Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop is a mobile graphics card from the Blackwell family for laptops, which was presented at CES 2025 and was commercially available in April 2025.

Architecture

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile utilizes the GB203 chip and employs 10,496 shaders/CUDA cores, which is the maximum of 10,752 that the chip supports. This makes the RTX 5090 Laptop more similar to the RTX 5080 desktop variant (same chip) than the Desktop RTX 5090 with 20,760 cores and higher clock rates.

As a novelty, Blackwell offers support for Multi-Frame Generation (MFG) with DLSS4, thanks to the 5th generation of Tensor cores.

Performance

As our tests show, performance gains over a 175W RTX 4090 Laptop GPU are barely noticeable in 3DMark tests. Still, when it comes to overall gaming performance, the card is 2-19% faster than the previous mobile flagship. The fastest laptop variant we tested is only 5% behind the RTX 5080 desktop. This means that the 5090L is usually capable to display full details at 4k fluently (see below). Furthermore, with the mentioned Multi-Frame Generation (MFG) you can get impressive frame rates, but keep latency in mind.

Power consumption

The GB203 chip is manufactured at TSMC in the 4N (custom 4NP 5nm) process. The maximum TGP of the card can reach 175 watts (150 watts + 25 watts Dynamic Boost). 

GeForce RTX 5000 Laptop GPU Series

GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop 10496 @ 0.99 - 1.52 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop compare 8192 @ 0.98 - 2.29 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop compare 5888 @ 0.85 - 2.22 GHz192 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop compare 4608 @ 0.91 - 2.35 GHz128 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop compare 3328 @ 0.95 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 24000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop compare 2560 @ 1.02 - 2.66 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGN22-X11
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines10496 - unified
TMUs328
ROPs112
Raytracing Cores82
Tensor / AI Cores328
Core Speed990 - 1515 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance31.8 TFLOPS FP16, 31.8 TFLOPS FP32
AI GPU1824 TOPS INT8
CacheL1: 10.3 MB, L2: 64 MB
Memory Speed28000 effective = 1750 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR7
Max. Amount of Memory24 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth896 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Power Consumption150 Watt (95 - 150 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm
PCIe5
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.1b
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement02.01.2025
PredecessorGeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
19 pt (57%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 6041     avg: 6343     median: 6400 (44%)     max: 6643 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 4791     avg: 5899     median: 6033.5 (42%)     max: 6329 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 18624     avg: 24478     median: 25981 (59%)     max: 27244 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
153090 Points (77%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 34972     avg: 44673     median: 46751 (54%)     max: 49864 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 113929     avg: 114416     median: 114416 (52%)     max: 114903 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 31954     avg: 39652     median: 38990 (59%)     max: 49845 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 42175     avg: 51612     median: 50816 (47%)     max: 62849 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 532587     avg: 581908     median: 595425 (66%)     max: 617713 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 16828     avg: 21689     median: 22200 (59%)     max: 24013 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 19216     avg: 23736     median: 24483 (50%)     max: 25984 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 836363     avg: 849431     median: 849431 (86%)     max: 862499 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 582157     avg: 588672     median: 588672 (69%)     max: 595187 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 69384     avg: 73615     median: 72337 (68%)     max: 80657 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 133460     avg: 144415     median: 142877 (35%)     max: 163068 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 85147     avg: 88899     median: 88898.5 (84%)     max: 92650 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 189862     avg: 196526     median: 196526 (76%)     max: 203190 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 38921     avg: 48534     median: 48598 (59%)     max: 54833 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 48548     avg: 67212     median: 69089 (53%)     max: 80022 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 111238     avg: 121938     median: 121938 (35%)     max: 132638 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 131334     avg: 133963     median: 133962 (73%)     max: 136591 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 64778     avg: 65248     median: 65248 (85%)     max: 65718 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 231     avg: 249.7     median: 249.7 (76%)     max: 268.3 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 15     avg: 17.8     median: 16 (2%)     max: 37 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 9     avg: 11.8     median: 11 (4%)     max: 18 Seconds
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
542 fps (100%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
35.9 fps (4%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
60.6 fps (17%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
640 fps (69%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
77.7 fps (13%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
122.2 fps (42%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
108.4 fps (53%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
207.3 fps (55%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
33.3 fps (3%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
27.4 fps (18%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
422 fps (61%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
56.4 fps (12%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
105 fps (47%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
65.2 fps (43%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
160 fps (54%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 22892     avg: 23907     median: 23907 (17%)     max: 24922 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 232.51     avg: 235.6     median: 235.6 (78%)     max: 238.7 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 121.3     avg: 279.3     median: 289 (17%)     max: 346 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 99.5     median: 99.6 (100%)     max: 99.6 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 242.8     avg: 254.8     median: 254.8 (96%)     max: 266.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 466     avg: 512     median: 511.5 (92%)     max: 557 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 1067     avg: 1094     median: 1094.5 (81%)     max: 1121.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 975     avg: 1017     median: 1016.6 (96%)     max: 1058.2 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
1112 fps (24%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
1154 fps (48%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
4193 fps (33%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 628     median: 315 (8%)     max: 2756 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 181670     avg: 220083     median: 227694 (59%)     max: 253130 points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 7393     avg: 115927     median: 144222 (36%)     max: 231659 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 9883     avg: 14086     median: 10445 (38%)     max: 21929 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 10315     avg: 18254     median: 21079 (37%)     max: 23367 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 48753     avg: 55060     median: 58198 (48%)     max: 58228 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 155.5     avg: 222     median: 225 (30%)     max: 250 Watt
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 200     avg: 240.5     median: 240.5 (34%)     max: 281 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270285Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 0.778     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (72%)     max: 0.96 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 164.5     avg: 282.4     median: 294 (82%)     max: 348 Watt
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 160.4     avg: 277.7     median: 289 (37%)     max: 343 Watt
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.4423     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.686 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

