Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce MX350

NVIDIA GeForce MX350

The Nvidia GeForce MX350 is a dedicated entry-level mobile graphics card for laptops. It was released in February 2020 and is based on the same GP107 Pascal chip with 640 shaders as the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 for laptops. The memory bus is cut in half to 64 bit (GDDR5).

First benchmarks however show a bit slower performance as the GTX 1050 and on par with a GTX 960M. Nvidia states on the product page that the MX350 offers 2.5x of the performance of a Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 in an i7-1065G7 (vs 2x for the MX330). Therefore, demanding games of 2019 like The Division 2, Metro Exodus or Rage 2 will only run in lowest detail settings acceptable. Less demanding games like Fifa 20 should run fine in high settings and even 1080p. However, this is always also depending on the used processor and main memory. See below for detailed gaming benchmarks.

The GP107-670-A1 chip is manufactured in a 14 nm FinFET process at Samsung and offers a number of new features, including support for DisplayPort 1.4 (ready), HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) as well as improved H.265 video de- and encoding (PlayReady 3.0). A full list of improvements and the new Pascal desktop GPUs is available in our dedicated Pascal architecture article.

In new Nvidia drivers drivers the GeForce MX350 appeared with the hardware ID 1C94.

The power consumption in our tests was lower than the average GTX 1050 (even Max-Q) and similar to the older MX graphics cards (as the TGP of 25 Watt suggests). Therefore, the GPU is suited for thin and light laptops.

GeForce MX300 Series

GeForce MX450 compare 896 @ 1.4 - 1.58 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce MX350 640 @ 1.35 - 1.47 GHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
GeForce MX330 compare 384 @ 1.53 - 1.59 GHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
CodenameN17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
ArchitecturePascal
Pipelines640 - unified
TMUs40
ROPs16
Core Speed1354 - 1468 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7000 effective = 1752 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth56.1 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption25 Watt
Transistor Count3.3 Billion
Die Size 132 mm²
technology14 nm
PCIe3.0
DisplaysHDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4
FeaturesVulkan 1.1, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 1.2, GPU Boost 3.0, Multi Monitor, Optimus, PCIe 3.0, GameWorks
Date of Announcement20.02.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
2 pt (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1219     avg: 1465     median: 1491 (4%)     max: 1752 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1123     avg: 1322     median: 1335.5 (4%)     max: 1595 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 77510     avg: 229394     median: 285166 (32%)     max: 306423 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 11700     avg: 15613     median: 16226 (17%)     max: 18419 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 23194     avg: 24858     median: 24744 (7%)     max: 26239 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3615     avg: 3975     median: 3985 (7%)     max: 4196 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3999     avg: 4390     median: 4371 (5%)     max: 4656 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 9538     avg: 9739     median: 9837 (5%)     max: 9841 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 5099     avg: 6325     median: 6376 (9%)     max: 6781 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 5191     avg: 6142     median: 6166 (5%)     max: 6540 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
specvp12 snx-02 +
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 snx-03 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 97.5     avg: 116.7     median: 110 (6%)     max: 140 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 33.9     avg: 50     median: 51.7 (7%)     max: 58.6 Watt
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45     avg: 49.2     median: 50.1 (7%)     max: 51.5 Watt
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 46     avg: 53     median: 54 (12%)     max: 59 Watt
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.278     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (31%)     max: 0.3326 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.2834     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (27%)     max: 0.3333 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 35.7     avg: 41.3     median: 42.2 (68%)     max: 43.9 dB(A)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Ready or Not

Ready or Not

2023
low 1920x1080
41.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
The Finals

The Finals

2023
low 1920x1080
31.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
54.8
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

2023
low 1920x1080
3.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
6.2
EA Sports WRC

EA Sports WRC

2023
low 1920x1080
10.1 (!)  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset LowAA 1280x720
39.8 (!)
Lords of the Fallen

Lords of the Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
7.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
12
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
67.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
117.7
Assassin's Creed Mirage

Assassin's Creed Mirage

2023
low 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Adaptive Quality Off) 1280x720
25
EA Sports FC 24

EA Sports FC 24

2023
low 1920x1080
32.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
48.3
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
low 1920x1080
65.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
72.4
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
35.2
Starfield

Starfield

2023
low 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
5.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
18.2
low 1920x1080
18.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
40.7
low 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 1280x720
4.1
low 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
21.7
low 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
30.1
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
26.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
67
Diablo 4

Diablo 4

2023
low 1920x1080
35.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
62.6
low 1920x1080
9.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
16.5
Dead Island 2

