Notebookcheck Logo

AMD FirePro W4190M

AMD FirePro W4190M

The AMD FirePro W4190M is a professional workstation graphics card for laptops. It is based on the same Mars chip as the AMD Radeon HD 8790M and AMD FirePro W4170M and similarly clocked. Therefore, the GPU takes position in the lower mid-range of mobile laptop graphics cards as of 2015. Thanks to its optimized drivers, the W4190M offers a very good performance in professional 3D applications like CAD, while the gaming performance is similar to a Nvidia GeForce 840M / Radeon HD 8790M.

The AMD FirePro M4100 series is based on the GCN architecture and therefore supports DirectX 12. The 384 shader cores can also be used with OpenCL as 6 compute units.

FirePro W Series

FirePro W7170M compare 2048 @ 0.72 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
FirePro W5170M compare 640 @ 0.93 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
FirePro W5130M compare 512 @ 0.93 GHz128 Bit @ 4000 MHz
FirePro W4170M compare 384 @ 0.85 - 0.9 GHz128 Bit @ 4000 MHz
FirePro W4190M 384 @ 0.83 - 0.9 GHz128 Bit @ 4000 MHz
CodenameMars XTX?
ArchitectureGCN
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed825 - 900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed4000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11.2, Shader 5.0
Transistor Count900 Million
technology28 nm
FeaturesApp Acceleration, PowerPlay, PowerTune, ZeroCore, Enduro, PCI Express 3.0 x16
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement12.11.2015

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.7 pt (2%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 6567     avg: 7603     median: 7894 (7%)     max: 8348 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 8513     avg: 11144     median: 12317 (3%)     max: 12601 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1517     avg: 1630     median: 1663 (3%)     max: 1711 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1588     avg: 1713     median: 1745 (2%)     max: 1806 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 35930     avg: 39704     median: 39703.5 (4%)     max: 43477 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2173     avg: 2451     median: 2570 (3%)     max: 2611 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1932     avg: 2221     median: 2351 (2%)     max: 2379 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
12929 Points (17%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 6.2     avg: 7.3     median: 7.3 (2%)     max: 8.3 fps
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
28.7 fps (17%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
23.4 fps (13%)
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
51.2 fps (39%)
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
8.7 fps (10%)
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
65.5 fps (49%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
67.5 fps (72%)
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
21.1 fps (10%)
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
29.6 fps (16%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 30.12     avg: 30.8     median: 30.8 (8%)     max: 31.41 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 19.89     avg: 19.9     median: 19.9 (3%)     max: 19.91 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 4.98     avg: 7.6     median: 7.6 (1%)     max: 10.21 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 4.51     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (1%)     max: 6.09 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 16.38     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (5%)     max: 16.66 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 0.34     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.41 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
16.9 fps (7%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 18.13     avg: 18.4     median: 18.4 (3%)     max: 18.62 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
11.4 fps (2%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
9490 points (7%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
49.6 fps (16%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 48.12     avg: 48.6     median: 48.7 (3%)     max: 48.99 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 415     avg: 423     median: 423 (2%)     max: 431 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 924     avg: 981     median: 984 (2%)     max: 1034 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
902 points (1%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
46.7 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra
0.1 fps per Watt (12%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
37.4 dB(A) (53%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
9.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
19.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
40  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
33.3 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.5 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.7 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
101.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
23.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
23.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
25.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14 17.4 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8 9.9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
59.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
28.5 28.6 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.4 18.5 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.7 9.7 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.7 6 ~ 6 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
72.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
20  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
16  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
39.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
85.2 100.9 101.9 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
38.4 53.4 53.9 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
34.1 45.4 46.9 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.6 15.5 15.9 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
The Evil Within 29.35.14.7
Ark Survival Evolved19.496.23.6
F1 201740181413
Dirt 433.310.57.7
Rocket League101.739.126.5
Resident Evil 723.710.99.45.4
Doom23.513.98.94.9
Rise of the Tomb Raider25.61697.9
Metal Gear Solid V59.942.318.913
The Witcher 32918106
GTA V72.76117.37.1
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor2016112
Company of Heroes 239.3230.5117.17
BioShock Infinite96494215
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
7
4
3
9
4
1
13
1

10








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 02. 16:27:14

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 01 Aug 2025 05:45:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.047s ... 0.048s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.048s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7246 +0.063s ... 0.111s

#8 got single benchmarks 7246 +0.016s ... 0.127s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.127s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.964s ... 1.091s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.091s

#12 Got 66 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 1.098s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.098s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.019s ... 1.117s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.176s ... 1.293s

#16 return log +0.006s ... 1.299s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2017-09- 5)