med. 1920x1080
182.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
167  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
116.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
87.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
51.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
78  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
116.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
103.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
93.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
75.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
52.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
28.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
37.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
43.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
181.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
169.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
159.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
145.8 159.4 ~ 153 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
108.5 109.3 ~ 109 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
59.4 59.7 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
82.5 83.6 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
136.7 143.4 ~ 140 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
98.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
82  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
68.7 76.6 ~ 73 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
48.5 54 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
32.8 37.1 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
18.6 20.2 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
107.1 117.5 ~ 112 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
54.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
188.1 221 240 279 317 322 ~ 261 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
176.8 207 226 256 268 279 308 ~ 246 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
168.3 200 217 241 252 280 291 ~ 236 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49.4 49.7 57 58.6 58.8 59.8 62.3 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
30.2 30.9 34 35.8 36.1 36.8 37.5 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.2 14.1 16 16.7 17.8 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
25.4 26.7 32.2 34.1 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
53 53.2 61 64 67.5 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
111.6
114
116.9
117.9
91.4
91.4
low 1920x1080
133.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
117.3 124.3 ~ 121 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
108.4 113.9 133.2 ~ 119 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
105.3 111.3 128.9 ~ 115 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
77 82.1 92.2 ~ 84 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
43.3 52.2 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
63 75.6 ~ 69 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
102.3 107.3 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
118.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
104.2 111.8 ~ 108 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
57.5 61.9 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
41.7 45.9 ~ 44 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
27.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
41.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
59.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
106 107 112 115 126 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
101 101 104 109 115 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88 88 90 95 97 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44 62 63 64 65 68 69 70 70 72 74 75 75 76 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
37 50 51 54 55 55 56 57 58 59 59 59 61 63 64 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35 36 39 40 40 41 41 42 42 44 46 46 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
47 53 53 53 55 55 59 61 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
45 62 64 65 65 67 69 76 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 2560x1440
87
106
97
105
108
97
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 3840x2160
66
78
74
81
84
76
med. 1920x1080
206 231 ~ 219 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
203 225 ~ 214 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
171.3 184.9 ~ 178 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
100.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
94.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66.4 68.1 80.8 83.5 87.6 88.2 88.3 88.9 89 94.6 95.3 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
54 65.6 70.3 70.4 72 73.3 73.8 74.7 75 76.4 80.5 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.4 44.1 44.4 46 46.3 46.8 46.9 47.5 47.7 48.5 50.8 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
57.6 60.3 61.2 64 64.5 69.2 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
63.9 68.6 79 81.9 85 86.4 92.8 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
184.3 195.8 ~ 190 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
151.7 165.7 ~ 159 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
108 118.5 130.3 ~ 119 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
82.6 86 97.2 ~ 89 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
56.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
70.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
98.7 114.5 115.5 ~ 110 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
186.4 187.5 192.6 203 ~ 192 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
