Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce MX330

NVIDIA GeForce MX330

The Nvidia GeForce MX330 is a dedicated entry-level mobile graphics card for laptops. It was released in February 2020 and is basically a renamed Geforce MX250GeForce MX150 / desktop GeForce GT 1030. It uses the same GP108 chip as the MX250 (GP108-655-A1 e.g.). It offers the same 384 CUDA cores as the MX250 and MX150 and also the clock speeds only increased slightly (+12 MHz Boost = 0.8% for the 25 Watt version). The dedicated GDDR5 graphics memory is connected via a 64 Bit memory bus and clocked at 3500 MHz (7000 MHz effective) leading to maximal bandwidth of 56 GB/s. Again there is a 25 Watt and slower 12 Watt (low power) variant.

In Nvidia drivers the GeForce MX330 appeared with the hardware ID 1D16.

The GP108 chip is manufactured in a 16 nm FinFET process and offers a number of new features, including support for DisplayPort 1.4 (ready), HDMI 2.0b, HDR and improved H.265 video de- and encoding (PlayReady 3.0). 4K HDR with Netflix however won't run due to the minimum 3 GB graphics memory that is required. Compared to the bigger Pascal chips, the small GP108 does not support Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) for VR and G-Sync. A full list of improvements and the new Pascal desktop GPUs is available in our dedicated Pascal architecture article.

The performance of the GeForce MX330 should be identical to the MX150 and MX250 of previous years. See our GeForce MX250 page for gaming benchmarks. Nvidia states on the product page that the MX330 offers 2x of the performance of a Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 in an i7-1065G7 (vs 2.5x of the MX350).  Therefore, very demanding games like Red Dead Redemption 2 will not run smoothly, older and less demanding games like Fifa 20 or Farming Simulator 19 however should run fine in medium settings (see below for our benchmark results with different laptops). The low power version (see below) will be clearly slower however.

There is a low power version N17S-LP with a TGP of 12 Watt (up 2 Watt from 10 Watt of the LP MX250) and a "normal" 25 Watt N17S-G3. The performance of both variants should clearly differ. The low power variant offers relatively slow clock rates of 746 - 936 MHz (base - Turbo), where the 25 Watt G3 variant is clocked at 1531 - 1594 (similar to the MX250 and +70% boost clock versus the LP variant).

GeForce MX300 Series

GeForce MX450 compare 896 @ 1.4 - 1.58 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce MX350 compare 640 @ 1.35 - 1.47 GHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
GeForce MX330 384 @ 1.53 - 1.59 GHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
CodenameN17S-LP / N17S-G3
ArchitecturePascal
Pipelines384 - unified
TMUs32
ROPs16
Core Speed1531 - 1594 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7000 effective = 1752 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth56.1 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption25 Watt (12 - 25 Watt TGP)
technology14 nm
PCIe3.0
DisplaysHDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4
FeaturesVulkan 1.1, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 1.2, GPU Boost 3.0, Multi Monitor, Optimus, GameWorks
Date of Announcement20.02.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1.7 pt (5%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
specvp12 snx-02 +
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 snx-03 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45     avg: 49.9     median: 49.9 (7%)     max: 54.8 Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Outriders

Outriders

2021
med. 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
31
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
med. 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920x1080
26
low 1280x720
19.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
9.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
5.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
12
low 1280x720
36  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
44.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
35.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
37.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
26.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 21

FIFA 21

2020
low 1280x720
125  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
79.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
75.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
63.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
119  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
48.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
40.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
36.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
85.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
61.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
28.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
3.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
33.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
81  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Valorant

Valorant

2020
low 1280x720
147  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
118  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
106  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
94.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
51.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
58.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
20.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
25.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
43.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
42.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
18.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
124  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
72.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
45.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
44.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
59 73 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17 31 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16 24 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13 19 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
52.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
41.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
58.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
50  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
94.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
45  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
34.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
67.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
44.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
112  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
59.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
164  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
37.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
40  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
42 45 52.4 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17 17 17.1 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10 12 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8 10 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
47.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
47  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
33.4 71 74.9 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47.3 50 56.5 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.9 44.1 51.3 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
18.1 23.9 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
49.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
37.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
95  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
178  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
111
low 1280x720
110 116 120.3 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
104 107 108.6 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53.9 69.6 73.2 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.2 63.8 65.3 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.9 25.4 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
63.8 64.7 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.2 37 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17 19.2 19.9 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.2 12 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
173.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
113.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
96  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Outriders2620.914.6
Hitman 318.81514.4
Cyberpunk 2077 1.019.79.226.185.09
Immortals Fenyx Rising361598
Yakuza Like a Dragon44.315.715.413.4
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War35.312.78.09
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla1898
Dirt 537.19.6
Watch Dogs Legion26.213.912
FIFA 2112579.575.163.1
Star Wars Squadrons11948.640.921.8
Mafia Definitive Edition36.716.515.8
Serious Sam 485.7138.16
Crysis Remastered61.722.811.98.86
Flight Simulator 202028.412.16.923.34
Horizon Zero Dawn2713119
Death Stranding33.414.713.713.4
F1 202081392816
Valorant147118106
Gears Tactics94.634.522.115.9
Doom Eternal35.3
Hunt Showdown51.61915.1
Escape from Tarkov58.233.723.321.6
Red Dead Redemption 220.815.1
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order25.721.38.72
Need for Speed Heat43.122.319.7
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 201942.523.214.513.9
GRID 201918.315.714.77.4
Ghost Recon Breakpoint2211104
FIFA 2012472.122.321.2
Borderlands 345.414.212.18.8
Control44.413.99.72
F1 201966242016
Total War: Three Kingdoms52.916.1
Rage 241.114.61312.9
Anno 180058.2118.646.13
The Division 2501987
Dirt Rally 2.094.529.326.816.1
Far Cry New Dawn45241514
Metro Exodus34.313.310.47.8
Apex Legends67.226.522.519.4
Just Cause 444.727.420.618.2
Darksiders III11230.123.120.5
Battlefield V59.429.423.218.7
Farming Simulator 1916462.237.528.3
Hitman 237.123.713.311
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey4019147
Forza Horizon 462312216
Shadow of the Tomb Raider4617119
Monster Hunter World47.619.716.813.3
Far Cry 547231514
X-Plane 11.1160514421
Kingdom Come: Deliverance49.821.318.312.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark37.11811.2
Fortnite9563.333.721
Rocket League17859.347.4
Dota 2 Reborn115107665624
The Witcher 364361912
BioShock Infinite173.9113.89637.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
8
28
14
6
42
9
7
46
5
4
40
2
1



