Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q (N18P-G62) is a dedicated mid range graphics card for laptops based on the Turing architecture. The Max-Q variant is the power saving version of the mobile GTX 1650Ti with reduced clock speeds, performance and of course power consumption. It is using the same TU117 chip with 1,024 shaders. Therefore, it is intended for thin and light gaming laptops. Compared to the faster RTX 2000 GPUs (e.g. RTX 2060), the 1650 Ti integrates no Raytracing or Tensor cores.

There are two variants of the 1650Ti Max-Q, one with 35 Watt and 1035 - 1200 MHz and a faster 40 Watt version with a clock speed of 1200 - 1365 MHz. Both however are significantly lower clocked than the normal Max-P version with 50 / 55 Watt and 1350-1385 MHz. The memory is most likely clocked at 1250 MHz = 10,000 MHz effective (Gbps) in most laptops, although there might be versions with 1500 MHz = 12,000 Gbps.

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.

Compared to the bigger Turing chips (like the TU116 of the GTX 1660 Ti and the RTX lineup), the TU117 does not include the new NVENC encoder but an older one similar to the one used in Pascal and Volta.

The power consumption of the 1650 Ti Max-Q laptops is specified at 35 Watt TGP (Total Graphics Power) by Nvidia and therefore 25 Watt lower than the mobile GTX 1650 Ti in the same package (other variants can reach up to 80 Watt).

GeForce GTX 1600 Series

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) compare 1536 @ 1.5 - 1.77 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) compare 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compare 1536 @ 1.46 - 1.59 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) compare 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) compare 1280 @ 1.53 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q compare 1536 @ 1.14 - 1.34 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compare 1024 @ 1.35 - 1.49 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) compare 896 @ 1.49 - 1.67 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile compare 1024 @ 1.38 - 1.56 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 1024 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 1.02 - 1.25 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
CodenameN18P-G62 Max-Q
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1024 - unified
Core Speed1035 - 1200 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed10000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption35 Watt
technology12 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.04.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3015     avg: 3309     median: 3235.5 (9%)     max: 3709 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2886     avg: 3139     median: 3098 (8%)     max: 3526 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 18333     avg: 22116     median: 22895 (24%)     max: 26161 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 29035     avg: 42978     median: 47657 (13%)     max: 53539 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 7292     avg: 7764     median: 7700 (14%)     max: 8659 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 8024     avg: 8542     median: 8564 (10%)     max: 9573 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 10610     avg: 11524     median: 11398 (16%)     max: 13121 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 11055     avg: 11796     median: 11538 (10%)     max: 13343 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 83.9     avg: 132.8     median: 140 (8%)     max: 145 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 61.5     avg: 66.7     median: 65.2 (9%)     max: 75 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 59.8     avg: 63.3     median: 63 (9%)     max: 67.3 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 60.6     avg: 72     median: 68.6 (15%)     max: 94 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3568     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (44%)     max: 0.522 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.4161     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (37%)     max: 0.4716 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 34.5     avg: 40.9     median: 42 (67%)     max: 47 dB(A)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
63.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
70 77 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45 48 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32 36 37 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28 29 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
24  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
97.5 105.1 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42.5 46.9 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.5 44.8 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.7 39.6 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
100  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
47 63 74 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30 38 45 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19 24 32 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5 12 14 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
12  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
5  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
70 89 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43 54 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37 39 47 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11 21 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
FIFA 21