Dead Island 2

2023
low 1920x1080
40.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
72.6
The Last of Us

The Last of Us

2023
low 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
13.6
low 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
5.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1280x720
22.9
low 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1280x720
23.6
low 1920x1080
26.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1280x720
36.5
low 1920x1080
30.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
50.8
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
12
low 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
27.3
low 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
18.9
low 1920x1080
33.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
55.6
low 1920x1080
21.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
33.1
low 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (without FSR Upscaling) 1280x720
47.1
low 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
28.2
low 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Basic Quality Preset T2X SMAA 1280x720
51
low 1920x1080
5.5 6.9 ~ 6 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
24.5
low 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
34.1
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
39.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
88
low 1920x1080
72.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
43.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
35.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
103.1
low 1920x1080
18.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
62.2
low 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
26.1
Elex 2

Elex 2

2022
low 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low / Off 1280x720
25.8
low 1920x1080
45.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
63.6
low 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
46
low 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality) 1280x720
75
low 1920x1080
19.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
31.8
low 1280x720
114.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
45.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
32.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
80.7
low 1280x720
66  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
35
low 1280x720
42  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
29
low 1280x720
99.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
37.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
63.8
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
37.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
21.9
Deathloop

Deathloop

2021
med. 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
10
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
med. 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1920x1080
71
med. 1920x1080
62.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
56.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
44.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
26.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
72.7
Days Gone

Days Gone

2021
med. 1920x1080
25.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
9.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
34
low 1280x720
83.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
28.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
13.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1920x1080
16.8
Outriders

Outriders

2021
med. 1920x1080
25.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
35.2
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
low 1280x720
47.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.9 22.9 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.5 18.7 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.4 16.7 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920x1080
31.9
31.8
low 1280x720
19 23.3 23.8 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.3 10.5 10.9 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.9 7 7.1 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
5.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
15.2
low 1280x720
38 38 41 47 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14 17 19 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10 10 15 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9 13 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
58.3 62.7 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.2 20.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.1 20.5 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.9 18 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
43 45.9 ~ 44 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.4 14.9 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9.8 13.4 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
17 19 22 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11 13 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6 6 8 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
44.5 48.9 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.7 15.2 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.2 8.6 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
29.2 33 35.7 36 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.8 18.4 20 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.7 13.7 15 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
6.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 21

FIFA 21

2020
low 1280x720
150  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
95.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
88.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
80.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
103 142 ~ 123 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
60 60.4 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
49.5 52.9 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25.2 45.9 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
45.3 49.6 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.1 21.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.9 20.2 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
67.4 69.7 71.6 107 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.6 12.6 12.8 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
3.8 8.1 10.6 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
76.2 81.5 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
28.4 30.4 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9.2 15.1 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
36.1 36.3 45.1 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.6 15.7 26.5 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.9 11 15.2 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
3.6 10 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low-End TAAAA 1920x1080
36.7
low 1280x720
29 33 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14 18 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10 11 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
40 40.3 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.4 20.5 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.4 18.7 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.1 18.1 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
98.7 102 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48.3 49 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33 36 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20 20.3 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Valorant

