Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
 
 
 
 

ARM Mali-T720

ARM Mali-T720

The ARM Mali-T720 is a mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs. The chip is available since 2014. Besides OpenGL ES 3.1, the GPU supports OpenCL 1.1 as well as DirectX 11 FL9_3. According to ARM, the Mali-T720 can be scaled from 1 - 8 cores/clusters (MP1, MP2, ... MP) and clocks up to 650 MHz.

Sometimes the SoC does not specifies the number of cores, therefore this generic page / GPU for the single cluster variant is used and the benchmarks may differ. See e.g. the Mali-T720 MP2 and T720 MP4 pages for comparison.

The MP1 variant is only as fast as the older Mali-400 MP4 graphics card and therefore only suited for low demanding 3D games (Android based). However, the power consumption on the other hand is rather low and therefore the GPU is also suited for small smartphones.

ManufacturerARM
Mali-T700 Series
Mali-T760 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.7 - 0.77 GHz
Mali-T760 MP6 compare 6 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T760 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T720 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T720 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T720 1 @ 0.6 GHz
CodenameMidgard (3rd Generation)
ArchitectureMidgard (3rd-gen)
Pipelines1 - unified
Core Speed600 MHz
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 9.3
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11.1, Renderscript, FSAA/MSAA
Date of Announcement01.03.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/m...
CPU in Mali-T720GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek MT67354 x 1500 MHz? MHz600 MHz
Mediatek MT87354 x 1300 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek MT6735P4 x 1000 MHz? MHz600 MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? MHz? - 600 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 2171     avg: 3387     median: 2974 (0%)     max: 6469 Points
+ 25 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 1375     avg: 1636     median: 1653 (0%)     max: 2008 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 2265     avg: 3255     median: 3387 (0%)     max: 4050 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 148     avg: 190     median: 169.5 (1%)     max: 284 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 120     avg: 157     median: 143 (0%)     max: 237 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 91     avg: 136     median: 116 (1%)     max: 287 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 73     avg: 91.7     median: 87 (1%)     max: 120 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 4.1     avg: 6.9     median: 6 (0%)     max: 19 fps
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
min: 4.8     avg: 10.6     median: 10 (0%)     max: 17 fps
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 1.3     avg: 2.5     median: 2.2 (0%)     max: 4.4 fps
+ 22 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
min: 1.2     avg: 4.7     median: 4.5 (1%)     max: 7.9 fps
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
1.8 fps (0%)
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
4 fps (2%)
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 20.86     avg: 32.1     median: 27.8 (46%)     max: 52.11 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 1485     avg: 2119     median: 1837 (4%)     max: 4005 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 3159     avg: 4471     median: 3911 (9%)     max: 8103 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 46.6     avg: 48.2     median: 46.9 (70%)     max: 51 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 2D Graphics Tests
min: 1568     avg: 2323     median: 2320 (2%)     max: 3158 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 3D Graphics Tests
min: 457     avg: 652     median: 577.5 (1%)     max: 1115 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 3088     avg: 3261     median: 3183 (69%)     max: 3537 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
12 fps  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
30  fps    + Compare
ultra
28 fps  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
low
38 □ fps  fps    + Compare
high
35 □ fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
26 29 29 30 30 fps ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
16 20 22 28 30 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high
10 11 12 12 13 23 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
14 fps 18 fps ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high
10 fps  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
low
15  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
59  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 12. 12:02:01

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 07 May 2021 12:34:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.062s ... 0.063s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.063s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.063s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 7332 +0.015s ... 0.078s

#7 got single benchmarks 7332 +0.044s ... 0.122s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.122s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.177s ... 0.3s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.3s

#11 Got 26 rows for game benchmarks. +0.026s ... 0.325s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.325s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.327s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.086s ... 0.413s

#15 return log +0.062s ... 0.475s

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-T720 graphics card

Amazon Fire HD 8 2017: MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 8.00", 0.4 kg
  Review » Amazon Fire HD 8 (2017) Tablet Review

Amazon Fire HD 8 2018: MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 8.00", 0.4 kg
  Review » Amazon Fire HD 8 (2018) Tablet Review

Blackview A8 Max: Mediatek MT6737, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Blackview A8 Max Smartphone Review

Blackview A80: Mediatek MT6737, 6.21", 0.2 kg
  Review » Blackview A80 Smartphone Review - Cell phone for little money

Blackview A9 Pro: Mediatek MT6737, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  Review » Blackview A9 Pro Smartphone Review

Bluboo Xfire: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  Review » Bluboo Xfire 4G Smartphone Review

Coolpad Porto S: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  Review » Coolpad Porto S Smartphone Review

