Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is a high end gaming graphics cards for laptops. It is the 2020 refresh of the GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and may now also use the TU104 chip with more shaders (as the desktop RTX 2070 Super did). The older mobile RTX 2070 uses the TU106 chip with 2,304 shaders and should be slightly slower than the new Super model.

Features

NVIDIA manufacturers the TU106 and TU104 chips on a 12 nm FinFET process and includes features like Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) and Real-Time Ray Tracing (RTRT), which should combine to create more realistic lighting effects than older GPUs based on the company's Pascal architecture (if the games supports it). The RTX 2070 Super is also DisplayPort 1.4 ready, while there is also support for HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) and H.265 video en/decoding (PlayReady 3.0).

GeForce RTX 2000 Series

NVIDIA Titan RTX compare 4608 @ 1.35 - 1.77 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop) compare 4352 @ 1.35 - 1.55 GHz352 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop) compare 3072 @ 1.65 - 1.82 GHz256 Bit @ 15500 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop) compare 2944 @ 1.52 - 1.71 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile compare 3072 @ 1.37 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile compare 2944 @ 1.38 - 1.59 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop) compare 2560 @ 1.61 - 1.77 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop) compare 2304 @ 1.41 - 1.62 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile 2560 @ 1.14 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14002 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.98 - 1.23 GHz256 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop) compare 2176 @ 1.47 - 1.65 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile compare 2304 @ 1.22 - 1.44 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q compare 2944 @ 0.74 - 1.1 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop) compare 1920 @ 1.32 - 1.62 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.93 - 1.16 GHz256 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q compare 2304 @ 0.89 - 1.19 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile compare 1920 @ 0.96 - 1.2 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.98 - 1.19 GHz192 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile compare 2048 @ 1.48 GHz64 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameN18E-G2R
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines2560 - unified
Core Speed1140 - 1380 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed14002 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption115 Watt
technology12 nm
FeaturesDLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor, 550 Watt system power recommended
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement02.04.2020

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 7943     avg: 8292     median: 8315.5 (24%)     max: 8602 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 7840     avg: 8238     median: 8272 (22%)     max: 8657 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 446705     avg: 471516     median: 481195 (55%)     max: 486649 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 39220     avg: 45009     median: 46745 (50%)     max: 50766 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 75986     avg: 121959     median: 126287 (33%)     max: 141778 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 14771     avg: 18634     median: 18919.5 (33%)     max: 19884 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 18662     avg: 21824     median: 22016 (25%)     max: 23042 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 20961     avg: 23775     median: 24028.5 (33%)     max: 25360 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 28207     avg: 29416     median: 29092.5 (25%)     max: 31050 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 snx-03 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 130     avg: 141     median: 142.1 (8%)     max: 154 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
175 Watt (25%)
0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 175     avg: 190.3     median: 190.5 (42%)     max: 201 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4264     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (44%)     max: 0.472 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 50     avg: 53.4     median: 54 (86%)     max: 57.5 dB(A)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1425     avg: 1479     median: 1455 (57%)     max: 1560 MHz
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
156  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
105.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
104.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
92.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
61  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
191  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
100.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
85.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
60.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings + Ultra Ray Tracing 1920x1080
49.5
low 1280x720
122  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
71  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
60 61 93 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
157 165 ~ 161 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91 91 95.5 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73.6 78 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45.5 63.8 68.6 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
52.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
34.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
112 112.2 ~ 112 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
102.7 105 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90.1 92 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.3 60 61 64 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
44  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing (DX12) 1920x1080
33.2
35
low 1280x720
263.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
224.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
211.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
202.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
123.7 149.5 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
95.2 106 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
92 96.6 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
122 124 143 ~ 130 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
93.7 94 102 ~ 97 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
81.6 86.6 87.8 ~ 85 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
71.1 72.5 78 82.1 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
63.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
39.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
66.6 71.2 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
58 61.7 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48.8 53.3 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.8 42.1 43.8 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low-End TAAAA 1920x1080
63.9
66.2
low 1280x720
139 152 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
107 129 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
94 116 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77 79 98 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
137.5 145 ~ 141 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
128.2 129.2 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
117.8 119.1 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
116.2 116.8 121.6 123.8 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
81.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
46.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
227  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
168  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
147  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
118 124 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
249.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
172.4 215 ~ 194 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
122.2 144 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
90 103 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
64.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
219.1 234.1 ~ 227 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
165.7 171.5 198 ~ 178 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
151.9 158.5 176 ~ 162 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
151 155.4 163.2 170 190.4 ~ 166 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
118  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
61.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
136  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
113  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
74  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
34.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
81  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
110  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
38.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
119  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
114  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
108  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
84  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
42.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
105  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
92.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
81.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
48.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
141  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
134  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
107  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
75.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 1920x1080
77.4
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
med. 1920x1080
160  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
119  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
80.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
70.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
47.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
115  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
101  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
75  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
55  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
med. 1920x1080
280  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
267  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
264  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
262  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
211  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
127  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
92.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
70.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
49.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Control

