Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q (N18P-G62) is a dedicated mid range graphics card for laptops based on the Turing architecture. The Max-Q variant is the power saving version of the mobile GTX 1650Ti with reduced clock speeds, performance and of course power consumption. It is using the same TU117 chip with 1,024 shaders. Therefore, it is intended for thin and light gaming laptops. Compared to the faster RTX 2000 GPUs (e.g. RTX 2060), the 1650 Ti integrates no Raytracing or Tensor cores.

There are two variants of the 1650Ti Max-Q, one with 35 Watt and 1035 - 1200 MHz and a faster 40 Watt version with a clock speed of 1200 - 1365 MHz. Both however are significantly lower clocked than the normal Max-P version with 50 / 55 Watt and 1350-1385 MHz. The memory is most likely clocked at 1250 MHz = 10,000 MHz effective (Gbps) in most laptops, although there might be versions with 1500 MHz = 12,000 Gbps.

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.

Compared to the bigger Turing chips (like the TU116 of the GTX 1660 Ti and the RTX lineup), the TU117 does not include the new NVENC encoder but an older one similar to the one used in Pascal and Volta.

The power consumption of the 1650 Ti Max-Q laptops is specified at 35 Watt TGP (Total Graphics Power) by Nvidia and therefore 25 Watt lower than the mobile GTX 1650 Ti in the same package (other variants can reach up to 80 Watt).

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1600 Series
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) compare 1536 @ 1.5 - 1.77 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) compare 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compare 1536 @ 1.46 - 1.59 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) compare 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q compare 1536 @ 1.14 - 1.34 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) compare 1408 @ 1.53 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop) compare 1024 @ 1.53 - 1.73 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compare 1024 @ 1.35 - 1.49 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile compare 1024 @ 1.4 - 1.56 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) compare 896 @ 1.49 - 1.67 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 1024 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 1.02 - 1.25 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
CodenameN18P-G62 Max-Q
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1024 - unified
Core Speed1035 - 1200 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed10000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1
technology12 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.04.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.nvidia.com/en-gb/geforce/gam...

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3168     avg: 3342     median: 3236 (18%)     max: 3709 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2982     avg: 3171     median: 3124.5 (16%)     max: 3526 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 18333     avg: 22556     median: 23382 (31%)     max: 26161 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 30436     avg: 45302     median: 49751.5 (25%)     max: 53539 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 7356     avg: 7807     median: 7800 (20%)     max: 8659 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 8024     avg: 8585     median: 8574.5 (17%)     max: 9573 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 10610     avg: 11540     median: 11321 (27%)     max: 13121 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 11055     avg: 11828     median: 11702.5 (20%)     max: 13343 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 83.9     avg: 132     median: 140.8 (40%)     max: 145 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 62.4     avg: 68.7     median: 68.7 (12%)     max: 75 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580859076.376.175.775.575.674.479.376.876.678.476.975.878.776.976.577.577.177.778.877.177.176.777.57777.376.777.37676.577.977.277.77780.27878.37878.277.677.178.377.577.276.877.377.377.976.776.477.776.777.578.276.977.677.276.776.679.176.976.577.574.574.275.176.674.776.875.175.175.874.774.574.975.674.776.574.675.673.974.974.576.775.373.974.175.174.474.375.474.275.375.574.174.475.174.474.87574.574.67774.674.874.677.274.975.174.975.374.774.676.674.976.17574.674.975.37574.976.174.774.874.974.674.474.974.574.775.374.974.97574.974.37574.876.174.976.574.374.774.874.476.87575.974.775.574.675.176757575.175.275.47576.97577.675.375.175.176.375.875.176.974.877.575.575.279.175.775.575.877.27575.577.374.976.17575.275.275.375.185.573.67575.576.775.576.174.575.47574.775.675.176.372.476.374.374.675.174.674.674.175.575.275.175.775.476.875.977.475.475.575.675.575.875.375.476.875.575.575.975.775.576.475.877.376.275.575.175.875.975.391.377.274.875.575.875.474.97677.674.975.777.174.776.174.874.875.77575.97774.874.874.87574.974.874.97575.674.87575.775.976.176.775.575.375.576.676.375.677.278.475.675.972.475.475.477.477.175.677.575.573.672.172.67277.578.271.775.571.771.47171.771.871.273.371.671.171.771.171.471.271.27371.871.571.471.771.671.571.67172.771.271.270.871.971.471.27471.771.171.971.771.472.374.273.673.77272.168.668.46868.768.168.468.668.467.967.868.267.968.669.668.468.868.869.168.768.869.469.669.268.869.36974.17474.277.475.475.374.975.775.179.179.979.975.375.277.677.677.678.679.678.179.274.675.577.375.275.877.174.673.774.27574.47674.976.274.575.274.274.374.774.373.774.97474.274.674.573.975.675.175Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 65.1     avg: 66.2     median: 66.2 (11%)     max: 67.3 Watt
051015202530354045505560657060.661.467.570.765.770.969.867.872.866.371.366.468.87171.167.971.86866.56567.172.567.469.567.265.767.369.465.265.66866.765.866.467.365.868.364.867.566.465.465.66664.465.968.962.565.165.967.666.866.860.665.771.16965.868.768.566.168.871.166.971.86567.764.367.465.765.464.96868.963.964.164.765.86262.765.262.867.564.664.962.863.366.86762.663.565.363.365.664.764.665.564.969.66764.463.567.665.564.964.864.172.165.76667.268.76361.964.860.864.864.163.16563.664.663.164.163.764.5636464.862.164.864.964.264.865.365.262.866.46359.763.762.565.962.567.564.563.663.663.663.16362.962.862.66366.463.962.963.863.263.163.368.162.56664.165.664.76467.164.564.863.965.463.564.566.263.968.763.664.463.163.664.264.365.96468.865.264.366.364.763.363.165.264.262.665.264.665.564.863.663.268.464.263.762.263.562.563.564.262.76465.363.463.663.964.763.964.865.564.563.96564.964.762.262.864.661.463.264.465.864.364.862.56466.964.864.564.96565.266.670.463.263.864.164.866.262.462.362.664.563.363.563.263.465.763.664.163.163.166.964.665.363.264.863.166.162.564.463.760.364.163.763.764.764.265.663.464.263.163.159.364.663.363.764.56464.56463.56266.562.364.762.863.162.461.96863.766.265.763.664.263.66563.566.660.664.963.665.365.562.564.763.464.162.565.4666765.267.865.765.862.865.565.568.866.566.568.565.564.96665.966.66568.566.668.366.26564.766.366.365.766.865.166.967.667.56668.868.566.666.5Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 61.5     avg: 73.6     median: 68.6 (15%)     max: 94 Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
63.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
70 77 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45 48 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32 36 37 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28 29 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
24  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
97.5 105.1 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42.5 46.9 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.5 44.8 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.7 39.6 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
100  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
63 74 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38 45 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24 32 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5 14 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
70 89 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43 54 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37 39 47 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11 21 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
FIFA 21

FIFA 21

2020
low 1280x720
210  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
202  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
192.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
165.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
129.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
79.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
222  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
124  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
112.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
103.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
70  fps    + Compare