Notebookcheck

AMD FirePro W4190M

AMD FirePro W4190M

The AMD FirePro W4190M is a professional workstation graphics card for laptops. It is based on the same Mars chip as the AMD Radeon HD 8790M and AMD FirePro W4170M and similarly clocked. Therefore, the GPU takes position in the lower mid-range of mobile laptop graphics cards as of 2015. Thanks to its optimized drivers, the W4190M offers a very good performance in professional 3D applications like CAD, while the gaming performance is similar to a Nvidia GeForce 840M / Radeon HD 8790M.

The AMD FirePro M4100 series is based on the GCN architecture and therefore supports DirectX 12. The 384 shader cores can also be used with OpenCL as 6 compute units.

ManufacturerAMD
FirePro W Series
FirePro W7170M compare 2048 @ 723 MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
FirePro W5170M compare 640 @ 925 MHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
FirePro W5130M compare 512 @ 925 MHz128 Bit @ 4000 MHz
FirePro W4170M compare 384 @ 850 - 900 MHz128 Bit @ 4000 MHz
FirePro W4190M 384 @ 825 - 900 MHz128 Bit @ 4000 MHz
CodenameMars XTX?
ArchitectureGCN
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed825 - 900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed4000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 11.2, Shader 5.0
Transistor Count900 Million
technology28 nm
FeaturesApp Acceleration, PowerPlay, PowerTune, ZeroCore, Enduro, PCI Express 3.0 x16
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement12.11.2015

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
5.7 pt (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1517     avg: 1630     median: 1663 (5%)     max: 1711 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1588     avg: 1713     median: 1745 (4%)     max: 1806 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2173     avg: 2451     median: 2570 (7%)     max: 2611 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1932     avg: 2221     median: 2351 (4%)     max: 2379 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
specvp11 sw-02 +
specvp11 proe-05 +
specvp11 maya-03 +
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
specvp11 ensight-04 +
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
specvp12 snx-02 +
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
9.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
19.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
40  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
33.3 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.5 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.7 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
101.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
23.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
23.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
25.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14 17.4 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8 9.9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
59.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
28.5 28.6 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.4 18.5 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.7 9.7 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.7 fps