Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 520

The Radeon 520 is a dedicated entry-level graphics card for laptops that was released in 2017. AMD reveals that the chip features five compute units based on the GCN architecture and 2 GB GDDR5 64-bit graphics memory. The new chip is not based on the Polaris architecture from 2016, but the old one that was introduced with the Radeon R5 M230 in 2014 and later used in the M330 and M430 / M440 / M445.

Due to the higher clock speed of up to 1030 MHz, the Radeon 520 should be slightly faster than the old Radeon R7 M445 (920 MHz, 320 shader units, GDDR5). However, the performance should be comparable, which means that demanding games like Dishonored 2, Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare or XCOM 2 should not run smoothly. Less demanding games like Overwatch, Fifa 17 (with a fast CPU) or Farming Simulator 17, would run well, but using low to medium detail settings. For detailed game benchmarks, visit the pages of the previous linked card. If only DDR3 is used, the performance should be on par with the Radeon R7 M440 (1021 MHz, 320 shader units, DDR3).

Radeon 500 Series

Radeon 530 compare 384 @ 1.02 GHz64 Bit @ 2250 MHz
Radeon 520 320 @ 1.03 GHz64 Bit @ 2250 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.0
Pipelines320 - unified
Core Speed1030 MHz
Memory Speed2250 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3, GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
technology28 nm
FeaturesDirectX 12, Mantle, OpenGL, OpenCL 1.2, Vulkan
Date of Announcement21.03.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.5 pt (1%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 383     avg: 454.5     median: 454.5 (1%)     max: 526 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 335     avg: 397     median: 397 (1%)     max: 459 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
77543 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
34545 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 5509     avg: 7240     median: 7240 (7%)     max: 8971 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 6156     avg: 8413     median: 8412.5 (2%)     max: 10669 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 954     avg: 1233     median: 1232.5 (2%)     max: 1511 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1022     avg: 1319     median: 1319 (1%)     max: 1616 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
49247 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2055     avg: 2232     median: 2232 (3%)     max: 2409 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1877     avg: 2017     median: 2016.5 (2%)     max: 2156 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
5266 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
4324 Points (2%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
11294 Points (12%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
6492 Points (8%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
4.1 fps (1%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
12 fps (4%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
9.2 fps (4%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
16.6 fps (3%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
9124 points (6%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
24.5 fps (8%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 29.98     avg: 35.6     median: 35.6 (2%)     max: 41.13 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
25.6 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
35.4 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
52.9 fps (2%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
114.1 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
184 Samples/s (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
325 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
929 points (1%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Destiny 2

Destiny 2

2017
low 1280x720
17.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
17.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 18

FIFA 18

2017
low 1280x720
102.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
34  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
95  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
87.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
46.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
57.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
30.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
26.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
40.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
70.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
47.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
41.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x768
11.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
21  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
21.6 36 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.5 20.8 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.4 9.8 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
52  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1366x768
53.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
84.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
29.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
119.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
35.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
47.8 82.4 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.4 43.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23.4 36.3 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.5 11.7 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
62.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
24.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
65.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
33.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
77.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
35.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
44.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Destiny 217.89.4
ELEX17.38.16.6
Middle-earth: Shadow of War22107
FIFA 18102.44435.732.6
F1 2017341513
Team Fortress 29587.338.319.6
Dirt 446.416.69.6
Rocket League57.122.214
Prey30.111.39.2
For Honor26.398.7
Resident Evil 740.218.58.2
Farming Simulator 1770.847.118.37.6
Overwatch41.93314.6
Ashes of the Singularity11.65.9
Far Cry Primal2198
Rise of the Tomb Raider291797.4
Rainbow Six Siege5231.913.8
World of Warships53.337.318.8
Dota 2 Reborn84.545.81917.9
The Witcher 329.718.710.25.8
Dirt Rally119.735.917.6
BioShock Infinite65363010
Tomb Raider62.331.824.212.5
Diablo III65.941.533.721.6
Anno 207077.435.122.111.1
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim44.829.419.810.6
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
8
9
9
14
11
1
20
4

10
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.29
log 16. 04:17:40

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Apr 2025 05:30:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.028s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.028s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7942 +0.031s ... 0.059s

#8 got single benchmarks 7942 +0.015s ... 0.075s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.075s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.681s ... 0.755s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.756s

#12 Got 94 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.759s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.759s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.016s ... 0.776s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.174s ... 0.949s

#16 return log +0.004s ... 0.953s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 520 graphics card

Dell Inspiron 17 3000 3780 (i7-8565U, Radeon 520) Laptop Review

Dell Inspiron 17 3000 3780 (i7-8565U, Radeon 520) Laptop Review

You know something's wrong when even an integrated Vega 8 can outperform your dedicated Radeon GPU. The Inspiron 17 3780 may sport the newest Intel Whiskey Lake...
Intel Core i7-8565U | AMD Radeon 520 | 17.30" | 2.8 kg

Dell Inspiron 15 3580, i5-8265U: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 3580, i5-8265U

Dell Inspiron 15 3581: Intel Core i3-7020U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 3581

Dell Inspiron 17 3780-M47RT: Intel Core i5-8265U, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 17 3780-M47RT

Dell Inspiron 15 3580, i7-8565U: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15-3580, i7-8565U

Dell Inspiron 15 3576: Intel Core i7-8550U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 3576

HP 15-bs123ns: Intel Core i5-8250U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP 15-bs123ns

HP 14-BW002AX: AMD A9-9420, 14.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP 14-BW002AX

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2017-09- 5)