138.2 142.6 146.1 151.9 ~ 145 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
87.7 119.6 121.9 126.1 127.9 128.6 130.6 132 133.4 133.9 135.2 140.3 142.3 152.6 ~ 129 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
66.1 97.3 99.1 101.3 101.6 102 102.2 102.6 105 105.9 106 107.1 112.6 112.9 115.9 121.9 ~ 104 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
48.2 62.3 63.5 65 65.5 65.6 66.4 66.6 66.6 68.6 70.8 72.3 73 ~ 66 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
76.2 113.9 118 119.9 120.6 122.4 133.7 141.4 ~ 118 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation 2560x1440
72.9
180
80.2
82
84.2
91.5
83.1
81.5
Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation 3840x2160
109
51.9
51
51.8
56.2
51.7
52.2
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
med. 1920x1080
100 106.1 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
88.1 92.6 167.8 ~ 116 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
76.3 81.8 147.6 ~ 102 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
59.8 65.4 110.7 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
65.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
92.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
124.9 134.6 ~ 130 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
201 205 215 229 ~ 213 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
186 194 200 209 ~ 197 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
135 157 165 169 ~ 157 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
128 147 147 151 161 162 162 174 ~ 154 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
92 116 117 123 127 131 136 151 ~ 124 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
60 71 79 82 90 101 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
81  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
131  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
109.9 110.6 ~ 110 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
96.9 102.4 116.6 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
87.5 93.9 104 ~ 95 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
65.6 69.5 76.6 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
45.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
63.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
79.7 86.3 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
102.8 104.1 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
102.1 103.1 108.5 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
100.8 101.4 108 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
97.2 98.6 107.4 ~ 101 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
69.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
94.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
97.5 100.8 ~ 99 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
79.3 91.1 ~ 85 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
72.7 82.9 ~ 78 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
62.8 70 71.6 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
43.7 54 61 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160 cinem.
24.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160 cinem.
40.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem.
66.5 70.8 70.9 ~ 69 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
ultra, RT ultra, DLSS, FG RR 2560x1440 cinem.
87.9
ultra, RT ultra, DLSS, FG RR 3840x2160 cinem.
53.4
ultra, RT ultra, DLSS, FG 4x, RR 3840x2160 cinem.
97.2
low 1920x1080
158  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
118  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
95 109 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55 57 63 63 65 74 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
42 44 47 48 48 50 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26 27 28 29 30 33 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
43 46 49 52 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
62 64 67 69 70 73 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
49  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
201
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 3840x2160
45
44
47
45
43
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 2560x1440
76
82
82
85
79
77
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
236 240 301 310 343 361 421 ~ 316 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
236 260 299 335 338 342 369 399 ~ 322 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
207 236 240 252 275 281 305 324 326 341 357 357 ~ 292 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
107.5 107.7 123.3 129 133 139 142.7 144.2 144.9 148 152 152.2 154.2 154.9 155.4 156.3 157.8 158.3 ~ 142 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
72.5 75.4 84.6 90 94.9 95 97 97.8 100 101 101.2 103.3 103.6 104 104.3 105 105.5 106.4 106.9 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39.3 39.5 44.4 48.8 49 50 50.5 51.3 52 52 52.2 52.3 53.6 54.2 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
66 66.8 75.3 80.5 80.8 82 87.9 89.2 90.2 90.6 90.9 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
77.7  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
105.5 108.1 124.7 126 130.7 139.1 141 141.8 144.8 151 155.9 156.3 159.3 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
156.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
257
med. 1920x1080
96.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
76.6 86.1 ~ 81 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
56.2 63.1 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
37.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
61.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
81.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
