Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M is a mid-range, DirectX 11.1 compatible graphics card that was announced in the first quarter of 2012 for laptops. It is a Kepler-based GPU built on the GK107 architecture and is manufactured in 28nm at TSMC. The graphics card uses a 128-Bit wide memory interface with either the more common but slower DDR3 for VRAM or the more expensive and faster GDDR5.

Architecture

The Kepler architecture is the successor to the Fermi architecture that first appeared in laptops with the GeForce 400M series. The GK107 Kepler core offers two shader blocks, called SMX, each with 192 shaders for a total of 384 shader cores that are clocked at the same speed as the processor core. Although more shader cores are available in the Kepler architecture as compared to the Fermi design, the Kepler shaders are still expected to be up to twice as power efficient. However, due to the missing hot clock of the shader domain, two shaders of a Kepler chip are as fast as one shader of a Fermi chip (the latter is clocked twice as fast). PCIe 3.0 is now supported by the mobile Kepler series and an optional Turbo mode can automatically overclock the Nvidia card by a theoretical 15 percent if the laptop cooling system allows it. The implementation of this boost mode is done in the BIOS, but it is ultimately dependent upon the manufacturer of the laptop.

Performance

The gaming performance of the GeForce GT 640M equipped with DDR3 graphics memory lies somewhere in the former 2011 high-end category between the older GeForce GT 555M and GeForce GTX 460M. The performance is exceptionally good in shader-heavy DirectX 11 games and benchmarks. However, the 128-Bit memory interface can be a bottleneck if DDR3 graphics memory is used. In our tests, demanding games of 2011 like Battlefield 3 are playable in 1366x768 and medium settings. Less demanding games, such as Modern Warfare 3, are easily playable with maxed out settings and high resolutions. Details on synthetic and gaming benchmarks performances of the GT 640M can be seen below. The more uncommon GDDR5 version of the GT 640M is slightly faster, getting closer to the DDR3 version of the GT 650M.

Features

The improved feature set now includes support for up to 4 active displays. Furthermore, high resolution monitors of up to 3840x2160 pixels can now be connected using DisplayPort 1.2 or HDMI 1.4a if available. HD-Audio codecs, such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD, can be transmitted via bitstream mode through the HDMI port. However, as most laptops will feature Optimus, the integrated GPU will likely have direct control over the display ports and may limit the feature set available by the Nvidia Kepler cards.

The 5th generation PureVideo HD video processor (VP5) is also integrated in the GK107 core and offers hardware decoding of HD videos. Common codecs such as MPEG-1/2, MPEG-4 ASP, H.264 and VC1/WMV9 are fully supported up to 4K resolutions while VC1 and MPEG-4 are supported up to 1080p. Two streams can be decoded in parallel for features such as Picture-in-Picture. Another novelty is the inclusion of a dedicated video encoding engine similar to Intel QuickSync that can be accessed by the NVENCI API.

The power consumption of the GeForce GT 640M is a bit below that of the older GeForce GT 540M and more in line with the GT 525M. As a result, the Nvidia GPU is best suited for multimedia notebooks 14-inches or greater.

GeForce GT 600M Series

GeForce GT 650M SLI compare 768 @ 0.79 - 0.84 GHz2x 128 Bit @ 4000 MHz
GeForce GT 650M compare 384 @ 0.74 - 0.9 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 - 4000 MHz
GeForce GT 645M compare 384 @ 0.71 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce GT 640M 384 @ 0.63 - 0.65 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 - 4000 MHz
GeForce GT 640M LE compare 384 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 - 4000 MHz
GeForce GT 635M compare 144 @ 0.66 - 0.75 GHz128/192 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce GT 630M compare 96 @ 0.67 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce GT 625M compare 96 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce GT 620M compare 96 @ 0.63 - 0.72 GHz64 / 128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
CodenameN13P-GS
ArchitectureKepler
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed625 - 645 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed1800 - 4000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3, GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
technology28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, 3D Vision, 3DTV Play
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement22.03.2012

