Notebookcheck

AMD FirePro W4190M

AMD FirePro W4190M

The AMD FirePro W4190M is a professional workstation graphics card for laptops. It is based on the same Mars chip as the AMD Radeon HD 8790M and AMD FirePro W4170M and similarly clocked. Therefore, the GPU takes position in the lower mid-range of mobile laptop graphics cards as of 2015. Thanks to its optimized drivers, the W4190M offers a very good performance in professional 3D applications like CAD, while the gaming performance is similar to a Nvidia GeForce 840M / Radeon HD 8790M.

The AMD FirePro M4100 series is based on the GCN architecture and therefore supports DirectX 12. The 384 shader cores can also be used with OpenCL as 6 compute units.

ManufacturerAMD
FirePro W Series
FirePro W7170M (compare) 2048 @ 723 MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
FirePro W5170M (compare) 640 @ 925 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
FirePro W5130M (compare) 512 @ 925 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 4000 MHz
FirePro W4170M (compare) 384 @ 850 - 900 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 4000 MHz
FirePro W4190M 384 @ 825 - 900 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 4000 MHz
CodenameMars XTX?
ArchitectureGCN
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed825 - 900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed4000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 11.2, Shader 5.0
Transistor Count900 Million
technology28 nm
FeaturesApp Acceleration, PowerPlay, PowerTune, ZeroCore, Enduro, PCI Express 3.0 x16
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement12.11.2015

Benchmarks

3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 6567     avg: 7603     median: 7894 (16%)     max: 8348 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 8513     avg: 11143.7     median: 12317 (8%)     max: 12601 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 1517     avg: 1630.3     median: 1663 (7%)     max: 1711 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 1588     avg: 1713     median: 1745 (4%)     max: 1806 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 35930     avg: 39703.5     median: 39703.5 (5%)     max: 43477 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 2173     avg: 2451.3     median: 2570 (9%)     max: 2611 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 1932     avg: 2220.7     median: 2351 (5%)     max: 2379 points
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Extreme HD DirectX 1920x1080
min: 6.2     avg: 7.3     median: 7.3 (5%)     max: 8.3 fps
SPECviewperf 11
Siemens NX 1920x1080 +
Tcvis 1920x1080 +
SolidWorks 1920x1080 +
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 +
Maya 1920x1080 +
Lightwave 1920x1080 +
Ensight 1920x1080 +
Catia 1920x1080 +
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 +
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 +
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 +
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 +
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 +
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 +
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 +
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 +
3ds Max (3dsmax-05) 1900x1060 +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
min: 415     avg: 423     median: 423 (8%)     max: 431 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 924     avg: 980.7     median: 984 (9%)     max: 1034 Samples/s
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

The Evil Within 2
low 1280x720
9.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Ark Survival Evolved
low 1280x720
19.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
40  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
33.3 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.5 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.7 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Rocket League
low 1280x720
101.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..