119.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
115.1 115.1 ~ 115 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
104.2 108.1 ~ 106 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
84.9 100.3 ~ 93 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
62  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
94.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
105.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
160.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
121.6 140.7 ~ 131 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
120.3 140.3 ~ 130 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
95 100.9 ~ 98 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
59.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
81  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
116.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
99.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
93.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
157.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
157.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
153.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
140.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
358  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
358  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
357  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
357  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
123.4 130.1 130.5 135.7 145.4 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
119.6 128.1 129.6 137.7 138.6 ~ 131 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
83 95 95.2 116.1 116.4 120.6 123.5 124.7 125.2 127.2 127.7 129.7 129.8 133.2 ~ 118 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
57.6 76.7 81.1 81.1 82.4 82.9 83.4 84.5 88.1 88.3 88.4 88.5 88.5 88.8 91.4 93.1 ~ 84 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
33.4 41.6 43 43.1 45.9 46 46.2 46.8 47.1 47.7 49.3 49.6 49.9 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
68.3 69.7 75.4 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 1920x1080
70.9
72
67
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 3840x2160
21.8
22.5
20.9
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing 3840x2160
19.7
20
20.8
19.8
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS 3840x2160
38.7
38.2
39.4
41.9
36.8
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 2x 3840x2160
66.7
65.8
71.1
72.3
65.5
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 4x 3840x2160
116.3
120.6
125.7
126.6
114.2
med. 1920x1080
390  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
327  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
275  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
224  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
125.8 132.4 154.7 164.2 164.7 173.7 178.7 185.5 186 191.2 194.9 208 226 ~ 176 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
115.4 127.9 146.4 154.5 163.5 171.6 177.3 181.6 185 185.8 187.9 188.1 191 202 208 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
117.8 120.3 124.5 147 155.1 161.5 166.4 166.8 167.6 168.9 170.2 171.9 174.5 177.1 179.1 180 185 ~ 161 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
91.4 105.3 112.3 112.3 137.5 144 151.9 152.5 152.7 153.6 154.8 154.9 155.8 157 157.5 158.5 163.4 164 166.5 167.3 169.9 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
83.2 84.9 90.8 98.6 104.8 106.8 107.7 108.3 109.7 109.7 110.6 110.8 111.1 111.2 111.3 111.4 111.5 115.6 116.6 118.9 120.5 121.8 122.8 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39.6 43.2 49.9 50.7 52.1 52.3 52.7 52.8 52.9 53.1 53.1 53.5 54.2 54.7 55 55.1 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
72.2 73.8 76.9 79.5 80.2 80.6 82.6 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
46.2 46.4 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
94.1 100.7 104.6 118.4 119 122.6 125.3 125.5 126.2 127.3 128.1 132.4 135.2 136.6 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
173.2
177.8
187.1
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
80.6
81.7
84.9
77.3
Ultra Preset (FSR2 on) 1920x1080
153.8
156.9
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
23.4
25.7
25
25
25.8
26.1
26
23.4
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
107.9
143.5
144.2
110
135
151.4
144.4
172.1
137.1
148.8
154
146
152.4
152.6
154.3
157
148.6
106.5
165.1
142.6
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset (no DLSS, no FG) 3840x2160
13.9
13.6
13
13
13.8
13.6
11.1
13.9
12.9
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality (no FG) 3840x2160
26.1
28.9
28.1
28.9
28.2
29.7
29.5
22.6
30
27.3
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation (M)FG 2x 3840x2160
46.2
50.4
50.4
52
50
47.4
50.8
41
53.2
49.3
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation MFG 4x 3840x2160
83.7
90.1
90
96.3
93.5
86.3
93.7
73.9
97.8
86.9
low 1920x1080
180 225.3 250 250 260.8 267 274 333.4 ~ 255 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
175 199 205.2 217 218.2 221 224 229.6 244 260.7 ~ 219 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
163.5 188.6 196.7 197 198.5 202 203.7 207 209 213.5 227.4 ~ 201 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
118.8 143.1 158.7 162 186.3 193.3 193.7 194 195 196.2 199.2 200 201 202 209 213 218.8 220.4 225.3 236.5 ~ 193 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
103.1 114.2 121 138.8 139.6 141.7 145.6 146 149.5 149.6 150.5 151 151 153.8 155.3 156.4 156.9 158.3 158.4 161.5 174.8 ~ 147 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
62.2 68.1 79.1 81.7 81.9 82.8 84.1 84.3 84.6 85.3 85.3 87.8 88.5 89.8 94 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