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.6 pt (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1691     avg: 1855     median: 1860.5 (3%)     max: 1968 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1534     avg: 1708     median: 1728 (1%)     max: 1778 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 6648     avg: 7413     median: 7425 (2%)     max: 8551 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 5773     avg: 6578     median: 6348 (4%)     max: 7440 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 28232     avg: 29495     median: 29298.5 (15%)     max: 31151 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 10001     avg: 11136     median: 10625.5 (14%)     max: 12843 Points
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 2.48     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (2%)     max: 2.6 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
specvp11 sw-02 +
specvp11 proe-05 +
specvp11 maya-03 +
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 18.15     avg: 18.3     median: 18.3 (9%)     max: 18.39 fps
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 6.75     avg: 6.9     median: 6.9 (4%)     max: 7.14 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 6.7     avg: 6.9     median: 6.9 (87%)     max: 7 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 4.6     avg: 6.3     median: 6.9 (87%)     max: 7 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4578     avg: 5741     median: 5635 (4%)     max: 7081 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 32.37     avg: 37.5     median: 37.6 (13%)     max: 41.86 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
83  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
34  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
52  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
44.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
21  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
51.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
17.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
33.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
106 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
56 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.1 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1366x768
40.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
57.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
31.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
57  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
49.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
12  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
19.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
128  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
35.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
52.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
44.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
45  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
26.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Crew

The Crew

2014
low 1280x720
42.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.5 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
35.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
9.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
46  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
43.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
24.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
65  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
43.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
38.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
25  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
ultra 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
49  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
120  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
68  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
33.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
50  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
46.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
56  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
32.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Titanfall

Titanfall

2014
low 1024x768
53  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
24.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
40.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
65  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
48.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
50.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
108  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
69  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
34  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
low 1024x768
65  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
62  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
ultra 1920x1080
124  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
71  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
48  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
40.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
48.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
67.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
47.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
36  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
65.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
23.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
87.3 109.8 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
62.3 77.7 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46.4 52.4 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.2 15.4 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
34  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
83.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
47.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
40.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
177  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
75  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
50  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
SimCity

SimCity

2013
low 1024x768
36.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
87.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
38.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
44.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
155  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
72  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
54.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 3

Far Cry 3

2012
low 1024x768
44.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
35.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1366x768
38.7 45.9 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
36 39.1 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.5 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
36.9 40 54.8 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26 31.5 38.9 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.1 17 23.6 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.5 8.4 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
81.8 88.1 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
69.8 70.3 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
40.2 42.5 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
55.3 58 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41.7 43.8 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
24.8 27.9 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
55.6 66.8 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37 44.1 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30.2 35.4 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.8 15.8 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
75.5 77 98.5 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
69 74.8 86.3 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
63.8 72.6 79 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.2 48.7 49.3 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
40.1 56.5 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28 28.8 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23.2 24 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fifa 13

Fifa 13

2012
low 1024x768
221 223.1 299.5 ~ 248 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
154.1 176 199.6 ~ 177 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
145.2 160 186.2 ~ 164 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
113 121.1 123 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2012

F1 2012

2012
low 1024x768
60 78 100 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
57 70.6 83 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
52 69.5 83 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26 34 43.2 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
65  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
40.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Torchlight 2

Torchlight 2

2012
low 1024x768
105.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
65 92.5 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63.7 64.3 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
39  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
129  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
99  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
84  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1366x768
58  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
50.3 60.8 73 74.2 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
49.1 53.5 57 57.2 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23.9 24.3 25 27.8 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6 6 6.1 6.6 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
38  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
39.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
35  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
62 75 129.5 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
43 43.8 75.5 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
33.8 39 46.5 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.2 16 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
71.1 119 129 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
63.5 (!) 74 77 85 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
48 59.2 (!) 75 76 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34 51.4 (!) ~ 43 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
46.9 50 52 52.4 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29 31 31.7 35.2 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
24 25.7 26 32.7 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11 12 12.5 20.2 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
60  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46 51 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Alan Wake

Alan Wake

2012
low 1024x768
41 43 51.4 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25 25.9 31.1 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12 13.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Star Wars: The Old Republic

Star Wars: The Old Republic

2011
low 1024x768
52  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
33  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
100.6 103 118 119 119.9 122.3 123.5 123.9 124.2 ~ 117 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
44 47.3 47.5 50 50.7 51 52.8 53 54.1 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
28 28.2 30 31 31.8 32.1 32.9 33.5 34.3 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13 14.3 15 15 15.1 16 16.5 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
52.3 54 57 57.6 58 60 63.9 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40 41.6 42 42.3 42.8 45 48.5 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
29 31 31.2 31.3 32 32 36.7 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16 16 17.1 17.2 18.4 20.8 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
143 165 ~ 154 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
71 96 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
51 75 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33 55 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
46 48 48 50.1 (!) 56.6 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
32 33 34 37.5 (!) 40.5 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
25 25 26 29.8 (!) 32.4 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11 11 11 14 (!) 14.5 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
91  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
74  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
36  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fifa 12