Valorant

2020
low 1280x720
151  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
129  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
116  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
128 141.5 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48 52.1 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.1 32.7 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.3 21.7 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
59.1 59.1 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.7 25.8 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.2 21.6 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
73.9 77.9 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
35.2 36.5 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.6 36.8 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.1 28 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
27 42.1 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.7 19.2 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
26.2 36.9 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.4 28.3 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.8 24 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
46.5 51.5 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.2 29.2 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.8 24.9 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20 21.7 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
50.3 54.7 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.4 32.6 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.2 22.3 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.3 19.2 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
59.4 71.9 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.4 28 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.8 26.2 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
42 44 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19 19 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15 18 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
104  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
70.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
65.9 68.2 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.3 27.3 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.9 17 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.6 14.7 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
43.5
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
51.6 53.2 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.9 18.1 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.8 12.7 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
85 110 110 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38 49 49 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28 37 39 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17 31 33 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
79.8 91.9 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.2 30.1 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
44 46.2 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.2 17.5 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.7 15.6 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.1 15.3 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
58.4 79.4 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30.3 35.5 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.5 20.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.2 11 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
53 57 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27 28 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20 22 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11 13 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
114 116.4 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
40.3 41.8 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.6 35.8 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.5 20.9 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
55 56 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
28 28 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
25 26 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22 23 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
34.8 39.1 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.5 14.9 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12 12 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.6 8.8 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
76.6 94 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.1 40.6 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.4 32.6 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.2 27.4 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
55.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
35.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
129  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
73.7 73.7 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
37.2 37.6 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.7 29.9 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.2 24 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
158.7 192 ~ 175 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81.9 88.6 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.1 52.6 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.1 38.5 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
53.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
48 49 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22 22 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12 15 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
88  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
54.3 60 65 68 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22 22.7 24 24 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15 17 18 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11 12 14 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
43
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
90.9 92.7 94.4 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.7 32.3 35 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.6 25 27.2 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.8 18.9 20.1 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
56.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
58 58 58 59 59 59 64 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22 22 22 23 23 24 25 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20 20 21 21 22 22 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
34
34
32
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
346.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
103.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
49.1 49.1 55.9 58.9 61 62.5 66.7 71.7 74.4 74.5 77.8 79.7 81.9 90.8 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
35.5 43.5 50 51 52 56.2 56.8 57 58.1 59.3 62.7 63 65.1 72.3 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.2 36.5 36.7 41.3 45.4 46.1 48.1 51.4 51.4 52.1 53.9 56.1 59.1 63.7 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
29.4  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
61.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
36.5 43.3 46.3 48.6 49.2 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.4 21.4 23 23.2 23.9 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.7 13.6 14.5 14.9 15.1 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
113 138.8 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
77 87.8 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.7 43.8 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.8 27 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
188 220 ~ 204 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
95.1 105.8 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66.6 74.4 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
168.8
148
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
192.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
143.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
83.7
low 1280x720
102.8 107.3 112.8 113 116 119.1 119.4 124 126 128 130 138 139 145 ~ 123 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
93.8 94.6 97.3 98 103 106.2 112 114.9 115 119 120 120 124 130 ~ 111 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.1 73.9 77.6 78.7 80.4 82.7 82.8 83.3 84.1 84.1 84.8 85.2 85.2 88.4 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.3 65.8 66.6 67.2 73.4 74 75.6 76.1 76.3 76.3 76.3 76.9 77.3 80.6 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
29.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
54.9 64.3 69.7 79.6 80.2 80.3 80.5 80.7 81.5 84.7 85.3 86 ~ 77 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
35.2 41.9 42 42.3 42.4 46.2 46.5 46.7 46.9 47.2 48.6 49.7 51.9 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.6 22.8 22.9 24.7 27 27.1 27.4 27.5 27.5 27.8 28.3 28.5 29.9 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.1 14 15 15.1 15.3 15.6 15.7 15.8 16.4 16.7 17.1 17.5 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
32.7
34.5
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
141 146 156 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
115 136.4 137.3 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.8 47 49.5 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.1 22.2 23.7 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
108.7
69
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
108.5
86.9
low 1280x720
218.2 222.6 ~ 220 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
132.4 135 ~ 134 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
110.6 111.4 ~ 111 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.2 43.4 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
252  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
228.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
204.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
120.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Ready or Not41.5373214.7
The Finals31.522.41712.8
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora3.5
EA Sports WRC10.1
Lords of the Fallen7.68
Total War Pharaoh67.9442318.4
Assassin's Creed Mirage17
EA Sports FC 2432.4
Counter-Strike 265.65030.516.5
Lies of P21.818.818.611.2
Starfield12.65.08
Armored Core 618.914.99.89
Immortals of Aveum4
Atlas Fallen10.910.5
Baldur's Gate 318.814.410.5
F1 2326.420.814.28.39
Diablo 435.23126.620.9
Star Wars Jedi Survivor9.32
Dead Island 240.335.42114.8
The Last of Us7.86
Resident Evil 4 Remake18.45.45
Company of Heroes 316
Sons of the Forest26.213.812.8
Atomic Heart30.923.96.89
Returnal6
Hogwarts Legacy15.38.16
Dead Space Remake8.88
The Witcher 3 v4.0033.824.67.42
High On Life21.914
The Callisto Protocol30.115.710
Need for Speed Unbound18.314.2
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022302014
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection6
A Plague Tale Requiem16.713.18.41
The Quarry23.516.711.1
F1 2239.832.420.314.4
Vampire Bloodhunt72.543.935.221.3
Ghostwire Tokyo18.116.714.813.6
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands21.614.28.1
Cyberpunk 2077 1.616.111.26.425.46
Elex 214.4
GRID Legends45.231.225.117.7
Elden Ring22.621.214.8
Rainbow Six Extraction352118
God of War19.615
Farming Simulator 22114.145.732.420.5
Forza Horizon 56625167
Riders Republic422115
Back 4 Blood99.637.229.226.5
Far Cry 637.117.410.98.48
Deathloop8.176.626.4
F1 20214531
Monster Hunter Stories 262.856.844.126.9
Days Gone25.823.512.19.17
Mass Effect Legendary Edition83.84428.313.3
Resident Evil Village13.913.7
Outriders25.721.516.3
Hitman 347.4221917
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0221175.86
Immortals Fenyx Rising41171211
Yakuza Like a Dragon61202017
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War441512
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla19137
Dirt 547158
Watch Dogs Legion3318146.34
FIFA 2115095.488.380.1
Star Wars Squadrons123605136
Mafia Definitive Edition472120
Serious Sam 479127
Crysis Remastered79291211.7
Flight Simulator 20203919127
Horizon Zero Dawn31161311
Death Stranding40191818
F1 2020100493520
Valorant151129116
Gears Tactics135503121
Doom Eternal40.2
Hunt Showdown592621
Escape from Tarkov76363425
Red Dead Redemption 23518
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order322420
Need for Speed Heat49282421
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 201953322218
GRID 201966272215.5
Ghost Recon Breakpoint4319176
FIFA 2010470.846.333.5
Borderlands 367271714
Control521812
F1 2019102453527
Total War: Three Kingdoms862611.96.7
Rage 245171515
Anno 180069332010
The Division 255282112
Dirt Rally 2.0115413518
Far Cry New Dawn56282623
Metro Exodus3715129
Apex Legends85373126
Just Cause 455.235.326.223.3
Darksiders III12938.330.725.3
Battlefield V74373024
Farming Simulator 19175855137
Hitman 253.326.519.817.4
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey4922148
Forza Horizon 488372619
Shadow of the Tomb Raider62231712
Strange Brigade93332619
Monster Hunter World56.723.621.116.8
Far Cry 559272321
World of Tanks enCore346.8103.839.8
X-Plane 11.1168564829.4
Kingdom Come: Deliverance61.126.32315.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark452214
Fortnite126824327
Rocket League20410071
Overwatch192.2143.96442.5
Dota 2 Reborn123111817229.7
The Witcher 377452615
GTA V1481304718
BioShock Infinite22013411143
Counter-Strike: GO252228.4204.9120.1
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
32
40
27
14
64
27
9
5
69
20
6
1
61
7
2
1
2
1