124.2 124.9 125.4 127.8 129 129 133.1 135.5 149.3 ~ 131 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
192 201 237.3 ~ 210 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
269
293
ultra 1920x1080
108.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
96.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
59.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
380 404 480 511 520 553 563 601 617 632 643 652 ~ 546 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
321 341 381 398 410 426 431 475 478 479 482 509 526 ~ 435 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
321 322 334 381 397 415 418 425 450 457 473 479 485 499 ~ 418 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
303 308 319 368 375 378 382 401 408 418 434 437 443 453 453.1 456 464 ~ 400 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
240 266 287 290 303 308 315 319 329 330 333 336 339 342.9 343 345 350 ~ 316 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
151.4 153.9 155.8 164.2 168 174.6 177.5 179.3 179.6 182.2 182.2 185.5 187.2 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
106.8 108.9 109.4 122.9 140.4 148.8 149.2 151.8 153.2 153.7 158 160 161.3 161.6 163.4 172.3 181.1 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
99.7 103.6 111.8 128.6 133 136.1 139.2 141.5 143 143.3 143.6 143.9 148.3 152.6 155.6 158.1 159.9 ~ 138 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.9 85.2 91.4 99.7 110 112.6 113.2 114.2 115.9 116.8 117.6 118.7 119.5 120.9 121.4 121.7 122.1 122.9 129.8 133.6 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
67 71.3 77.2 89.9 93.5 93.6 94.8 95.6 97.1 100 100.2 102.4 104.3 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
174.7 196.1 218 226 232 233 233 233 234 234 234 235 ~ 224 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
167.8 173.6 184.5 217 226 226 230 230 231 232 232 233 233 234 236 ~ 219 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
144.4 147.4 154.4 181.9 192.6 194.6 198.1 199.3 201 201 203 203 205 208 209 210 212 212 215 ~ 194 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
123.4 129.9 139.5 157 160.5 160.7 161.8 162.4 166.4 169.7 170 170.7 172.2 173.5 176.5 176.7 177.2 179.5 181 183.6 184.3 ~ 166 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
83.4 96.8 99 101.3 101.7 102.9 103.9 104.2 104.7 106.4 109.1 109.2 109.4 111.8 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
169.2 170.5 173.9 200 215 216 217 223 223 223 225 229 234 234 240 251 313 ~ 221 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
150.7 152.7 154.4 175 184.1 186.6 189.4 193.5 193.8 195.2 196.6 204 207 207 210 214 288 ~ 194 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
143.3 143.3 151.3 168.9 177.5 178.9 179.2 184.4 187.5 188.3 190.2 193 197.3 198.3 200 201 208 275 ~ 187 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
132.4 137.1 141.9 154.7 161 166.4 167.2 170.3 171 171.5 172 175.5 176.4 184.7 184.8 185.6 186.1 186.6 248 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
131.2 133 151.6 152.6 165.2 165.3 168.6 168.8 174 176.8 178.5 179.9 180.1 ~ 164 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
192 218.5 224 240 ~ 219 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
151 185 199.1 ~ 178 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
114 129 169.8 ~ 138 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
112.4
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
182 185.2 ~ 184 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
178 184.5 186.7 187.5 ~ 184 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
180.4 180.5 182.5 184.3 185.3 ~ 183 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
120.5 121.6 136.6 140.9 142.4 145.6 161.9 162.4 162.8 164.1 166.1 166.2 183.9 186.9 ~ 154 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
96.9 119.8 121.4 129.7 133.4 146.8 156.8 158 160.1 163.1 164.3 164.5 165.6 183.9 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
150.7 163.8 173.2 176.1 179.5 179.9 ~ 171 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
84.4
110.3
110.6
114.7
116.7
104.2
105.4
90.1
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
183
184.8
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
179.4
186.5
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
ARC Raiders182.5167116.187.551.1
The Outer Worlds 2103.693.275.552.928.3
Battlefield 6181.4169.4159.915310960
Borderlands 498.48273513519
F1 25261246236573416
Doom: The Dark Ages133.51211191158448
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered118.4108604427.3
Assassin's Creed Shadows11310692685641
Civilization 7219214178
Monster Hunter Wilds100.194.8857146
Kingdom Come Deliverance 21901591198956.2
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle19214512910466
Stalker 21031161027965.4
Call of Duty Black Ops 621319715715412481
Until Dawn110105957145.4
Space Marine 210310510310169.6
Star Wars Outlaws8578685324.6
Black Myth: Wukong158118102634729
F1 243163222921429749
Senua's Saga Hellblade 296.8816037.5
Ghost of Tsushima119.61151069362
Horizon Forbidden West160.31311309859.5
Dragon's Dogma 299.393.4
Helldivers 2157.7157.3153.8140.1
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown358358357357
Alan Wake 21331311188445
Counter-Strike 2390327275224
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty17617216114710952
Baldur's Gate 325521920119314783
Hogwarts Legacy108.396.859.5
Strange Brigade546435418400316172
X-Plane 11.1114713811391
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark224219194166103
Dota 2 Reborn221194187172164
The Witcher 3219178138
GTA V184184183154147171
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