FIFA 21

2020
low 1280x720
210  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
202  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
192.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
165.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
129.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
79.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
222  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
124  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
112.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
103.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
70  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
93.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
46.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
27.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
94.8 115.7 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47.5 51.9 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36.8 40.8 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.9 30.5 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
22.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
154.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
80 99 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42 58 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35 36 48 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32 40 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
30  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
8  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
85.6 99.6 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53.6 60.9 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.7 56.4 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49.5 54.4 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
35.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
211  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
107  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
82  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
41  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
162.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
145.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
115.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
120.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
71.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
63.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
61.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
114  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
74  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
102.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
104.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
171  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
89  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
71  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
155.9 164.3 176 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56 57.5 60.3 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.4 36 36.5 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.6 21.6 31.4 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
89.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
65.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
93  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
195.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
89  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
83.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
143.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
86.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
62.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
63  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
97.2 102 106 112 115 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.8 55 55 56 64 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40 44 46 52.5 55 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34 37 40 43.3 48 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15 15 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
100
90
92
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
167 188 196 ~ 184 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
68.6 76.5 81.5 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.9 62.2 65.6 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.9 53.6 55.2 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
35  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
90 102 115 ~ 102 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
46 56 64 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
42 51 60 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
39 47 48 56 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
27 38 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14 17 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
62
54
low 1280x720
79 80.2 85.9 86.6 86.8 91.2 92.6 93.9 96.4 97.5 98 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
71.5 71.9 72.8 73.5 78.2 79.2 79.4 80.7 83.5 83.9 87.5 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60.5 62.6 62.7 63.1 66.4 66.7 67.5 69.7 70.6 70.8 72.3 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39.2 49.2 52.8 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
72 90.1 94 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.3 46.3 48.1 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.1 32.5 33.9 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
19.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
89.7 163.4 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
84.7 107.4 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58.1 60.5 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.9 49.1 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19.9 22.9 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
118 128 130 137 140 140 142 143 143 144 147 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
112 116 117 118 118 119 121 124 124 127 129 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
107 107 109 111 111 112 113 115 117 117 121 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
101 103 104 104 105 106 107 108 108 109 110 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41.5 51.5 58.2 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
144.3 153 153.2 156.8 159.5 167.9 183 198.6 199 ~ 168 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
76.3 87.3 90 92 92 100.3 117 127 132 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.9 52.6 52.8 53.6 53.8 54.9 55 56.4 61 66 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25.3 29.8 30.1 30.7 31.5 32.5 34.8 35 36.1 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
16.8 19.3 21.3 24 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
83.2
67.5
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
156 167 171 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
145 157 164 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73.2 88.1 91.5 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.1 45.3 45.4 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
12.9
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
161
134
152
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
169
142
158
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Cyberpunk 2077 1.063.73326.822.2
Immortals Fenyx Rising744735292414
Yakuza Like a Dragon10145433825.412.4
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War10055.644.140.225.810.6
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla61382510125
Watch Dogs Legion8049411614
FIFA 21210202192.9165.2129.679.6
Star Wars Squadrons222124112.9103.47030.7
Mafia Definitive Edition93.946.24327.914.1
Serious Sam 410550392622.3
Crysis Remastered154.159.831.923.6
Horizon Zero Dawn90504036308
Death Stranding9357545235.916.8
F1 202021110782574122
Gears Tactics162.973.744.433.423.513.5
Doom Eternal145.191.252.6
Hunt Showdown115.750.141.8
Escape from Tarkov120.771.252.847
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order63.353.246
Need for Speed Heat61.849.345.833.9
GRID 201911476.964.327.5
Ghost Recon Breakpoint74453422
Borderlands 3102.852.634.726.1
Control104.739.229.1
F1 2019171897162
Total War: Three Kingdoms165583524
Anno 180089.465.841.121.5
The Division 293514130
Dirt Rally 2.0195.963.155.138.1
Far Cry New Dawn89565349
Metro Exodus83.140.129.823.2
Apex Legends143.786.268.762.9
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey63494119
Shadow of the Tomb Raider10657484015
Strange Brigade1847661523521.4
Far Cry 51025551483316
X-Plane 11.1190786747
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark85443119.310.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider12796594921
Dota 2 Reborn13712011310650
The Witcher 3168102553220
GTA V16515584432624.8
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


25
16

24
14
4
4
28
9
1
13
18
4
1
10
5
1
1
16
3
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 17. 08:43:32

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.066s ... 0.067s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.067s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.067s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10309 +0.017s ... 0.084s

#7 got single benchmarks 10309 +0.05s ... 0.134s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.134s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.823s ... 0.957s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.957s

#11 Got 406 rows for game benchmarks. +0.098s ... 1.055s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.055s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.037s ... 1.092s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +2.081s ... 3.173s

#15 return log +0.063s ... 3.236s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q graphics card

Razer Blade Stealth 13 2021 in review: Mobile gamer with OLED panel

Razer Blade Stealth 13 2021 in review: Mobile gamer with OLED panel

Razer offers its compact Blade Stealth 13 with an OLED screen in addition to the familiar IPS display. This offers advantages like the extremely fast response t...
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 13.30" | 1.5 kg
MSI Summit E14 laptop review: GeForce GTX graphics without the GeForce GTX weight

MSI Summit E14 laptop review: GeForce GTX graphics without the GeForce GTX weight

The Summit E14 may look like an ordinary Ultrabook, but it manages to house a full-fledged GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q to offer significantly faster graphics perf...
Intel Core i7-1185G7 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 14.00" | 1.3 kg
Lenovo ThinkBook 15p 4K laptop review: Multimedia allrounder with a great 4K display but weak connections

Lenovo ThinkBook 15p 4K laptop review: Multimedia allrounder with a great 4K display but weak connections

