Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc Graphics 130V

Intel Arc 130V

The Intel Arc Graphics 130V is an integrated graphics adapter that lower-end Intel Lunar Lake family processors employ. This is a direct successor to the Arc 7 iGPU; it has 7 Xe² architecture "cores" (codename Battlemage) running at up to 1,850 MHz and 7 ray tracing units at its disposal.

DirectX 12 Ultimate is fully supported here and the iGPU also supports hardware-decoding a long list of popular video codecs such as h.266 VVC, h.265 HEVC, h.264 AVC, AV1 and VP9. It can drive three SUHD 4320p monitors simultaneously via HDMI 2.1, eDP 1.5 and DP 2.1.

Just like it was with Meteor Lake, Intel taps its Foveros technology to build Lunar Lake chips meaning the iGPU and the CPU cores are found on different dies stacked on top of each other or next to each other.

Performance

Its performance can be vastly different depending on which benchmarks and games one runs. Oftentimes, it isn't much faster than its direct predecessor, the Arc 7. It is clear the 130V isn't fast enough to run most triple-A 2024 games at 1080p. However, it's still more than good enough for an occasional gaming session.

Power consumption

Lunar Lake processors' power consumption figures are relatively modest at around 20 W to 30 W, with up to about a half of that getting consumed by the integrated GPU.

Gen13 / Arc Xe2 Series

Arc 140V compare 8 @ 2.05 GHz
Arc 130V 7 @ 1.85 GHz
CodenameLunar Lake iGPU
ArchitectureXe² Battlemage
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines7 - unified
Raytracing Cores7
Core Speed1850 (Boost) MHz
Memory TypeLPDDR5x
Max. Amount of Memory16 GB
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Man. Technology3 nm
Displays3 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesSUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VVC/VP9/AV1 decoding
Date of Announcement24.09.2024
PredecessorArc 7-Core
CPU in Arc 130VGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V8 x 2100 MHz, 17 W300 MHz1850 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V8 x 2100 MHz, 17 W300 MHz1850 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V8 x 2100 MHz, 17 W300 MHz1850 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V8 x 2100 MHz, 17 W300 MHz1850 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz1850 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.7 pt (11%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.0639 -98%
...
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
3.23 -13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
3.29 -12%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
3.35 -10%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
3.35 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
3.4 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
3.41 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
3.43 -8%
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
3.49 -6%
AMD Radeon 780M
3.52 -6%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
3.73
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
3.73 0%
Intel Arc A310
3.73 0%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
3.74 0%
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
3.82 2%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3.85 3%
AMD Radeon 890M
3.94 6%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3.95 6%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
4.07 9%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
4.08 9%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
22.7 509%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 793%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 452     avg: 479     median: 479 (3%)     max: 506 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 477     avg: 580     median: 589 (4%)     max: 659 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 2413     avg: 2666     median: 2670 (6%)     max: 2877 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
23603 Points (12%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 12207     avg: 12978     median: 13324 (5%)     max: 13402 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 6913     avg: 7647     median: 7784 (12%)     max: 8007 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 7536     avg: 8373     median: 8463 (8%)     max: 8755 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 195491     avg: 236844     median: 251095 (28%)     max: 263945 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3415     avg: 3655     median: 3652 (9%)     max: 3850 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 3148     avg: 3371     median: 3388 (7%)     max: 3543 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
434157 Points (44%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
149590 Points (18%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 28090     avg: 30018     median: 30375 (29%)     max: 31232 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 42128     avg: 47415     median: 48426.5 (12%)     max: 50680 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 29054     avg: 30879     median: 30878.5 (29%)     max: 32703 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 38271     avg: 40212     median: 40211.5 (15%)     max: 42152 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 8815     avg: 10160     median: 10260 (12%)     max: 10582 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 8129     avg: 9709     median: 9765 (7%)     max: 10312 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 33968     avg: 37925     median: 37924.5 (11%)     max: 41881 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 31489     avg: 35818     median: 35817.5 (20%)     max: 40146 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
32742 Points (36%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 34075     avg: 35023     median: 35022.5 (46%)     max: 35970 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
24.8 fps (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
64.1 fps (16%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
3.6 fps (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
28.2 fps (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
14.5 fps (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
51.4 fps (14%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
0.5 fps (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
22.8 fps (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
52.2 fps (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
56.2 fps (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
70.4 fps (19%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
6.7 fps (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
30.9 fps (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
16 fps (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
72.1 fps (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
4.5 fps (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
44.9 fps (7%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
74.3 fps (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
51.1 fps (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
6.9 fps (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
9.7 fps (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
102 fps (11%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
4.7 fps (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
29.8 fps (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
17.5 fps (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
21.6 fps (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
6.7 fps (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
4.3 fps (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
42.1 fps (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
3.3 fps (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
18.7 fps (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
11.5 fps (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 15120     avg: 15997     median: 15997 (11%)     max: 16874 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 104.73     avg: 116.1     median: 116.1 (12%)     max: 127.43 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 122.5     avg: 143.6     median: 142.1 (8%)     max: 175.11 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 23.5     avg: 24.9     median: 24.9 (9%)     max: 26.3 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 53.4     avg: 57.6     median: 57.6 (10%)     max: 61.8 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 141.2     avg: 144.9     median: 144.9 (11%)     max: 148.6 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
107.4 fps (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
157.5 fps (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
218.1 fps (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
378.8 fps (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 356.3     median: 315 (8%)     max: 1528 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 73.6     median: 73.6 (13%)     max: 143.6 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU OpenCL
min: 23879     avg: 25766     median: 25671 (7%)     max: 27095 points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU Vulkan
min: 19700     avg: 27525     median: 27369 (7%)     max: 34432 points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 678     avg: 838     median: 837.5 (3%)     max: 997 Samples/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 1538     avg: 2118     median: 2118 (4%)     max: 2698 Samples/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 5886     avg: 5937     median: 5937 (5%)     max: 5988 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 27.5     avg: 33.6     median: 35.4 (5%)     max: 37.5 Watt
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 38.7     avg: 43.2     median: 43.8 (12%)     max: 47.4 Watt
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.1     avg: 41.2     median: 41.9 (5%)     max: 46 Watt
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.3739     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.593 fps per Watt
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
28 dB(A) (40%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
67.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
33.4
Until Dawn