3
15


12
20


15
18

2
14
14

7
17
10
6
12
9
4

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 13. 09:56:11

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Nov 2025 05:38:39 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.033s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.033s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12928 +0.025s ... 0.058s

#8 got single benchmarks 12928 +0.065s ... 0.123s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.123s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.245s ... 1.368s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.368s

#12 Got 1600 rows for game benchmarks. +0.875s ... 2.243s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 2.243s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.029s ... 2.272s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.36s ... 2.632s

#16 return log +0.006s ... 2.638s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop graphics card

MSI Stealth 18 HX AI laptop review: Most portable 18-inch gamer yet

MSI Stealth 18 HX AI laptop review: Most portable 18-inch gamer yet

The Stealth 18 takes almost everything we love about the Titan 18 including a Core Ultra 9 processor, GeForce RTX 5090 graphics, and a 4K UHD mini-LED display a...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 18.00" | 3 kg
Asus ProArt P16 5090 review - Tandem OLED and RTX 5090 up against the Apple MacBook Pro 16

Asus ProArt P16 5090 review - Tandem OLED and RTX 5090 up against the Apple MacBook Pro 16

Asus is on the upgrade march, and its ProArt P16 is now available with an extremely bright tandem OLED panel and the mobile GeForce RTX 5090 with 24 GB of VRAM....
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 16.00" | 2 kg
Lenovo Legion 9 18 with RTX 5090 in review

Lenovo Legion 9 18 with RTX 5090 Review: The most powerful gaming laptop on the market

Lenovo has effortlessly conquered the 18-inch gaming laptop segment with the Legion 9 18. After recently testing the RTX 5080 version, we now take a look at the...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 18.00" | 3.5 kg
Aorus RTX 5090 AI Box

Laptop power boost: Gigabyte Aorus RTX 5090 AI Box - External Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 GPU via Thunderbolt 5 review

With the AORUS RTX 5090 AI Box, Gigabyte presents an external GPU solution based on the fastest consumer graphics card currently available. This makes it easy t...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 18.00"
Schenker Key 18 Pro E25 review: High-end workstation with RTX 5090 and 256 GB RAM

Schenker Key 18 Pro E25 review: High-end workstation with RTX 5090 and 256 GB RAM

With the Key 18 Pro, Schenker has a mobile workstation on offer that is aimed at enthusiasts and can be configured extensively. We tested the top model with the...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 18.00" | 4.1 kg

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  Review » Extremely fast, but comparatively quiet gamer - Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 laptop review

Alienware 18 Area-51: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 4.2 kg
  Review » Alienware 18 Area-51 laptop review: Performance above all else

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, 18.00", 3.6 kg
  Review » MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG Review: No-holds-barred Core Ultra 9 285HX and 175 W RTX 5090 Laptop performance

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » Competing against ROG, Legion and co with an RTX 5090 and 240 Hz OLED - Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 gaming laptop review

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 laptop review: RTX 5090 gamer with optional water cooling

Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, 16.00", 2.9 kg
  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D and RTX 5090 Laptop for maximum gaming performance - XMG Neo 16 A25 review

Tuxedo Stellaris 16 Gen7 Engineering Sample: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
  Review » AMD is the gaming leader with its Fire Range HX3D - Ryzen 9 9955HX3D vs. Intel Core Ultra 275HX review

Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.9 kg
  Review » The fastest gaming laptop is now even better thanks to 300 Hz mini LED - XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 laptop review