Fifa 12

2011
low 800x600
245.8 268 274 ~ 263 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
120 161 178 ~ 153 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
112.6 144 146 ~ 134 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
101.4 102 104 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2011

F1 2011

2011
low 800x600
61 (!) 86 108 132 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
42 (!) 61 73 90 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
36 (!) 51 56 58 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20 21 22 24 (!) ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
59 116.4 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
57 61 61.8 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23 24 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
124 143 174 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
84.6 96.8 100 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
62.8 64 64.7 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20 20.3 20.6 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
25  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21  fps    + Compare
high 1600x900
15  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
low 800x600
60.2 79 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
54 59.7 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
40 53.4 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12 17.3 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra DX11 High Res Textures 1920x1080
11
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
low 1024x768
165  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
31.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Civilization 5

Civilization 5

2010
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
54.2 68.4 69.6 74 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
50 50.5 53 57 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
42 44.9 46.8 48 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.9 27.8 28 29 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
195  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
56.6 63 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
42 46 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Just Cause 2

Just Cause 2

2010
ultra 1920x1080
18.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 800x600
63.5 69 98 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
40.1 48 69.2 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
high 1600x900
25 39 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8 13.4 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
88  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
51.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
79  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
62  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46 47 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25 31 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Stalker: Call of Pripyat

Stalker: Call of Pripyat

2010
ultra 1920x1200
19.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
high 1366x768
100  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36 56 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Risen

Risen

2009
med. 1024x768
54  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
32 39 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
high 1360x768
55.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
high 1360x768
51.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
ArmA 2

ArmA 2

2009
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

2008
high 1280x1024
29.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
98.5  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
66.7 68.7 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
163  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
73.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
ultra 1920x1080
33.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
high 1024x768
45.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
71  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
52  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
197.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Quake 4

Quake 4

2005
ultra 1024x768
62  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
med. 1024x768
109  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
41  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Team Fortress 259.3
Farming Simulator 178350.922.6
Mirror's Edge Catalyst3418.6
Overwatch5244.722.1
Far Cry Primal2110
Rainbow Six Siege51.429.216.511.2
Assassin's Creed Syndicate17.3
Anno 220533.216
FIFA 161065635.1
World of Warships40.132.319.8
Metal Gear Solid V6057.620.1
Mad Max31.615.6
Dota 2 Reborn5749.725.424.1
Batman: Arkham Knight129
The Witcher 319.8
Dirt Rally12835.518.212.6
GTA V52.844.6123
Battlefield Hardline4532.715.18.3
Evolve26.320.29.2
The Crew42.227.616.4
Dragon Age: Inquisition026.5
Far Cry 435.826.99.6
Assassin's Creed Unity9.1
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare4629.5
Civilization: Beyond Earth43.817.4
Ryse: Son of Rome24.5176.76.4
Alien: Isolation6543.222.415.5
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor38.42514.510
Fifa 1542
Risen 3: Titan Lords4927.713.111
GRID: Autosport1206832.816.2
Watch Dogs33.825.45.9
Wolfenstein: The New Order5046.321.1
The Elder Scrolls Online564532.417.7
Titanfall5333259.5
Thief24.819.214.67.2
Assassin´s Creed IV: Black Flag40.332.118.59.5
X-Plane 10.256527.613.16.4
Call of Duty: Ghosts48.84021.58.9
Battlefield 450.334.723.59.9
Batman: Arkham Origins108693415
F1 201365616231
Fifa 14124
Total War: Rome II714840.211.5
Saints Row IV48.439.219.912.8
The Bureau: XCOM Declassified67.739.718.410.1
Splinter Cell: Blacklist47.13621
Dota 265.245.922.8
Company of Heroes 223.619.310.53.7
GRID 299704915
Metro: Last Light3428.413.89.2
BioShock Infinite83.347.440.414.3
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm177755018.6
SimCity36.120.816.79.8
Tomb Raider87.650.138.59.9
Crysis 344.325.3176.5
Dead Space 31557254.832.6
Far Cry 344.135.72812.8
Assassin´s Creed III423813
Hitman: Absolution4432197
Call of Duty: Black Ops 285704125.2
Need for Speed: Most Wanted57432615.5
Medal of Honor: Warfighter61413314
Dishonored84777246
World of Tanks v848282413
Fifa 13248177164119
F1 201279706834
Borderlands 2655540.625
Torchlight 2105.67964
Guild Wars 23922.19.7
Counter-Strike: GO129998449
Darksiders II58
Sleeping Dogs6554256
The Secret World383726.99.1
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier39.62512.4
Max Payne 335341813
Dirt Showdown89544016
Diablo III106756543
Risen 2: Dark Waters50322714
Mass Effect 3604932
Alan Wake452713
Star Wars: The Old Republic523326
Anno 2070117503115
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim58433218
CoD: Modern Warfare 3154846344
Battlefield 350352812
Batman: Arkham City91743617
Fifa 12263153134102
F1 201197675022
Deus Ex Human Revolution886024
Dirt 3147946420
The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings2521154
Crysis 270574715
Total War: Shogun 216531.5
Call of Duty: Black Ops44
Civilization 550.213.35
Mafia 267534528
StarCraft 2195604427
Just Cause 218.9
Metro 203377523211
Dawn of War II - Chaos Rising886151.227.2
Battlefield: Bad Company 279624728
Stalker: Call of Pripyat19.1
CoD Modern Warfare 210046
Risen543622
Resident Evil 555.642.5
Colin McRae: DIRT 251.727.5
ArmA 211
Sims 345
F.E.A.R. 242
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto29.8
Left 4 Dead107
Far Cry 298.56832.2
Trackmania Nations Forever16373.145.4
Supreme Commander - FA Bench33.6
Crysis - GPU Benchmark45.911.6
World in Conflict - Benchmark715221
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark197.6
Quake 462
World of Warcraft10941
Counter-Strike Source65
Doom 3190
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo317
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
10
41
33
12
25
43
21
2
44
34
13
4
69
17
4
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 15. 02:48:28

