Notebookcheck

NVIDIA Quadro P5200

NVIDIA Quadro P5200

The Nvidia Quadro P5200 is a mobile high-end workstation graphics card for laptops. Similar to the consumer GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), it is based on a GP104 chip with 2560 shaders but uses a bit slower GDDR5 instead of GDDR5X of the GTX1080. The Quadro P5200 ist the successor to the Quadro P5000. There will be a normal (Max-P) and a slower but more efficient (Max-Q) variant of the card. For the Max-P variant, the clock speeds are specified from 1556 (base) to 1746 MHz (Boost), the power efficient Max-Q clocks from 1316 MHz (base) to 1569 (Boost) according to a GPU-Z screenshot from a reader (-15% / -10%). The 16 GB GDDR5 are clocked at 3,6 GHz leading to a memory bandwidth of 230 GB/s.

The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.

Performance

The theoretical performance should be a bit above the older Quadro P5000. Altough the clock speed increase is not yet known, the power consumption is rumored to be a lot higher, which should lead to a noticable improved performance. Nvidia specifies a theoretical peak performance of 8,9 GFLOPS (Single Precision).

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro P5200 is specified by Nvidia as 150 Watt (Max-P) and rumored to be 100 - 110 Watt for the Max-Q variant. Therefore, it is a lot higher than the Quadro P5000 versions (100 Watt and 80 Watt).

ManufacturerNVIDIA
Quadro P Series
Quadro P5200 2560 @ 1316 - 1569 MHz256 Bit @ 7216 MHz
Quadro P4200 compare 2304 @ 1215 - 1480 MHz256 Bit @ 7132 MHz
Quadro P5000 compare 2048 @ 1164 - 1506 MHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P5000 Max-Q compare 2048 @ 1101 - 1366 MHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 compare 1792 @ 1202 - 1228 MHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 Max-Q compare 1792 @ 1113 - 1240 MHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P3200 compare 1792 @ 708 - 1202 - 1228 MHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 compare 1280 @ 1088 - 1215 MHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 Max-Q compare 1280 @ 1075 - 1240 MHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P2000 compare 768 @ 1215 - 1468 MHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P2000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 1215 - 1468 MHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P1000 compare 512 @ 1493 - 1519 MHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P620 compare 512 @ 1177 - 1442 MHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
ArchitecturePascal
Pipelines2560 - unified
Core Speed1316 - 1569 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7216 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory16384 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0
technology16 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement11.01.2017

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
61.5 pt (63%)
3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 6580     avg: 6646.5     median: 6646.5 (140%)     max: 4738 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
min: 6390     avg: 6422     median: 6422 (147%)     max: 4378 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 39077     avg: 43443.5     median: 43443.5 (110%)     max: 39492 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 105184     avg: 106328     median: 106328 (123%)     max: 86193 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 16528     avg: 16625.5     median: 16625.5 (139%)     max: 11956 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 18390     avg: 18467     median: 18467 (134%)     max: 13827 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 21204     avg: 21715     median: 21715 (124%)     max: 17450 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 24934     avg: 25100     median: 25100 (132%)     max: 18967 points
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 +
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 +
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 +
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 +
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 +
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 +
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 +
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 +
SPECviewperf 13 Solidworks (sw-04) +
Siemens NX (snx-03) +
Showcase (showcase-02) +
Medical (medical-02) +
Maya (maya-05) +
Energy (energy-02) +
Creo (creo-02) +
Catia (catia-05) +
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
min: 15892     avg: 15892     median: 15892 (165%)     max: 9659 Points
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
min: 218.9     avg: 227.6     median: 227.6 (106%)     max: 214 Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
147  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
212  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
152  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
125  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
46  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
183.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
110.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
100.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Destiny 2

Destiny 2

2017
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
219  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
137  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
106  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
84  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
354.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
221.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
126  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
84.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
56.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1366x768
242.3
low 1280x720
248.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
247  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
185.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
92.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
249.8
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
145  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
144.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
145  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
144.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
60.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF FXAA 1366x768
144.4
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
300  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
300  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
252.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
174.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
88.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
290
Epic (Render Scale 100 %) 16xAF SMAA 3820x2160
57.4
low 1280x768
113  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
99.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
43.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
extreme 3840x2160
56.8
low 1024x768
289 292.9 ~ 291 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
210.1 220.6 ~ 215 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
121.5 125.5 ~ 124 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
101 105.2 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
44.9 46.6 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
low 1280x720
241.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
236.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
46.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
60  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
186  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
176  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
131  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
50  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
303.5 327.2 ~ 315 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
211.6 228.7 ~ 220 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
116.1 120.2 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63.4 fps