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » The RTX 5090 Laptop and mini LED inside a gaming laptop - Asus ROG Strix SCAR 16 2025 review

HP Omen Max 16 ah000: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » HP Omen Max 16 laptop review: Super fast but a little bit too hot

Aorus Master 18 AM8H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.4 kg
  Review » Aorus Master 18 gaming laptop review: The RTX 5090 takes its toll

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » The slimmest gaming notebooks with the RTX 5090 Laptop - Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 vs. Razer Blade 16

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » The slimmest gaming notebooks with the RTX 5090 Laptop - Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 vs. Razer Blade 16

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » A slim gaming laptop now with an RTX 5090 and 64 GB of RAM - Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 review

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX vs. Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX Analysis: The battle for the fastest gaming CPU

Schenker Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX vs. Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX Analysis: The battle for the fastest gaming CPU

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  Review » The 18-inch gamer with great mini LED and an RTX 5090 Laptop - Asus Strix SCAR 18 G835LX review

Schenker Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
  Review » XMG Neo 16 2025 Preview - The fastest gaming notebook now with AMD, RTX 5000 and 300 Hz Mini-LED

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » Razer Blade 16 2025 review - Gaming laptop now with GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop and an even slimmer case

  Review » Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop Analysis - Faster, but there is more to come

Schenker Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
  Review » Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop Analysis - Faster, but there is more to come

MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XWJG: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 2.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XWJG

MSI Raider A18 HX A9WJG: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, 18.00", 3.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Raider A18 HX A9WJG

Acer Predator Helios 16 AI PH16-73: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios 16 AI PH16-73

Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10

Acer Predator Helios 18 AI PH18-73: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios 18 AI PH18-73

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H, RTX 5090: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H, RTX 5090

HP Omen Max 16 ah000: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Max 16 ah000

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025

Alienware 18 Area-51: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 4.2 kg
  External Review » Alienware 18 Area-51

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, 18.00", 3.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H

Aorus Master 18 AM8H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Aorus Master 18 AM8H

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090

MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3 kg
   » Super loud Cooler Boost mode on MSI Stealth 18 HX isn't necessary for most gaming scenarios

   » MSI Stealth 18 HX or Razer Blade 18: Thinner and lighter isn't always better

   » MSI Stealth 18 HX 280 W AC adapter reaches almost 70 C to be one of the warmest we've seen

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2 kg
   » Asus vs. Lenovo: Who has the best tandem OLED display?

   » The new Asus ProArt P16 with the Tandem OLED is the best multimedia laptop you can buy right now

Asus ROG Xbox Ally X: AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme
   » Weak Asus ROG Xbox Ally X supply leaks suggesting Microsoft doesn't have lot of confidence in handheld console

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2 kg
   » Asus ProArt P16 Preview - Now with RTX 5090 Laptop and Lumina Pro OLED

Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.9 kg
   » XMG's NEO 16 & PRO 16 do not get G-Sync and Advanced Optimus support after all

Schenker Key 18 Pro M25 RTX 5090: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 4.1 kg
   » Schenker's mobile workstation Key 18 Pro offers high-end features and excellent maintenance options

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.2 kg
   » Do you really need 440 Hz? Why the new dual-mode display of the Razer Blade 18 is a downgrade for many users

   » Razer's new Blade 18 is 1 kg lighter than the Alienware 18, but just as fast and even a bit quieter

Alienware 18 Area-51: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 4.2 kg
   » Alienware 18 Area-51 is missing one key feature against the MSI Titan 18 HX

   » Alienware 18 Area-51 outperforms nearly all other gaming laptops and we have the benchmarks to prove it

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » RTX 5090 laptops in comparison: Where does the Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 rank?

Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, 16.00", 2.9 kg
   » Intel is beaten - AMD's Ryzen 9 9955HX3D with 3D V-Cache is the best choice for gaming

Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.9 kg
   » XMG Neo 16 E25: Still one of the best gaming laptops but Advanced Optimus/G-Sync is lacking

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.3 kg
   » Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) with RTX 5090, mini-LED screen and Thunderbolt 5 now available for preorder

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » The 2025 Razer Blade 16 with the RTX 5090 Laptop looks like a downgrade

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *
Arc B 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Class 3

UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01- 5)