Control

2019
med. 1920x1080
107  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
80.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
52.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
25.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Quality Preset & High Ray Tracing Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
47.1
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
med. 1920x1080
203  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
178  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
170  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
116  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
73  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
med. 1920x1080
143  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
119  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
74.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
36.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
med. 1920x1080
116  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
44  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
150  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
124  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
87  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
61  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
211  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
178  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
97.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
72.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
111  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
94  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
89  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
50  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
82.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
54.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Quality DXR 16xAF 1920x1080
52.5
med. 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
121  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
66.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
162  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
119  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
105  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
75  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
166  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
141  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
127  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
88.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
44  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
166  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
152  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
141  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
110  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
62.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset DXR 1920x1080
71.8
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
med. 1920x1080
98.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
89.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
82.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
78.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
46.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
56  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
36  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
121 153 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
110 120 123 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
107 115 118 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
100 104 108 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
73  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
37  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
130  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
120  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
98.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
63.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
107 113 117 118 ~ 114 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
89.4 98.6 103 103 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78.5 82.1 86.5 87 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
146  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
119  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
82.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
59.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.7 91.1 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
37.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
med. 1920x1080
164  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
156  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
129  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
93.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
47.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
154 155 156 156 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
136 137 141 145 ~ 140 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
111 127 133 135 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
104 122 126 129 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
274 296.3 368.7 381.2 ~ 330 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
236.7 247.1 256.5 268 268.1 ~ 255 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
154.3 161 162.9 168 170.2 ~ 163 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
76.3 84.4 85.1 85.7 87.8 90.8 93.6 94.6 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
57.6 59.8 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
42
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
193.9
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
182  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
177  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
163  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
94  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
174
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
181
low 1280x720
371.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
308.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
299  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
173.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Yakuza Like a Dragon156105.4104.192.26131.4
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War191100.593.885.160.635.3
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla122837171
Dirt 516193765952.334.9
Watch Dogs Legion11210491614425
Star Wars Squadrons263.1224.6211.5202.4
Mafia Definitive Edition13710194
Serious Sam 413097857663.739.8
Flight Simulator 202069605141
Horizon Zero Dawn14611810585
Death Stranding14112911812081.346.9
F1 2020227168147121
Gears Tactics249.11941339764.533.3
Doom Eternal22717816216611861.6
Hunt Showdown1361137434.1
Escape from Tarkov1211211218141.4
Red Dead Redemption 211073.147.638.124.8
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order1191141088442.5
Need for Speed Heat1059792.481.748.1
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 201914113410775.341.6
GRID 201916011980.770.247.2
Ghost Recon Breakpoint115101755532
FIFA 20280267264262211
Borderlands 312792.170.649.826.8
Control10780.852.625.6
F1 201920317817011673
Rage 214312111974.236.7
Anno 180011690.4514423.9
The Division 2150124876132
Dirt Rally 2.021117897.772.4
Far Cry New Dawn111104948950
Metro Exodus11282.765.554.431.9
Apex Legends14414414412166.6
Just Cause 41621191057541.2
Darksiders III16614112788.344
Battlefield V16615214111062.7
Hitman 298.889.782.578.846.4
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey10490635636
Shadow of the Tomb Raider1371181131047337
Monster Hunter World13012098.963.932.1
Far Cry 5105
X-Plane 11.111149984
Kingdom Come: Deliverance14611982.559.731.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1218537.7
Fortnite16415612993.447.9
Dota 2 Reborn155140127120
The Witcher 33302551638759
GTA V18217716394
BioShock Infinite371.8308.3299173.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


3
17


21
27

1
27
20

4
27
13

10
24
2
5
27
4
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 17. 08:45:29

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.043s ... 0.045s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.045s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.045s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10229 +0.015s ... 0.059s

#7 got single benchmarks 10229 +0.038s ... 0.098s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.098s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.682s ... 0.78s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.78s

#11 Got 337 rows for game benchmarks. +0.048s ... 0.828s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.828s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.043s ... 0.871s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +2.456s ... 3.327s