Until Dawn

2024
low 1920x1080
27.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
God of War Ragnarök

God of War Ragnarök

2024
low 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Final Fantasy XVI

Final Fantasy XVI

2024
low 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Space Marine 2

Space Marine 2

2024
low 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Star Wars Outlaws

Star Wars Outlaws

2024
low 1920x1080 cinem.
8.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
7.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
66 72.6 74.1 74.3 80.6 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56 61.7 64.3 66.1 74.3 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41 47.1 49.1 52.1 55.2 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12 14.8 16.1 16.4 18.1 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2

Senua's Saga Hellblade 2

2024
low 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Ghost of Tsushima

Ghost of Tsushima

2024
low 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Horizon Forbidden West

Horizon Forbidden West

2024
low 1920x1080
25.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dragon's Dogma 2

Dragon's Dogma 2

2024
low 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Helldivers 2

Helldivers 2

2024
low 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

2024
med. 1920x1080
162.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
103.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
101.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Ready or Not

Ready or Not

2023
low 1920x1080
52.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
40.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
The Finals

The Finals

2023
low 1920x1080
79.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
62.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
55.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
44.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

2023
low 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Alan Wake 2

Alan Wake 2

2023
low 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Lords of the Fallen

Lords of the Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
99.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Assassin's Creed Mirage

Assassin's Creed Mirage

2023
low 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
low 1920x1080
50.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
28.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077

2023
low 1920x1080
33.6 36.2 38.3 38.5 39.3 40.9 41.1 41.2 41.6 43 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.2 28.2 30.5 31.3 31.9 32.6 32.8 33 33.2 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.5 23.7 25 26.5 26.9 27.8 28 28.5 28.6 29.2 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.8 21.8 23.1 23.9 24.9 24.9 25.1 25.4 25.6 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
59
53.2
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
8.6
7.9
Steam Deck 1280x800
52.4
Ultra Preset (FSR2 on) 1920x1080
25.6
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
20.1
21.7
20.1
16.5
22
17.2
19.4
22.8
16.4
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