4


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 16. 17:37:14

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.054s ... 0.055s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.055s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.055s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9980 +0.032s ... 0.088s

#7 got single benchmarks 9980 +0.059s ... 0.147s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.147s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.965s ... 1.111s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.111s

#11 Got 764 rows for game benchmarks. +0.11s ... 1.221s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.221s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.094s ... 1.315s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +3.531s ... 4.846s

#15 return log +0.08s ... 4.926s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce MX350 graphics card

Lenovo V17 G2 ITL

Lenovo V17 G2 review: 17-inch laptop with unrewarding MX350

With its 17-inch display, Nvidia graphics, and Intel's Core i7 CPU, Lenovo's V17 G2 is well suited for office and multimedia tasks, including simple gaming. Our...
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | 17.30" | 2.2 kg
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ OLED laptop review: The Lenovo IdeaPad alternative

Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ OLED laptop review: The Lenovo IdeaPad alternative

The VivoBook 15 K513 offers an amazing bang for the buck with its OLED display, 11th gen Intel CPU, and discrete Nvidia graphics all for under $950 USD. Though ...
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | 15.60" | 1.6 kg
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition in review. (Image Source: Xiaomi)

Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition Laptop Review: Cost-cutting not done right

With the Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition, Xiaomi aims to lower the entry point for a capable multimedia laptop. While the pricing seems right for a Core i7 Comet...
Intel Core i7-10510U | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
Honor MagicBook Pro review: Compact 16.1-inch allrounder with a good battery life

Honor MagicBook Pro review: Compact 16.1-inch allrounder with a good battery life

The MagicBook Pro offers a well-rounded level of equipment: a Core i5 processor, a GeForce MX350 GPU, 16 GB of working memory (dual-channel mode), an NVMe SSD, ...
Intel Core i5-10210U | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | 16.10" | 1.7 kg
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW

Dell Inspiron 14 7400 Laptop Review: Portable office laptop with a Tiger Lake CPU

The Inspiron 14 7400 is small and light. It also comes with a superb display. In combination with a Tiger Lake CPU and Nvidia’s GeForce MX350, the Inspiron 14 c...
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | 14.50" | 1.3 kg

Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 17.30", 2.2 kg
  Review » Acer Aspire 5 A517 laptop review: Attractive 17.3-incher with Tiger Lake CPU and MX350 GPU

Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  Review » Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ in review: Elegant all-rounder with equipment weaknesses

Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Huawei MateBook 14 2020 laptop review: 3:2 clamshell convinces both with Intel and AMD CPUs

HP Envy 13-ba0001ng: Intel Core i7-10510U, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  Review » HP Envy 13 Laptop Review: Elegant metal case and solid performance

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14 laptop review - With Nvidia GPU against AMD

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05 Review: Good performance and a long battery life - thanks to the 70-Wh battery

MSI Prestige 14 A10RD: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00"
  Review » Nvidia GeForce MX330 and MX350 in review: Known architecture - New name

Acer Aspire 5 A514-54G, i3-1115G4 MX350: Intel Core i3-1115G4, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A514-54G, i3-1115G4 MX350

Acer Aspire 5 A515-56G-78TR: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-56G-78TR

MSI Modern 14 B10RBSW-257XFR: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 14 B10RBSW-257XFR

Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 17.30", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE

Acer Aspire 5 A514-54G-743J: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A514-54G-743J

Dell Vostro 15 3510, i7-1165G7 MX350: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell Vostro 15 3510, i7-1165G7 MX350

Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ

Asus VivoBook 14 S433JQ-EB166: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 14 S433JQ-EB166

Asus VivoBook S14 S433JQ-EB166T: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S14 S433JQ-EB166T

Acer Aspire 5 A514-54G-58R8: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A514-54G-58R8

Asus VivoBook Ultra 14 K413EQ-EK115T: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00"
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Ultra 14 K413EQ-EK115T

HP Pavilion 14-dv0006ns: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 14-dv0006ns

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55GT-72L0: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 5 SF514-55GT-72L0

Honor MagicBook Pro 10210U: Intel Core i5-10210U, 16.10", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook Pro 10210U

Asus VivoBook S14 S433JQ-EB163: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S14 S433JQ-EB163

Acer Aspire 5 A515-56G-51YF: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-56G-51YF

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 14IIL05-82A4000MUS: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 14IIL05-82A4000MUS

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IIL05-82A10076GE: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IIL05-82A10076GE

MSI Modern 14 B10RBSW-064XES: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 14 B10RBSW-064XES

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55GT-79BM: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 5 SF514-55GT-79BM

Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T

Acer Book RS Porsche Design AP714-51GT-71A4: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Book RS Porsche Design AP714-51GT-71A4

Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 14IIL05: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 14IIL05

Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel

HP Envy 13-ba0004ns: Intel Core i7-10510U, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 13-ba0004ns

Asus VivoBook S14 S433JQ i5-1035G1: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S14 S433JQ i5-1035G1

Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5i 15IIL05-81YK003SHH: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5i 15IIL05-81YK003SHH

Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 i7-1065G7, MX350: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 16.10", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 i7-1065G7, MX350

Huawei MateBook 14 KLVC-WFE9L: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook 14 KLVC-WFE9L

Huawei MateBook 14 (2020): Intel Core i5-10210U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook 14 (2020)

Asus ZenBook 14 Q407IQ: AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 Q407IQ

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05

HP Envy 13-ba0005ns: Intel Core i7-10510U, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 13-ba0005ns

Acer Swift 5 SF514-54GT-72NT: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 5 SF514-54GT-72NT

Acer Aspire A514-53G-55A8: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire A514-53G-55A8

Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon, i7-10510U

Acer Swift 3 SF313-52G-54JU: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF313-52G-54JU

Asus ZenBook 14 UM433IQ-A5026T: AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UM433IQ-A5026T

Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 17.30", 2.2 kg
   » Lenovo V17 G2 reviewed: The 17-inch laptop is affordable when going without the MX350

Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.6 kg
   » 2021 Asus VivoBook 15 sets a new display standard for budget laptops with its outstanding 1080p OLED panel

Honor MagicBook Pro 10210U: Intel Core i5-10210U, 16.10", 1.7 kg
   » Honor MagicBook Pro with AMD or Intel/Nvidia?

Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.50", 1.3 kg
   » Dell Inspiron 14 7400: Tiger Lake processor plus a good screen equals a great laptop

Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
   » The Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ comes with a Thunderbolt 4 port

Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » Outdated Comet Lake CPU in the Huawei MateBook 14 is only convincing when it comes to battery life

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » The Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14 with the Nvidia GPU is better for gaming

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 15.60", 1.7 kg
   » The Lenovo Ideapad 5 15IIL05 comes close to entry-level gaming notebooks with its GeForce MX350 GPU

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA GeForce MX350 Laptop Graphics Card
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2019-12-30)