Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 812

Qualcomm Adreno 812

The Adreno 812 is an integrated graphics unit for smartphones and tablets, making its debut in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 and intended for mid-range Android-based devices.

It supports common graphics APIs such as Vulkan 1.4 (according to Qualcomm, only 1.3), OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP, but does not support ray tracing. According to Qualcomm, the GPU is up to 20% faster than its predecessor, the Adreno 810. While it doesn’t stand out quite as clearly in our benchmarks, it still averages slightly ahead.

The Adreno 812 supports displays with extended Full HD resolution and a refresh rate of up to 144 Hz. It also supports the HDR standards HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, and HDR Vivid.

Adreno 800 Series

Adreno 850 compare 3 @ 1.45 GHz
Adreno 840 compare @ 1.2 GHz
Adreno 830 compare 1536 @ 1.1 GHz
Adreno 829 compare @ 1.23 GHz
Adreno 840 V Series compare @ 1.2 GHz
Adreno 825 compare
Adreno 812
Adreno 810 compare @ 1.05 GHz
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Shared Memoryyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, Vulkan 1.4
Man. Technology4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement08.07.2026
PredecessorAdreno 810
CPU in Adreno 812GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 58 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 415     avg: 427     median: 427 (1%)     max: 439 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 4613     avg: 4646     median: 4645.5 (2%)     max: 4678 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1162     avg: 1174     median: 1174 (1%)     max: 1186 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 8.6     avg: 9     median: 9 (3%)     max: 9.4 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 20     avg: 21     median: 21 (4%)     max: 22 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 51     avg: 54     median: 54 (4%)     max: 57 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 38     avg: 39     median: 39 (4%)     max: 40 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 71     avg: 71.5     median: 71.5 (2%)     max: 72 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 97     avg: 98     median: 98 (4%)     max: 99 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
152 fps (1%)
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 59.94     avg: 61.1     median: 61.1 (1%)     max: 62.28 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 7.0 - Geekbench 7.0 GPU OpenCL
3321 Points (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU OpenCL
3748 points (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU Vulkan
5021 points (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
25586 Points (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
38480 Points (51%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
4.6 Watt (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
00.20.50.711.21.51.722.22.52.733.23.53.744.24.54.7Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
58.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
54.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
39.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
39.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact58.154.6
PUBG Mobile39.239.6
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2








2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Amazon: No results found for your request.

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 13. 16:41:10

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 13 Oct 2026 05:29:30 +0200 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.024s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.024s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13662 +0.013s ... 0.038s

#8 got single benchmarks 13662 +0.008s ... 0.046s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.046s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.323s ... 0.369s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.369s

#12 Got 4 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.371s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.371s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.372s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.012s ... 0.384s

#16 return log +0.357s ... 0.741s

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

ARM Mali G2-Ultra NX MP16 *
A20 Pro 7-core GPU *
Xclipse 960 *
Adreno 825 *
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU *
A19 GPU *
A19 Pro 5-Core GPU *
A18 Pro GPU *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
CXTP-48-1536 *
DXT-48-1536 *
A18 GPU *
UHD Graphics 730
A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A17 Pro GPU *
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC16 *
Immortalis-G925 MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC11 *
Adreno 750 *
Xclipse 950 *
Xclipse 940 *
Immortalis-G720 MP12 *
Immortalis-G715 MP11 *
A16 GPU 5-Core *
A19 4-Core GPU *
Adreno 740 *
Adreno 725 *
Adreno 722 *
Mali-G720 MP8 *
Mali-G720 MP7 *
Maleoon 955 *
Adreno 735 *
A15 GPU 5-Core *
A16 GPU 4-Core *
Adreno 732 *
Adreno 730 *
Mali-G715 MP7 *
Mali-G615 MP6 *
Adreno 720 *
Mali-G710 MP10 *
A15 GPU 4-Core *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Maleoon 935 *
Maleoon 935A *
Maleoon 920 *
Maleoon 920A *
Xclipse 920 *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
Mali-G710 MP7 *
Mali-G78 MP22 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 650 *
Mali-G78 MP20 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-09-11)