Doogee Valencia2 Y100 Pro: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  Review » Doogee Valencia2 Y100 Pro Smartphone Review

Gretel GT6000: Mediatek MT6737, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Gretel GT6000 Smartphone Review

Lenovo B: Mediatek MT6735M, 4.50", 0.1 kg
  Review » Lenovo B Smartphone Review

Lenovo Moto C: Mediatek MT6737, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  Review » Lenovo Moto C Smartphone Review

Lenovo Moto E3: Mediatek MT6735P, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  Review » Lenovo Moto E3 Smartphone Review

LG K4: Mediatek MT6735, 4.50", 0.1 kg
  Review » LG K4 Smartphone Review

Nokia 3: Mediatek MT6737, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  Review » Nokia 3 Smartphone Review

Oukitel U7 Plus: Mediatek MT6737, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oukitel U7 Plus Smartphone Review

Samsung Galaxy J1 2016: Samsung Exynos 3475 Quad, 4.50", 0.1 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) Smartphone Review

Samsung Galaxy XCover 4: Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (SM-G390F) Smartphone Review

Ulefone Metal: Mediatek MT6753, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  Review » UleFone Metal Smartphone Review

VChok M9-LTE: Mediatek MT6735, 4.50", 0.4 kg
  Review » Vchok M9 LTE Smartphone Review

Wiko U Feel: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  Review » Wiko U Feel Smartphone Review

ZTE Blade A452: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  Review » ZTE Blade A452 Smartphone Review

ZTE Blade A510: Mediatek MT6735P, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  Review » ZTE Blade A510 Smartphone Review

ZTE Blade V7 Lite: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  Review » ZTE Blade V7 Lite Smartphone Review

Acer Iconia Talk S : Mediatek MT8735, 7.00", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Iconia Talk S

Alcatel A3 10: Mediatek MT8735, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Alcatel A3 10

Alcatel Pixi 4 (5) : Mediatek MT6735M, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Alcatel Pixi 4 (5)

Amazon Fire HD 8 2017: MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 8.00", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Amazon Fire HD 8 2017

Amazon Fire HD 8 2018: MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 8.00", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Amazon Fire HD 8 2018

Archos 101 Helium Lite: unknown, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Archos 101 Helium Lite

Archos 55 Helium Ultra: Mediatek MT6737, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Archos 55 Helium Ultra

Blackview A9 Pro: Mediatek MT6737, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Blackview A9 Pro

Bluboo Dual: Mediatek MT6737, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Bluboo Dual

Bluboo Edge: Mediatek MT6737, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Bluboo Edge

BQ BQS 5515: Mediatek MT6735, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » BQ BQS 5515

BQ BQS 5515 Wide: Mediatek MT6735, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » BQ BQS 5515 Wide

BQ RU BQ-5032 Element: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  External Review » BQ BQ-5032 Element

Chuwi Hi8 SE: Mediatek MT8735, 8.00", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Chuwi Hi8 SE

Coolpad Mega 2.5D: Mediatek MT6735, 5.50", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Coolpad Mega 2.5D

Coolpad Note 5 Lite C: Mediatek MT6735M, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Coolpad Note 5 Lite C

Coolpad Porto S: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Coolpad Porto S

Doogee T3: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Doogee T3

Doogee T5 Lite: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Doogee T5 Lite

Doogee T6 Pro : Mediatek MT6753, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Doogee T6 Pro

Doogee X6 Pro: Mediatek MT6735, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Doogee X6 Pro

Doogee Y300: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Doogee Y300

Doro 8020X: Mediatek MT6735M, 4.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Doro 8020X

Huawei P8 Lite Smart: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei P8 Lite Smart

Huawei Y6 Pro: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Y6 Pro

Leagoo T1 Plus: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Leagoo T1 Plus

Lenovo A7700: Mediatek MT6735, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo A7700

Lenovo B: Mediatek MT6735M, 4.50", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Vibe B

Lenovo Moto C: Mediatek MT6737, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Moto C

Lenovo Moto E3: Mediatek MT6735P, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Moto E3

Lenovo Phab 2: Mediatek MT8735, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Phab 2

Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business: , 10.10", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business

Lenovo Tab 3 Tb3-850M: Mediatek MT8735, 8.00", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Tab 3 Tb3-850M

Lenovo Tab 4 7 Essential LTE TB-7304X-ZA330191DE: Mediatek MT6735, 7.00", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Tab 4 7 Essential LTE TB-7304X-ZA330191DE

Lenovo Tab 4 7 TB-7504X: Mediatek MT8735, 7.00", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Tab 4 7 TB-7504X

