Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 644

Qualcomm Adreno 644

The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.

The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

Adreno 600 Series

Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Shared Memoryyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement07.05.2021
PredecessorAdreno 642
CPU in Adreno 644GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 6303     avg: 6921     median: 6953.5 (30%)     max: 7472 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 8656     avg: 8893     median: 8751 (19%)     max: 9414 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5501     avg: 6187     median: 6286 (28%)     max: 6466 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 6767     avg: 7042     median: 7023 (20%)     max: 7388 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 6114     avg: 6700     median: 6700 (60%)     max: 7285 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 8410     avg: 8641     median: 8487 (51%)     max: 9025 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 5090     avg: 5524     median: 5565 (27%)     max: 5876 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 5779     avg: 6156     median: 6159.5 (21%)     max: 6524 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3035     avg: 3133     median: 3137 (2%)     max: 3184 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 825     avg: 832     median: 829 (1%)     max: 854 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7     avg: 7.4     median: 7.5 (3%)     max: 7.9 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 15     avg: 16.4     median: 17 (3%)     max: 18 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 41     avg: 45.3     median: 46 (3%)     max: 49 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 37     avg: 38.2     median: 38 (4%)     max: 40 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 52     avg: 62.4     median: 65 (1%)     max: 67 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 86     avg: 89.2     median: 88 (4%)     max: 94 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 147     avg: 150.2     median: 148 (1%)     max: 158 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 174679     avg: 177977     median: 175343 (18%)     max: 187645 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 50.74     avg: 51.7     median: 51.7 (1%)     max: 52.63 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 2448     avg: 2513     median: 2497 (1%)     max: 2610 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 2650     avg: 2776     median: 2729.5 (1%)     max: 2993 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
30029 Points (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42541 Points (70%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.19     avg: 4.8     median: 4.6 (2%)     max: 5.9 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
42  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra Ultra
45  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
45 89 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
40  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
60 61 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal4245
Armajet67
PUBG Mobile604040
Dead Trigger 260
Subway Surfers61
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1

1


1
3

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.28
log 08. 04:51:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 07 Dec 2024 05:31:35 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.035s ... 0.036s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.036s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0.014s ... 0.05s

#8 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.018s ... 0.068s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.068s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.453s ... 0.521s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.521s

#12 Got 15 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.526s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.526s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.528s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.084s ... 0.612s

#16 return log +0.003s ... 0.615s

Notebook reviews with Qualcomm Adreno 644 graphics card

Motorola Edge 50 smartphone review – When luxury features meet a mid-range price

Motorola Edge 50 smartphone review – When luxury features meet a mid-range price

The Motorola Edge 50 is barely bigger than its predecessor, but it features a larger screen and a much more powerful battery. In addition, it boasts lots of sto...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Adreno 644 | 6.70" | 180 g
Nubia Flip 5G review - The affordable flip phone with a great display

Nubia Flip 5G review - The affordable flip phone with a great display

The Nubia Flip 5G aims to be an affordable foldable phone. It competes for buyers' attention with its mid-range SoC, surprisingly good display and two storage v...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Adreno 644 | 6.90" | 214 g
(photo: Daniel Schmidt)

Huawei MatePad 11.5 review - A productive tablet at a low price

The Huawei MatePad 11.5 has a large IPS display and uses a modern Snapdragon 7 processor with plenty of storage. Huawei also offers a pen as well as a keyboard ...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Adreno 644 | 11.50" | 499 g
In the review: HTC U23 pro

HTC U23 pro smartphone review - Back to old strength?

HTC has been quiet, but now the HTC U23 pro is launched. With the new model HTC wants to make an impression in the upper mid-range. It brings the status LED, mi...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Adreno 644 | 6.70" | 205 g
In review: Honor 90 5G

Honor 90 5G smartphone review: Display- and storage giant

Honor aims to win over new fans in the midrange with the 90. 512 GB of storage, 12 GB of RAM, a 200 MP camera and a 120 Hz OLED panel do not sound measly at all...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Adreno 644 | 6.70" | 183 g

Motorola Razr 40: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, 6.90", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Razr 40 review: An afforable flip smartphone at last

Xiaomi 13 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi 13 Lite review: Classy mid-range smartphone with an ambitious price tag

Samsung Galaxy M55s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M55s

Motorola Edge 50: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge 50

Samsung Galaxy F55 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy F55 5G

Samsung Galaxy C55: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy C55

Samsung Galaxy M55: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M55

Nubia Flip 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, 6.90", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nubia Flip 5G

Kyocera DuraForce Pro 3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, 5.38", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Kyocera DuraForce Pro 3

Huawei MatePad 11.5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, 11.50", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MatePad 11.5

HTC U23 pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » HTC U23 pro

Honor 90 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 90 5G

Motorola Razr 40: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, 6.90", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Razr 40

Xiaomi 13 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi 13 Lite

Nubia Flip 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, 6.90", 0.2 kg
   » Nubia Flip 5G: Alternative to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip currently available with discount and gift

Huawei MatePad 11.5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, 11.50", 0.5 kg
   » Huawei MatePad 11.5: Affordable midrange tablet with powerful equipment

Honor 90 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Verdict on the Honor 90 5G: Good, but not perfect

Motorola Razr 40: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, 6.90", 0.2 kg
   » Motorola Razr 40: The foldable for purists

Xiaomi 13 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, 6.55", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi 13 Lite: The cheapest Xiaomi 13 sports the new Snapdragon 7 Gen 1

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-04-11)