2


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 17. 08:47:45

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.052s ... 0.053s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.053s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.053s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9978 +0.03s ... 0.083s

#7 got single benchmarks 9978 +0.039s ... 0.122s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.122s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.736s ... 0.859s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.859s

#11 Got 245 rows for game benchmarks. +0.03s ... 0.889s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.889s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.047s ... 0.936s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +2.206s ... 3.142s

#15 return log +0.043s ... 3.185s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce MX330 graphics card

Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen 1 Laptop Review: Foiled by lack of AMD option

Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen 1 Laptop Review: Foiled by lack of AMD option

This year's T-series ThinkPads have only received minor updates. Nevertheless, the smaller 14-inch models have improved quite a bit in regard to performance tha...
Intel Core i7-10510U | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | 15.60" | 1.8 kg
HP Envy 17t (Core i7-1065G7, Nvidia MX330, 4K) Laptop Review

HP Envy 17t (Core i7-1065G7, Nvidia MX330, 4K) Laptop Review

The HP Envy 17t is a well-crafted 17-inch laptop, but its beauty is only skin deep. Some of its components are major standouts, most notably the screen. While i...
Intel Core i7-1065G7 | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | 17.30" | 2.7 kg
Nvidia GeForce MX330 and MX350 in review: Known architecture - New name

Nvidia GeForce MX330 and MX350 in review: Known architecture - New name

Nvidia is retiring the GeForce MX230 and MX250, replacing them with slightly faster models. We've taken a closer look at the two new entry-level GPUs, and in th...
Intel Core i7-10510U | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | 14.00"

Acer Chromebook Spin 713 CP713-3W-5102: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 13.50", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook Spin 713 CP713-3W-5102

Acer Enduro Urban N3 EUN314-51WG-74PB: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Enduro Urban N3 EUN314-51WG-74PB

Dell Vostro 14 3401, i7-1165G7: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Dell Vostro 14 3401, i7-1165G7

Asus ExpertBook B1 B1500C, i5-1135G7 MX330: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ExpertBook B1 B1500C, i5-1135G7 MX330

Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400C, 1165G7 MX330: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400C, 1165G7 MX330

Asus ExpertBook B1 B1500C, i7-1165G7 MX330: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ExpertBook B1500C, i7-1165G7 MX330

Asus VivoBook X515EP, i5-1135G7 MX330: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook X515EP, i5-1135G7 MX330

Asus Vivobook 15 K513EP-EJ104T: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 15 K513EP-EJ104T

Asus VivoBook 15 S512JP-EJ015: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 15 S512JP-EJ015

Asus VivoBook Ultra 14 K413JP-EK070T: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Ultra 14 K413JP-EK070T

HP Envy 17-cg0033nf : Intel Core i7-1065G7, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 17-cg0033nf

Dell Inspiron 14 5406, i5-1135G7 MX330: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 14 5406, i5-1135G7 MX330

Dell Vostro 15 5501: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell Vostro 15 5501

Acer Aspire 3 A315-57G-59LG: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A315-57G-59LG

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 13.30"
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon

Dell Inspiron 15 5501-FV9G2: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 5501-FV9G2

Asus VivoBook 15 X512JP EJ228T: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 15 X512JP EJ228T

Asus VivoBook Ultra 14 K413: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Ultra 14 K413

Asus Vivobook 14 A409JP-EK502T: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 14 A409JP-EK502T

MSI Modern 14 A10RAS-870XES: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 14 A10RAS-870XES

Asus VivoBook 14 A413, i5-10210U MX330: Intel Core i5-10210U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 14 A413, i5-10210U MX330

HP Envy x360 15-ed0900ng: Intel Core i7-10510U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 15-ed0900ng

Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00"
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i

Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IIL05-81X1001BGE: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IIL05-81X1001BGE

HP 17-by3268ng: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 17.30", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP 17-by3268ng

MSI Modern 14 A10RAS-1049XES: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 14 A10RAS-1049XES

MSI Modern 15 A10RAS-089XES: Intel Core i5-10210U, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 15 A10RAS-089XES

HP 17-by3250ng: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 17.30", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP 17-by3250ng

HP Envy 17-cg0001ng: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 17-cg0001ng

HP Envy 17-cg0220ng: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 17-cg0220ng

MSI Modern 14 A10RAS-871XES: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00"
  External Review » MSI Modern 14 A10RAS-871XES

Lenovo IdeaPad 3 17IML05-81WC0048GE: Intel Core i7-10510U, 17.30", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 3 17IML05-81WC0048GE

HP Envy 17t-cg000: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 17t-cg000

MSI Prestige 14 A10RC: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00"
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 A10RC

Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00: Intel Core i7-10510U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
   » ThinkPad T15 review shows that Lenovo should be offering all of its ThinkPad laptop with AMD Ryzen 4000

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA GeForce MX330 Laptop Graphics Card
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2019-12-30)