LG K4: Mediatek MT6735, 4.50", 0.1 kg
  External Review » LG K4

Medion LifeTab X10311-MD60654: unknown, 10.10", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Medion LifeTab X10311-MD60654

Motorola Moto E3: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto E3

Motorola Moto E3 Power: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto E3 Power

Nokia 3: Mediatek MT6737, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Nokia 3

Oukitel C5 Pro: Mediatek MT6737, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oukitel C5 Pro

Oukitel U20 Plus: Mediatek MT6737, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oukitel U20 Plus

Oukitel U7 Plus: Mediatek MT6737, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oukitel U7 Plus

Panasonic Eluga I3 Mega: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Panasonic Eluga I3 Mega

Panasonic P77 : Mediatek MT6735P, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Panasonic P77

Prestigio Grace 3101 4G: Mediatek MT8735, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Prestigio Grace 3101 4G

Prestigio Grace 5588 4G: Mediatek MT8735, 8.00", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Prestigio Grace 5588 4G

Samsung Galaxy J1 2016: Samsung Exynos 3475 Quad, 4.50", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy J1 2016

Samsung Galaxy XCover 4: Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy XCover 4

Ulefone Metal: Mediatek MT6753, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Metal

Wiko Harry: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Wiko Harry

Wiko U Feel: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Wiko U Feel

Wiko UPulse: unknown, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Wiko UPulse

Wileyfox Spark X Add-X: Mediatek MT6735, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Wileyfox Spark X Add-X

Zopo Color F2: Mediatek MT6735, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Zopo Color F2

ZTE Blade A452: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Blade A452

ZTE Blade A910: Mediatek MT6735, 5.50", 0.1 kg
  External Review » ZTE Blade A910

ZTE Blade V6 Plus: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  External Review » ZTE Blade V6 Plus

ZTE Blade V7 Lite: Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  External Review » ZTE Blade V7 Lite

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 650 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU

Class 4

A10 Fusion GPU
Mali-G77 MP11 *
Mali-G77 MP9 *
Mali-G76 MP16 *
Adreno 642 *
Adreno 640 *
Mali-G76 MP12 *
Mali-G76 MP10 *
Mali-G57 MP6 *
Mali-G57 MP5 *
Adreno 540 *
Mali-G72 MP18 *
Mali-G71 MP20 *
Mali-G72 MP12 *
Mali-G71 MP8
PowerVR GM9446
Adreno 530
PowerVR GXA6850
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600
Mali-T880 MP12
Mali-G76 MP4 *
Mali-T760 MP8
Mali-G71 MP2 *
Adreno 430
Mali-G72 MP3 *
Mali-T880 MP4
Mali-G52 MP6 *
Mali-G52 MP2 *
Mali-G52 MP2 *
Mali-T760 MP6
Mali-T880 MP2
PowerVR GX6450
Adreno 420
Adreno 620 *
Mali-G57 MP4 *
Mali-G57 MP3 *
Mali-G57 MP2 *

Class 5

Adreno 418
Adreno 619 *
Adreno 619L *
Adreno 618 *
Adreno 616 *
Mali-G51 MP4 *
Adreno 612 *
Adreno 610 *
Adreno 512 *
Adreno 510 *
Adreno 330
PowerVR G6430
PowerVR GX6250
PowerVR G6400
Mali-T628 MP6
Mali-T760 MP4
SGX554MP4
Mali-T628 MP4
Adreno 509 *
Adreno 508 *
Adreno 506 *
GE8322 / IMG8322 *
Adreno 505 *
Adreno 504 *
Mali-T860 MP2
Mali-T830 MP3
Mali-T604 MP4
GeForce Tegra 4 *
PowerVR G6200
Adreno 405 *
Mali-T830 MP2

Class 6

SGX543MP4 *
Mali-T624
Adreno 320 *
Mali-T760 MP2
PowerVR GE8320 *
PowerVR GE8300 *
PowerVR GE8100 *
Mali-T720 MP4
Mali-450 MP4
Mali-T830 MP1
SGX543MP3 *
SGX543MP2 *
SGX545
SGX544MP2 *
Mali-T720 MP2
SGX544 *
Adreno 308
Adreno 306
Adreno 305
Adreno 304
Mali-T720
GC7000UL
Adreno 302
Adreno 225 *
GC4000 *
Mali-400 MP4 *
VideoCore-IV *
Adreno 220 *
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Mali-400 MP2 *
Mali-400 MP *
SGX540 *
Adreno 205 *
Adreno 203 *
GC800 *
SGX535
SGX531
SGX530
Adreno 200 *
Mali-200 *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > ARM Mali-T720 - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2016-07-20)