#15 return log +0.047s ... 3.373s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile graphics card

Schenker Compact 17 (Clevo PB71DF2-G) in review: A lot of performance with little heat development

Schenker Compact 17 (Clevo PB71DF2-G) in review: A lot of performance with little heat development

The Schenker Compact 17 offers powerful hardware, 32 GB of RAM (dual-channel mode), a 4K display, and a 1 TB NVMe SSD. In addition, there's an extensive range o...
Intel Core i7-10875H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | 17.30" | 2.9 kg
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Comet Lake

Schenker XMG Neo 15 laptop in review: Comet Lake upgrade

In addition to an Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super, Schenker is also donating an Intel Core i7-10875H to the XMG Neo 15. In our test report, we clarify what improv...
Intel Core i7-10875H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | 15.60" | 2.2 kg
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (2020, Tongfang GM7MPHS) Review: Overboost unleashes the Core-i7 processor

Schenker XMG Neo 17 (2020, Tongfang GM7MPHS) Review: Overboost unleashes the Core-i7 processor

The Neo 17 brings all the current computer games smoothly to the very responsive 17.3-inch screen (FHD, IPS, 240 Hz). The level of equipment is also right: a me...
Intel Core i7-10875H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | 17.30" | 2.6 kg
Asus ROG Strix G17 G712LWS in review: Powerful gaming machine with integrated light show

Asus ROG Strix G17 G712LWS in review: Powerful gaming machine with integrated light show

The Strix G17 doesn't lower its guard and displays all modern games smoothly on the matte screen (IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz). The individually configurable LED bar o...
Intel Core i7-10750H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | 17.30" | 2.8 kg
Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L

Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L laptop in review: Gaming laptop updated to Comet Lake

Not only does the slim Zephyrus S15 from Asus come with improved hardware in the new edition, but it now also features a 300 Hz panel. In our review, we'll clar...
Intel Core i7-10875H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | 15.60" | 2.1 kg

Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  Review » Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Laptop Review: GeForce Supercharged

MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  Review » MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Laptop Review: Premiere for the RTX 2070 Super

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-73L3: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-73L3

HP Omen 17-cb1278ng: Intel Core i7-10750H, 17.30", 3.3 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 17-cb1278ng

MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS

MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS-054ES: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS-054ES

MSI GL65 Leopard 10SFSK-280XES: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI GL65 Leopard 10SFSK-280XES

Asus Strix Scar 15 G532LWS: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Strix Scar 15 G532LWS

Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LWS-HG029T: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LWS-HG029T

Alienware Area-51m R2, i7-10700K, RTX 2070 Super: unknown, 17.30", 4.1 kg
  External Review » Alienware Area-51m R2, i7-10700K, RTX 2070 Super

Asus Strix G17 G712LWS-EV003T: Intel Core i7-10750H, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Strix G17 G712LWS-EV003T

Asus Strix Scar 15 G532LWS-HF162T: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Strix Scar 15 G532LWS-HF162T

HP Omen 17-cb1273ng: Intel Core i7-10750H, 17.30", 3.3 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 17-cb1273ng

Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS

MSI GE75 Raider 10SFS-034CZ: Intel Core i7-10750H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI GE75 Raider 10SFS-034CZ

MSI GE66 10SFS-072 Raider: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI GE66 10SFS-072 Raider

Asus Strix G15 G512LWS-AZ029T: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Strix G15 G512LWS-AZ029T

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LWS-HF055T: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LWS-HF055T

MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  Article » Staying secure in the new normal: How AMD Ryzen Pro processors ensure 24x7 protection for your critical data

  Article » MSI laptops are the ideal Holiday season gifts for the avid gamer or content producer in your life

SCHENKER Compact 17: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.30", 2.9 kg
   » "Marvel's Avengers" or "Troy - A Total War Saga" - Buyers of the Schenker Compact 17 will get one of the two games for free

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.30", 2.6 kg
   » A real wolf in sheep's clothing: With the XMG Neo 17 (2020), Schenker delivers powerful hardware in a moderate exterior with a mechanical keyboard

Asus Strix G17 G712LWS: Intel Core i7-10750H, 17.30", 2.8 kg
   » The Asus ROG Strix G17 G712LWS offers space for up to three M.2 2280 SSDs

Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
   » Asus Zephyrus S15: Advantage gained by RTX 2070 Super only marginal

Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.4 kg
   » MSI GE66 Raider vs. Asus ROG Strix Scar G532: Nothing but the facts

MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.4 kg
   » MSI GE66 Raider: light show and monster battery

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-03-27)