2023
low 1920x1080
27.3 29.9 29.9 31.7 31.9 32.6 36.1 36.6 37.6 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.9 24.6 24.7 25 25.5 26.2 27.5 29.6 29.6 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.3 20.8 21.5 22.9 23.1 23.8 24 25.8 25.9 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.6 20.4 21.3 22.5 22.8 23.3 24.9 25.2 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
49.7
47.7
Low Preset FSR 2.2 Balanced 1920x1080
32.6
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
91.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
151.2
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

2022
low 1920x1080
61.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
101.7
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
176.4 178.3 192.6 192.9 194.2 205 211 ~ 193 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
66.3 70.7 72.2 73.6 73.8 75.1 76.7 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.2 58.3 58.4 60.3 61.5 62 62.2 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.6 48.2 50.6 51.3 51.4 51.8 51.8 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
73 80 ~ 77 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
41 45 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
37 41 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33 38 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
34.8 38.4 39.7 41.2 43.3 44.4 44.5 47.4 49.6 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.3 31 31.6 32.6 33.5 34.1 36.3 36.7 38.4 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.3 27.1 27.7 29.2 29.7 29.8 31.5 32.8 38.9 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
73.4 73.4 73.5 74.6 75.2 81.2 83.2 85.6 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.1 40.8 41.1 41.3 41.4 42.4 43.9 44 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.4 27.9 28.3 29.2 30 30 30.3 31 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
90.9 91.2 94.1 94.2 94.5 97.8 98 100.3 102.6 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
78.9 82.8 84.1 84.4 85 85.4 86.8 87.4 97.1 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.3 58 67.6 75.7 75.8 76.8 78.5 78.6 84.2 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.2 65.3 72.6 77.6 78.1 78.1 79.5 82.9 84.3 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
149.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
100  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
53.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
66.8
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
115.9 141.9 148.2 150.4 151.2 151.5 151.8 153 154 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
103.6 111.1 120 131.1 132.4 133.6 144.1 145.2 146.4 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.3 44.2 51.4 56.9 57.9 58.1 60.2 62.8 65.8 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.8 20.8 21.1 22 22.7 23.6 23.9 24.5 25.6 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
135.1
112.3
86.4
108.4
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
120.3
147.2
132.1
108.3
115.3
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2567.153.443.8
Until Dawn27.618.612.39.68
God of War Ragnarök18.718.516.215.7
Final Fantasy XVI14.713.611.711.5
Space Marine 216.41514.713.2
Star Wars Outlaws8.567.3
F1 2474644915
Senua's Saga Hellblade 213.211.79.12
Ghost of Tsushima22.520.817.813.6
Horizon Forbidden West25.522.116.315.1
Dragon's Dogma 217.613.1
Helldivers 233.425.623.522
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown162.6103.8101.5
Ready or Not52.540.826.519.9
The Finals79.662.955.344.8
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora12118.77.1
Alan Wake 215.112.611.2
Lords of the Fallen17.116.114.311.4
Total War Pharaoh99.855.53125.4
Assassin's Creed Mirage333229
Counter-Strike 250.747.128.321.4
Cyberpunk 207739312724
Baldur's Gate 333262322
F1 2291.281.359.718
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands61.143.627.221.2
Strange Brigade193736050
Far Cry 577433936
X-Plane 11.11433430
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark78422923.4
Dota 2 Reborn96867275
The Witcher 3149.910053.423.2
GTA V1461305623
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		12
7
9
3		13
10
6
2		19
9
3
19
3
2
1