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 05:40:26 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.042s ... 0.043s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.043s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.043s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 2961 +0.029s ... 0.072s

#7 got single benchmarks 2961 +0.058s ... 0.13s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.13s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.619s ... 0.749s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.749s

#11 Got 609 rows for game benchmarks. +0.028s ... 0.778s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.778s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.079s ... 0.856s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +3.167s ... 4.023s

#15 return log +0.045s ... 4.069s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M graphics card

 

Review Acer Aspire V3-571G-53214G50Maii Notebook

IPS for everyone. It is like witchcraft: Reviewers and readers have complained about poor TN panels in Acer's multimedia notebooks for years. Now we review a 6...
Intel Core i5-3210M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M | 15.60" | 2.5 kg
 

Review Acer Aspire Timeline Ultra M5-581TG Ultrabook

Ultra(Gaming)Book. Acer equips their Ultrabook with a 20.6 millimeter (0.81 inch) thick aluminum chassis and a Kepler GT640M GPU suitable for gaming. Does this ...
Intel Core i5-3317U | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M | 15.60" | 2.2 kg
 

Review Samsung Series 7 700Z5C Notebook

Rejuvenation. Samsung refreshes its Series 7 models and launches the successor to the luxurious all-rounder 700Z5A with the latest hardware. In the following re...
Intel Core i7-3615QM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M | 15.60" | 2.3 kg
 

Review Acer Aspire V3-571G-73614G50Makk Notebook

The ideal multimedia laptop? An Ivy Bridge quad-core CPU and a GeForce GT640M ensure the Aspire V3-571G has a good performance. Our comprehensive review provide...
Intel Core i7-3610QM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M | 15.60" | 3.2 kg
 

Review Gigabyte U2442N Notebook

Ultra-mobile without Compromise? Ultrabook-slim yet high performance? The new Gigabyte U2442N promises just that and it delivers thanks to a HDD-SSD combo and t...
Intel Core i5-3210M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M | 14.00" | 1.7 kg

Dell XPS 15 (L521X): Intel Core i7-3612QM, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  Review » Review Dell XPS 15 (L521X) Notebook

Acer TravelMate P653-MG-53214G75Mikk: Intel Core i5-3210M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  Review » Review Acer TravelMate P653 Notebook

Toshiba Satellite P855-107: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 15.60", 3 kg
  Review » Review Toshiba Satellite P855-107 Notebook