Lenovo has equipped its entry-level business series again with a Comet Lake processor, combining the CPU with a GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, and thus turning the device i...
Intel Core i7-10750H | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 15.60" | 2 kg
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314 laptop review: Powerful convertible is slowed down by Intel Comet Lake

Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314 laptop review: Powerful convertible is slowed down by Intel Comet Lake

Acer sells laptops for creative professionals and engineers under the "ConceptD" label. In order to reach this target group, they have specialized in convertibl...
Intel Core i7-10750H | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 14.00" | 1.8 kg
2021 HP Envy 14 Laptop Review: Tiger Lake, 16:10 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q All-In-One

2021 HP Envy 14 Laptop Review: Tiger Lake, 16:10 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q All-In-One

Unveiled at CES 2021, the latest Envy 14 incorporates almost everything great about last year's 15.6-inch Envy 15 but in a more portable 14-inch form factor. It...
Intel Core i5-1135G7 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 14.00" | 1.6 kg

MSI Summit E15 A11SCST: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  Review » MSI Summit E15 laptop review: Advance into the premium business segment

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen3-20TLS0UV00: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  Review » ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen3 2020: Lenovo's Premium Multimedia Laptop with GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q in Review

Asus ZenBook UX535-M01440: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2 kg
  Review » Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX535 laptop review: It could still be a little more Zen

Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  Review » Razer Blade Stealth Tiger Lake GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q Laptop Review: A Small Step Forward

Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  Review » 2020 Razer Blade Stealth GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q Laptop Review: Like the 2019 Version, But Done Right

HP Envy 14-eb0021tx: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 14-eb0021tx

Razer Blade Stealth 13 2021 OLED: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade Stealth 13 2021 OLED

MSI Summit E14 A11SCS: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Summit E14 A11SCS

MSI Prestige 14 A11SCS-036DC: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 A11SCS-036DC

MSI GF63 Thin 10SCSR-1051XES: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GF63 Thin 10SCSR-1051XES

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH-K6200T: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, 13.40", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH-K6200T

HP Envy 14-eb0003ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 14-eb0003ns

MSI Summit E15 A11SCS-091AU: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Summit E15 A11SCS-091AU

MSI GF63 Thin 10SCSR-876XES: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GF63 Thin 10SCSR-876XES

MSI Prestige 15 A11SCS-033XES: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 15 A11SCS-033XES

HP Envy 14-eb0775ng: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 14-eb0775ng

Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

MSI Summit E15 A11SCST-067RU: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » MSI Summit E15 A11SCST-067RU

Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513: Intel Core i7-10750H, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513

MSI Summit E15 A11SCST-227ID: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 15.60"
  External Review » MSI Summit E15 A11SCST-227ID

Lenovo ThinkBook 15p IMH-20V30009GE: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 15p IMH-20V30009GE

MSI Summit E15 A11SCST: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » MSI Summit E15 A11SCST

HP Envy 14-eb0010nr: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 14-eb0010nr

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G3, i7-10850H, 1650 Ti Max-Q: Intel Core i7-10850H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G3, i7-1850H, 1650 Ti Max-Q

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G3-20TK000NGE: Intel Core i9-10885H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G3-20TK000NGE

Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX535LI-E3089T: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX535LI-E3089T

HP Spectre x360 15-eb0036ng: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 15-eb0036ng

Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel

MSI GF63 10SCSR-243: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GF63 10SCSR-243

Dell XPS 15 9500 i7-10750H, 1650 Ti Max-Q: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 15 9500 i7-10750H, 1650 Ti Max-Q

Razer Blade Stealth 2020, i7-1065G7, GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade Stealth 2020, i7-1065G7, GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

MSI Summit E14 A11SCS: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » MSI Summit E14 vs. MSI Prestige 14: What's the difference?

Lenovo ThinkBook 15p Gen1 4K: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2 kg
   » The Lenovo ThinkBook 15p has a great display but bad connections for a business allrounder

Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513: Intel Core i7-10750H, 14.00", 1.8 kg
   » Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel shows wasted potential in our test

HP Envy 14-eb0010nr: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » HP Envy 14 Core i5-1135G7 runs at faster clock rates than most Core i7-1165G7 laptops

MSI Summit E15 A11SCST: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
   » MSI Summit E15 - A challenger for the Dell XPS 15 and the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen3-20TLS0UV00: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
   » Lenovo improves the performance of the ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen3, but we would like to see a bigger update with AMD Ryzen

Asus ZenBook UX535-M01440: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2 kg
   » Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX535: Rather with more Zen the next time

Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.5 kg
   » The 2019 Razer Blade Stealth series was a huge mess. The 2020 series puts it back on track

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-03-27)