured in 4 nanometers.

Mali-G720 Series

Mali-G720 MP8 compare 8
Mali-G720 MP7 7
CodenameKrake
Architecture5th Gen
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines7 - unified
Shared Memoryyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Man. Technology4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, Vulkan 1.2, ASTC, AFBC
Date of Announcement29.05.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G720 MP7GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 84508 x 2100 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 84008 x 2100 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 1272     avg: 1372     median: 1422 (3%)     max: 1423 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 12261     avg: 13023     median: 13159 (7%)     max: 13648 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3691     avg: 3883     median: 3943 (5%)     max: 4014 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 6358     avg: 6487     median: 6545 (3%)     max: 6557 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
672 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
14161 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
20018 Points (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 25     avg: 27.3     median: 28 (10%)     max: 29 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 55     avg: 60.3     median: 61 (11%)     max: 65 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 144     avg: 154.3     median: 153 (11%)     max: 166 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 109     avg: 115.3     median: 115 (11%)     max: 122 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 134     avg: 180.3     median: 199 (4%)     max: 208 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 151     avg: 246     median: 243 (10%)     max: 344 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 568     avg: 595     median: 584 (5%)     max: 632 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
524874 Points (52%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 571622     avg: 595186     median: 595186 (41%)     max: 618749 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 144.22     avg: 167.4     median: 167.4 (4%)     max: 190.49 fps
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 GPU OpenCL
min: 11710     avg: 12117     median: 12211 (3%)     max: 12429 points
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 GPU Vulkan
min: 12267     avg: 12655     median: 12785 (3%)     max: 12913 points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 13.4     avg: 13.6     median: 13.6 (5%)     max: 13.8 Watt
0123456789101112131415Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
59.6 59.7 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
59.5 59.8 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
117.8 118.8 ~ 118 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
59.5 59.7 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
39.7 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Smoothest
90
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
59.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
59.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact6060
PUBG Mobile1186040
Asphalt 9: Legends59.959.6
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
2




1
1

1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 16. 11:56:36

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 May 2026 05:30:17 +0200 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13021 +0.014s ... 0.044s

#8 got single benchmarks 13021 +0.015s ... 0.059s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.059s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.523s ... 0.582s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.582s

#12 Got 14 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.586s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.586s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.587s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.029s ... 0.616s

#16 return log +0.329s ... 0.946s

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-G720 MP7 graphics card

Polished looks, powerhouse battery, a few trade-offs – Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G review

Polished looks, powerhouse battery, a few trade-offs – Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G review

With the Reno15 Pro, Oppo sets out to blur the line between upper mid-range and flagship territory. The compact 5G smartphone pairs premium design with capable cameras and impressive endurance, but it does not emerge entirely without compromise.
MediaTek Dimensity 8450, ARM Mali-G720 MP7, 6.32", 188 g
Xiaomi 15T smartphone review

Xiaomi 15T review - Price drop makes this Android smartphone the best deal

If you are looking for an inexpensive phone with a modern look and a great price-performance ratio, the Xiaomi 15T should definitely be on your radar. Thanks to the price drop, the mid-range phone with its strong features is almost a bargain if premium features are not a factor in a purchase. Update: Android 16, battery tests completed; sample video & accessory photos added.
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, ARM Mali-G720 MP7, 6.83", 194 g
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Image source: Manuel Masiero)

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Smartphone Review: Dimensity 8400-Ultra debut with software updates until 2029 for under €400

The inexpensive Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro makes other mid-range smartphones look pale in comparison. For well under €400 (~$420), the Poco X7 Pro debuts the new MediaTek Dimensity 8400-Ultra that offers brute performance on a par with a 2024 flagship, a 120 Hz AMOLED display, and an above-average battery life. However, buyers should also be aware of a few disadvantages.
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, ARM Mali-G720 MP7, 6.67", 198 g

Infinix Note 60 Ultra: unknown, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Note 60 Ultra

Oppo Reno15 Pro Max 5G: unknown, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno15 Pro Max 5G

Oppo Reno15 Pro Mini: unknown, 6.32", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno15 Pro Mini

Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 8450, 6.32", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno15 Pro

Oppo Reno15: unknown, 6.32", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno15

Oppo K13 Turbo: unknown, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo K13 Turbo

Xiaomi 15T: MediaTek Dimensity 8400, 6.83", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi 15T

Oppo Reno14 Pro: unknown, 6.83", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno14 Pro

Realme GT 7T: MediaTek Dimensity 8400, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme GT 7T

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4: unknown, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4

Realme Neo7 SE: unknown, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme Neo7 SE

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 8400, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro

Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 8450, 6.32", 0.2 kg
   » Oppo Reno15 Pro: Three weaknesses that detract from its premium feel

   » Oppo Reno15 Pro: These three strengths turn a mid-range phone into premium

   » A phone that impresses with a great display and long battery life - Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G

Xiaomi 15T: MediaTek Dimensity 8400, 6.83", 0.2 kg
   » The best mid-range photography smartphone for the start of 2026

   » Verdict on the Xiaomi 15T: Price-performance king in the mid-range smartphone class

   » Xiaomi 15T verdict: How good are videos on the affordable Android smartphone?

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 8400, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Stable HyperOS 3 rollout expands to three new Redmi and Poco phones

   » Verdict on the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro: One of the best smartphones for under $400

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL *
UHD Graphics 750
A19 4-Core GPU *
Intel Graphics 1 Xe3 WCL *

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)