Acer TravelMate P643-MG-53214G75Mikk: Intel Core i5-3210M, 14.00", 2.4 kg
  Review » Review Acer TravelMate P643-MG-53214G75Mikk Notebook

MSI CX70-i789BW7H: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  Review » Review MSI CX70-i789BW7H Notebook

Acer Aspire M3-581TG: Intel Core i7-2637M, 15.60", 2 kg
  Review » Review Acer Aspire Timeline Ultra M3-581TG Ultrabook

Dell XPS 15 (L521X): Intel Core i7-3612QM, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 15 (L521X)

Sony Vaio SVS1312Q9ES: Intel Core i3-3110M, 13.30", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio SVS1312Q9ES

Acer Aspire M3-581TG-33214G52: Intel Core i3-3217U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire M3-581TG-33214G52

Acer Aspire V3-571G-53214G50Maii: Intel Core i5-3210M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-571G-53214G50Maii

Samsung 700Z5C-S02DE: Intel Core i5-3210M, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Samsung 700Z5C-S02DE

Toshiba Satellite P875-31P: Intel Core i7-3630QM, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P875-31P

Acer Aspire V3-571G-73614G50Makk: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 15.60", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-571G-73614G50Makk

Samsung 700Z5C-S01IT: Intel Core i7-3615QM, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Samsung 700Z5C-S01IT

Acer Aspire M5-581TG-53314G12Mas: Intel Core i5-3317U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire M5-581TG-53314G12Mas

Acer Aspire V3-771G-53218G50Makk: Intel Core i5-3210M, 17.30", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-771G-53218G50Makk

Gigabyte U2442N: Intel Core i5-3210M, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte U2442N

Cyberpower Xplorer X6-9120: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Cyberpower Xplorer X6-9120

Toshiba Satellite P855-10G: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 15.60", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P855-10G

Acer Aspire V5 Touch: unknown, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V5 Touch

Acer Aspire V3-471-73814G50Ma: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 14.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-471-73814G50Ma

Acer Aspire TimeLineU M5-581TG-73516G25Mass: Intel Core i7-2637M, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire TimeLineU M5-581TG-73516G25Mass

Acer Aspire M3-581TG-6736: Intel Core i5-2467M, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire M3-581TG-6736

Acer Aspire M5-581TG-53314G52Mass: Intel Core i5-3317U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire M5-581TG-53314G52Mass

Acer Aspire V3-471G-53214G75Makk: Intel Core i5-3210M, 14.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-471G-53214G75Makk

Acer Aspire M5-581TG-9825: Intel Core i7-3517U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire M5-581TG-9825

Dell XPS 15-L521X: Intel Core i7-3612QM, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 15-L521X

Acer Aspire V3-571G-9435: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-571G-9435

Medion Akoya P7815-MD98063: Intel Core i7-3612QM, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya P7815-MD98063

Sony Vaio SV-S1311AGXB: Intel Core i7-3520M, 13.30", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio SV-S1311AGXB

Sony Vaio SV-S151190X: Intel Core i5-3210M, 15.50", 2 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio SV-S151190X

Acer Aspire V3-571G-73618G1TMakk: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-571G-73618G1TMakk

Acer Aspire M3-581TG-52464G52Mnk: Intel Core i5-2467M, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire M3-581TG-52464G52Mnk

Acer Aspire TimelineU M3-581TG-2464g520mnkk: Intel Core i5-2467M, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire TimelineU M3-581TG-2464g520mnkk

Acer Aspire M3-581TG-7376G25Mnkk: Intel Core i7-2637M, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire M3-581TG-7376G25Mnkk

Acer Aspire TimelineU M3-581TG-9326: Intel Core i7-2637M, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire TimelineU M3-581TG-9326

Acer Aspire M3-581TG: Intel Core i7-2637M, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire M3-581TG

Toshiba Satellite P855-107: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 15.60", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P855

Acer Aspire M3-581TG-52466G52Mnkk: Intel Core i5-2467M, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire M3-581TG-52466G52Mnkk

Gigabyte U2442V: Intel Core i5-3317U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte U2442V

Acer Aspire M3-581T-32364G34Mnkk: Intel Core i3-2367M, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire M3-581T-32364G34Mnkk

Acer Aspire S5: Intel Core i5-2467M, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire S5

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter