Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G615 MP6

ARM Mali-G615 MP6

The ARM Mali-G615 MP6 is an integrated mid-range graphics unit for ARM SoCs, which was first used in the MediaTek 8200-Ultra in the first quarter of 2024.

Like the faster G715 variant, the Mali-G615 is based on the 4th generation of the Valhall architecture and therefore also supports variable rate shading.

Mali-G615 Series

Mali-G615 MP6 7
Mali-G615 MP2 compare 2
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureValhall 4th Gen
Pipelines7 - unified
Shared Memoryyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement30.11.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G615 MP6GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 83508 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra8 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 83008 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
12818 Points (56%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
18343 Points (40%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 10285     avg: 11302     median: 10622 (45%)     max: 12999 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 13159     avg: 15887     median: 15484 (39%)     max: 19017 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 1796     avg: 9004     median: 11001 (6%)     max: 11262 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 2497     avg: 2856     median: 2953 (3%)     max: 3153 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 15     avg: 21     median: 22 (8%)     max: 24 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 33     avg: 46.4     median: 49 (9%)     max: 53 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 82     avg: 118.2     median: 125 (9%)     max: 135 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 73     avg: 94.3     median: 97 (9%)     max: 110 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 116     avg: 141.3     median: 139.5 (3%)     max: 170 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 151     avg: 181.8     median: 181 (8%)     max: 214 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 316     avg: 401.8     median: 414.5 (3%)     max: 462 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
497323 Points (50%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 403435     avg: 486409     median: 496690 (40%)     max: 548821 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 97.35     avg: 124.4     median: 121.8 (3%)     max: 154.11 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 4837     avg: 7464     median: 8207 (2%)     max: 9349 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 5008     avg: 7653     median: 8620 (2%)     max: 9330 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
48610 Points (17%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
32634 Points (54%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 10.4     avg: 10.7     median: 10.7 (4%)     max: 10.9 Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678910111213Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
58.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra Ultra
59  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
58.7 59 59.4 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
55.4 58.9 59 60 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
57.2 60.1 88.6 ~ 69 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
39.4 58.9 59 59.3 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
39.5 39.5 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
30 59.3 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal58.259
Genshin Impact5958
PUBG Mobile695440
Asphalt 9: Legends45
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1




2


3







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 22. 04:18:11

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 19 May 2025 05:31:39 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.027s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12428 +0.014s ... 0.04s

#8 got single benchmarks 12428 +0.016s ... 0.056s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.056s

#10 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.124s ... 0.18s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.021s ... 0.201s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.02s ... 0.221s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.022s ... 0.244s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.246s ... 0.49s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.49s

#16 Got 20 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.496s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.496s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.498s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +0.025s ... 0.522s

#20 return log +0.003s ... 0.525s

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-G615 MP6 graphics card

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

High-end smartphone at a mid-range price - Tecno Camon 40 Premier 5G review

Appearance isn't what matters. Tecno believed this and integrated a fast SoC with ample memory into the design of a mid-range smartphone. Although the phone is ...
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | ARM Mali-G615 MP6 | 6.67" | 194 g
Honor Pad V9 (image source: Daniel Schmidt)

A light, high-endurance tablet with surround sound and a stylus: Honor Pad V9 review

An XXL battery, a 144 Hz display, and eight speakers. With these features, the 11.5-inch Honor Pad V9 is aiming to shake up the Android competition and establis...
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | ARM Mali-G615 MP6 | 11.50" | 475 g
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro review – The large tablet with a pen and long runtimes costs less than $450

The Lenovo Idea Tab Pro features a large screen and costs less than $450. Creative minds can go wild thanks to its active stylus, gamers can look forward to a h...
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | ARM Mali-G615 MP6 | 12.70" | 620 g
Xiaomi 14T

Xiaomi 14T smartphone review - Flagship tech at a low price, but with a few small flaws

If the Xiaomi 14 is too expensive, then how about the Xiaomi 14T? It is a lot more affordable, while still mastering an extensive range of features—plus, it run...
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra | ARM Mali-G615 MP6 | 6.67" | 195 g
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro review - One of the best smartphones for less than 400 Euros

The powerful Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro shows that you don't have to accept any performance compromises in a mid-range smartphone. In our test, the Android 14 smartphon...
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra | ARM Mali-G615 MP6 | 6.67" | 186 g

Honor Pad V9: MediaTek Dimensity 8350, 11.50", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Honor Pad V9

Unihertz Shark 3: MediaTek Dimensity 8300, 6.73", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Unihertz Shark 3

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 8300, 12.70", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Idea Tab Pro

Oppo Pad 3: unknown, 11.61", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Oppo Pad 3

Oppo Reno13 Pro: unknown, 6.83", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno13 Pro

Oppo Reno13: unknown, 6.59", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno13

Xiaomi 14T: MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi 14T

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 8300, 12.70", 0.6 kg
   » Lenovo Idea Tab Pro: Gigantic, high-quality tablet for little money

Xiaomi 14T: MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi 14T review: Few differences compared to the top model, but a lot cheaper

   » Xiaomi 14T and Xiaomi 14T Pro: Surcharge for Pro model not worth it according to DxOMark camera analysis

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro reviewed: These are the differences to the Poco X6

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-03- 2)