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Amazon Logo
  • $699.00
    HP OmniBook X Flip 14 2-in-1 Laptop, Laptop Touchscreen 14" WUXGA IPS, Intel 8-core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc 130V GPU, 16GB RAM 512GB SSD, Thunderbolt 4, Windows 11 Home with Stylus Pen
  • $509.00
    Acer Aspire 14 AI Copilot+ PC - Intel Core Ultra 5 226V & 14” WUXGA Touch - NPU: Up to 40 Tops - GPU: Up to 53 Tops | Intel Arc 130V | 16GB LPDDR5X | 1TB Gen 4 SSD | Wi-Fi 6E | A14-52MT-59DP
  • $679.99
    HP OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop, 16" WUXGA Touchscreen, Intel Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V, 16GB Ram, 512GB SSD, Windows 11 Home (Renewed)
  • $699.99
    HP OmniBook X Flip 14 2-in-1 Laptop, Laptop Touchscreen 14" WUXGA IPS, Intel 8-core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc 130V GPU, 16GB RAM 512GB SSD, Thunderbolt 4, Windows 11 Pro with Stylus Pen
  • $1,139.00
    HP OmniBook X Flip 14 2-in-1 Laptop, Laptop Touchscreen 14" WUXGA IPS, Intel 8-core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc 130V GPU, 16GB RAM 2TB SSD, Thunderbolt 4, Windows 11 Home

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 06. 04:27:55

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 04 Aug 2026 05:33:53 +0200 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.035s ... 0.036s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.036s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12695 +0.058s ... 0.094s

#8 got single benchmarks 12695 +0.037s ... 0.131s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.131s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +3.825s ... 3.956s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0.001s ... 3.956s

#12 Got 336 rows for game benchmarks. +0.071s ... 4.028s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 4.028s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.02s ... 4.047s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.471s ... 4.518s

#16 return log +0.373s ... 4.891s

Notebook reviews with Intel Arc Graphics 130V graphics card

GMKtec NucBox K17

GMKtec NucBox K17 Review: Just how quiet an Intel Core Ultra mini PC can be

The GMKtec NucBox K17 combines the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V with a quiet cooling system and high energy efficiency. In this review, we’ll examine how this compact mini-PC performs in everyday use, under heavy load, and with multimedia and office applications, as well as its strengths and weaknesses compared to the competition.
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 461 g
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7

Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 review - Lunar Lake delivers longer battery life but brings trade-offs

We tested the ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 equipped with Intel’s Lunar Lake chip, which improves battery life but lags behind in CPU performance and limits maintenance options. This raises the question: is the Arrow Lake variant the better overall choice?
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V, Arc 130V, 14", 1.4 kg
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 review - Finally a rival to Apple's MacBook Air thanks to Lunar Lake?

Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 review - Finally a rival to Apple's MacBook Air thanks to Lunar Lake?

Samsung is now equipping its slim 14-inch laptop with Intel's efficient Lunar Lake processors, resulting in better runtimes. However, the price remains high, and Samsung is also slowly losing market share in the OLED panel segment.
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 14", 1.2 kg
A kilo of tech that inspires - Acer TravelMate P6 Business laptop in review

A kilo of tech that inspires - Acer TravelMate P6 Business laptop in review

Acer's new TravelMate P6 is feather-light, mostly silent, and its battery life is outstanding. It's a notebook that gets through several workdays without a single thought spared for the charging cable, all while the compact business laptop delivers respectable performance.
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 14", 1 kg
Intel empire strikes back with 21 hrs of battery life: Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 laptop review

Intel empire strikes back with 21 hrs of battery life: Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 laptop review

Qualcomm, AMD and Intel - the Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 is a laptop that can be configured with every available option. The Intel Lunar Lake model we test today may be the best yet, striking the ideal balance between great everyday performance and efficiency.
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V, Arc 130V, 14", 1.3 kg

Acer Aspire 14 AI N24Q14: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Acer Aspire 14 AI review: Basic home and office laptop done right

Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED Review: Affordable, quieter, and long lasting thanks to Lunar Lake

Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 laptop review - The large OLED convertible benefits from Intel Lunar Lake

Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » Acer Swift 14 AI review: The first laptop with the Arc Graphics 130V

Acer TravelMate X4 14 AI TMX414-51: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate X4 14 AI TMX414-51

Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14ILL10: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14ILL10

Acer Swift Go 14 AI SFG14-75 : Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 AI SFG14-75

HP OmniBook X Flip NGAI 14-fm0000: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook X Flip NGAI 14-fm0000

Acer Aspire 14 AI A14-53M: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 14 AI A14-53M

Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8, Ultra 5 238V: Intel Core Ultra 5 238V, 13.80", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8, Ultra 5 238V

Asus VivoBook 14 Flip TP3407SA, Ultra 5 226V: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 14 Flip TP3407SA, Ultra 5 226V

Microsoft Surface Pro 11: Intel Core Ultra 5 236V, 13.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Pro 11

Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51, Ultra 5 226V: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51, Ultra 5 226V

Acer Aspire 14 AI N24Q14: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 14 AI N24Q14

Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA

Asus Vivobook S14 Q423: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S14 Q423

Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU

Asus ZenBook S14 OLED UX5406SA: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook S14 OLED UX5406SA

GMK NucBox K17: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 0.5 kg
   » GMKtec NucBox K17: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V meets whisper-quiet fans

Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE: Intel Core Ultra 5 228V, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » Lenovo offers the ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 with modern Intel CPUs, but only old AMD CPUs

   » Lenovo's ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 shows that Lunar Lake is not automatically the better choice for compact laptops

Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » Samsung charges premium prices for the Galaxy Book5 Pro, but €1699 for 16 GB RAM and a 512 GB SSD is excessive

   » Samsung's OLED panel in the Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 falls behind the competition

Acer TravelMate P6 TMP614-54-TCO-553Z: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1 kg
   » Hidden talents: clever features of the Acer TravelMate P6 that shine in everyday use

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 Intel: Intel Core Ultra 5 228V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » Maximum efficiency: Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 shows why Lunar Lake is the perfect choice for business laptops

Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » Portable Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED laptop is phenomenal value as it is now 47% cheaper than list price

Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » Acer Swift 14 AI Lunar Lake laptop with long battery life and 32 GB RAM is now $300 cheaper

Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » Asus Vivobook S 14 (S5406) OLED laptop with 17-hour battery life drops back to record low price after 33% cut

   » Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED becomes one of the best value laptops around as price drops 42% to new historic low

   » Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED laptop with 32 GB of RAM and super long battery life enjoys 33.3% price cut

   » Long-lasting Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED laptop with efficient Lunar Lake APU is back on sale

   » Asus Vivobook S 16 (M506KA) and Vivobook S 14 (M5406WA) debut with new AMD Krackan Point APUs and OLED displays

   » Asus Vivobook S 16 (S5606CA) launched with latest Intel Core Ultra 200H Arrow Lake mobile CPUs and Lumina OLED display

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
Radeon RX 6850M XT
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6800M
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Radeon 8065S
Radeon 8060S
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU *
Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 6800S
Radeon RX 7700S
M3 Max 40-Core GPU *
M2 Max 38-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop
Radeon RX 6700M
M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
M4 Max 32-Core GPU *
M3 Max 30-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
M2 Max 30-Core GPU *
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 7600M *
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 7600S
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
A770M
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6700S
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU
Radeon RX 6600S
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Generation Laptop
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
A730M
Radeon 8040S *
Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon RX 5600M
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
A570M *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

RTX A1000 Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
A550M *
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
A530M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Radeon RX 6550M
Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6550S
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop
Arc B370 Panther Lake iGPU
A370M
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon 890M
Arc 140T
Radeon RX 6450M *
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Arc 8-Core
X2-90 *
X2-85 *
Arc 140V
M4 9-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6300M *
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Radeon 880M
GeForce MX570
Pro A30M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
T1200 Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Adreno 840 *
M4 8-Core GPU *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
T600 Laptop GPU
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Adreno 830 *
Adreno 829 *
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS *
A310
Radeon 780M
GeForce MX550
Arc 7-Core
A350M
Arc 130V
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 860M
Radeon 680M
T550 Laptop GPU
T500 Laptop GPU
GeForce MX450
Arc 130T
Radeon Pro Vega 16
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL
Radeon 760M
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS *
Adreno X2-45 *
Radeon 840M
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Radeon 740M
Radeon 660M
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
Quadro P620
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 640
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
GeForce MX150
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS *
Radeon 630
Quadro P520
Radeon 540X *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL *
UHD Graphics 64EUs
Vega 10
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS *
Vega 9
Vega 8 *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
GeForce MX230
Radeon 820M
Vega 7
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
GeForce MX130
Vega 8
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 6 *
GeForce MX110
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs *
Intel Graphics 1 Xe3 WCL *
Vega 3
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)